BB drop effect for commuting/touring?
#1
_____________ø
Thread Starter
BB drop effect for commuting/touring?
i'm in the market for a new (complete) bike to be used 80% of the time for commuting and long weekend rides w/ rear rack and pannier, and 20% for medium loaded touring w/ two panniers on the rear and a small front rack w/ rando style bag+supplies.
my riding tends to be comprised of 80-90% on pavement (including rough roads), and 10-20% on gravel/dirt/trails.
the two bikes i currently have my eye on are the (2016) Jamis Aurora Elite and Salsa Marrakesh.
besides the gearing, the quality of components look to be fairly similar on the two.
the one thing i'm noticing that differs greatly between the two is the 12mm in BB drop.
Aurora Elite = 65mm BB drop
Marrakesh = 77mm BB drop
i'm wondering what sort of advantage one would have over the other, and what sort of real world difference i could expect to feel on each bike. i've heard that the lower the bottom bracket the more stable the ride is, especially when loaded, but is that enough of a reason to choose a bike with a 77mm drop as opposed to 65mm?
my riding tends to be comprised of 80-90% on pavement (including rough roads), and 10-20% on gravel/dirt/trails.
the two bikes i currently have my eye on are the (2016) Jamis Aurora Elite and Salsa Marrakesh.
besides the gearing, the quality of components look to be fairly similar on the two.
the one thing i'm noticing that differs greatly between the two is the 12mm in BB drop.
Aurora Elite = 65mm BB drop
Marrakesh = 77mm BB drop
i'm wondering what sort of advantage one would have over the other, and what sort of real world difference i could expect to feel on each bike. i've heard that the lower the bottom bracket the more stable the ride is, especially when loaded, but is that enough of a reason to choose a bike with a 77mm drop as opposed to 65mm?
Last edited by blujosh; 10-23-15 at 02:33 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
You're talking a difference of one-half inch. I don't think it will be a big deal. Higher BB is less likely to pedal strike if you happen to pedal through a turn. Your saddle will also have to be 12mm higher above the ground to account for the higher BB. Lower BB will be more steady but a little more prone to pedal strike. Saddle can be slightly lower.
#3
Banned
My Brompton has a pretty low BB , so Its an easy comfortable thing to stop and put a foot down.. perfectly suited for purpose ..
Drop is relative to the Wheel Radius , with a Tire on It , what are those Numbers ?
axis difference between centers of hub & BB but wheel size determines how close to the ground the BB is ..
So doing a 27" ->650b conversion also moves the BB down
and the Crank arm choice also lets the saddle height be lower with a Longer arm, & higher with a shorter.
Your question is oversimplified .. flip a coin.
Drop is relative to the Wheel Radius , with a Tire on It , what are those Numbers ?
axis difference between centers of hub & BB but wheel size determines how close to the ground the BB is ..
So doing a 27" ->650b conversion also moves the BB down
and the Crank arm choice also lets the saddle height be lower with a Longer arm, & higher with a shorter.
Your question is oversimplified .. flip a coin.
Last edited by fietsbob; 12-07-15 at 04:28 PM.
#4
_____________ø
Thread Starter
My Brompton has a pretty low BB , so Its an easy comfortable thing to stop and put a foot down.. perfectly suited for purpose ..
Drop is relative to the Wheel Radius , with a Tire on It , what are those Numbers ?
and the Crank arm choice also lets the saddle height be lower with a Longer arm, & higher with a shorter.
Your question is oversimplified .. flip a coin.
Drop is relative to the Wheel Radius , with a Tire on It , what are those Numbers ?
and the Crank arm choice also lets the saddle height be lower with a Longer arm, & higher with a shorter.
Your question is oversimplified .. flip a coin.
Last edited by blujosh; 10-23-15 at 02:32 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Unless you're racing CX or riding a FG, BB drop isn't going to have a big real world impact.
#6
Banned
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 1,643
Bikes: 1997 Rivendell Road Standard 650b conversion (tourer), 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10 (gravel/tour), 2013 Foundry Auger disc (CX/gravel), 2016 Cannondale Fat CAAD 2 (MTB/winter), 2011 Cannondale Flash 29er Lefty (trail MTB)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
The lower BB will put you lower on the same bike. That improves the handling (lower center of gravity) but increases the likelihood of banging or scraping a pedal.
That's one of the major differences between a cyclocross bike and a touring bike; the cyclocross bike has a higher BB for obstacle avoidance.
Low BB is good, unless it's too low. 77 mm drop sounds good.
That said, there are many other differences between the Aurora and the Marrakesh so I doubt I could pick out the difference in BB height. If it were the exact same bike otherwise, you'd probably notice the difference.
That's one of the major differences between a cyclocross bike and a touring bike; the cyclocross bike has a higher BB for obstacle avoidance.
Low BB is good, unless it's too low. 77 mm drop sounds good.
That said, there are many other differences between the Aurora and the Marrakesh so I doubt I could pick out the difference in BB height. If it were the exact same bike otherwise, you'd probably notice the difference.
#8
Junior Member
The Jamis has quicker geometry (BB height and shorter chainstays.) They both look like great choices (really dig those metal fenders on the Jamis) but the Salsa would be my choice as it has a kickstand plate.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: North Shore, MA
Posts: 206
Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Surly ECR, Serotta CSI
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
i'm in the market for a new (complete) bike to be used 80% of the time for commuting and long weekend rides w/ rear rack and pannier, and 20% for medium loaded touring w/ two panniers on the rear and a small front rack w/ rando style bag+supplies.
my riding tends to be comprised of 80-90% on pavement (including rough roads), and 10-20% on gravel/dirt/trails.
the two bikes i currently have my eye on are the (2016) Jamis Aurora Elite and Salsa Marrakesh.
besides the gearing, the quality of components look to be fairly similar on the two.
the one thing i'm noticing that differs greatly between the two is the 12mm in BB drop.
Aurora Elite = 65mm BB drop
Marrakesh = 77mm BB drop
i'm wondering what sort of advantage one would have over the other, and what sort of real world difference i could expect to feel on each bike. i've heard that the lower the bottom bracket the more stable the ride is, especially when loaded, but is that enough of a reason to choose a bike with a 77mm drop as opposed to 65mm?
my riding tends to be comprised of 80-90% on pavement (including rough roads), and 10-20% on gravel/dirt/trails.
the two bikes i currently have my eye on are the (2016) Jamis Aurora Elite and Salsa Marrakesh.
besides the gearing, the quality of components look to be fairly similar on the two.
the one thing i'm noticing that differs greatly between the two is the 12mm in BB drop.
Aurora Elite = 65mm BB drop
Marrakesh = 77mm BB drop
i'm wondering what sort of advantage one would have over the other, and what sort of real world difference i could expect to feel on each bike. i've heard that the lower the bottom bracket the more stable the ride is, especially when loaded, but is that enough of a reason to choose a bike with a 77mm drop as opposed to 65mm?
I ride an Aurora with a 65mm drop and a Rivendell Sam Hillborne with a 78mm drop. Yes, the lower bracket of the Sam feels closer to the ground or stable in that sense, but it's such a small factor in the overall ride experience. The Jamis is far easier to ride with no hands - if that's not a test of stability, I don't know what is. I prefer the Jamis for pavement and commuting (my commute is 9 miles pavement, 4 miles gravel bike trail, each way.) It 'feels' like I sit higher and a bit taller compared to cars. I'm 6',190lbs and I just feel more imposing out there. A bit more like I mean business and a bit less vulnerable. I dig the sport touring geometry as well, it can handle a load without being too pokey.
The Hillborne feels more at home on trails, dirt roads, or even urban settings w/ curbs and whatnot. I have it set-up with thicker tires, 38mm vs the 32mm on the Jamis - which actually measure closer to 28.
I think that the Sam feels a bit like a trail bike that I can ride on the pavement whereas the Jamis feels like a road bike I can ride on some light trails. The Sam is for fun and the Jamis is for speed but like I said, there are so many factors that contribute to the overall ride other than BB drop.
The Marakesh looks nice, I looked into Salsa myself at one point (the Vaya) .Don't quote me on this but I'd be wary about the the frame's compatibility with other racks and more importantly, fenders. For some reason I remember reading a review that pointed out the owner's frustration with the lack attachment points near the rear dropouts. Maybe it's been resolved since then.
Last edited by Marc40a; 10-23-15 at 09:41 PM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 765
Bikes: Fitz randonneuse, Trek Superfly/AL, Tsunami SS, Bacchetta, HPV Speed Machine, Rans Screamer
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
In general I think bikes these days are too high in the BB. Even when I used toe clips, my bikes were much lower slung. My rando bike has a BB about 1" lower than my old road bike, and 2" lower than my MTB. I find it distinctly easier to start and stop with the lower BB. Once riding, not much difference.
I sometimes think of putting 27.5" wheels on my 29" just to lower the BB. Not seriously.
So, all things being equal...
I sometimes think of putting 27.5" wheels on my 29" just to lower the BB. Not seriously.
So, all things being equal...
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,411
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
18 Posts
I've done a lot of experimenting with different bikes and how geometry affects ride and I've come to consider BB height as more important than BB drop because tires have such a huge impact. For example, the 26" Surly LHT is a touring bike and has a "lower" BB or "higher" BB drop than most 26" bikes. However, Surly designed that bike for tires in the mid-30mm range so if you put 50mm tires on it, which many people do, it no longer has a low BB.
In your case, a 700c x 35mm tire has a diameter of about 700mm and a radius of 350mm.
BB height = Radius - BB drop
350 - 65 = BB height of 28.5cm. That's a pretty high BB
350 - 77 = BB height of 27.3cm. That's a pretty low BB and based on what I've read, it's pretty standard for old school road riders. If you expect to ride in rough terrain, 27.3 cm may be too low.
I think you would feel a considerable difference between the two bikes but which is better is a matter of personal preference. If at all possible, test ride each bike or if you can't find a Marrakesh to test ride, find a 700c Surly Long Haul Trucker. The LHT has about as low a BB as anything out there and is very similar in design theory to the Marrakesh.
In your case, a 700c x 35mm tire has a diameter of about 700mm and a radius of 350mm.
BB height = Radius - BB drop
350 - 65 = BB height of 28.5cm. That's a pretty high BB
350 - 77 = BB height of 27.3cm. That's a pretty low BB and based on what I've read, it's pretty standard for old school road riders. If you expect to ride in rough terrain, 27.3 cm may be too low.
I think you would feel a considerable difference between the two bikes but which is better is a matter of personal preference. If at all possible, test ride each bike or if you can't find a Marrakesh to test ride, find a 700c Surly Long Haul Trucker. The LHT has about as low a BB as anything out there and is very similar in design theory to the Marrakesh.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,411
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
18 Posts
I've thought of this as well and even went so far as to put 26" wheels with 55mm tires on my Karate Monkey as a proof of concept. There was nothing at all wrong with the resulting handling but it no longer rode like a Karate Monkey. It didn't even ride like a Troll, which was my hope. I think that much lower BB (compared to both 700c KM and a Troll) completely took away that nimble feeling that characterizes the KM & Troll. It basically turned my KM into a 26" touring bike.
#13
_____________ø
Thread Starter
The Marakesh looks nice, I looked into Salsa myself at one point (the Vaya) .Don't quote me on this but I'd be wary about the the frame's compatibility with other racks and more importantly, fenders. For some reason I remember reading a review that pointed out the owner's frustration with the lack attachment points near the rear dropouts. Maybe it's been resolved since then.
i've been reading similar concerns about the rack compatibility of the Marrakesh. sounds like only Salsa's racks are compatible with that frame, and the rack that comes with it isn't rated very high for weight capacity. they have alternator plates that allows for fender mounting, but doesn't resolve the mounting issue for third party racks. a shame really as the rest of the bike seems more or less what i was looking for.
Last edited by blujosh; 10-24-15 at 01:48 PM.
#14
_____________ø
Thread Starter
I think you would feel a considerable difference between the two bikes but which is better is a matter of personal preference. If at all possible, test ride each bike or if you can't find a Marrakesh to test ride, find a 700c Surly Long Haul Trucker. The LHT has about as low a BB as anything out there and is very similar in design theory to the Marrakesh.
#15
Schwinnasaur
For me the main effect of having a lower bb is that places the handlebars relatively higher for the same size frame. This has a big effect on comfort.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: North Shore, MA
Posts: 206
Bikes: Jamis Aurora, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Surly ECR, Serotta CSI
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
As opposed to the BB being closer to the ground.
Last edited by Marc40a; 10-26-15 at 12:07 PM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Just for clarification, BB drop has no relationship whatsoever to wheel and tire size. It's the measure of the BB center distance below the line created by connecting the centers of the wheel hubs (dropouts). BB distance from the ground, OTOH, is a function of tire radius minus BB drop (as mentioned above).
For instance my old KHS 26" MTB had a higher BB than my 700C road bike. Its BB drop was very small in comparison to the road bike.
For instance my old KHS 26" MTB had a higher BB than my 700C road bike. Its BB drop was very small in comparison to the road bike.
#18
Schwinnasaur
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
marakesh has the rear brake MTB style, so has a raised rack eyelet so needs a special rack with short legs.
Aurora has chainstay brake mounts, compatible with normal accessories.
Aurora has chainstay brake mounts, compatible with normal accessories.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,261
Bikes: Salsa Vaya
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The Marakesh looks nice, I looked into Salsa myself at one point (the Vaya) .Don't quote me on this but I'd be wary about the the frame's compatibility with other racks and more importantly, fenders. For some reason I remember reading a review that pointed out the owner's frustration with the lack attachment points near the rear dropouts. Maybe it's been resolved since then.
Re the kickstand plate, I was initially concerned about it's never an actual problem, there's always something to lean against and the bike is less likely to fall over than it would be on a kickstand.
Last edited by asmac; 10-29-15 at 07:32 AM.
#21
Did I catch a niner?
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: a van down by the river
Posts: 542
Bikes: Vassago Fisticuff/Surly Ogre/Surly Pugsley/Surly Pugsley 29+
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The Marrakesh has the alternator plate which is what causes this whole problem in the first place. The rack mounts to the swing plate bolt which sits very high up, so the legs are shorter on the salsa specific racks. On top of that I believe they all do not come with the plate to allow fenders to be mounted, so you must buy this plate for another $60 (I know this to be true only on the fargo).
I really like the look and idea of the Marrakesh but I think the alternator plate is just screwing over salsa. I do not see this bike every being on par with a vaya for touring, commuting I think it will be just fine. It I do not think will have world presence like an LHT either.
I really like the look and idea of the Marrakesh but I think the alternator plate is just screwing over salsa. I do not see this bike every being on par with a vaya for touring, commuting I think it will be just fine. It I do not think will have world presence like an LHT either.
#22
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,470 Times
in
1,435 Posts
There's a lot of good advice here. I agree that BB drop shouldn't be a major criterion for your decision. You'll get used to either bike. And they both look like fantastic bikes. I want to read ride reports from you!
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#23
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
I don't understand how we can discuss BB drop without considering crank arm length.
Jamis specifies three different crank arm lengths for the Aurora Elite, depending on frame size, which sounds like a good idea; but these different crank arms all come with the same BB drop. So the smaller framed Aurora Elites have more pedal clearance than the larger ones. Go figure!
Salsa doesn't specify the crank arm length of the Marrakesh. There's attention to detail for you!
Bottom line, BB drop and crank arm length only matter if you're getting near the extremes, and on these bikes you aren't, and it won't make much difference one way or another.
Jamis specifies three different crank arm lengths for the Aurora Elite, depending on frame size, which sounds like a good idea; but these different crank arms all come with the same BB drop. So the smaller framed Aurora Elites have more pedal clearance than the larger ones. Go figure!
Salsa doesn't specify the crank arm length of the Marrakesh. There's attention to detail for you!
Bottom line, BB drop and crank arm length only matter if you're getting near the extremes, and on these bikes you aren't, and it won't make much difference one way or another.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391
Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Well a taller person generally rides a larger frame size, and needs longer cranks. It all depends on the person and their ideal fit, though.
#25
_____________ø
Thread Starter
I don't understand how we can discuss BB drop without considering crank arm length.
Jamis specifies three different crank arm lengths for the Aurora Elite, depending on frame size, which sounds like a good idea; but these different crank arms all come with the same BB drop. So the smaller framed Aurora Elites have more pedal clearance than the larger ones. Go figure!
Salsa doesn't specify the crank arm length of the Marrakesh. There's attention to detail for you!
Bottom line, BB drop and crank arm length only matter if you're getting near the extremes, and on these bikes you aren't, and it won't make much difference one way or another.
Jamis specifies three different crank arm lengths for the Aurora Elite, depending on frame size, which sounds like a good idea; but these different crank arms all come with the same BB drop. So the smaller framed Aurora Elites have more pedal clearance than the larger ones. Go figure!
Salsa doesn't specify the crank arm length of the Marrakesh. There's attention to detail for you!
Bottom line, BB drop and crank arm length only matter if you're getting near the extremes, and on these bikes you aren't, and it won't make much difference one way or another.
i'd be going for a 54cm in a Marrakesh, whereas i'd go for a 50cm in an Aurora Elite (standover of the 53cm is too high for me).
with all that said, i'm now also considering throwing one more option into the mix:
building up a 52cm New Albion Privateer, with gearing (48/36/26t + 11-32t) and components (brakes + shifters) similar to a Long Haul Trucker.
i like that the geo of the Privateer is pretty much right in between touring geo and CX geo, and similarly that the BB drop of the Privateer is kind of right in the middle of that range at 72mm.
i am aware that the tubing isn't as beefy on the Privateer, but i'm wondering if that would be an issue since i will only be using it for more med/fully loaded touring about 10% (would be using it with a rear rack and single pannier the rest of the time).
any opinions on that?
Last edited by blujosh; 10-30-15 at 03:22 PM.