Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-08, 11:16 AM   #1
tarwheel 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tarwheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia
Posts: 8,437
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
tax credits for bike commuting

Some Congressmen (Sen. Roy Wyden and Rep. Earl Blumenauer, both of Oregon) introduced legislation over the past few years that would extend certain tax credits or deductions for people who bike commute. Does anybody know if that legislation ever passed? I think not, given our current power structure in Washington. However, I'm in the process of doing my taxes for 2007, so I thought I would check to make sure.
tarwheel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-08, 11:39 AM   #2
knucklesandwich
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Somewhere
Bikes: Kona Jake (2006)
Posts: 909
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It was voted down. When you see people in this forum start showing off their new Seven and Moots commuters, you'll know the bill passed.
knucklesandwich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-08, 12:20 PM   #3
Bad Human
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Colorado
Bikes: Dawes Haymaker 1200
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That sucks although it isn't suprising. I bought a hybrid this year and felt the tax credit was going to be a sure thing until I started researching it. I found out that the tax credits for hybrids are only offered until a certain number of each is sold then the credit steadily decreases until it goes away entirely. Luckily I still qualified and used my refund to buy a bike. Apparently the government only cares about rewarding a few people for getting hybrids and then its just to costly. Communist!



N.

http://badhuman.wordpress.com
Bad Human is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-08, 12:36 PM   #4
JeffS
not a role model
 
JeffS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Bikes:
Posts: 4,659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarwheel View Post
Some Congressmen (Sen. Roy Wyden and Rep. Earl Blumenauer, both of Oregon) introduced legislation over the past few years that would extend certain tax credits or deductions for people who bike commute. Does anybody know if that legislation ever passed? I think not, given our current power structure in Washington. However, I'm in the process of doing my taxes for 2007, so I thought I would check to make sure.

It wasn't going to work that way anyway... it would have provided the break to your employer.
JeffS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-08, 03:04 PM   #5
tarwheel 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tarwheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia
Posts: 8,437
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Isn't this a wonderful country? Tax breaks for buying a Hummer but not bike commuting! Maybe someday.
tarwheel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-08, 07:31 PM   #6
Wheels4
Senior Member
 
Wheels4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Decatur, alabama
Bikes: Trek Hybrid and Scott Roadie
Posts: 348
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i wish i could sit in on one meeting with the Committee on ways and means .... and talk to them about this subject.
__________________
all-around: 09 Trek 7.3 FX
roadie: 09 Scott S60
Wheels4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-08, 08:21 PM   #7
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 112 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffS View Post
It wasn't going to work that way anyway... it would have provided the break to your employer.
But the employer in turn hands over the money to the employee. It is a hassle for employers and that is why many do not provide the benifit to employees for the current approved commute methods (like parking, bus and train passes).

If parking is an employee benifit and your company has to pay monthly for a parking pass for each employee, try seeing if you can get the monthly cash rather than the parking card. That is what is working for me.
Not to mention, our parking fee went up Jan 1, 08 from $75 to $100 per month.$$$

Last edited by CB HI; 03-13-08 at 11:30 PM.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-08, 01:23 AM   #8
dobovedo
simply bikin'
 
dobovedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Asheville, NC
Bikes: 2009 Specialized Roubaix Pro; 2009 Specialized Tricross Sport; 2009 Specialized Rockhopper 29er Comp; 2006 Flyte Arsenal; 2001 Bianchi Reparto Corse Boron XL; 2007 Raleigh One Way; 1986 Raleigh Alyeska Touring
Posts: 404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffS View Post
It wasn't going to work that way anyway... it would have provided the break to your employer.
Well, if it ever happens, my employer can keep it. They can use it to have the carpets cleaned from me dragging my snow and crud covered bikes through the halls and into my office.
dobovedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-08, 01:33 AM   #9
Tude 
Blasted Weeds
 
Tude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Trek 1200C, Specialized Rockhopper, Giant Yukon FX, Giant Acapulco
Posts: 1,182
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dobovedo View Post
Well, if it ever happens, my employer can keep it. They can use it to have the carpets cleaned from me dragging my snow and crud covered bikes through the halls and into my office.
hehe, I take my bike up an elevator to the 5th floor and by the time it reaches the storeroom (even if I've slammed the bike down a few times down on the sidewalk to excise the snow/slush) there's always the clump that blobs off.

OTOH, someone was telling me that NYS was looking into this - but I have yet to find anything about this.
Tude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-08, 12:51 PM   #10
Bill Kapaun
Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
Posts: 9,198
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Think of the state & federal fuel taxes you AREN'T paying, when you ride your bike.
I'd rather not pay a tax in the first place instead of having the gov. give me back part of it.
Where would these rebates come from? Taxpayers!
Bill Kapaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-08, 01:05 PM   #11
Rob_E
Senior Member
 
Rob_E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Bikes: Surly World Troller, Dahon Boardwalk, Raleigh 20, and the frame of a Surly Longhaul Trucker
Posts: 1,937
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun View Post
Think of the state & federal fuel taxes you AREN'T paying, when you ride your bike.
I'd rather not pay a tax in the first place instead of having the gov. give me back part of it.
Where would these rebates come from? Taxpayers!
Amen. Whatever refunds they might offer, would, I assume, be to encourage using less gas and thus easing demand, decreasing wear and tear on the roads, contributing less to pollution, etc. If all these problems are caused by gas-driven vehicles, pay for them out of taxes levied against gasoline. You haven't just encouraged commuting to work. You've encouraged alternative transportation and mass transit for all purposes.

Encouraging favourable behavior is good, but if you want to effect change, I would think that providing disincentives for the undesirable behaviors would be better.
Rob_E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-08, 09:37 PM   #12
JasonC
Senior Member
 
JasonC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Bikes: Trek Pilot 1.0, Giant Sedona (old, winter/rain bike)
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun View Post
Think of the state & federal fuel taxes you AREN'T paying, when you ride your bike.
I'd rather not pay a tax in the first place instead of having the gov. give me back part of it.
Where would these rebates come from? Taxpayers!
This is an interesting comment.

I agree with it 100%, but as a fan of "use taxes" or "user fees" over income taxes, it makes me wonder about something.

It seems to me that the government can only subsidize biking to a certain point. For every person who rides a bike to work, the government gets less money in gas taxes. And if they are subsidizing biking at the same time, then they are really starting to lose money. Granted, the proposed credit isn't huge, but at a certain point something has to give.

A similar situation popped up a few years ago. With consumers starting to purchase more fuel-efficient vehicles, some states were considering replacing the gas tax with a "mileage tax"... taxing you per mile driven. Although, it wasn't very popular with the public and I don't think it got anywhere.

I offer no answers... I just present a puzzle (at least, its a puzzle in my mind).

-Jason
JasonC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-08, 01:56 AM   #13
Bill Kapaun
Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
Posts: 9,198
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Oregon is "investigating" the mileage tax. Motor vehicles would be equipped with a GPS device to track miles traveled and who knows what else they would track!
You'd pay the same tax per mile if you were driving a Hummer or a Prius! Totally stupid!
It amazes me to see how much fuel is wasted in drive up windows across the country. People will idle their vehicles for 15 minutes in line at Taco Bell etc. Park it and walk in!
Bill Kapaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-08, 03:42 AM   #14
Chris L
Every lane is a bike lane
 
Chris L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia - passionfruit capital of the universe!
Bikes:
Posts: 9,626
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonC View Post
This is an interesting comment.

I agree with it 100%, but as a fan of "use taxes" or "user fees" over income taxes, it makes me wonder about something.

It seems to me that the government can only subsidize biking to a certain point. For every person who rides a bike to work, the government gets less money in gas taxes. And if they are subsidizing biking at the same time, then they are really starting to lose money. Granted, the proposed credit isn't huge, but at a certain point something has to give.
The issue is actually much more fundamental than this (although it's a valid consideration). How exactly does one determine the subsidy that a "bike commuter" is entitled to? If you offer someone a rebate when they buy the bike, it may well just sit in the garage unused. There's no accurate way to measure just how much someone is actually riding the thing to work.

The idea of a tax-break for bike commuters is all very well in theory, but it all falls apart when one takes an honest look at the tax system and starts to plug figures in. First of all, you only get a tax-deduction on amounts you actually spend. Given that the maintenance on a bike is already considerably cheaper than that of a car, a sizeable chunk of the deduction is gone right there. Now here in Australia, most working individuals have an income that has them on a 30% marginal rate of tax. So take 30% of your deduction to get the real tax saving (because you would have only been paying 30% of your income to the taxman anyway). And don't forget, if you're playing by the rules, you can only count the wear and tear that accures over commuting miles -- and not your weekend club rides or multi day bike tours.

At the end of the year, the amount that ends up in your pocket is very small. It's virtually negligible when you consider that bicycling to work is already cheaper than driving to work by $5-10,000 in most cases. Frankly, if the existing savings aren't going to entice more people to ride to work (which may or may not be a good thing for those who currently do), then this policy certainly won't. That's probably the real reason it got voted down.
__________________
"I am never going to flirt with idleness again" - Roy Keane
"We invite everyone to question the entire culture we take for granted." - Manic Street Preachers.
My blog.
My bike tours. Japan tour page under construction.
Chris L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-08, 06:03 AM   #15
Rob_E
Senior Member
 
Rob_E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Bikes: Surly World Troller, Dahon Boardwalk, Raleigh 20, and the frame of a Surly Longhaul Trucker
Posts: 1,937
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonC View Post
This is an interesting comment.

I agree with it 100%, but as a fan of "use taxes" or "user fees" over income taxes, it makes me wonder about something.

It seems to me that the government can only subsidize biking to a certain point. For every person who rides a bike to work, the government gets less money in gas taxes. And if they are subsidizing biking at the same time, then they are really starting to lose money. Granted, the proposed credit isn't huge, but at a certain point something has to give.
This is why I feel like taxes should be more closely tied to how/where they will be used. If you're using gas taxes to pay for things like road repair and countering the effects car-created pollution (not that they are, but wouldn't it be nice) then the fewer cars on the road, the less the need for those taxes. And if the cost of any gas-related activities becomes too high, those costs get passed back to consumers via the gas tax, further encouraging them to ease off the gas use. I'm sure that system would be difficult to implement, too, but it makes more sense to me than a credit towards non-car drivers.
Rob_E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-08, 06:50 AM   #16
tarwheel 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tarwheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia
Posts: 8,437
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Hey, I wasn't necessarily advocated for tax breaks, but would certainly take advantage of them if available. I do agree that the gas tax should be higher as a disincentive to driving motor vehicles. But what really irks me is that our government continues to give fairly substantial tax breaks to people who buy Hummers and other gas hogs that they supposedly use in their jobs. This is a crime.
tarwheel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-08, 07:48 AM   #17
Hobartlemagne 
Spelling Snob
 
Hobartlemagne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Plano, Texas
Bikes: Panasonic DX4000, Bianchi Pista
Posts: 2,862
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun View Post
Oregon is "investigating" the mileage tax. Motor vehicles would be equipped with a GPS device to track miles traveled and who knows what else they would track!
You'd pay the same tax per mile if you were driving a Hummer or a Prius! Totally stupid!
It amazes me to see how much fuel is wasted in drive up windows across the country. People will idle their vehicles for 15 minutes in line at Taco Bell etc. Park it and walk in!
That sounds terrible. So balsy, big brother is going to come right out and tell you that your every movement
in the car will be under surveillance.
__________________

The first rule of flats is You don't talk about flats!
Hobartlemagne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-08, 08:39 AM   #18
idcruiserman
Mmmmm potatoes
 
idcruiserman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Idaho
Bikes:
Posts: 1,921
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun View Post
Think of the state & federal fuel taxes you AREN'T paying, when you ride your bike.
I'd rather not pay a tax in the first place instead of having the gov. give me back part of it.
Where would these rebates come from? Taxpayers!
+1

Seems like you should be living in eastern Oregon .
idcruiserman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-08, 02:26 PM   #19
retromullet
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yep, 100% agree. Gee, thanks for giving me back what was mine in the first place. Especially since you need it sooo much more than I do.
retromullet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-08, 06:00 PM   #20
Rob_E
Senior Member
 
Rob_E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Bikes: Surly World Troller, Dahon Boardwalk, Raleigh 20, and the frame of a Surly Longhaul Trucker
Posts: 1,937
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarwheel View Post
Hey, I wasn't necessarily advocated for tax breaks, but would certainly take advantage of them if available. I do agree that the gas tax should be higher as a disincentive to driving motor vehicles. But what really irks me is that our government continues to give fairly substantial tax breaks to people who buy Hummers and other gas hogs that they supposedly use in their jobs. This is a crime.
I hear you. I actually heard a part of a story where some official was lamenting the lost revenue from taxes as cars become more fuel efficient. I didn't get the whole story, but I call B.S. anyway . For one thing, cars aren't really all that more fuel efficient. I actually find them to be surprisingly inefficient, except for hybrids (and if you want to make up for lost revenue on hybrids, tax the batteries just like you do the gas). Almost every time I see a commercial where they're boasting about their new, more fuel efficient cars, they're always touting milage very similar to what I get in my 1991 Ford Escort Wagon. Sorry, if my ten year old car even comes close to the new one, then they haven't been trying for fuel efficiency at all. Also the price of gas has shot up. So, assuming any gas taxes are done on a percentage basis, they should still be coming out ahead even if people were buying less gas.
Rob_E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-08, 06:13 PM   #21
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 112 Post(s)
All the gas taxes I have seen have been per gallon.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-08, 09:10 PM   #22
macteacher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Suburbia, Ontario
Bikes: Specialized FSR
Posts: 882
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
there is just no way to regulate, who commutes and who does not. The best thing they can do is eliminate taxes on bikes sold. Now thats an incentive. The Ontario government, waived its 8% sales tax on all bikes under $1000.00. Not bad, although it should have been waived for bikes under $1500
macteacher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-08, 06:01 AM   #23
sasquatch2
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I just estimated my 10 cent/mile deduction we to get in NJ and came up with about $160, hardly worth itemizing. anyone deduct this, is it really that miniscule? Maybe I could get taxpayers to subsidize a new bike like an SUV, I could buy a top of the line commuter and still have $86,000 left over for to invest in stimulating the economy! From CBS news: "It’s a highly stimulating provision in the administration’s economic stimulus program. The loophole would allow someone who buys an $102,581 Hummer H1 for “business purposes” to deduct $87,135 from his taxes immediately. Seriously." http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/...in537649.shtml
sasquatch2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-08, 07:13 AM   #24
evblazer
Thread Killer
 
evblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Marfan Syndrome-Clyde-DFW, TX
Bikes: Fuji Touring Xtracycle, Merlin Road, Bacchetta Giro 26 (Sold), Challenge Hurricane, Cruzbike Sofrider
Posts: 1,845
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Naw that subsidy isn't that great. They high income person still ends up paying $68,947 for the hummer and a lower income person would end up saving paying more because they have less taxes. A $300 tax deduction or a $2,000 tax deduction still will probably mean I take the standard deduction because itemizing won't get me any better.

You gotta get the Arizon Alternate Fuel Tax credit from back in the late 90s. 30k tax credit on bi-fuel vehicle. Free truck or sub 10k SUV anyone? http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39f3a12054e3.htm

I got a tax credit last year on installing my solar hot water heater why not my commuter bike?
evblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-08, 06:43 PM   #25
ChipSeal
www.chipsea.blogspot.com
 
ChipSeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South of Dallas, Texas
Bikes: Giant OCR C0 road
Posts: 1,026
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
ChipSeal found this article, and because it seemed on topic for this thread, he bumped the thread.

California has passed this law: "If your place of work has 50 persons or more employed for them and subsidizes leased parking for you and your fellow employees, then they must participate in the Parking Cash-Out program, offering you a cash allowance in lieu of a parking space."

ChipSeal says that more can be found here:

http://www.carectomy.com/index.php/P...ys-Not-to-Park
ChipSeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 AM.