Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-18-14, 07:11 AM   #1
Medic Zero
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Medic Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Vancouver,Washington
Bikes: Old steel GT's, for touring and commuting
Posts: 2,189
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Surly considering offering new pants in Clydes sizes, looking to hear from Clydes.

.


Like it says in the title, Surly has come out with a new cycling pant that looks very well thought-out, designed and tested. They're soliciting feedback trying to determine if it is worth it for them to offer it in larger sizes.

I e-mailed them and you should too!

Send to derby@surlybikes.com with "fatsopants‏"* in the subject line.

Nice write-up here:
http://surlybikes.com/blog

*Yeah, I know, I think the guy who came up with the idea for that is their Clyde who is testng their prototype larger pants, so I think it is about reclaiming the term, not negative.

For whatever it is worth, I don't work for Surly or anything, just a Clyde who'd like to see more options in clothing for us.

Unfortunately, it doesn't look like they are offering a ladies, much less an Athena version of these pants (yet!?). I would encourage Athena's to contact them as well.
Medic Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-14, 09:22 AM   #2
tunavic 
Senior Member
 
tunavic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Redlands, CA
Bikes: '12 BMC Road Racer, Pinarello KOBH
Posts: 765
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Here's a few sentences from the blog:

The pants are available in these sizes 30 & 32x 32 inseam, 34-40x 34 (but really it’s a 36 read below)
There is one thing about the pants that didn’t quite go as planned. We have some really tall weird giants in this brand, each of who wears a 36 inseam in their trousers. When we had our samples made, the 36 inseam was too long for Wood (our handsome seven-footer), but the 34 fit him perfectly. So we went with that measurement, and that’s what we put on the tag in the pants.
Of course they fit like most other brands 36s, in fact they are even longer than some 36” inseamed pants out there (I just coined the phrase “inseamed”).

My comment:

As if sizing in cycling clothing isn't confusing enough..........let's purposely mislabel the sizes. Big fail.
tunavic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-14, 11:42 AM   #3
IAMAMRA
Big Boned Biker
 
IAMAMRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NW Indiana
Bikes: Raleigh Detour 4.5, Trek Crossrip Elite '14
Posts: 433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
I already wrote them, they need to offer some smaller inseams for us vertically challenged folks.
IAMAMRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-14, 12:10 PM   #4
bbeasley 
Cat 5 field stuffer
 
bbeasley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hammond, La
Bikes: Wabi Lightning RE, Wabi Classic
Posts: 1,425
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAMAMRA View Post
I already wrote them, they need to offer some smaller inseams for us vertically challenged folks.
^
I did the same, I'm fat not tall. If I was taller, I'd be just right. I'm just short for my weight. Know what I mean
bbeasley is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33 AM.