Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    2010 Litespeed Xicon
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    any 6 footers riding a 57cm frame?

    I bought a 57cm Sirrus sport, and I'm 6' tall. It feels a little smalle to me, but the guy at the LBS told me that the next size up, 61cm, is only for giants.

  2. #2
    Banned wagathon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You'd think the next size up would be a 59. It is for some makes of bikes but maybe Sirrus does not have that size. If not, my guess is their 61 is not measured c-to-c, in which case, it's not all that big--definitely not for giants. Looking at some other bikes, for example, a 61 Bianchi or Trek is no bigger than a 59 Lemond wheras a 63 Bianchi or Trek is equal to a 61 Lemond.

    P.S., I just checked out the geometry on Specialized's website and they sure make it hard to know what's going on there. They're not giving you what the measurement would be assuming the top bar was horizontal. Even so, the headtube lengths on your brand does seem big, e.g., about 40 mm longer for your 58 than for my 61c Lemond and 63c Trek. It must be a bike that is made for more upright riding. Even your wheelbase is longer (y just a little) so I'd you probably do have the right size frame. If you feel too scrunched, maybe you just need a longer stem.
    Last edited by wagathon; 06-30-06 at 07:11 PM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    2010 Litespeed Xicon
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wagathon
    You'd think the next size up would be a 59. It is for some makes of bikes but maybe Sirrus does not have that size. If not, my guess is their 61 is not measured c-to-c, in which case, it's not all that big--definitely not for giants. Looking at some other bikes, for example, a 61 Bianchi or Trek is no bigger than a 59 Lemond wheras a 63 Bianchi or Trek is equal to a 61 Lemond.

    P.S., I just checked out the geometry on Specialized's website and they sure make it hard to know what's going on there. They're not giving you what the measurement would be assuming the top bar was horizontal. Even so, the headtube lengths on your brand does seem big, e.g., about 40 mm longer for your 58 than for my 61c Lemond and 63c Trek. It must be a bike that is made for more upright riding. Even your wheelbase is longer (y just a little) so I'd you probably do have the right size frame. If you feel too scrunched, maybe you just need a longer stem.
    Thanks! I guess my only gripe is that the saddle needs to be slid all the way back in its track in order for my knee to be properly positioned over the pedal at 3:00 o'clock. The seat tube is definately not 57cm (more like 51cm) but I think they measure it as though the top tube were horizontal. It's a hybrid bike, so it has a little bit of an upright riding position, but it's less upright than I'm used to on my old mountain bike.

  4. #4
    Faith-Vigilance-Service Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Port Orchard, WA
    My Bikes
    Trinity, Paradisus, Centurion, Mongoose, Trek
    Posts
    8,333
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The most important measurement on a bike frame is the top tube length. Find out how much reach you need first, then go from there.
    President, OCP
    --"Will you have some tea... at the theatre with me?"--

  5. #5
    Fattest Thin Man Az B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Directly above the center of the earth
    My Bikes
    Miyata 610, Vinco V, Rocky Mountain Element
    Posts
    2,649
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've got 2 58cm frames and a 61cm frame. I'm 6'1".

    The 61cm frame works, but the reach feels a bit too far, even with a 10mm shorter stem. The 58cm frames initially feel a little small, but after many long rides, they are certainly comfortable.

    I have yet to try a 59cm frame for any distance.

    Az

  6. #6
    Banned wagathon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by buttfish77
    . . . I guess my only gripe is that the saddle needs to be slid all the way back in its track in order for my knee to be properly positioned over the pedal . . . .
    Even so, sounds like you made it work. That can be a bigger challenge on a road bike, compared with mtb bikes with more shallow seat tube angles, for some guys with longer legs (it's also a challenge for riders, especially gals, whose upper leg is relatively long compared to overall leg length). Setback seatposts have simplified things; otherwise, you need a road bike with a more layed back seat tube angle. Then, you're further away from the bars and that can be a problem so you need a shorter stem, or you need a larger frame but there's too little standover height so you need a downward sloping top tube, or . . . My guess is you have a few things to consider which make it more difficult to get an ideal fitting bike right off the rack.
    Last edited by wagathon; 07-01-06 at 09:22 AM.

  7. #7
    LF for the accentdeprived
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Budapest, Hungary
    Posts
    3,550
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Patriot
    The most important measurement on a bike frame is the top tube length.
    Word. I don't know what this crazy obsession with seattube length is... Pretty pointless.
    If you can't measure up the bike and have to go by the manufacturer's sizing, you're better off looking at the range of sizing... E.g.: "they make 5 sizes of this model, I'm 5'11", so the second biggest should be about right"

    Sounds like your ideal size would have been a 59, but a bit smaller is not too bad at all.
    Quote Originally Posted by dutret
    Do you deny that you are clueless or do you just think that "moron" didn't need to be tacked on there?
    Bike on flickr and on FGG

  8. #8
    Senior Member Neist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    219
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 6ft and ride a 57, but check the geometry of it first. I'm riding about 566 Seat Tube / 570 Top Tube.

    Different companies use all different geometries. But if its close to what mine is, I ride mine just fine. In fact, I daresay its the perfect height for me.

    Seat tube matters, but it matters to me on how relative I want my handlebars to my seat. If I'm riding drops and the frame is too small, my saddle is going to be rather high, which is going to affect the ride (because the bars will be slightly lower, technically).
    Quote Originally Posted by soze
    I would use something in addition to the U-lock. Like a guy named Tony with a baseball bat.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    My Bikes
    2010 Litespeed Xicon
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for all the replies! I'm doing OK with the 57cm so far, I just wanted to see if my choice of frame size was way off base.

  10. #10
    train safe buelito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Reston, VA
    Posts
    801
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    bike fit depends a lot on the bike--and the rider
    I have a 57 track bike (fixie), a 56 road bike (standard frame) and a 54 road bike (compact geometry)--I am 6 feet tall. All the bikes 'fit' me pretty well.

  11. #11
    34x25 FTW! oboeguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NYC
    My Bikes
    Scott CR1 '07, Dahon SpeedPro '06
    Posts
    6,002
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Lemond Reno 1998 model in a 57 for me. The top tube is (duh, Lemond) too long but otherwise it fits fine.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Order
    Quote Originally Posted by sknhgy
    I do not want to be associated with the kind of riders that come through my neck of the woods on weekends, dressed in superhero costumes
    Do they wear capes?
    ---

    http://www.cycopaths.net/

  12. #12
    Life is good RonH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Between Lecanto and Hernando Florida, 6 miles west of the Withlacoochee Trail
    My Bikes
    I've had several since 1999 but have settled on my beloved 2001 Litespeed Tuscany and my latest, a 2013 Cannondale CAAD 10.
    Posts
    13,541
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My Jamis Nova is 57cm and I'm 6'-0". Fits like a glove, although some days (maybe when I too tired to get my leg over) it seems a tad too tall.
    My bikes --> 2001 Litespeed Tuscany---2013 Cannondale CAAD 10 2 (5) "Racing Edition"

    Life is like a 10-speed bicycle. Most of us have gears we never use. ~ Charles Schultz

  13. #13
    Commuter First newbojeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,286
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by buttfish77
    Thanks for all the replies! I'm doing OK with the 57cm so far, I just wanted to see if my choice of frame size was way off base.
    It's up to you. I am 5'11", but all leg. I felt smushed on a Trek 56 cm frame and so am riding a 58 cm frame. Need to move the seat forward both for knee positioning and reach, but it much more comfortable for commuting to have the extra leg room.

  14. #14
    Senior Member EGreen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY. Made in France
    Posts
    1,137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not that it matters, because as said it really depends on the maker and the particular rider, but I'm 6' 2", with a longish torso and have a 57cm (classic geometry) Litespeed frame (among a couple of 58 cm frames).

    I was advised that better a bit too small than too large, and to some better a bit too small than 'right' size. (I surmise, to minimize flex) It took some time and adjustments and man is it one sweet ride! I just finished a particularly grueling solo century and afterwards I hurt in all the right places!
    Last edited by EGreen; 07-03-06 at 01:25 AM.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    751
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Try using one of the online fit calculators to see what size frame you should be using given your body measurements. If you aren't of average build, one or more of the frame dimensions will likely need to be compensated for and the calculator will give you an idea of which one.

    I'm 5'11", average build, riding a 57cm Sequoia with a 56.5cm top tube. Based on a fit calculator, the top tube length is about an inch too long for my build so I felt a bit stretched out with the stock 120mm stem and saddle, even with the saddle pushed almost all the way forward. Switching to a 110mm stem and Brooks B-17 saddle (which could be adjusted farther forward) allowed me to get the handlebar/seat distance just right.

  16. #16
    or tarckeemoon, depending marqueemoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    the pesto of cities
    My Bikes
    Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer
    Posts
    7,016
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 6'2" and my road bike is a 57 with a 57cm top tube. With a 120mm stem and a post with a little setback it's comfy. The only time I wish I had a slightly bigger frame is on steep seated climbs where it takes more effort to keep the front end down and tracking straight than I'd like. I think a lot of that has to do with the steep head angle though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •