Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 31 of 31
  1. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    My Bikes
    Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB
    Posts
    5,171
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bigfred View Post
    By the way RollCNY, I believe that 36/52 was promoted as the new "compact" gearing choice before 34/50 became the more popular.
    52/36 seems to be a quirk of Shimano's product strategy.

    In the distant past, like 4 years ago, your only options for wide-range gearing from Shimano were an 11-27 or 12-27 cassette combined with either a 53/39 or 50/34 crank. People who wanted to climb often chose the knee-friendly 50/34 and 11-27 giving a gear range from 34.0 to 122.7 gear-inches. The 53/39 + 11-27 gives you a range of 39.0 to 130.1 gear inches, BTW.

    Then somebody at Shimano ran the numbers and figured out that if you combined a 52/36 crank with an 11-28 cassette you'd end up with almost the same gearing as a compact: 34.7 to 127.6 gear-inches. As you can see, the 52/36 is a nice compromise between the 50/34 and 53/39: you still have the same low gearing for climbing, but a bit more top-end for hammering along the flats in a pace-line. Plus, your buddies who haven't run a gear calculator will still think you're a stud since you've got a 52-tooth chainring

  2. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    'burque, holmes
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire, Trek X-Cal
    Posts
    256
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sstorkel View Post
    With my SRAM Red and Ultegra 6600 drivetrains, I personally can't feel any difference in shift quality between my 50/34 and 52/39 cranks... and I'm more sensitive than most people to stuff like this.
    Interesting. I'm sticking a set of praxis rings on my want list. Probably 50/34, since I don't want to replace those and the cassette JUST yet.

  3. #28
    SuperGimp TrojanHorse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Whittier, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Roubaix
    Posts
    8,037
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by expatbrit View Post
    I already spend most of my time in the large chainring, but I think that on a 50/34 I'd be in the smaller ring MUCH more.
    It really depends on how fast you're going and what cadence you choose to maintain. 16 mph or so is the cutoff for me (I think, I don't really have a cutoff but unless it's hilly or windy, I'm on the 50 ring for the most part) Slower than that and you can get along just fine in the 34 ring.

  4. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    'burque, holmes
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire, Trek X-Cal
    Posts
    256
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TrojanHorse View Post
    It really depends on how fast you're going and what cadence you choose to maintain. 16 mph or so is the cutoff for me (I think, I don't really have a cutoff but unless it's hilly or windy, I'm on the 50 ring for the most part) Slower than that and you can get along just fine in the 34 ring.
    Yeah. Lots of climbing here, at least for my 14stone butt.

  5. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Valley Forge: Birthplace of Freedom
    Posts
    474
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride a 48-34 with a 12-28. It is plenty except fr some short steep off road. 230 lbs and a built up older steel frame. It's sweet and I can climb anything on road I've run into. I'm in the 48 on everything but hills on road. Stay in the 34 off road.
    Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong. Let all that you do be done in love.

  6. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    'burque, holmes
    My Bikes
    Ridley X-Fire, Trek X-Cal
    Posts
    256
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by stevel610 View Post
    I ride a 48-34 with a 12-28. It is plenty except fr some short steep off road. 230 lbs and a built up older steel frame. It's sweet and I can climb anything on road I've run into. I'm in the 48 on everything but hills on road. Stay in the 34 off road.
    Yeah. 50-34 with good rings (Praxis) might be the way I go. It's not terribly expensive, and I am running into both the top of my gearing (albeit on longer, if shallow, downhills) and the bottom (though I still CAN make it up the hills I've ridden, but those don't go much over 9%, and not for very long).

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •