Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cross-check improvements

    I am getting a bike for my graduation gift from my father (top of my class, cheers for me). I have decided to build up a surly cross-check, and so far the only deviations from the C-C complete are going to be an 8 speed gear hub on the back, a triple crank in the front, and a leather saddle. Where else would upgrading a part be advisable? I read something about the brakes not being spectacular, but I couldn't locate the thread again.

  2. #2
    bulletproof tiger ok_commuter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Waterford 2200, Litespeed Tuscany, Salsa La Cruz, Kona Fire Mountain
    Posts
    1,934
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Go with a compact double on the front unless you have a really good reason for the triple.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Northern VT
    My Bikes
    recumbent & upright
    Posts
    1,554
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    CxCk stock brakes are ok,
    the stock brake pads need replacement- suggest salmon koolstops.
    also the stock wheels- make sure they tensioned and trued correctly.
    don't forget the FrameSaver.

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by martianone View Post
    make sure they tensioned and trued correctly
    Definitely! If you ride the stock wheels, check the spoke tension on the rear wheel often during the first month. Mine started to self-destruct on the ride home one night about 3 weeks after I got it. Replaced the stock wheels with ultegra/open pros.

  5. #5
    Perineal Pressurized dobber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Ebritated
    Posts
    6,556
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you're going that far, why not just build the frame up from scratch.
    This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.

  6. #6
    Gears? CliftonGK1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2009 Spesh Singlecross, 2011 RM Flow1
    Posts
    11,321
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by carno View Post
    Definitely! If you ride the stock wheels, check the spoke tension on the rear wheel often during the first month. Mine started to self-destruct on the ride home one night about 3 weeks after I got it. Replaced the stock wheels with ultegra/open pros.
    The stock wheels are fine as long as you de/re-tension them initially, and check them again around 200 miles.
    Iv'e got over 2000 miles on mine since January and they're fine. I haven't even had to true them since 300 miles in, after they initially 'settled'.

  7. #7
    ride for a change modernjess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-check & Moonlander, Pivot Mach 429, Ted Wojcik Sof-Trac, Ridley Orion. Santa Cruz Stigmata
    Posts
    2,016
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dobber View Post
    If you're going that far, why not just build the frame up from scratch.
    +1 - the complete is a decent bike, but really like most complete bikes it's series of compromises in order to come in at a price point. IF you can build one up from the frame the way you want it. It's the only way to go if you got the money and the time.

    It deserves better wheels: a nicely built set of open pros with Ultegra hubs is a good choice.
    105 level group at least.
    Avid shorty 6 brakes with koolstop pads (I prefer black to salmon, they're too grippy for me, and make the fork shudder at times)
    I'd put different levers on it, The feel of the Cane Creeks are much better to me than those skinny shimano levers. OR get some 105 brifters. Better yet get Dura ace, wait I'm getting carried away....
    Brooks saddle is a good choice.

    You sure you need a triple? Compact crankset would work better, but unless you are in hill country or going to be huffing a big load all the time a regular double is usually plenty.

    oh yeah, congratulations on your school performance. That's something to really be proud of. Well, that and you new cross check!

  8. #8
    M_S
    M_S is offline
    All Mod Cons M_S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Face down in a snowbank
    My Bikes
    K2 Enemey Cyclocross franken build; Redline D660 29er, Volpe SS Cross
    Posts
    3,694
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Maybe I'm missing something, but how does the chain stay tensioned with a triple crank and no rear derailleur?

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The shop guy mentioned a compact double but when I said I wanted to do some light touring he advised me to go for a triple. In what ways is a compact double superior to a triple and vice versa?

    I'll definitely research the wheels some more.

    The tension problem occurred to the me as well but the shop guy says he can set up a tensioner. Does that ruin the point of an internal derailleur?

  10. #10
    M_S
    M_S is offline
    All Mod Cons M_S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Face down in a snowbank
    My Bikes
    K2 Enemey Cyclocross franken build; Redline D660 29er, Volpe SS Cross
    Posts
    3,694
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    it doesn't ruin the point, I guess, but make sure the tensioner takes up enough slack.

    I'd personally go with a standard rear derailleur and triple for touring.

    If you want to tour though, why are you getting the crosscheck and not the Long Haul Trucker?

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am going for the Cross-Check because I felt sluggish on the LHT and will only do light touring, which I have been told the C-C check handle just fine. Plus, I am going to be using this bike to get around and when I am not touring I will appreciate the zippier frame.

    On a side note, since I am building the bike up, I am going to go get the frame painted something other than black or grey. I really like the olive color the LHT comes in.

  12. #12
    Senior Member climbhoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Parker, CO
    My Bikes
    SS Surly Crosscheck; '91 Cannondale 3.0
    Posts
    1,657
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Y'know, you have a common problem.

    I wonder when bike mgers. are going to notice the trend and come out with a bike that has a touring bike's comfort and overall amenities but in a zippier package.

    The Pake C'Mute was and is a good attempt, and I'd take it for the geometry, except the steel they use sucks and it's heavy.

    Give me some quality Waterford, a 400mm fork with braze ons, slacker touring/cross geometry with, say, 430mm chainstays and a taller headtube and I'm happy! Oh yeah, and the Cross Check BB is WAY high! I mean, 70 is fine for BB drop. I don't need 66!

    Maybe I'll just get a custom shop to build this for me when I have the duckets...
    View my blog: climbhoser.blogspot.com

  13. #13
    Perineal Pressurized dobber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Ebritated
    Posts
    6,556
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 6strikekickball View Post
    On a side note, since I am building the bike up, I am going to go get the frame painted something other than black or grey. I really like the olive color the LHT comes in.
    I like the blue of the Traveler Check
    This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.

  14. #14
    Some Guy russ3706's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Nompton, OK
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by climbhoser View Post
    Y'know, you have a common problem.

    Oh yeah, and the Cross Check BB is WAY high! I mean, 70 is fine for BB drop. I don't need 66!
    Not trying to flame, but is 4mm of BB drop really going to make that big of a difference? Can you guys really tell the difference if you hopped on a bike with a bottom bracket that was 3/16ths of an inch different than another? Or am I missing something here?

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lincoln, Nebraska
    My Bikes
    '07 Trek 1500, '08 Surly Cross Check, '09 Masi Speciale Sprint custom build
    Posts
    4,568
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 6strikekickball View Post
    I am getting a bike for my graduation gift from my father (top of my class, cheers for me). I have decided to build up a surly cross-check, and so far the only deviations from the C-C complete are going to be an 8 speed gear hub on the back, a triple crank in the front, and a leather saddle. Where else would upgrading a part be advisable? I read something about the brakes not being spectacular, but I couldn't locate the thread again.
    I just bought one. The brakes work, but they are super cheap. Ask me in about a hundred miles if I think they work well enough. I think they're about as strong as the caliper breaks on my road bike (which aren't spectacular, but they're not junk).

    The tires that come on it suck. They might be nice for cross, but they're awful on the pavement in a turn. That should be obvious from the tread though. I can't wait until my slicks come in .

    I also stuck a Brook's saddle on it. It rides nice with the Brook's saddle. I feel the bumps, but in a very different and much gentler way than I feel them on my aluminum road bike.

    I haven't even ridden the bike enough to get the saddle height where I want it yet, so I'm afraid you'll have to wait a while before I can give a better report!

  16. #16
    actin' the foo ragboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    yo mamma's
    My Bikes
    several
    Posts
    837
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ok_commuter View Post
    Go with a compact double on the front unless you have a really good reason for the triple.
    +1

    A triple is unnecessary unless you're going to be doing some steep hills. I rode my Cross Check on a 5-day tour last year with road slick tires and it performed great with the stock double crank.

    My road bike has a triple and the occassional chain rub from cross chaining is annoying.

    Also, the stock Cross Check is great as it is. I slapped on a Brooks, SKS fenders and 38 WTB trail tires and couldn't hope for a better city bike. People get too hung up on 105/tiagra/Ultegra issue. You're not racing it, so the stock Tiagra is fine.
    ugh.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •