Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-11-13, 08:23 AM   #1
Saluki1968
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Saranac Lake, NY
Bikes: 1974 Gitane TdF, 1989 Specialized Hardrock "Ice Bike", 1990 Gary Fisher Tassajara, 2012 Trek 1.5 Alpha, 2010 Surley LHT, 2011 Surley Pugsley "Fat Tire", 1988 Gary Fisher Gemini Tandem MTB
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Stationary Bike vs Biking On-Road: Which burns more calories?

I've been riding both a stationary bike - especially in the winter months - and my various "road" bikes - which include a Trek 1,5 Alpha, a Surly Long Haul Trucker, a Surly Pugsley and a 1990 Gary Fisher Tassajara MTB. All my road rides include hills - there's no getting away from them where I live! I know I'm "burning up the calories" going up each hill, but once over the top and going down it's a "free ride" with almost no effort at all . I'm not into speed, so rather than powering downhill I'm more likely to be on the brakes. With the stationary bike, I can keep the resistance steady the entire workout - no "coasting". The question is, for a given time period, am I burning more calories on the stationary bike or riding my road bike up hill and coasting down. Comments?
Saluki1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-13, 08:37 AM   #2
kingsqueak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ cellphone central
Bikes: Surly Ogre // (old and gone) Cannondale ST400, Rockhopper Sport
Posts: 468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Equal effort on both is equal effort.

You don't have to coast on the road...just keep pedaling.

Get a heart rate monitor if you want somethign to fix yourself to for added discipline, it will give you feedback on your cardio effort.
kingsqueak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-13, 08:41 AM   #3
donalson
just pedal
 
donalson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kemah, TX (greater Houston area)
Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Klein stage comp, trek 560
Posts: 904
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
assuming you are working the same amount it should be the same... if you are just barely turning the cranks with virtually no resistance even for Hrs on end you aren't doing yourself any favors (I say this because I see if often in the gym)

the problem for me is stationary/trainers are so boring... put yourself on a good training plan for them doing intervals and such and the trainer will be much more beneficial... also you don't have traffic to worry about or lights... so pushing hard is much easier to do consistently...

that being said... with your stable it sounds like you should be set to ride outdoors no matter the weather...
donalson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-13, 08:42 AM   #4
ShartRate
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 204
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Who cares, riding stationary bikes sucks.
ShartRate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-13, 08:48 AM   #5
Fastflyingasian
Draft Producer
 
Fastflyingasian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: south shore , Ma
Bikes: fuji CCR 1.0 carbon,Surley Pacer,02 norco shore freeride MTB, cannondale rigid MTB, Fuji aloha 1.0, Monty trials bike
Posts: 381
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
+1 for the road. hills are like intervals. but in any case i know i am willing to suffer more out on the road rather than sit and sweat in place on a trainer or stationary. also short of the threat of death you wont keep me on a stationary for more than a half hour. sunday i rode with guys half my size for 5 hours and they push me to the breaking point. they almost broke me but i still stole two town line sprints from those elves

you get out what you put in. so if your working harder for the same volume for one over the other than you have your answer. if the hills are not killing you than go faster .
Fastflyingasian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-13, 09:19 AM   #6
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint
Posts: 14,056
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
just to reply to the basic premise/question: which ever leads to the best compliance. meaning which are you more likely to do/use.

it's harder to run or ride outside than inside on machines. yes, you can increase incline and resistance inside but I think the unpredictable nature of the environment adds a certain built in variance that adds intensity, and so also calorie burning ...
rumrunn6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-13, 09:47 AM   #7
genejockey
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Bikes: Battaglin MAX, Chorus kit; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, 7410 Dura Ace
Posts: 1,099
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have to concentrate really hard to keep putting out enough effort on a trainer to keep my HR above 120 for half an hour. On the road, it's hard to keep my HR below 140, and I can ride for hours.

So, if you expend the same effort, it should be the same Calories. But good luck expending the same effort!!!
genejockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-13, 10:21 AM   #8
Jarrett2
Senior Member
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Bikes: Steel Roadies
Posts: 3,208
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastflyingasian View Post
they almost broke me but i still stole two town line sprints from those elves
I don't know anything about stationary bikes, but this line almost made me spit out my lunch
Jarrett2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-13, 10:50 AM   #9
bud16415
Senior Member
 
bud16415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Erie Penna.
Bikes:
Posts: 1,086
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
A trainer has the potential to burn more calories than riding outside for a given period of time spent. In the real world assuming you ride from point A to point B andthen have to return to point A you will always have a net zero climbing oraltitude change. On a trainer you can climb for your total workout and end up at the same place you started. In reality the outside factors like boredom and time on the bike not being the same are imposable to calculate from one personto the next. Someone in statistics would say your risk of injury is higher on a real road and the down time after being hurt would subtract from the total. You canít calculate such things.

If you arean animal and can ride climbing nonstop at your max output and as you wear out lower your output level to your new max and ride till you can no longer a trainer will do more.

I personallywould rather ride 4 hours on the road compared to 1 hour on a trainer and I havea hard time also maxing my effort on a trainer, so I think I burn more cals on the road.
bud16415 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-13, 01:48 PM   #10
InOmaha
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 182
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I use the speedometer and cadence meter more on the trainer than on the road. I have a heart rate monitor that I've hooked up occasionally, but overall if I start out in a relatively high resistance on the trainer and keep up 16-18mph average for an hour (with intervals), I'll burn about as much as my outside 22 mile 1hr:20min workout.

Inside I blow a big fan on me to cool off and stand occasionally whether I need it or not. To pass the time I listen to music and watch closed caption TV. It's still boring, but not as boring. I'd rather be outside, but not in January.
InOmaha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-13, 08:15 PM   #11
gforeman 
Senior Member
 
gforeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix SL4 Expert, Specialized Crux Disc
Posts: 728
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I use Spinervals DVD's for my Spin Bike rides, and I know for sure I burn more calories per hour. But I sure like riding outdoors more, weather permitting. I do thank God I have the spin bike for the winter though. Before I got it, when spring rolled around I was so out of shape biking wise (I did work out all winter, just not biking).

I have my spin bike set up almost exactly like my bicycles. Same pedals, seat, and all the measurements.
__________________
Gary F.


2015 Specialized Roubaix SL4 Expert
2012 Specialized Crux Disc
My bike page: http://www.gwfweb.com/bicycles
Build a bike stand! http://www.gwfweb.com/bicycles/stands.html
gforeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 12:12 AM   #12
floatsinwater
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Normal rides < bike trainer < actual climbs

I'm too lazy and I end up coasting on normal rides, but I found that I work a lot harder on hills than when I do intervals on my trainer. I think it's because whenever I do intervals on my trainer all I think about is how tiring it is, whereas if I'm actually doing a climb I can look at the scenery and such.
floatsinwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 06:03 AM   #13
sfynzy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
When I had my knee injury I stayed away from cycling for a long time and yet because of my weak knees cycling was the only form of exercise I could do other than swimming or something like that. I didn't want to risk cycling outside so I used a stationary bike. Combined with dieting I've had very successful results. Now I am back to cycling outside but still the fear is there and I don't want to do anything risky.
sfynzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 09:10 AM   #14
IBOHUNT
Senior Member
 
IBOHUNT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Western Maryland - Appalachian Mountains
Bikes: Motobecane Fantom Cross; Cannondale Supersix replaced the Giant TCR which came to an untimely death by truck
Posts: 3,593
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Depends on the effort and the duration of the effort

I've looked at my data for trainer sessions where I knew I was doing intervals (Sufferfest Blender video) and for hard rides where I was on it the entire time. I burn far more on my hard rides, up to 17kJ per minute, than I do on a trainer which was 10kJ per minute for that specific session.

Can I keep up the pace of my hard rides for as long as I do a Sufferfest video? Not a chance although I'd sure love to be able to.

At 17kJ per min I'm done after 40 minutes or so.
10kJ per minute and that's a 4 hour metric that only has 5800' of elevation gain (88'/mi)
IBOHUNT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 11:27 AM   #15
bbattle
.
 
bbattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Trevisio, 1991 Colnago Master, '06 Bianchi San Jose, 1987 Moulton Fuso, 1990 Gardin Shred, '82 John Howard(Dave Tesch)
Posts: 12,550
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Get a fixed gear bike if you want a good workout with no coasting allowed.
bbattle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 11:53 AM   #16
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genejockey View Post
I have to concentrate really hard to keep putting out enough effort on a trainer to keep my HR above 120 for half an hour. On the road, it's hard to keep my HR below 140, and I can ride for hours.

So, if you expend the same effort, it should be the same Calories. But good luck expending the same effort!!!
This
Keith99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 11:55 AM   #17
Mithrandir
Senior Member
 
Mithrandir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Bikes: 2012 Surly LHT, 1995 GT Outpost Trail
Posts: 2,400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For me the answer is easy.

Stationary bike = work out for 30 minutes, get bored, get off and do something else.
Real bike = bike an hour, realise "omg an hour has gone by already!", then either bike back home or go even further.


Real bike burns more calories, every time.
Mithrandir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 12:24 PM   #18
genejockey
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Bikes: Battaglin MAX, Chorus kit; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, 7410 Dura Ace
Posts: 1,099
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mithrandir View Post
For me the answer is easy.

Stationary bike = work out for 30 minutes, get bored, get off and do something else.
Real bike = bike an hour, realise "omg an hour has gone by already!", then either bike back home or go even further.


Real bike burns more calories, every time.
The other thing is, if you're on a stationary bike and you get bored, you can hop off go watch TV. If you're on the road and you get bored, you still have to get home some how. Last night, the last 6 miles of the 20 I rode were all into a headwind. That sucked. But I still had to get back to the car!
genejockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 02:30 PM   #19
sfynzy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
With a stationary bike though if you ever feel like working out even in the middle of the night you can just hop on. Right after you can go to bed. And also you don't have to worry about having to slow down because people are around. It would be good to have both. If I had to choose only one I'd go with a real bike but only cause it's more fun, if my objective was to only lose weight I would want a stationary bike. But stationary bikes that can take a lot of weight can be quite costly.
sfynzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 03:02 PM   #20
IBOHUNT
Senior Member
 
IBOHUNT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Western Maryland - Appalachian Mountains
Bikes: Motobecane Fantom Cross; Cannondale Supersix replaced the Giant TCR which came to an untimely death by truck
Posts: 3,593
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbattle View Post
Get a fixed gear bike if you want a good workout with no coasting allowed.
I can see me trying that on some of the hills here.
Rip my legs clean off and I'd then be the Black Knight in Monty Python Holy Grail
IBOHUNT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 03:30 PM   #21
mr_pedro
Senior Member
 
mr_pedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saluki1968 View Post
I've been riding both a stationary bike - especially in the winter months - and my various "road" bikes - which include a Trek 1,5 Alpha, a Surly Long Haul Trucker, a Surly Pugsley and a 1990 Gary Fisher Tassajara MTB. All my road rides include hills - there's no getting away from them where I live! I know I'm "burning up the calories" going up each hill, but once over the top and going down it's a "free ride" with almost no effort at all . I'm not into speed, so rather than powering downhill I'm more likely to be on the brakes. With the stationary bike, I can keep the resistance steady the entire workout - no "coasting". The question is, for a given time period, am I burning more calories on the stationary bike or riding my road bike up hill and coasting down. Comments?
It all depends on how hard you ride the stationary bike and how hard you ride the road bike. The amount of time going down hill should be very small compared to the total ride time.
mr_pedro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 04:54 PM   #22
Saluki1968
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Saranac Lake, NY
Bikes: 1974 Gitane TdF, 1989 Specialized Hardrock "Ice Bike", 1990 Gary Fisher Tassajara, 2012 Trek 1.5 Alpha, 2010 Surley LHT, 2011 Surley Pugsley "Fat Tire", 1988 Gary Fisher Gemini Tandem MTB
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_pedro;16059305[COLOR=#ff0000
]........ The amount of time going down hill should be very small compared to the total ride time[/COLOR].
Exactly! Let's say I'm going to climb up a pretty good hill. It's a mile to the top, and really exerting myself, I average 5mph. Using V=D/T (velocity = distance / time), at my average speed of 5mph, it would take me 12 minutes to reach the top. So that's 12 minutes of hard exertion. On the return, it's all down hill, and lets say I'm spinning about as fast as I dare and average 30mph. Using the same formula, the "down" trip will take just 2 minutes and being "gravity assisted, the effort isn't nearly as much. So using this token example, for every hill climbed I spend 12 of 14 minutes straining uphill! I guess the old adage is true then - "Going downhill never makes up for climbing uphill"!
Saluki1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 05:40 PM   #23
Daspydyr 
Pedals, Paddles and Poles
 
Daspydyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Btw the Mohave desert and AREA 51
Bikes: Santa Cruz Tallboy, Ridley Noah, Scott Spark 20
Posts: 5,352
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShartRate View Post
Who cares, riding stationary bikes sucks.
Agreed, riding outside keeps me moving for longer periods of time so it naturally burns more calories. The most I can stand stationary is 40 minutes.
__________________
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!

I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
Daspydyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 06:50 PM   #24
jsigone
got the climbing bug
 
jsigone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego
Bikes: one for everything
Posts: 8,426
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daspydyr View Post
The most I can stand stationary is 40 minutes.
I'm good for half that LOL and even half of that if talking gym bike
__________________
Rule #10 // It never gets easier, you just go faster.
jsigone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-13, 07:05 PM   #25
koolerb
Senior Member
 
koolerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Upstate NY
Bikes: Giant Defy 1, and some others
Posts: 891
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShartRate View Post
Who cares, riding stationary bikes sucks.
+1, and I don't think I would work as hard on a stationary bike.
koolerb is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:13 PM.