About to pull the trigger on a MTB...Any advice
#26
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,535
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Nothing against PB, but I feel like the brands at PB have less of a dealer restriction that the other brands require. You have to buy them in store. From my understanding, most of the big manufacturers want you to patronize the LBS, so there is no online sales allowed. For a company like PB, the dealer restriction would hamper the online/mail order business dramatically, so they carry brands such as GT and FUJI that allow online sales, not necessarily because of trustworthiness or quality. My 0.02 cents.
True.
However, my point was that Performance stands behind their products. Also, you get to actually test ride the bike, before you take possession. If there are any functional issues after sale, Performance will refund the buyer.
#27
Abuse Magnet
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,869
Bikes: '91 Mtn Tek Vertical, '74 Raleigh Sports, '72 Raleigh Twenty, '84 Univega Gran Turismo, '09 Surly Karate Monkey, '92 Burley Rock-n-Roll, '86 Miyata 310, '76 Raleigh Shopper
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 174 Times
in
88 Posts
You might also want to reconsider getting a bike with shocks on it. Especially with people like us, we tend to start "pumping" the shocks as we pedal, making it less efficient and more tiring. Yes, having to do more work is better for us trying to lose weight, but it can be discouraging. A nice CX bike, as others have mentioned, would be a good choice.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Brodhead, WI - south of Madison
Posts: 2,928
Bikes: 2009 Trek 1.2
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 239 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
You might also want to reconsider getting a bike with shocks on it. Especially with people like us, we tend to start "pumping" the shocks as we pedal, making it less efficient and more tiring. Yes, having to do more work is better for us trying to lose weight, but it can be discouraging. A nice CX bike, as others have mentioned, would be a good choice.
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 212
Bikes: Breezer Storm Comp 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The shocks have lockouts and they're front suspensions...no rear shocks.
#30
just pedal
#31
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
It sounds to me like going with a "dual sport" or "trekking" bike, or whatever name different manufacturers use could be better for your riding mix than a mountain bike.
My rail trail rider could do the job well enough for me on easy off road trails, and it is a Trek 7.3 FX (fitness bike type of hybrid) with a new set of 40mm cyclocross tires (which barely fit). In my case, I also upgraded the wheels for reliability, but that is because much of my riding is in the middle of nowhere, so I equip myself in a relatively paranoid manner.
Of course, the last time I did any real mountain biking was before Mr. Breeze invented the mountain bike, when I just rode my 3 speed cruiser through the trails in the woods in Washington state. I wish I had a picture of that beast... I miss it.
My rail trail rider could do the job well enough for me on easy off road trails, and it is a Trek 7.3 FX (fitness bike type of hybrid) with a new set of 40mm cyclocross tires (which barely fit). In my case, I also upgraded the wheels for reliability, but that is because much of my riding is in the middle of nowhere, so I equip myself in a relatively paranoid manner.
Of course, the last time I did any real mountain biking was before Mr. Breeze invented the mountain bike, when I just rode my 3 speed cruiser through the trails in the woods in Washington state. I wish I had a picture of that beast... I miss it.
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: southeastern PA - a mile west of Philadelphia
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My pleasure, gman214.
Don’t allow anyone to dissuade you from purchasing the bike of your preference. Just as mountain bikes aren’t for everyone, the same holds true for road bikes.
I own a lightweight (21.4 pounds) Trek 2.1 road bike, but I still prefer riding my portly (36, 35, & 32 pound) mountain bikes, which explains why my road bike’s odometer only has 586 miles on it years later whereas my portly mountain bikes have a total of just over 5,000 miles and they’re all road miles.
In fact, on August 24, 2013 (at age 57), I rode my upgraded 35 pound 2012 Trek Wahoo 29er hardtail (no lockout feature) with 29” x 2.1 Continental street tires on my first 200-mile ride. It was “to and from” Jim Thorpe, PA (just over 10,000 feet of climbing) and I immensely enjoyed that ride! I can hardly wait to do it again this year and I’ll again be riding my 29er hardtail.
However, I may mount a set of 700 x 32 tires this time around to reduce overall energy requirements on such a long ride. I already have the new 700 x 32 tires, but admittedly, it’s hard to willingly remove those large volume 29” x 2.1 tires, as they provide a great ride.
The 29” x 2.1 street tires are heavy (915 grams each, but not a concern to me on century rides or shorter commuting distances) whereas the 700 x 32 tires are lighter (481 grams each) and since the 32’s also use smaller inner tubes, each wheel will weigh roughly 1.5 pounds less for a 3 pound reduction in static bike weight as well as a 3 pound reduction in rotating wheel mass. It’ll definitely make a noticeable difference that can be appreciated over a 200-mile ride distance. I’ll simply remount the 29” x 2.1 tires after I return from that 200-mile ride.
Don’t allow anyone to dissuade you from purchasing the bike of your preference. Just as mountain bikes aren’t for everyone, the same holds true for road bikes.
I own a lightweight (21.4 pounds) Trek 2.1 road bike, but I still prefer riding my portly (36, 35, & 32 pound) mountain bikes, which explains why my road bike’s odometer only has 586 miles on it years later whereas my portly mountain bikes have a total of just over 5,000 miles and they’re all road miles.
In fact, on August 24, 2013 (at age 57), I rode my upgraded 35 pound 2012 Trek Wahoo 29er hardtail (no lockout feature) with 29” x 2.1 Continental street tires on my first 200-mile ride. It was “to and from” Jim Thorpe, PA (just over 10,000 feet of climbing) and I immensely enjoyed that ride! I can hardly wait to do it again this year and I’ll again be riding my 29er hardtail.
However, I may mount a set of 700 x 32 tires this time around to reduce overall energy requirements on such a long ride. I already have the new 700 x 32 tires, but admittedly, it’s hard to willingly remove those large volume 29” x 2.1 tires, as they provide a great ride.
The 29” x 2.1 street tires are heavy (915 grams each, but not a concern to me on century rides or shorter commuting distances) whereas the 700 x 32 tires are lighter (481 grams each) and since the 32’s also use smaller inner tubes, each wheel will weigh roughly 1.5 pounds less for a 3 pound reduction in static bike weight as well as a 3 pound reduction in rotating wheel mass. It’ll definitely make a noticeable difference that can be appreciated over a 200-mile ride distance. I’ll simply remount the 29” x 2.1 tires after I return from that 200-mile ride.
#33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 212
Bikes: Breezer Storm Comp 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Man that's AWESOME! Thanks for the input! I'm gonna get the Breezer. Good components and getting it for $722! Only better deal I found was a 2013 Fuji Nevada 1.3 ($599) but have to travel an hour and 15 minutes to Performance Bikes.
The Breezer has the same specs as the Fuji (Joe Breezer designed Fuji's frame) but with a few upgraded components. I'll be in good shape with it. But need to get a set road tires so I can hit the roads, dirt, light or gravel pathways. Again thanks...happy riding!!
The Breezer has the same specs as the Fuji (Joe Breezer designed Fuji's frame) but with a few upgraded components. I'll be in good shape with it. But need to get a set road tires so I can hit the roads, dirt, light or gravel pathways. Again thanks...happy riding!!
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Leesburg
Posts: 106
Bikes: Trek
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
my post was never meant to change your mind one way or the other, just wish the sales guy had shown me some more options. I should have done some more research too. I have the Gary Fisher Mamba and its a great bike but now I know a little more about what I like. Riding the Mamba in June in the Hilly Billy Roubaix, 70 miles through the mountains. Next bike, CX. Enjoy your new bike and get out there!
#35
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 212
Bikes: Breezer Storm Comp 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Roosterbird...your post and some of the other posts just made me look at other options. I even looked at some Trek bikes.
I like the ride of the Breezer and component value against other bikes in the $699 -$949 range (on and off sale). I was looking for the best bang for the buck! I'm sure once I start cycling and get some miles on the saddle, my next bike choice(s) will be more from experience. Thanks for the input!!
I like the ride of the Breezer and component value against other bikes in the $699 -$949 range (on and off sale). I was looking for the best bang for the buck! I'm sure once I start cycling and get some miles on the saddle, my next bike choice(s) will be more from experience. Thanks for the input!!
#36
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 212
Bikes: Breezer Storm Comp 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pulled the trigger on the Breezer...got a 18.5" instead of the in-stock 19.5"! Should arrive next Tuesday! Thinking of putting some 700cX40mm on it for local riding and keep the MTB tires for rough terrain rides.
Breezer Bikes - Storm Comp 29 - Bike Overview
Breezer Bikes - Storm Comp 29 - Bike Overview
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: southeastern PA - a mile west of Philadelphia
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Pulled the trigger on the Breezer...got a 18.5" instead of the in-stock 19.5"! Should arrive next Tuesday! Thinking of putting some 700cX40mm on it for local riding and keep the MTB tires for rough terrain rides.
Breezer Bikes - Storm Comp 29 - Bike Overview
Breezer Bikes - Storm Comp 29 - Bike Overview
Last edited by Gnosis; 04-17-14 at 12:48 PM.
#39
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 212
Bikes: Breezer Storm Comp 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks Gnosis...I do too! Now to find some good road tires for road, gravel, light trail stuff.