Lanesight System, would you adopt it? Why or why not?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

10-05-15, 09:12 AM

#26

DunderXIII

Senior Member

Join Date: May 2007

Location: Montreal, Canada

Posts: 223

Bikes: Marinoni Piuma, Tricross Elite, Tricross Sport (*R.I.P), Mikado DeChamplain

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

Tagged: 0 Thread(s)

Quoted: 19 Post(s)

Likes: 0

Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

I think it has a lot of potential but as a standalone product, not linked to a phone and with proper UI.

Its OK to test the market with a cell phone though because the tech can probably be somewhat reused.

10-05-15, 10:37 AM

#27

Moe Zhoost

Half way there

Join Date: Sep 2015

Location: North Carolina

Posts: 2,956

Bikes: Many, and the list changes frequently

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)

Tagged: 0 Thread(s)

Quoted: 986 Post(s)

Likes: 608

Liked 880 Times in 527 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrblue

For metropolitan areas, that light would be blinking non-stop. So it would be easier and cheaper just turn your rear blinky light on.

+1 During my urban commute, there are always cars approaching me from behind. That's why I use a helmet mounted mirror.

10-06-15, 01:40 PM

#28

Daniel4

Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2013

Location: Toronto

Posts: 3,501

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)

Tagged: 0 Thread(s)

Quoted: 1480 Post(s)

Likes: 51

Liked 639 Times in 437 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shimagnolo

I like that idea!
Or simpler yet, just pop a 36" telescoping rod out to the left with a 1" solid steel ball on the end to do some damage.
If they hit the steel ball, then right there is proof they violated the 3' passing law.

You know how many times I have thought of that? If somebody were to do it, I'd bet some road raging motorist will start doing something in retaliation that will be worse.