Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    My Bikes
    2009 Trek 7.3 FX, 1980 Gazelle Sprinter Race, 2013 Koga Roadchamp
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    sizing help cannondale synapse 2006

    Hey guys,

    In my quest to find a roady with a relaxed geometry i came across a 2006 Synapse.
    But i'm not sure if it's the right size.
    It's quite a long drive so i wanne make sure it's worth it.

    The bike is a size 53. I am 5.11" with a leg inseam of 31"
    The guys who is selling the bike is 5.8" and says it's a bit too big for him.
    So now i'm not sure the bike is a right size for me since i got short legs.

    Anyone riding a synapse that can shed some light on the sizing?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    148
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd suspect it's a bit small for you, I think you'd likely fit better on the 56. FWIW I'm an inch shorter than you, with about a half inch shorter inseam, so also short legs, and ride a 54 (not the Synapse, though I did test a newer Synapse and almost got it in the 54). But I'm kind of between 54 and 56, rather than between 54 and 52, thus with you slightly bigger that would point to 56. The 53 is going to have better standover clearance for your short legs, but your upper body probably will be a bit cramped, and if you are after more relaxed (upright) position you'd want the larger head tube on the bigger bike. Those of us with proportionately short legs for our height have to sacrifice standover to get the bike comfortable for our upper bodies, which is a lot more important while actually riding; only way to get normal standover is to go custom.

  3. #3
    Senior Member spdracr39's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Cabot, Arkansas
    My Bikes
    2012 Trek Madone 5.2, 2012 Giant Composite XTC 29er 1, 2014 Specialized Dolce Sport, (2) 2014 Trek 7.1FX, 2014 Electra Townie 7D
    Posts
    518
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am 6'0 and 31" inseam and I ride a 58cm. I feel like it is one size to large so a 56cm would fit me perfect. The 53 is going to be a little small.

  4. #4
    Senior Member catonec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    burlington VT.
    Posts
    2,224
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    at 5'11 a 53 will be too small. probably need at least a 56 if not 58.
    2010 Kestrel RT900SL, 800k carbon, chorus/record, speedplay, zonda
    1997 Trek ZX6000, 6061w/manitou spyder, xt/xtr, time atac

  5. #5
    Senior Member daviddavieboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Great White North
    My Bikes
    2012 C'Dale Supersix 5,96' C'Dale F500, Schwinn RD700
    Posts
    126
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just bought a supersix(basically the same) I am 6.0' with a 31" inseam. and the 36 is perfect for me. Almost as comfortable as my old touring

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    My Bikes
    2009 Trek 7.3 FX, 1980 Gazelle Sprinter Race, 2013 Koga Roadchamp
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thanks for your replies guys!

    So i was worried of the bike being to big based on the following size guide, and the comments of the seller:

    http://www.evanscycles.com/product_d...zing-chart.pdf

    According to the size guide, with my inseam i need a 52cm frame. But my length could go for a 54cm or even a 56cm frame.
    Arg, this is so confusing..........

  7. #7
    SuperGimp TrojanHorse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Whittier, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Roubaix, Merlin Road, Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    7,665
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You really don't size bikes by inseam these days, there's plenty of room to move the seat post up and down. The effective top tube length is more along the lines of what is required. A frame that is too small will give you more drop from the saddle to the bars, which is probably not what you're after either.

    And is that your pants inseam or the cycling inseam?

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    My Bikes
    2009 Trek 7.3 FX, 1980 Gazelle Sprinter Race, 2013 Koga Roadchamp
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TrojanHorse View Post
    And is that your pants inseam or the cycling inseam?
    I put a level between my legs and had someone measure the distance towards the floor.

    I think i will let the deal pass and look for a bike with a bigger frame.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •