Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33
  1. #1
    Avatar Bandit jdeane4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Murfreesboro, TN
    Posts
    597
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Which of These Fenders whould You Pick?

    Ok, I am wanting to buy a set of full fenders. I dont know which of these two I should buy. They are both equally priced. They will not be a permanent part of the bike, but I dont want the clip on fenders.


    SKS Road Fenders


    or

    Planet Bike Freddy Fenders



    I personally dont like the look of the mud flaps that the freddy fenders have, but I dont know which is better.

  2. #2
    Certifiable Bike "Expert"
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sks
    I don't even use the offensive term "Fred." -- Sheldon "All Cyclists Are My Friends" Brown (1944-2008)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    3,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Freddy Fenders are very short and have decorative mudflaps that are too short to do anything. The SKS look to be much longer, and you can add mudflaps to them if they are not long enough.

    Paul

  4. #4
    Senior Member ollo_ollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stayton, OR
    My Bikes
    Still have a few left!
    Posts
    3,478
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Of these 2, I would choose SKS. My Torelli now has a Zefal rear fender & a Planet Bike front thanks to a stick that shattered the Zefal front & a gift Freddy takeoff from my LBS. That little flap on the Freddy does look only decorative but it actually deflects quite a bit of water, its just not as effective as a full, wide flap such as the Giles Berthaud leather. Don

  5. #5
    Senior Member joe v's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Belgium
    My Bikes
    90's Colnago Master Competition- ca.'84 Merckx Corsa - '77 Groene Leeuw - ca. '78 Guerciotti - ca.1984 L'Express - 1974 Gitane 'Super Olympic' - Peugeot 1981 PXN10 - 1975 Peugeot PR10 -1974 Norta -1974 Peugeot PX10 LE
    Posts
    653
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    SKS + self-made mudflaps = way to go.

    BTW what's with the avatar, did The Purple One really kidnap Chipcom's dog? Always new the-artist-who-can-walk-under-tables-without-ducking wasn't to be trusted... (Randy Newman knew ages ago!)

  6. #6
    jcm
    jcm is offline
    Gemutlichkeit
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,424
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The factory 'appendages' on the Planet Bikes are useless. I got rid of them and installed stair tread that goes almost to the ground. It's the only way it works. As to the specific brand of fender? It doesn't matter as long as they are the full coverage type.

    The real choice here is whether you want to look stupid with a wet, muddy stripe up your back side and crud all over your bike, OR, geeky but sensible, with a relatively cleaner bike.

  7. #7
    Certifiable Bike "Expert"
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One tip with the SKS - the little tab on the front fender goes IN FRONT of the fork, not behind. I just figured that out.
    I don't even use the offensive term "Fred." -- Sheldon "All Cyclists Are My Friends" Brown (1944-2008)

  8. #8
    Senior Member Brian Ratliff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Near Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Three road bikes. Two track bikes.
    Posts
    9,760
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've used both. The SKS is a much better product. The biggest problem with the planet bike fenders is that they rattle. It is impossible to mount the front fender, IMO, without having it rattle around because it uses a single support on the front. SKS uses a double support on the front, which keeps the fender from swaying, and the fender material itself is of better quality. The PB fenders use plastic which flexes, while the SKS fenders use an aluminum/plastic composite material which is much stiffer and more durable. The hardware and attachment points used by SKS are of better quality in general as well.

    The only issue that sets the PB fenders at a higher level than the SKS fenders is tire clearance and weight. The PB fenders are a little lighter (for the reason that the fender material is not as strong) and the shape of the fender fits in tighter spots better as well. I want to say though, that I have SKS fenders on both my road bikes, and both of them have tight tire clearance.

    You might have problems though if you have a wishbone seat stay or a very curved brake bridge which produces a tight tire clearance. If you have this, you may have to modify your fender to set to go over the top of the brake bridge. SKSs are easier to modify because the material stands up to cutting a drilling better than straight plastic. I also have found that the "lip" on the front fender on both fender types have to be cut off. I've never had a fender where I could keep the lip, because the lip always gets skewed and rubs against the tire, and/or it simply is unsupported and vibrates too much. So I just take a hacksaw and cut the lip off.
    Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
    "If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    07 Fisher Paragon, 00' Lemond Buenos Aries, Specialized Langster, Schwinn World Sport SS townie, 99 SS-Works single speed conversion, early 90s Raleigh roadie rain bike, 07 Fisher Rig, Trek 520, and a home-modified chopper
    Posts
    707
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have both on different bikes. The SKS fenders have stiffer stays and rattle a lot less. They're much quieter overall.

  10. #10
    Daily Rider hairlessbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    My Bikes
    89 Bridgestone MB-3, 93 Bridgestone RB-1,93 Bridgestone MB-1, 95 Klein Fervor, 02 BikeE AT, 06 Surly Cross-check, 8? Schwinn Frontier
    Posts
    638
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Go with the SKS fenders. My Planet Bike Hardcore fenders are okay but they tend to rattle when the bike hits a big bump. They are too plastic for me. I will be switching over to a set of SKS fenders this spring. I agree that those built-in mudflaps are pretty useless.

  11. #11
    Mmmmm potatoes idcruiserman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    1,921
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I bought SKS fenders with the mudflaps. Happy with them after a few months commuting.
    Idaho

  12. #12
    PatronSaintOfDiscBrakes dynaryder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    dropped and lost in Washington DC
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've used SKS and PB and liked them all. If you're looking for a clean look,go with the standard(non-Hardcore) Freddies. No access strut sticking out,and no rattle due to the more solid mounts.

    C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport/Qualifier,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    14,280
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have both. SKS is my preference as well.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,757
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For about the same money as the SKS, I would recommend Giles Berthoud stainless steel fenders. They are no more difficult to mount/unmount than the SKSs. Link to both

  15. #15
    Packfodding 3 caloso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sacramento, California, USA
    My Bikes
    Ridley Excalibur, Gazelle Champion Mondial, On-One Pompino, Specialized Rock Hopper
    Posts
    30,273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Another vote for SKS.



    I had to do a little McGuyvering with p-clips and zipties to fit them on my Trek 660, but in the end I got a very snug and solid fit. I am very happy with them.
    Cyclists of the world, unite! You have nothing to lube but your chains!

  16. #16
    not a role model JeffS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    4,645
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I chose the SKS

  17. #17
    Avatar Bandit jdeane4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Murfreesboro, TN
    Posts
    597
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Are the SKS fenders easy to take on and off quick? I hate the look of those clip on full fenders and want that slick look. But I don't want to wear the fenders on a daily basis. Pretty much only when needed.

  18. #18
    Designated Drinker Wulfheir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    My Bikes
    '04 Kona Fire Mountain
    Posts
    800
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's hard to say which fender I'd pick....



    (i'm sorry, i couldn't resist)
    My Bike Journal Profile

    Oh, you hate your job? There's a support group for that, it's called EVERYONE and they meet at the PUB!

  19. #19
    Senior Member fender1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Berwyn PA
    My Bikes
    I hate bikes!
    Posts
    4,536
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jdeane4
    Are the SKS fenders easy to take on and off quick? I hate the look of those clip on full fenders and want that slick look. But I don't want to wear the fenders on a daily basis. Pretty much only when needed.
    Then you are screwed. The full fenders bolt on under the brakes and to remove you would have to loosen your brakes and readjust each time you removed/installed.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    14,280
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    To remove a set of full standard fenders often would be a PITA. What you are looking for are clip ons but I do not believe these are available as a full fender.
    Also, whenever you forget your fenders it will rain or snow.

  21. #21
    Senior Member Brian Ratliff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Near Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Three road bikes. Two track bikes.
    Posts
    9,760
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Neither the SKS or the PB fenders are fun to repeatedly put on and take off. Both take roughtly the same amount of time to install/de-install.

    If you have a road bike, you could look at SKS "raceblades" if you want something you can put on and take off in a hurry that doesn't look ackward. They are kind of spendy though, $50 dollars last I checked. I was looking at these, but settled for the standard SKS fenders.
    Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
    "If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter

  22. #22
    Certifiable Bike "Expert"
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you had cantis or discs, you could attach the fenders with studs and wing nuts instead of screws for somewhat of a quick-change option. Round here, it rains every day...
    I don't even use the offensive term "Fred." -- Sheldon "All Cyclists Are My Friends" Brown (1944-2008)

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Posts
    326
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What about these for clipons? http://ecom1.planetbike.com/7015.html



    Looks a lot more effective than RaceBlades and almost as good as permanent fenders.

  24. #24
    ♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯ -=(8)=-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
    My Bikes
    Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
    Posts
    7,906
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wulfheir
    It's hard to say which fender I'd pick....

    [IMG].jpg[/IMG]

    (i'm sorry, i couldn't resist)


    I dont see any mex-o-casters ...........
    whats up with that !! ??

    to stay mildy on topic...I just found out the expensive way that
    rigididity is very imortant in the fender material and brackets too...
    Pick the one that has both.
    -ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"

  25. #25
    Slow Rider bwgride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    811
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have both and both seem similar to me. My Freddy's don't rattle (and I've had them for several years now on my commuter). Anyway, if I were to buy new fenders today, I would buy this new model from Planet Bike--Cascadia. It has v-stays for more stability and extra long mud flap:

    http://ecom1.planetbike.com/fenders.html

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •