Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Just Follow Your Feet! AlphaGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Augusta, GA
    My Bikes
    Volae Expedition, ActionBent Tidal Wave II, Nishiki Olympic, Giant Cypress
    Posts
    515
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm pondering a new bike. I haven't been commuting long. I'm trying to evaluate if a front fork suspension is worth the extra 90 bucks or not. It's usually cheaper to buy it up front, rather than change out later, but do I really need it on a commute. Whadduya think?

  2. #2
    RAGBRAI. Need I say more? Steele-Bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    West Branch, Iowa USA
    My Bikes
    1998 Mongoose NX7.1, 2008 Kona Jake, GT singlespeed (year unknown).
    Posts
    868
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would say yes, mostly because any bike(more than likely) that has a suspension fork, is going to be a better bike (ie. frame, components). They just don't sell high quality MTB's without suspension, even though you can get some nice hybrids.

    I personally commute 10 miles a day and have a front suspension, but if I were commuting longer I would consider getting a road bike.

    If you are deciding between a rigid MTB or a hardtail, I would say go with the hardtail.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,419
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Its getting really hard to find a good non-sus MTB.
    Consider fitting a fixed fork (like a Kona Project) to a good frame. Just make sure you can fit fenders if you feel the urge to stay dry.

    If you want the bike just for the road, consider a different style. That doesn't have to mean a competition racing bike or comfort-fit hybrid. There are cyclo-cross bikes (off road racing) , light touring bikes (for long day rides), standard touring bikes. Check out Jamis, Bianchi and REI for some good value practical bikes.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,419
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    To answer your other Q, No a sus fork serves no purpose on a road going bike and makes climbing more difficult.
    The fixed forks should be supple enough to absorb a lot of road shock, and the lack of moving parts means you have a more reliable machine that takes less servicing.

  5. #5
    NOT a weight weenie Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Posts
    1,762
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would say yes also get it. If you are going the route of MTB with front suspension to commute on, the benefit is of course you can take it off road if you wish. Unlike a road or a hybrid, or even a comfort bike, it will handle better off road. Sure it does not ride as well as a road or touring bike on pavement, but there are downsides to every bike in certain applications. However if this is strictly a commuter, and nothing more you might want to think of a hybrid. I still think a good MTB would be better for if you need to go off the pavement real fast and it is rough doing so a MTB would suit the task better.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    306
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't be afraid to ride rigid. I can commute, ride trails, race xc on my mountain bike. I weighs less, too, and it's good for climbing hills.

  7. #7
    Just Follow Your Feet! AlphaGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Augusta, GA
    My Bikes
    Volae Expedition, ActionBent Tidal Wave II, Nishiki Olympic, Giant Cypress
    Posts
    515
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Actually, I'm thinking in terms of a hybrid. Simply because I don't do mountains or dirt, just daily 5 mi commute. I used to have a mountain bike, but it was stolen. Ouch that still hurts! So the revised question is: Should I get suspension for the front fork on a hybrid (cross bike)?
    Recumbents rock!

  8. #8
    RAGBRAI. Need I say more? Steele-Bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    West Branch, Iowa USA
    My Bikes
    1998 Mongoose NX7.1, 2008 Kona Jake, GT singlespeed (year unknown).
    Posts
    868
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If it is purely for commuting there would be no reason for a suspension fork. And as MichaelW said, such a fork would only add more maintenance to the bike. Also, consider the fact that a suspension fork will add a couple more pounds to the bike. Sorry Hunter, I am a "weight weenie".

  9. #9
    Carfree since '82. Grrr! JonR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Kansas City, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    1,548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I had a daily 5-mi-each-way commute on which I accumulated 13,000 miles without benefit of a suspension fork. Discomfort was the least of my worries! Even though some of the roads were rough, all I needed to do was rise momentarily out of the seat to accomodate steel plates, potholes, big waves of asphalt, etc. Usually this was on my mountain bike. But when I rode the road bike, I just did the same, only I would have to swerve around some stuff that would have given me a pinch flat or other trouble with the more delicate wheels.

    To me it seems suspension for city riding is only added weight, and potential added trouble and expense.

  10. #10
    Senior Mem. & Trail Sage steve33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Asheville NC
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Any suspension of any kind is terribly energy insufficient, would not have it.!!!
    steve33 (aka windwalker)
    http://www.angelfire.com/nc3/nctrailtime/
    A nice place to visit.

  11. #11
    Mr. Cellophane RainmanP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    3,037
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    AlphaGeek,
    I have a Giant Cypress DX with the front suspension fork. It has its benefits, I guess, as I do ride on pretty rough streets, but I would not spend the extra money if I had it to do over again. I would get the model that has just the suspension seat post. When you don't need the extra shock absorption anymore you can tighten the clamp to lock out the suspension.
    Raymond
    If it ain't broke, mess with it anyway!

  12. #12
    Sumanitu taka owaci LittleBigMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    8,945
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I understand the benefits of suspension forks are lost on pavement.

  13. #13
    Love Me....Love My Bike! aerobat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Winnipeg
    My Bikes
    Bikes: Giant hybrid, Trek 4500, Cannondale R800 Some commuting 20mi/day, mostly fitness riding - 20-50 mile rides
    Posts
    1,231
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My commuter bike is a hybrid with rigid forks, an older Giant Innova.

    It rides very well even on rough pavement. I've put smaller tires on than the originals and with the higher tire pressure I feel the bumps slightly more, but as JonR says you can avoid or reduce most of that with riding technique.

    The faster speeds with the smaller tires more than make up for the slightly rougher ride. I don't think you need suspension if you don't intend to go off road. Actually I've taken the hybrid on some light off road trails, with the larger tires, and it was quite adequate.
    "...perhaps the world needs a little more Canada" - Jean Chretian, 2003.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •