Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    tch
    tch is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ashland, Oregon
    My Bikes
    07 Sulry Cross-Check, 05 Giant Reign
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cross Check vs Pacer

    I posted this thread a few months ago classic 1st post bike question . . . and have come to a decision between the cross check and the pacer, but I'm stuck with what frame I want to build up.

    Has anyone ridden each that could give some comparative information?

    The assumed pros to the Pacer on my paved MUP commute is that it will be a bit faster and lighter than the CC. The negative is that it only allows for 28's and I don't know of any studded 28's. I'd most likely want the studs during the winter commutes.

    Looking forward to getting the build started as I move on Wednesday and I want to start the commute in the next few weeks.

  2. #2
    ride for a change modernjess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-check & Moonlander, Pivot Mach 429, Ted Wojcik Sof-Trac, Ridley Orion. Santa Cruz Stigmata
    Posts
    2,011
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Cross Check is definitely a more versatile bike in terms of set up options. The extra tire clearance is one reason I went with the Cross Check. I run 35mm Nokian 106 studs in the winter, and 25mm Ultra gatorskins the rest of the year. Also I run single speed, and the Cross Check has long semi horizontal drop outs and the Pacer has verticle drop-outs, which are not ideal for a SS/FG.

    I'm pretty sure you're right, the Pacer may be a bit faster and lighter due to it's road geometry, but the Cross Check is no slouch, it's very a comfortable road bike and it's ability to be built in practically any configuration really apealled to me. I know that if I want to change stuff as the years go by, it'll be ready.

  3. #3
    Code Warrior mwrobe1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    South suburbs of Chicago, Illinois
    My Bikes
    Schwinn MTB/Raleigh Marathon
    Posts
    620
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Oh man...hands down...go with the Surly.

    Pacer's are ooogly.



    Elwood: It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, 1/2 a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses.

    Jake: Hit it.



  4. #4
    Retro-nerd georgiaboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Morningside - Atlanta
    My Bikes
    2002 Cannondale Badboy, 2004 Bianchi Vigorelli
    Posts
    1,584
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tch
    I posted this thread a few months ago classic 1st post bike question . . . and have come to a decision between the cross check and the pacer, but I'm stuck with what frame I want to build up.

    Has anyone ridden each that could give some comparative information?

    The assumed pros to the Pacer on my paved MUP commute is that it will be a bit faster and lighter than the CC. The negative is that it only allows for 28's and I don't know of any studded 28's. I'd most likely want the studs during the winter commutes.

    Looking forward to getting the build started as I move on Wednesday and I want to start the commute in the next few weeks.
    Sounds like you should get the Crosscheck so as to make sure you can use the studded tires for winter. The weight difference is a moot point if you will be carrying cargo. They are both great frames.

    Crosscheck 56cm = 4.88 lbs (2.2 kg)

    Pacer 56cm = 4.45 lbs. (2.02 kg)

    Difference of .35 lbs. Basically 1/3 of a pound.
    Would you like a dream with that?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •