Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 32 of 32
  1. #26
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    My Bikes
    Trek 7.3 FX
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So, I was doing some looking and I found that the trek 7.3 FX has some bigger bike sizes and it's not too bad on the price for brand new. It states that the size is 25" I'm assuming this is the stem size. Does anyone know anything about it?

    7.3 FX - Trek Bicycle

  2. #27
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    My Bikes
    Trek 7.3 FX
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So, I went to the bike shop today, to order the Trek 7.3 FX ($699).

    I started talking to the owner and he suggested that I try the x-caliber 8 ($1049), which is a 29er. It is more than I wanted to spend, but I don't mind spending a bit more to get better quality to support my size well. The trek 7.3 comes in a 25", the x-cal 8 comes in a 23", I don't think the difference is a huge issue.

    I want to know if the x-cal 8, which seems like a much stronger and thicker framed bike, is worth it for me. It also does seem to have better rims and wheels. I don't really plan on doing a whole lot extreme forest riding or anything. I'll mostly be on paved trails and the road, maybe once in a while some dirt paths and rockier terrain.

    If it matters, I'll mostly be riding to work and back which is roughly 25km, round trip. But, also some trips with friends, maybe 50-100km round trips.

    Any input would be great, I'm really wanting to pull the trigger soon, I wanna be riding already

  3. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NZ
    My Bikes
    More than 1, but, less than S-1
    Posts
    3,807
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I meant to resond to your post about considering an FX 7.3. Although I have no personal experience with them, they do seem to be popular here on the clyde forum. However, most folks are not your height.

    The Trek xcal 8 has a fairly sloping top tube and realatively short seat tube. This may be made to work for you. But, you may need to enquire of the shop owner if he has a 400mm or longer seat post of suffiencient strength. Compared with a more traditional frame with a horizontal top tube, you're going to have a LOT of seat post sticking out.

    Without seeing you in person and measuring your inseam against your overall height and torso length, it's difficult for us to get too specific about what will or won't work for you.
    Birth Certificate, Passport, Marriage License Driver's License and Residency Permit all say I'm a Fred. I guess there's no denying it.

  4. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec
    My Bikes
    Litespeed Ultimate 2006, Litespeed Pisgah , Specialized Roubaix 2008, Trek Madone 2011
    Posts
    909
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would buy the 29er b/c it has a bigger frame, much stronger wheels than the FX and you can adjust the compression of the suspension fork to give a smoother ride.

  5. #30
    Senior Member ChargerDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Oceanside CA
    My Bikes
    Madone 5.9, Sequoia, World Sport
    Posts
    229
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I suggest the 7.3. It is closer to the hybrid, and will be better for distance.
    and these two wheels will take us anywhere.

  6. #31
    Senior Member Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,993
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the hybrid is a better choice

    the x cal comes with a coil spring fork
    and it will have a limit to how stiff it can be adjusted
    and that limit will almost definitely be too soft for a 300 lb guy

    it is possible that there is small difference in the strength of the rims
    but that will only come into play if you are crashing into curbs and rocks
    which you should avoid

    for regular riding the fx bike will be plenty strong
    and is designed for exactly the type of riding you said you want to do

    also
    i am 6 foot five
    and i have a bike with a 22 inch seat tube
    and the 400mm seatpost i have
    which is damn long
    is out close to its maximum extension
    and i have to be careful that i unweight the saddle over bumps as much as possible
    as i have bent several seatposts in that frame
    partially because of the long unsupported length
    under my 260 lb weight

    so consider my experience
    add two inches to my height and one inch to the seattube
    and eighty pounds of rider weight

    in my opinion
    if the fx is comfortable for you
    then it would be a good choice
    if the fx is not comfortable
    then keep looking

  7. #32
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    My Bikes
    Trek 7.3 FX
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you guys very much for all your input, you've been very helpful and made the process a lot less daunting.

    I went to today and tested a few bikes and I ordered the Trek 7.3 FX 25", it was by far the best fit and it was a pleasant ride. The 29er just felt soooo slow and and every pedal made me bounce.

    The bike should be coming in roughly 2 weeks, possibly and hopefully less. I can't wait to take it out by the lake paths, luckily that's my bike ride to work.

    Again, thank you very much.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •