Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-05-07, 07:32 PM   #1
DXchulo
Upgrading my engine
Thread Starter
 
DXchulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Reno
Bikes:
Posts: 5,926
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Tire width- Is 32 enough for the winter?

I'm moving soon and I'd like to get rid of my MTB and my beater road bike and replace those with 1 do-it-all bike. I'm doing this half for space and half because I'm going to have a longer commute and the MTB is in very bad condition (I got it for free).

I'm thinking about either a Redline 925 or a Surly Steamroller. I might be able to get a pretty good deal on the 925. Supposedly 32 mm tires are fine on the 925, but the Steamroller is fine with 38s. Is that enough of a difference that it should influence my decision? I'll be moving back to Indiana, so it snows, but not all that often. I like to commute in anything besides an all-out blizzard.

I had been riding the MTB in the snow and 25 mm tires in everything else, so I'm not experienced with anything in between.
DXchulo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-07, 07:46 PM   #2
newbojeff
Commuter First
 
newbojeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,286
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
One consideration -- and someone correct me if I'm wrong -- the smallest studded tires are 35 mm Nokians, which I have. I ride a road bike with 28s for much of the winter if the roads are good too.
newbojeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-07, 07:47 PM   #3
squeakywheel
domestique
 
squeakywheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: off the back
Bikes:
Posts: 2,004
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
with the Redline, you won't have the option of using the most popular studded tire.

http://aebike.com/page.cfm?PageID=30...ils&sku=TR1110

Edit: Uh..yeah..what Jeff said.
squeakywheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-07, 08:17 PM   #4
DXchulo
Upgrading my engine
Thread Starter
 
DXchulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Reno
Bikes:
Posts: 5,926
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Do you guys think studded tires are necessary? I made it all winter here without them, albeit with wider tires.
DXchulo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-07, 05:01 AM   #5
squeakywheel
domestique
 
squeakywheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: off the back
Bikes:
Posts: 2,004
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
No, I don't think studded tires are necessary. I reserve the right to change my mind next year, though. That's why I'd prefer the Surly. It gives you the option of studded tires if you later decide to go that way.

Personally, I wouldn't get rid of both your existing bikes. I'd keep one for a bad weather bike and spare commuter. Then, I wouldn't have to worry about the tire width of the nice bike.
squeakywheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-07, 07:08 AM   #6
knucklesandwich
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Somewhere
Bikes: Kona Jake (2006)
Posts: 909
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'd say it depends on your other commuting options when the weather sucks. I biked all winter but on the icy days drove, mainly b/c while I might be fine on studded tires, I don't trust the idiot locals here in VA, for whom a snowstorm is another excuse to drive like jackasses in their SUV's.

I don't know what I'd pick out of those two bikes, but I'd lean towards the one that'd make me happier most of the time...
knucklesandwich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-07, 07:33 AM   #7
rajman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: Miyata 600, Marin Larkspur, Marin Muirwoods, GT tequesta, Fuji Ace
Posts: 970
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think the Hakka W106 comes in a 700c x 35 model: see http://www.peterwhitecycles.com/studdedtires.asp for details.

If your conditions are mostly snow, rather than ice, you can save yourself the expense of studded tires. For me, the added manouverability and traction comes in handy just when you need it - but I've been riding a calgary winter, where we get a lot of ice.
rajman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-07, 08:18 AM   #8
pinkrobe
DNPAIMFB
 
pinkrobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, AB
Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.
Posts: 4,654
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This past week we've got a skiff of snow every day on the roads. For max grip i could run studs, but instead I ran my usual 28C slicks. Unless you get ice, there's not much point in studs. I'll qualify that by saying that they make a huge difference in climbing traction if there is snow on the ground. On the flats, fresh snow up to two inches or so has been no problem on slicks. As soon as I have to climb [or descend], that's when things get dicey and I need the studded tires.
__________________
Proud Member of the HHCMF
'06 Cervelo Soloist Carbon | '09 Titus El Guapo | '09 Misfit diSSent | '09 Wabi Lightning
pinkrobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:29 AM.