Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Any objective difference?

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Any objective difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-15, 09:08 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Any objective difference?

After much forum perusing, debating, and test riding I've narrowed down the bike I want to get to the CAADX 105 ($1450) and the Trek CrossRip LTD ($1600).

With the price points so close it's hard to make a choice. I like both of them equally in terms of ride. I prefer the look of the stock LTD bike more, but I usually personalize my ride with vinyl tape and the like anyways. The LTD one at the shops comes with brakes on the hoods, which is definitely useful for when I'm in casual cruising mode (80+ mile bike rides require some form relaxation and I do rides like that fairly often) but it's nothing I can't just get on the CAADX nor is it that crucial as I can brake fine from the hoods by the top of the brakes.

Is there anything objectively / on paper better about either bike? Any personal experience?

Thanks, I love you guys <3

(This is in commuting because I'm not using these bikes for cyclocross racing, though when I'm not commuting with this bike I'm gonna be having fun time in the dirt)

Last edited by Jallsop; 06-04-15 at 09:12 AM.
Jallsop is offline  
Old 06-04-15, 09:45 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post links to each bike?
YouthInAsia is offline  
Old 06-04-15, 09:55 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
CrossRip LTD - Trek Bicycle

CAADX 105 Disc - CAADX - CYCLOCROSS - ROAD - BIKES - 2015

Of course ignore the prices listed on these sites.
Jallsop is offline  
Old 06-04-15, 10:37 AM
  #4  
GATC
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: south Puget Sound
Posts: 8,728
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times in 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Jallsop
The LTD one at the shops comes with brakes on the hoods,
Do you mean in-line brakes on the bars? My wife just got a cannondale and they installed those for her for $45 (I think the parts were $45, no labor charge for a new bike).

Have you taken them on a long ride? My wife did a lot of shopping for that cannondale but never took any bike out for more than 20 minutes. I would want to ride one for an hour...
HardyWeinberg is offline  
Old 06-04-15, 10:41 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've taken them out both for 30 minutes. Some of these LBS allow rentals maybe I can see if I can rent each for 2 hours and take them about.

But let's say then I still can't decide. Anything about either that sticks out more than the other that may prove "better?" Frame geometry? Components? Etc.
Jallsop is offline  
Old 06-04-15, 11:00 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Cyclosaurus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Chicago Western 'burbs
Posts: 1,065

Bikes: 1993 NOS Mt Shasta Tempest, Motobecane Fantom Cross CX, Dahon Speed D7, Dahon Vector P8, Bullitt Superfly

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Comparing geometry between the crossrip and the caad

The crossrip has a longer wheelbase, a little more trail, and a longer head tube. I would say that the geometry of the crossrip is meant to give you a little more stability than the caad at the price of agility. Whether this would actually make any difference to you in practice is unknown, it's not like the differences are very big. I'm thinking you can't go wrong either way.

Assuming these are coming from different dealers, you could play one against the other to see who will give you the best price, throw in extras, etc.
Cyclosaurus is offline  
Old 06-04-15, 11:02 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,989
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2493 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times in 522 Posts
Originally Posted by Jallsop
I've taken them out both for 30 minutes. Some of these LBS allow rentals maybe I can see if I can rent each for 2 hours and take them about.

But let's say then I still can't decide. Anything about either that sticks out more than the other that may prove "better?" Frame geometry? Components? Etc.
Sorry, I just don't think there will be anything glaring enough at that price level to make one clearly "better" than the other. Going by just the photo's I would pick the CAADX. I've always liked the look of Cannondales. More so in the 80's when they were the only bikes with big tubes and upright geometry. Even now you can plainly see much less slope to the top tube of the CAADX than the LTD. This should be fine as long as you get fitted properly. FWIW.
Leisesturm is offline  
Old 06-04-15, 11:08 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Top Mount Brake Levers are not difficult to add if you want them and the Box-Stock bike does not have them.

Your LBS can probably do that at Point of sale , as well as being The best time to add accessories.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 06-04-15, 11:10 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cyclosaurus
Comparing geometry between the crossrip and the caad

The crossrip has a longer wheelbase, a little more trail, and a longer head tube. I would say that the geometry of the crossrip is meant to give you a little more stability than the caad at the price of agility. Whether this would actually make any difference to you in practice is unknown, it's not like the differences are very big. I'm thinking you can't go wrong either way.

Assuming these are coming from different dealers, you could play one against the other to see who will give you the best price, throw in extras, etc.
Originally Posted by Leisesturm
Sorry, I just don't think there will be anything glaring enough at that price level to make one clearly "better" than the other. Going by just the photo's I would pick the CAADX. I've always liked the look of Cannondales. More so in the 80's when they were the only bikes with big tubes and upright geometry. Even now you can plainly see much less slope to the top tube of the CAADX than the LTD. This should be fine as long as you get fitted properly. FWIW.
Thanks guys, both very helpful. The stability I can see being nice on my long ride days, while the agility I can see being nice in transversing the hectic city or trails-not-much-travelled through the woods. But like you said, the differences are probably minute enough where it'd probably not be too noticeable.

Time to pit these LBSs against each other.
nuevex is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Leo001
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
4
06-12-12 10:20 PM
The_DK
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
56
02-07-12 05:13 PM
Cyclogenesis
Road Cycling
13
07-15-11 02:21 PM
phx1973
Commuting
2
05-13-11 12:02 PM
thdave
Commuting
25
04-12-10 12:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.