Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

What's the deal with riders choosing much older bikes over latest technology?

Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

What's the deal with riders choosing much older bikes over latest technology?

Old 09-15-14, 12:47 PM
  #76  
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,804

Bikes: everywhere

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12636 Post(s)
Liked 7,528 Times in 3,989 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
So I took a little vacation this weekend and stayed in South Austin for a couple of days. It's a cool town. There are cyclists and bike friendly infrastructure everywhere in that town. But the thing I found funny, was in this part of Austin virtually EVERYONE was riding an older bike What appeared to be lots of older steel bikes of different makes and models. Lots of fixies as well. Very few newer race/carbon bikes on the road.

Yesterday, I went a little farther South to the Austin Veloway and it was almost all carbon race bikes in that area. I went down to New Braunsfel and went to a popular ride area and all carbon race bikes there as well.

But after reading this thread, I have a better idea of why people ride older bikes instead of the latest tech:

Nostalgia - like owning a 68 Camaro / had one when they were a kid
Practical - some rides/locales are not good for expensive bikes
Financial - they appear to be very inexpensive comparatively
Prefer the Ride - grew up riding steel, likes steel, not interested in change
Familiar Tech - grew up working on old bikes, not interested in learning to work on new tech

For me, I live and ride in a low crime area. My bikes stay in my garage. I don't commute to work and don't have to leave my bikes in an insecure area. I didn't spend the last decades riding older tech bikes, so it currently holds no appeal to me. My LBS that I like carries and rides newer tech. The group rides I do consist mostly of riders on carbon race inspired bikes.

Every time I ask local riders about steel, they tell me it is too noodly for a rider of my size/strength. And that a stiffer material like carbon or maybe even titanium would be better for me.
I'm pretty light and week, so I've only found two bikes so far that are too noodly for me. '88 Trek 400T and 1990 Raleigh Technium Pro (which had aluminum main tubes).

Steel roadbikes were few and far between in the 1990s, actually road bikes on the whole were being outsold by MTBs in that decade that there aren't a whole lot of used ones to choose from. When the Lance era came about road sales shot up but steel was pretty much only available in custom bikes and some reasonably priced steel started up from Surly and Soma, etc. The Surly stuff isn't exactly sporty, so a sporty steel lover would probably rather get '80s action.

Even then you were talking $400 frameset when you could get some SWEET Italian steel complete offa craigslist for that.

I like steel road bikes. Horizontal top tubes and preferably no tubes greater than 1-1/8", is what looks good to me.

I do have a (barely) 21[sup]st[/sup] century roadie, TIG'd 853 Lemond with a plastic fork.

Gonna eventually put some Ultegra 9-sp shifters on my late-80s Scapin some day. Have the shifters and the wheel, just need cassette.

Last edited by LesterOfPuppets; 09-15-14 at 12:51 PM.
LesterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 09-15-14, 12:54 PM
  #77  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 5,721

Bikes: Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 854 Post(s)
Liked 111 Times in 66 Posts
Older bikes are cheaper. 2 of my commuters are set up just for winter, not going to subject a new ride to harsh NE winters. When is the last time you saw a carbon bike older than 15 yrs? Just saying.
Leebo is offline  
Old 09-15-14, 09:05 PM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
cyclist2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Up
Posts: 4,695

Bikes: Masi, Giant TCR, Eisentraut (retired), Jamis Aurora Elite, Zullo, Cannondale, 84 & 93 Stumpjumpers, Waterford, Tern D8, Bianchi, Gunner Roadie, Serotta, Serotta Duette, was gifted a Diamond Back

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Liked 2,038 Times in 604 Posts
I have one that is 10 years old and its still going strong.

Originally Posted by Leebo
Older bikes are cheaper. 2 of my commuters are set up just for winter, not going to subject a new ride to harsh NE winters. When is the last time you saw a carbon bike older than 15 yrs? Just saying.
cyclist2000 is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 01:52 AM
  #79  
Senior Member
 
Medic Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Vancouver,Washington
Posts: 2,286

Bikes: Old steel GT's, for touring and commuting

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by squirtdad
thanks

yes the pinstriping is reflective tape. Fenders and the black pinstriping on the frame is reflective also
Nice work!

I did my the fenders on my girlfriends' bike similarly, and with black reflective tape on the frame too:




Medic Zero is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 01:58 AM
  #80  
Senior Member
 
Medic Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Vancouver,Washington
Posts: 2,286

Bikes: Old steel GT's, for touring and commuting

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
So I took a little vacation this weekend and stayed in South Austin for a couple of days. It's a cool town. There are cyclists and bike friendly infrastructure everywhere in that town. But the thing I found funny, was in this part of Austin virtually EVERYONE was riding an older bike What appeared to be lots of older steel bikes of different makes and models. Lots of fixies as well. Very few newer race/carbon bikes on the road.

Yesterday, I went a little farther South to the Austin Veloway and it was almost all carbon race bikes in that area. I went down to New Braunsfel and went to a popular ride area and all carbon race bikes there as well.

But after reading this thread, I have a better idea of why people ride older bikes instead of the latest tech:

Nostalgia - like owning a 68 Camaro / had one when they were a kid
Practical - some rides/locales are not good for expensive bikes
Financial - they appear to be very inexpensive comparatively
Prefer the Ride - grew up riding steel, likes steel, not interested in change
Familiar Tech - grew up working on old bikes, not interested in learning to work on new tech

For me, I live and ride in a low crime area. My bikes stay in my garage. I don't commute to work and don't have to leave my bikes in an insecure area. I didn't spend the last decades riding older tech bikes, so it currently holds no appeal to me. My LBS that I like carries and rides newer tech. The group rides I do consist mostly of riders on carbon race inspired bikes.

Every time I ask local riders about steel, they tell me it is too noodly for a rider of my size/strength. And that a stiffer material like carbon or maybe even titanium would be better for me.
I wonder what size that would be? I'm very happy with steel and don't find it noodly, and I'm ~275 pounds, and sometimes cycle camp on my steel frames, and they're really loaded down then, between me, and all my camping gear, especially since I can't pack light to save my life!

IMO, they are trying to sell you the most expensive thing they can or don't know what they are talking about.
Medic Zero is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 06:25 AM
  #81  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126

Bikes: Steel 1x's

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Medic Zero
IMO, they are trying to sell you the most expensive thing they can or don't know what they are talking about.
Possibly. That was coming from a Specialized, Trek and Felt store. I think the AWOL was the only steel bike in the whole place. I rode it and it felt like a tank. I was looking for fast and light.

Last edited by Jarrett2; 09-16-14 at 06:28 AM.
Jarrett2 is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 07:05 AM
  #82  
~>~
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: TX Hill Country
Posts: 5,932
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 119 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
Possibly. That was coming from a Specialized, Trek and Felt store........ I rode it and it felt like a tank. I was looking for fast and light.
So your "local riders" were a LBS that doesn't sell modern lightweight steel road bikes?
No better way to get a fair & impartial overview of a variety of materials, designs and construction techniques in bicycles.
Try asking a Waterford dealer the same question, that would be fair.

-Bandera
Bandera is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 07:18 AM
  #83  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126

Bikes: Steel 1x's

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Bandera
So your "local riders" were a LBS that doesn't sell modern lightweight steel road bikes?
No better way to get a fair & impartial overview of a variety of materials, designs and construction techniques in bicycles.
Try asking a Waterford dealer the same question, that would be fair.

-Bandera
Maybe that's the issue. No modern lightweight steel road bike dealers in my area. Never heard of Waterford.
Jarrett2 is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 07:31 AM
  #84  
~>~
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: TX Hill Country
Posts: 5,932
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 119 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
Never heard of Waterford.
Custom Bicycles from Waterford Precision Cycles
Bandera is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 08:50 AM
  #85  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,093 Times in 2,325 Posts
Originally Posted by Bandera
So your "local riders" were a LBS that doesn't sell modern lightweight steel road bikes?
No better way to get a fair & impartial overview of a variety of materials, designs and construction techniques in bicycles.
Try asking a Waterford dealer the same question, that would be fair.

-Bandera
Really? You are going to compare a custom made "modern" lightweight steel bike that costs $2500 for a frame and fork to a complete bike that cost $1550 for everything?

Originally Posted by Jarrett2
Maybe that's the issue. No modern lightweight steel road bike dealers in my area. Never heard of Waterford.
There's a reason you don't have a "modern lightweight steel road bike dealer" in your area Jarrett2. They basically don't exist. You can find a few steel bikes in some companies' lines but, for the most part, steel bikes are part of the boutique market (aka custom market) and have been since around the late 90s.

Steel bikes were never all that lightweight to begin with which is why nearly all manufacturers transitioned to aluminum and then carbon. There are exceptions but, for the most part, steel bikes are going to be significantly heavier than just about anything else. World class race bikes, i.e. the kind ridden by professional racers, from the early 80s to early 90s weighed in at around 20 lbs. That's superbly lightweight but by today's standards that in boat anchor class. If it weren't for the backwardness of of the UCI, racing bike weights could easily be under 12 lbs.

I do agree (somewhat) with Bandera's previous comment about learning a bit more about materials and design. Any bike material can be used to make a bike that is stiffer than you'd want to ride. Steel, for example, isn't a "compliant" material. It's actually much stiffer than aluminum...by a factor of nearly 3. But the way the material is used has a large effect on the way it rides. A steel bike wouldn't necessarily be "noodly" unless the manufacturer used thin tubes and a small diameter. That's generally what they do with steel to make it "lightweight" because that's the flip side of the stiffness issue.

Steel has a density that is about 3 times that of aluminum. A cube of aluminum that is a foot square, for example, would weigh 168 lbs. A cube of the same size in steel weight 490 lbs. Because of the lack of stiffness in aluminum, you need to use more of it to make a frame stiff enough so that is isn't "noodly" but you don't have to use 3 times as much. If you increase the diameter of the tubing, you can use less material to achieve the stiffness that you want while using slightly less material. A large tubed aluminum frame uses about 1.5 times the volume of steel but, because of the density differences, the steel bike still weighs more. You can thin out the steel to make the frame lighter but there is a limit to how thin you can make the frame before you start denting it too easily.

Finally, go read the link to materials above. A bike's ride is more dependent on the tires, saddle and how the rider rides the bike then on the frame material. If you read enough of these "steel is real/aluminum is crap" discussions, you find that the real differences boil down to aesthetics more than any other factor.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!




Last edited by cyccommute; 09-16-14 at 08:53 AM.
cyccommute is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 09:42 AM
  #86  
~>~
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: TX Hill Country
Posts: 5,932
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 119 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
Really? You are going to compare a custom made "modern" lightweight steel bike that costs $2500 for a frame and fork to a complete bike that cost $1550 for everything? .
It's an open ended comparison since I didn't note any specific budget from the OP just bogusness from the "local riders/LBS" who don't sell quality lightweight steel frames and incorrectly dismiss them as "too noodly for a rider of my size/strength". "Noodly" (I'm guessing at whatever that technical term means) is not a characteristic of a well designed & manufactured steel frameset. Waterford being an example or a $700 Soma Stanyan frameset at a modest price.

Is a $6,000 Pinarello Dogma 2 frameset a better comparison to a custom $2,500 Waterford?

Well designed CF or Alum framesets will be lighter than steel and can be just as "noodly", "punishing", "vertically compliant", "plane-ing" or whatever the marketing speak of the day requires designers, engineers and manufacturers to produce.

I'm not an apologist for steel, although I own several (and Alumium & CF) but sheer utter nonsense needs to be called out as such and myths eliminated from serious discourse.

-Bandera
Bandera is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 10:02 AM
  #87  
Senior Member
 
MRT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319

Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by Bandera
It's an open ended comparison since I didn't note any specific budget from the OP just bogusness from the "local riders/LBS" who don't sell quality lightweight steel frames and incorrectly dismiss them as "too noodly for a rider of my size/strength". "Noodly" (I'm guessing at whatever that technical term means) is not a characteristic of a well designed & manufactured steel frameset. Waterford being an example or a $700 Soma Stanyan frameset at a modest price.

Is a $6,000 Pinarello Dogma 2 frameset a better comparison to a custom $2,500 Waterford?

Well designed CF or Alum framesets will be lighter than steel and can be just as "noodly", "punishing", "vertically compliant", "plane-ing" or whatever the marketing speak of the day requires designers, engineers and manufacturers to produce.

I'm not an apologist for steel, although I own several (and Alumium & CF) but sheer utter nonsense needs to be called out as such and myths eliminated from serious discourse.

-Bandera
Good points. I am in the steel is real camp. It is somewhat of a niche these days but you don't have to buy a Waterford to get steel. Jamis, Surly, Soma, Velo Orange, and Salsa all make steel frames. Most are not in the super lightweight category, but is is possible to build up a 20 lb bike or slightly less for less than many carbon fiber bikes these days which isn't bad, maybe just a couple of lbs heavier than comparable cf. Unless you are planning on competing at an elite level, you will hardly notice a difference.
MRT2 is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 10:47 AM
  #88  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,093 Times in 2,325 Posts
Originally Posted by Bandera
It's an open ended comparison since I didn't note any specific budget from the OP just bogusness from the "local riders/LBS" who don't sell quality lightweight steel frames and incorrectly dismiss them as "too noodly for a rider of my size/strength". "Noodly" (I'm guessing at whatever that technical term means) is not a characteristic of a well designed & manufactured steel frameset. Waterford being an example or a $700 Soma Stanyan frameset at a modest price.

Is a $6,000 Pinarello Dogma 2 frameset a better comparison to a custom $2,500 Waterford?

Well designed CF or Alum framesets will be lighter than steel and can be just as "noodly", "punishing", "vertically compliant", "plane-ing" or whatever the marketing speak of the day requires designers, engineers and manufacturers to produce.

I'm not an apologist for steel, although I own several (and Alumium & CF) but sheer utter nonsense needs to be called out as such and myths eliminated from serious discourse.

-Bandera
A Waterford isn't a bike that you'll find in an LBS that "sell[s] modern lightweight steel road bikes". Nor is it a bike that you are likely to find many people in any given area that have experience with. Riders in his area (or any area) are much more likely to run across some old 80's bike that was noodly and not all that light weight. There's about a million of each one of those to every Waterford you'll run across.

For that matter, you aren't likely to run across a shop that sells Soma or Salsa or Velo Orange bikes. If you are lucky, you might find a shop that carries Jamis or Surly but neither are offering that what I would call a "lightweight" steel bike...certainly not on par with something like a Waterford or Rodriquez.

And, just like the other major manufacturers, Jamis only offers a few steel bikes while the rest of the line is aluminum and carbon.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 11:02 AM
  #89  
Senior Member
 
adrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,210

Bikes: Firefly custom Road, Ira Ryan custom road bike, Ira Ryan custom fixed gear

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MRT2
Good points. I am in the steel is real camp. It is somewhat of a niche these days but you don't have to buy a Waterford to get steel. Jamis, Surly, Soma, Velo Orange, and Salsa all make steel frames. Most are not in the super lightweight category, but is is possible to build up a 20 lb bike or slightly less for less than many carbon fiber bikes these days which isn't bad, maybe just a couple of lbs heavier than comparable cf. Unless you are planning on competing at an elite level, you will hardly notice a difference.
I love that there's a long discussion heading into frame weight on a Clyde forum. For most of us, the difference in frame weights between an epoxy bike and a steel one is less than the fluctuation of our weight over a day or two. Certainly it is the case with me, and I'm not big as Clydes go.

I think experience might also come into play here in having ridden many, many bikes as opposed to listening to a sales rep in an LBS. Carbon bikes can be made very light, and relatively easily so, especially by big manufacturers. If you make a living racing, yes, lighter is faster. But you don't feel weight much, and it's not much weight.

I have a lovely high-end custom steel bike. Built up, with wheels that last under 210 pounds of me hammering it, it weighs, oh, 19 pounds or so. With a carbon fork and lighter group set I could shave another 1.5 pounds off that.

For what it cost, in all, I could be riding, say a Madone or a Tarmac or a Roubaix, maybe even an S Works if I was careful. Those would weigh around 16 pounds. I've ridden them, and I don't like how they feel. I am reminded of a friend of mine who has a very similar steel bike and a c59, and prefers the steel bike except in very fast group rides or when climbing a lot (like more than 5,000 feet), and a c59 is far more lust-worthy in my mind than one of the big brand bikes I mentioned.

I also rode a Dogma 64.1 for a little over a week this summer. Weighed about 14 pounds in my size (!) and I was faster on it, probably, oh, by 3-5% by my calculations, and only on ascents. I was actually slower on descents, because it was more skittish. I liked it a lot, though it did poorly on anything not super-smooth, and it was a handful as a descender. It was also, roughly, $16,000. But it's the first carbon bike I've spent a lot of time with that I genuinely liked, in all its edgy Italian ugliness.

Bottom line: the weight argument is 95% marketing for anyone who doesn't make a living racing. If you do, it's legit, but you can still get a steel bike down to that weight. In fact, the Condor team in the UK is racing steel.
adrien is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 11:17 AM
  #90  
~>~
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: TX Hill Country
Posts: 5,932
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 119 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
A Waterford isn't a bike that you'll find in an LBS that "sell[s] modern lightweight steel road bikes". Nor is it a bike that you are likely to find many people in any given area that have experience with. Riders in his area (or any area) are much more likely to run across some old 80's bike that was noodly and not all that light weight. There's about a million of each one of those to every Waterford you'll run across.

For that matter, you aren't likely to run across a shop that sells Soma or Salsa or Velo Orange bikes. If you are lucky, you might find a shop that carries Jamis or Surly but neither are offering that what I would call a "lightweight" steel bike...certainly not on par with something like a Waterford or Rodriquez. .
No idea why you are so intent on beating this horse but here goes:

1) "A Waterford isn't a bike that you'll find in an LBS that "sell[s] modern lightweight steel road bikes". "
A Waterford dealer is less than 10 miles from my driveway, look for one if interested.
He also sells Gunnar, a nice lightweight steel frameset at a lower price.

B)"Riders in his area (or any area) are much more likely to run across some old 80's bike that was noodly and not all that light weight"
What does that have to w/ the price of tea in China?
The point being addressed is mis-information/myth promulgated by "local rider/LBS" not what old machines are in local garages.

III) "you aren't likely to run across a shop that sells Soma or Salsa or Velo Orange bikes"
My Soma Stanyan was purchased through a LBS 15 minutes from home, it's light enough for my requirements.
In the age of e-commerce purchasing a frameset or bike from an online vendor is preferred by many, especially when one's LBS spouts sheer utter nonsense.

-Bandera: Done w/ this Horse
Bandera is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 11:58 AM
  #91  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,093 Times in 2,325 Posts
Originally Posted by Bandera
No idea why you are so intent on beating this horse but here goes:

1) "A Waterford isn't a bike that you'll find in an LBS that "sell[s] modern lightweight steel road bikes". "
A Waterford dealer is less than 10 miles from my driveway, look for one if interested.
He also sells Gunnar, a nice lightweight steel frameset at a lower price.
You may have a Waterford dealer near your house as do I but you aren't likely to walk into the store today and wheel one off the floor. I have Moots dealers in my area as well but I'm not going to be able to pick up a frame from them today.

Originally Posted by Bandera
B)"Riders in his area (or any area) are much more likely to run across some old 80's bike that was noodly and not all that light weight"
What does that have to w/ the price of tea in China?
The point being addressed is mis-information/myth promulgated by "local rider/LBS" not what old machines are in local garages.
If all the experience you have with steel is with old flexy frames, it colors your attitude towards steel. Not everyone has ridden a high end steel bike. As for misinformation and myths, there are plenty out there about steel. "It's compliant" and "the ride is smoother" are two of the biggest ones, followed closely by "it can be fixed anywhere".

Originally Posted by Bandera
III) "you aren't likely to run across a shop that sells Soma or Salsa or Velo Orange bikes"
My Soma Stanyan was purchased through a LBS 15 minutes from home, it's light enough for my requirements.
In the age of e-commerce purchasing a frameset or bike from an online vendor is preferred by many, especially when one's LBS spouts sheer utter nonsense.

-Bandera: Done w/ this Horse
The point, like with the Waterford bikes, is that you can't walk into the store today and walk out with one. Soma, Salsa, Velo Orange and even Surly are bikes that you can't generally pull off the peg and go ride. I've never run across a store...and I've been in lots of bike shops...that had rows and rows of any of those steel bikes. You can order them but you aren't going to find them in stock. It's rather difficult to comparison shop for a bike that you can't ride until you buy it. It's difficult enough to walk into somewhere and order a Surly frame for $300 to $400, sight unseen. It's almost impossible to walk into a shop and plunk down $5000 for a complete bike that you won't see until it is done and probably can't send back if you are dissatisfied.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!




Last edited by cyccommute; 09-16-14 at 12:12 PM.
cyccommute is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 12:01 PM
  #92  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
It's a pity this thread has deteriorated in a "steel or not" discussion. Steel isn't, in itself, an outdated tech. Reynolds 953 stainless can give titanium a run for its money as far as strength/weight ratio is concerned, and with a top of the line groupset and decent wheels can come in at or close to the UCI minimum weight.

The guys who built racing bikes out of 531 back in the day knew what they were doing. Some of those bikes were terrific, despite being heavier than the modern aluminium or CF equivalents. And these days, one can equip them with modern tech. My own custom steel bike is made of columbus spirit. Great material. I removed most of the weight differential between it and a CF bike by specifying a carbon fork. It's the bike I use for jra and ultralight touring, so I have a Shimano 105 triple on it and a set of Mavic openpros with Hope hubs. Far from the lightest set-up I could achieve, but the bike weighs in at 19 lbs despite being a 62cm frame.

That's a long way from being a "boat anchor". Sure, it's heavier than my Giant TCR, but to a degree that is noticeable only on the climbs and at race pace. I'd happily race it in a crit and not feel at any disadvantage - possibly the reverse, because having been built specifically for me it handles slightly better that the TCR, my centre of gravity is fractionally further forward.

Outdated technology? I don't really think so.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 12:15 PM
  #93  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,093 Times in 2,325 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
It's a pity this thread has deteriorated in a "steel or not" discussion. Steel isn't, in itself, an outdated tech. Reynolds 953 stainless can give titanium a run for its money as far as strength/weight ratio is concerned, and with a top of the line groupset and decent wheels can come in at or close to the UCI minimum weight.

The guys who built racing bikes out of 531 back in the day knew what they were doing. Some of those bikes were terrific, despite being heavier than the modern aluminium or CF equivalents. And these days, one can equip them with modern tech. My own custom steel bike is made of columbus spirit. Great material. I removed most of the weight differential between it and a CF bike by specifying a carbon fork. It's the bike I use for jra and ultralight touring, so I have a Shimano 105 triple on it and a set of Mavic openpros with Hope hubs. Far from the lightest set-up I could achieve, but the bike weighs in at 19 lbs despite being a 62cm frame.

That's a long way from being a "boat anchor". Sure, it's heavier than my Giant TCR, but to a degree that is noticeable only on the climbs and at race pace. I'd happily race it in a crit and not feel at any disadvantage - possibly the reverse, because having been built specifically for me it handles slightly better that the TCR, my centre of gravity is fractionally further forward.

Outdated technology? I don't really think so.
How can the thread be anything but a "steel or not" discussion? That's what older bikes are (usually).
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 12:32 PM
  #94  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,059
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18320 Post(s)
Liked 15,299 Times in 7,231 Posts
Originally Posted by FrenchFit
but I can't help but chuckling at all the 40/50/60 somethings in full kits, clipless, electric shifting, powertap, computers, carbon wheels on $3-8K wunder-bikes. I'll leave it at that, but leaving the coffee shop I'd rather ride on with Grant. My simple critique is the car culture mindset of the last century has found a new home, and it's in the upscale bike industry and it's gadgets.
$3K bike? LOL! My next frame (a custom Engin Ti) is going to cost more than $3K, especially when you factor in the cost of the baked on ceramic coating instead of paint. Oh. And I don't own full kit...or a car.

BTW...I did I see you in that video "I'm On a Mother F&$%in' Bike"? If you haven't see it, check it out on YouTube.
indyfabz is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 12:38 PM
  #95  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
How can the thread be anything but a "steel or not" discussion? That's what older bikes are (usually).
Because the frame material is only one part of the technology. Arguably, the least important.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 01:31 PM
  #96  
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,804

Bikes: everywhere

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12636 Post(s)
Liked 7,528 Times in 3,989 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
Maybe that's the issue. No modern lightweight steel road bike dealers in my area. Never heard of Waterford.
Felt had some nice steel a couple of years ago, the F4130. I think the tallstack stem turned a lot of people off. The MSRP was 2500 but my local Felt dealer had to drop theirs down to $1500 or so to sell it.




Specialized has the fancy 40th Anniversary Allez, but it's $4k for frame/fork/wool sweater/saddle/etc.

If you have a Jamis dealer anywhere nearby, they have some sweet production steel. Quest Elite is a damn fine bike. $1700-ish

LesterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 01:59 PM
  #97  
Senior Member
 
MRT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319

Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times in 146 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
You may have a Waterford dealer near your house as do I but you aren't likely to walk into the store today and wheel one off the floor. I have Moots dealers in my area as well but I'm not going to be able to pick up a frame from them today.



If all the experience you have with steel is with old flexy frames, it colors your attitude towards steel. Not everyone has ridden a high end steel bike. As for misinformation and myths, there are plenty out there about steel. "It's compliant" and "the ride is smoother" are two of the biggest ones, followed closely by "it can be fixed anywhere".



The point, like with the Waterford bikes, is that you can't walk into the store today and walk out with one. Soma, Salsa, Velo Orange and even Surly are bikes that you can't generally pull off the peg and go ride. I've never run across a store...and I've been in lots of bike shops...that had rows and rows of any of those steel bikes. You can order them but you aren't going to find them in stock. It's rather difficult to comparison shop for a bike that you can't ride until you buy it. It's difficult enough to walk into somewhere and order a Surly frame for $300 to $400, sight unseen. It's almost impossible to walk into a shop and plunk down $5000 for a complete bike that you won't see until it is done and probably can't send back if you are dissatisfied.
I bought my Salsa Casseroll after test riding it at my lbs. Same shop had a Steel framed Surly Pacer on the floor for a long time. They also stock most of the Steel frame Jamis Quests. I even saw a couple of custom built Velo Orange bikes there. There is another shop in town that sells Waterford and Gunnar. I guess I am just lucky, but I figured if you can find steel bikes right on the showroom floor in a smallish Midwestern city like Milwaukee (where bicycle sales plummet in winter chances are pretty good you can find them in big cities like New York or Chicago or cycling Meccas like Portland, Oregon, or San Francisco, and big college towns.
MRT2 is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 02:08 PM
  #98  
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,804

Bikes: everywhere

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12636 Post(s)
Liked 7,528 Times in 3,989 Posts
Yep, down in Portland are many stores where you can buy nice off-the-rack steel.
LesterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 02:49 PM
  #99  
Senior Member
 
rangerbill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Plateau of Tennessee
Posts: 95

Bikes: 92 Giant Perigee/ 85 Peugeot P8 / 94 Specialized Allez Sport/ 93 Specialized Rockhopper/ 96 Specialized Rockhopper/ 2000 Gary Fisher Gitche Gumee/ 93 Cignal Ozark MTB/ Pacific Dualie Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
On the positive, I just like old bikes for the, price and nostalgia. On the negative, I just do not like carbon fiber and suspensions. I believe that my rigid, steel and cromo frames will last longer, especially with my weight. I guess deep down I am a person that likes old ways. It is a thread that runs through a lot of my choices. If I ever get light enough or fast enough to need carbon fiber and modern I will try them out. Nothing against the new stuff.
rangerbill is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 02:58 PM
  #100  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,274

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,093 Times in 2,325 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
Because the frame material is only one part of the technology. Arguably, the least important.
That's a whole other discussion...see the Grant Petersen loop above.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.