Coffee
#51
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7345 Post(s)
Liked 2,452 Times
in
1,430 Posts
Aha, that's where I went wrong. Is this an opportunity for Campagnolo or Cinelli or Colnago? Pinarello?
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Still, Campy makes a nice corkscrew so anything's possible...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,411
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
18 Posts
Interesting, are the ceramic ones better? Mine is I believe the same as this, I got it for a dollar at salvation army. I think the linear bottom has like 4 little holes.
I don't have a grinder (except for our electric spice grinder, and I don't want spicy coffee), so I grind mine in the store, but I believe that fresh-ground would make a difference. I've thought about buying a cheap grinder like this, on the theory that, even though it's super cheap, at least it's a burr grinder, and adjustable. Anybody have success with a super-low-end grinder like that? (Now that I search ebay again, I now see another type at the low end of the price range, looks better I think)
I don't have a grinder (except for our electric spice grinder, and I don't want spicy coffee), so I grind mine in the store, but I believe that fresh-ground would make a difference. I've thought about buying a cheap grinder like this, on the theory that, even though it's super cheap, at least it's a burr grinder, and adjustable. Anybody have success with a super-low-end grinder like that? (Now that I search ebay again, I now see another type at the low end of the price range, looks better I think)
I have a Hario Skerton and I can't get it to work well for a course, french press grind. Even after adding an after-market part and adjusting it many times. I suspect that if I set it for drip grind, it would make a drinkable cup of coffee but not great and it would be a lot of work to grind enough for a pot of coffee (the finer the grind, the longer it takes and the more difficult it is).
I have a Cuisinart burr grinder (about $50) and it does a drinkable French press grind but it's not consistent enough to produce a good French Press grind. I end up with large particles and small particles and they get extracted at different rates so my coffee ends up more bitter than it should (smaller particles being immersed for the length of time meant for larger particles = overextraction). I had a local coffee shop french press grind some of their beans for me in their commercial grinder and it made a big difference in the flavor of the coffee.
If you are drinking coffee at a less than enthusiast level, those hand grinders will probably work fine and if you are an enthusiast, it seems possible to make those grinders work, though it's eluded me so far.
#54
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7345 Post(s)
Liked 2,452 Times
in
1,430 Posts
Come to think of it, I have an Italian made espresso machine. It is stylish and gorgeous. I have to contort my body to reach the water reservoir. I don't use it any more, but I should put it on display.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#55
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,244
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,417 Times
in
2,526 Posts
#56
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,244
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,417 Times
in
2,526 Posts
"less than enthusiast level" sounds like me, I think an irregular grind could work OK since my method is hybrid: steep (like french press) and then paper-filter (like drip)
#57
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7345 Post(s)
Liked 2,452 Times
in
1,430 Posts
What difference does the fineness (finity?) of the grind make? I do understand why fine is better for paper and coarse for french press, but I find I get away with violating the guidelines. If I use coarse for paper, I just use more. If I use fine for french press, it's just more mud in my mouth and more cleanup. I don't mind any of these things.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nanaimo, BC
Posts: 2,014
Bikes: 1997 Kona Hahana Race Light, 2010 Surly LHT(deceased), 1999 Rocky Mountain Turbo
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is making me consider the option of using the particle size distribution testing apparatus to shift my ground beans to obtain a wholly uniform mixture for brewing the perfect cup.
Oh the possibilities.
I also have an automated solvent extractor at work that holds samples in a cell for a certain time, pressure, and temperature with your selected solvent and then extracts into the collection vessel. Then we have a lyophillizer or freeze dryer and I can make my own instant coffee for the road.
Oh the possibilities.
I also have an automated solvent extractor at work that holds samples in a cell for a certain time, pressure, and temperature with your selected solvent and then extracts into the collection vessel. Then we have a lyophillizer or freeze dryer and I can make my own instant coffee for the road.
#59
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,244
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,417 Times
in
2,526 Posts
What difference does the fineness (finity?) of the grind make? I do understand why fine is better for paper and coarse for french press, but I find I get away with violating the guidelines. If I use coarse for paper, I just use more. If I use fine for french press, it's just more mud in my mouth and more cleanup. I don't mind any of these things.
#60
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7345 Post(s)
Liked 2,452 Times
in
1,430 Posts
I love that "coffeeness!"
Well, some really don't like their coffee muddy, and I respect that. I love it that way. I make my coffee blow-the-top-of-your-head-off strong and just don't drink much of it.
Well, some really don't like their coffee muddy, and I respect that. I love it that way. I make my coffee blow-the-top-of-your-head-off strong and just don't drink much of it.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Physically speaking, smaller particles offer more surface area per given unit...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
#62
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,244
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,417 Times
in
2,526 Posts
ergo less steeping time and more difficult filtering, but otherwise would the coffee taste different?
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,411
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
18 Posts
The temperature of the water also needs to be between 195-205 degree Fahrenheit, but that's a whole other issue.
For example, when I brew with my French Press I grind 19 grams of coffee at a course setting. I mix this with about 300 grams of water that is about 202 degrees Fahrenheit for four minutes and then I filter and pour. My grinder isn't the best so I end up with a lot of correctly sized bits of coffee but also a fair amount of powder, which gets over-extracted. My grinder is good enough that it doesn't ruin the coffee but it doesn't produce the quality I want. Also, if I use water that is lower than the high 190's, my coffee will be sour because the water wasn't hot enough and the grinds are under-extracted, resulting in a sour cup. If I use boiling water, which is too hot, my coffee will be over-extracted and the cup will be bitter. And the French Press is considered one of the more forgiving brewing methods!!! I haven't even considered trying pour-overs, which are the newest rage.
This is why people will spend $500 for a good grinder and a Technivorm brewer. You just have to measure you water, measure your coffee, grind it at a pre-determined setting and let the machine do the rest. There are only a few home brewing machines that get the water hot enough to properly extract the flavor from the coffee beans. Technivorm is one ($300) and Bonavita ($150) is another.
I think most Americans have never had truly good coffee. I know that was true for me until just the last year when I started seriously researching and trying my hand at good coffee. A good cup of coffee, served black, is creamy, smooth and has a sweet taste. I wouldn't have believed that if I hadn't experienced it first-hand.
Last edited by corwin1968; 03-02-16 at 04:03 PM.
#65
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,244
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,417 Times
in
2,526 Posts
This. If you grind 20 grams of coffee at a very fine setting, there will be much more surface area exposed to water than if you ground that same 20 grams of beans at a very course setting. The finely ground coffee will reach full extraction much faster than the course ground coffee. Therefore, the brewing time has to match the grind of the coffee. The specifics are pretty well established for each brewing method available. If you over-extract coffee, it will taste bitter. If you under-extract coffee, it will taste sour. The ratio of water to coffee is also pretty well established as around 17-to-1. The catch is that all of the ground coffee needs to be the same size. If the grind is not consistent, you end up with different levels of extraction and either a bitter or sour cup of coffee.
I wonder how effective it would be to attempt a coarse grind, and then pass the result through a fine metal strainer or a flour sifter, to separate the grounds into coarse vs finer (finer doesn't need to be thrown away, just brewed separately)
Is that maybe why people like espresso, because it's such a fine grind, it's easier to get consistent size particles?
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,411
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
18 Posts
Thanks, that is a very good explanation.
I wonder how effective it would be to attempt a coarse grind, and then pass the result through a fine metal strainer or a flour sifter, to separate the grounds into coarse vs finer (finer doesn't need to be thrown away, just brewed separately)
Is that maybe why people like espresso, because it's such a fine grind, it's easier to get consistent size particles?
I wonder how effective it would be to attempt a coarse grind, and then pass the result through a fine metal strainer or a flour sifter, to separate the grounds into coarse vs finer (finer doesn't need to be thrown away, just brewed separately)
Is that maybe why people like espresso, because it's such a fine grind, it's easier to get consistent size particles?
Espresso is a whole other world. From what I've read, if making a great cup of coffee is equal to graduating high school, making good espresso is equal to getting a PhD. The grind has to be perfect, the amount of coffee has to be perfect, the compression of the grounds in the basket has to be perfect and most importantly, you need a really, really expensive machine (four digit cost) to get good espresso. If I want a latte or cappucino, I let the professionals make it for me.
#67
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Gevalia is a fine grind intended for drip makers. I use it in a French press. Tastes great. A little mud, but it doesn't bother me.
If irregularly ground coffee tastes bitter, in a French press or any other, something is wrong with the coffee itself. Good beans properly roasted should never be bitter. Shouldn't even be that picky about water temperature.
But most so-called French roast and dark roast coffees I've tried (again, with the exception of Gevalia) taste like an excuse for masking the flavor of inferior beans. I prefer medium or light roasts. More caffeine, better flavor.
If irregularly ground coffee tastes bitter, in a French press or any other, something is wrong with the coffee itself. Good beans properly roasted should never be bitter. Shouldn't even be that picky about water temperature.
But most so-called French roast and dark roast coffees I've tried (again, with the exception of Gevalia) taste like an excuse for masking the flavor of inferior beans. I prefer medium or light roasts. More caffeine, better flavor.
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,411
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
18 Posts
Gevalia is a fine grind intended for drip makers. I use it in a French press. Tastes great. A little mud, but it doesn't bother me.
If irregularly ground coffee tastes bitter, in a French press or any other, something is wrong with the coffee itself. Good beans properly roasted should never be bitter. Shouldn't even be that picky about water temperature.
But most so-called French roast and dark roast coffees I've tried (again, with the exception of Gevalia) taste like an excuse for masking the flavor of inferior beans. I prefer medium or light roasts. More caffeine, better flavor.
If irregularly ground coffee tastes bitter, in a French press or any other, something is wrong with the coffee itself. Good beans properly roasted should never be bitter. Shouldn't even be that picky about water temperature.
But most so-called French roast and dark roast coffees I've tried (again, with the exception of Gevalia) taste like an excuse for masking the flavor of inferior beans. I prefer medium or light roasts. More caffeine, better flavor.
I also think there is a wide range of tolerance among people for the tastes of coffee. I suspect I'm on the very finicky side and need a near-perfect cup to be satisfied. I've read a lot of threads on coffee and many people aren't picky...if it tastes like coffee and has caffeine, they are happy.
#69
Senior Member
I can't believe how many people post here,,I NEED my coffee,
One cool spring morning on top of this ,,,,,,Mountain, we got up doing everything we could to keep warm. Then down off that hill we went, 18 mile decent and my legs froze stiff,,,I see a little country store with a picture of a steaming coffee cup in the window....OH that was good.. Not mine, but it did the job.
One cool spring morning on top of this ,,,,,,Mountain, we got up doing everything we could to keep warm. Then down off that hill we went, 18 mile decent and my legs froze stiff,,,I see a little country store with a picture of a steaming coffee cup in the window....OH that was good.. Not mine, but it did the job.
#70
Senior Member
I used to think the same, but K cups have come a long way. They actually brew an OK cup of coffee. My favorite is Caribou. Best thing is they are free at work, and easy to prepare. I drink my coffee black, so the flavor is not masked by creamer, and all I can say is it's tolerable, not nasty, though.
#71
Standard Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,255
Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1294 Post(s)
Liked 934 Times
in
486 Posts
The quality of the coffee (or juice or tea) is mostly related to how good your water filtration system is.
Right now, I am using a Crystal Quest Multi-stage Flouride reduction filter system (single tower), but in the past I have had good results from NSA. Cold water goes into a one quart stainless steel pan (no paper or plastic) and three heaping teaspoons of Wicked Joe's organic medium roast. Put the range on high and go brush my teeth. Almost ready to boil when I come back. Stir and let sit, preferably in a window, to circulate chi into the coffee.
Right now, I am using a Crystal Quest Multi-stage Flouride reduction filter system (single tower), but in the past I have had good results from NSA. Cold water goes into a one quart stainless steel pan (no paper or plastic) and three heaping teaspoons of Wicked Joe's organic medium roast. Put the range on high and go brush my teeth. Almost ready to boil when I come back. Stir and let sit, preferably in a window, to circulate chi into the coffee.
__________________
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
#73
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,244
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,417 Times
in
2,526 Posts
I also think there is a wide range of tolerance among people for the tastes of coffee. I suspect I'm on the very finicky side and need a near-perfect cup to be satisfied. I've read a lot of threads on coffee and many people aren't picky...if it tastes like coffee and has caffeine, they are happy.
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Posts: 6,301
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Conical Burr - Coffee Grinders
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 1,257
Bikes: 2017 Salsa Carbon Mukluk frame built with XT, 2018 Kona Rove NRB build with Sram Apex 1,2008 Salsa El Mariachi, 1986 Centurion Ironman
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times
in
65 Posts
This. If you grind 20 grams of coffee at a very fine setting, there will be much more surface area exposed to water than if you ground that same 20 grams of beans at a very course setting. The finely ground coffee will reach full extraction much faster than the course ground coffee. Therefore, the brewing time has to match the grind of the coffee. The specifics are pretty well established for each brewing method available. If you over-extract coffee, it will taste bitter. If you under-extract coffee, it will taste sour. The ratio of water to coffee is also pretty well established as around 17-to-1. The catch is that all of the ground coffee needs to be the same size. If the grind is not consistent, you end up with different levels of extraction and either a bitter or sour cup of coffee.
The temperature of the water also needs to be between 195-205 degree Fahrenheit, but that's a whole other issue.
For example, when I brew with my French Press I grind 19 grams of coffee at a course setting. I mix this with about 300 grams of water that is about 202 degrees Fahrenheit for four minutes and then I filter and pour. My grinder isn't the best so I end up with a lot of correctly sized bits of coffee but also a fair amount of powder, which gets over-extracted. My grinder is good enough that it doesn't ruin the coffee but it doesn't produce the quality I want. Also, if I use water that is lower than the high 190's, my coffee will be sour because the water wasn't hot enough and the grinds are under-extracted, resulting in a sour cup. If I use boiling water, which is too hot, my coffee will be over-extracted and the cup will be bitter. And the French Press is considered one of the more forgiving brewing methods!!! I haven't even considered trying pour-overs, which are the newest rage.
This is why people will spend $500 for a good grinder and a Technivorm brewer. You just have to measure you water, measure your coffee, grind it at a pre-determined setting and let the machine do the rest. There are only a few home brewing machines that get the water hot enough to properly extract the flavor from the coffee beans. Technivorm is one ($300) and Bonavita ($150) is another.
I think most Americans have never had truly good coffee. I know that was true for me until just the last year when I started seriously researching and trying my hand at good coffee. A good cup of coffee, served black, is creamy, smooth and has a sweet taste. I wouldn't have believed that if I hadn't experienced it first-hand.
The temperature of the water also needs to be between 195-205 degree Fahrenheit, but that's a whole other issue.
For example, when I brew with my French Press I grind 19 grams of coffee at a course setting. I mix this with about 300 grams of water that is about 202 degrees Fahrenheit for four minutes and then I filter and pour. My grinder isn't the best so I end up with a lot of correctly sized bits of coffee but also a fair amount of powder, which gets over-extracted. My grinder is good enough that it doesn't ruin the coffee but it doesn't produce the quality I want. Also, if I use water that is lower than the high 190's, my coffee will be sour because the water wasn't hot enough and the grinds are under-extracted, resulting in a sour cup. If I use boiling water, which is too hot, my coffee will be over-extracted and the cup will be bitter. And the French Press is considered one of the more forgiving brewing methods!!! I haven't even considered trying pour-overs, which are the newest rage.
This is why people will spend $500 for a good grinder and a Technivorm brewer. You just have to measure you water, measure your coffee, grind it at a pre-determined setting and let the machine do the rest. There are only a few home brewing machines that get the water hot enough to properly extract the flavor from the coffee beans. Technivorm is one ($300) and Bonavita ($150) is another.
I think most Americans have never had truly good coffee. I know that was true for me until just the last year when I started seriously researching and trying my hand at good coffee. A good cup of coffee, served black, is creamy, smooth and has a sweet taste. I wouldn't have believed that if I hadn't experienced it first-hand.
As a grinder I use a Kuissential Manual Ceramic Burr grinder. Again, sadly, no longer available. Works well. Has a good adjustment for coarseness. Takes some time, but that's the price one pays for good coffee.
__________________
Don't complain about the weather and cower in fear. It's all good weather. Just different.
Don't complain about the weather and cower in fear. It's all good weather. Just different.