Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

This article really puts into perspective how to deal with angry drivers

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

This article really puts into perspective how to deal with angry drivers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-08, 11:04 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Throwmeabone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This article really puts into perspective how to deal with angry drivers

Some of the things I've read here like dispensing "u-lock justice" and experiences like being spit on have sometimes left me wanting to kick the next guys ass who messes with me on the road. I even pulled up next to a car once that honked at me intending to chew them out. Luckily it ended up being someone I knew that was just honking because they recognized me, and it didn't become a confrontation. After reading this article I fully intend to ignore harassing drivers. Fortunately the worst harassment I've gotten is just being honked at a handful of times. I know of course that a cyclist is no match for a 3,000 pound vehicle but I never thought anyone would stoop low enough to literally use a car as a weapon!

Legally Speaking with Bob Mionske - Bikes v. cars
By Bob Mionske

To the casual observer, it may seem as though tempers have been rising along with the temperatures this summer, but as we’ll see, we know that the summer heat has nothing to do with it. Nevertheless, add higher gas prices, more bikes on the road, and — why not? — alcohol to the usual tension between motorists and cyclists, and you’ve got a potent cocktail for conflict.

On July 4, two southern California cyclists ran headlong into that conflict as they made their way through Brentwood’s Mandeville Canyon, a popular weekend destination for cyclists who want to put in a maximum of miles with a minimum of traffic signals. Ron Peterson, 40, a southern California cycling coach, and Christian Stoehr, 29, a member of the West Los Angeles Cycling Club, and both members of Team Cynergy Cycles, had joined some 300 cyclists for a holiday ride up Mandeville Canyon Road — a five mile climb without a single traffic light. On the descent, somebody crashed. Peterson and Stoehr stayed behind with the injured cyclist until the paramedics arrived, then continued their descent towards Sunset Boulevard, two abreast, along the twists and turns of Mandeville Canyon Road. A late model Infiniti sedan approached them from behind and honked; Peterson obligingly pulled ahead of Stoehr to let the driver pass. Not quite ready to hurry along his way, the driver buzzed Stoehr and Peterson, passing within less than a foot of their handlebars, and shouting his profanity-laced advice to ride single file. Peterson fired back with some choice words of his own; the driver then quickly veered into the path of the two cyclists and braked hard — “as hard as he could,” Peterson recalled.

Peterson went face-first through the rear window of the Infiniti, breaking teeth and nearly severing his now-broken nose. Stoehr, riding just behind Peterson, nearly steered clear of the car, clipping it just enough to catapult him over his bars. He landed on the road just ahead of the car, separating his shoulder on impact.
The driver, Dr. Christopher T. Thompson [Note: NOT the same Dr. Christopher Thompson who has been threatened and harassed by angered cyclists since the incident], exited his car, identified himself as a doctor, but according to Peterson, “from that point on, he never offered any help” — despite having spent 29 years as an emergency room doctor.

Dr. Thompson was arrested on suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon; he was later released on $30,000 bail. Dr. Thomspon, who lives on Mandeville Canyon Road, and whose wife Lynne sits on the board of the Upper Mandeville Canyon Association, was subsequently described as “a great guy who has been active in the community” by board president Wendy-Sue Rosen. "People here are very, very angry at bicyclists and their disregard for the laws of the road," Rosen noted. Reports that residents had been spat upon by cyclists only further fueled the anger; reports of what had triggered the spitting incidents were not as forthcoming from the angered residents.

Speaking on behalf of Dr. Thompson afterwards, his attorney emphatically denied “that there was any road rage incident. It was a very unfortunate accident.” Unfortunately for Dr. Thompson, the “accidental” nature of the alleged assault was quickly called into question when it was revealed that he had been involved in a strikingly similar incident a few short months before, in March of 2008.

Cyclist Patrick Watson, one of two cyclists involved in the March incident with Dr. Thompson, recalled that, as on the July 4th incident, the driver had braked suddenly and hard, sending a cyclist to the ground; the driver “then ran me off the road and as I jumped back onto the pavement he slammed on his brakes right in front of us.”

According to Watson, the driver then drove straight at the fallen cyclist, then again “drove straight at me.” The quick-thinking Watson entered the driver’s license number into his cell phone and reported the incident. Although the Los Angeles Police Department promptly investigated the March incident, the Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley declined to file charges against Dr. Thompson, saying the case wasn’t “a winner.”

If this coddling left Dr. Thompson feeling enabled to continue assaulting cyclists, the feeling didn’t last long. His luck with prosecutors ran out after the second assault in Mandeville canyon; in connection with the July 4th incident, he has been charged with two felony counts of reckless driving causing injury, and two felony counts of battery with serious bodily injury. Although no charges have yet been filed in the March assault, Patrick Watson’s quick-thinking and subsequent complaint to the LAPD present a serious obstacle to any defense claims that Thompson’s actions on July 4th were just “a very unfortunate accident.”

A few days after Dr. Thomson’s second run-in with cyclists, another road rage incident broke out in Portland, Oregon, again between a driver and a cyclist, but this time, with a twist. Colin Yates, 47, a bike mechanic, was driving home with his family on July 6, when he alleged that a cyclist who was riding erratically nearly collided with him before running a red light. Yates reported that he pulled up next to the cyclist — later identified as Steven McAtee, 31 — and told him that he was making other cyclists look bad. McAtee’s response? He allegedly urged Yates to get out of his car and fight. When Yates refused, McAtee raised his bike over his head and began slamming it into the front of Yates’ car. Yates, finally having had enough of McAtee’s behavior, exited his vehicle, and was promptly attacked by McAtee, who now began slamming his bike into Yates. While Yates was being assaulted, a passer-by punched McAtee, knocking him down. A crowd of passing cyclists gathered, and assuming that a motorist had injured a cyclist, many began taking photos of Yates. When the police — who had received a report of a car-on-bicycle crash — arrived, they heard conflicting versions of which party was the aggressor in the incident, but after talking with a witness who was too afraid to speak openly in front of the crowd, eventually decided that McAtee was the aggressor, and placed him under arrest; he was charged with third-degree assault, criminal mischief, disorderly conduct, and driving under the influence of intoxicants.

One week later, a speeding driver who passed a little too close to a Portland cyclist — 37 year old Jason Rehnberg — on a residential street elicited an admonishment to “slow down, gashole!” Tires smoked as the driver, 21 year old James Millican, screeched to a halt and leapt out, threatening to beat the cyclist. The cyclist attempted to escape, but after a few moments, jumped off his bike and onto the hood of the car when the still-enraged Millican drove straight at him, crushing his bike. The event made national news when a bystander got cellphone video footage of the driver careening down the street with the terrified cyclist clinging to the hood of the car. Eventually, Millican slowed down enough for Rehnberg to escape from his perch on the hood. Later that day, Millican was arrested and charged with kidnapping, second-degree attempted assault, driving under the influence of intoxicants, third-degree criminal mischief and reckless driving.

Incredibly, two days after Millican assaulted Rehnberg, Portland was witness to yet another spectacle of road rage; this third incident began when 23 year old bike courier Adam Leckie allegedly cut off a vehicle; riding in the vehicle was cyclist Patrick Schrepping, 30, and a co-worker of Colin Yates, the bike mechanic involved in the July 6th road rage incident. As Leckie cycled on his way, Schrepping yelled at him for cutting off his friend who was driving, and then delivering the coup de grace, yelled at him for not wearing a helmet. According to Leckie, he had his helmet with him, but was not wearing it because he wanted to cool off — not that he owes an explanation to anybody. But more to the point, Leckie claims he had had a bad day, and the “get a helmet” comment was just the straw that broke the camel’s back. After yelling back at Schrepping, Leckie apparently reversed course, and followed the SUV containing Schrepping and his friend to the restaurant where they planned to have diner. While Schrepping and his friend were inside, Leckie rode by and keyed the door; unbeknownst to Leckie, however, Schrepping was watching, and he ran out to confront Leckie. A brawl erupted, during the course of which Leckie’s u-lock fell to the ground; Schrepping alleges that the u-lock fell when Leckie swung it at him. Schrepping dove for the u-lock, and in a turn of the tables, delivered some “u-lock justice” to the messenger, opening up a 1-inch gash in Leckie’s head. At that point, a bystander stepped in and broke up the fight. When police arrived — Schrepping says that he called the police — they cited Leckie for criminal mischief and arrested Schrepping on suspicion of assault. Subsequently, Leckie and Shcrepping apologized to each other, and dropped their respective charges; the District Attorney is still reviewing the case.

Something about these incidents, occurring in quick succession during the first two weeks of July, captured our collective attention; for the Portland, Oregon-based The Oregonian, each new incident was evidence of a “bikes vs. cars” war, and as such, merited successive, almost daily above-the-fold headlines in the newsstands. And then the national media took notice. First, Newsweek declared that a surge in ridership had spurred a “new kind of road rage,” in the July 28 article Pedal vs.
Metal. Of course, for anybody who has actually been on a bike before this summer, Newsweek’s discovery of this “new kind of road rage” was very old news indeed.

The New York Times weighed in one week later, addressing the clash between cyclists and motorists head-on in the August 8 article Moving Target .

Of course, despite national attention being focused, even if only briefly, on the issue, “bikes vs. cars” violence wasn’t winding down. On July 25, just three days before the Newsweek article was published, “bike vs. cars” violence broke out again, when the monthly Critical Mass ride crossed paths with a driver who was taking his passenger to her birthday party. It began as other Critical Mass incidents have, with some of the riders corking the driver as the rest of the riders rode past. The driver — identified only as “Mark,” a 23 year old travel agent and former bicycle commuter — reported waiting patiently, at first, but after tiring of waiting, he decided to back up and take a different route. As he tried to back up and leave, the cyclists responded by surrounding his car, preventing him from moving in any direction. That’s when the situation began to deteriorate; the driver reports that some of the cyclists began pulling on his mirrors, taunting him with threats that they would tip his car. His response? Feeling intimidated, and “concerned for my safety," Mark began revving his engine. “[I] was going to…try to be macho and scare some people. I didn’t realize my car was in first [gear].”

As he popped his clutch, Mark’s car lurched forward, striking two of the cyclists who were hemming him in. He was immediately swarmed, and reports that one cyclist tried to punch him. At that point, fearing for his safety, he drove off, with one cyclist — Seattle Attorney Tom Braun — still under his wheel, and another cyclist who had jumped onto the hood for safety clinging to his roof rack. A block away, he heard somebody shout “Someone’s really hurt,” so he stopped his car. “I thought I just knocked two bikes over,” Mark reported. “I wanted to get away from the situation but if I’d hurt someone, I didn’t want to flee.” When the cyclists caught up with him, they began smashing his windows and slashing his tires, reportedly to “in order to make sure that he did not continue operating his vehicle through the city like a madman.”

As Mark exited his car, somebody, attacking from behind, hit him in the head with a U-lock, opening up a large gash in Mark’s head. Cyclists David Maxwell, 23, and John Lawson, 24, were arrested on charges of Malicious Mischief, but charges have not yet been filed in the case. Outside of the courthouse, arguing that Seattle police should have investigated the driver’s role in the altercation, Maxwell said "I think the driver should be in the position we're in.”

The cyclist who opened up Mark’s head with his U-lock was interviewed as a witness by police, before another witness identified him as the assault suspect. Seattle police, who have his name from the interview, are still searching for him, and expect to file charges when he is found. Speaking afterwards about the violence, Lawson noted that "Critical Mass is supposed to be a positive thing. This isn't what it's supposed to be about."

One week later, on August 2, “bikes vs. cars” violence spilled into the headlines once again, this time from just Utah. It was on the Mirror Lake Highway, between Salt Lake City and Kamas; the highway was posted for the Tour de Park City that day. Cyclist Shane Dunleavy reports that as he was on a morning training ride, a pickup truck pulled up alongside him.

"The guy pulled up next to me and was already in a rage,” Dunleavy recalled. “When he started screaming out his window at me, I said something back about having a right to be on the road."

That only further enraged the driver, who began swerving into Dunleavy. The truck’s passenger door was now being repeatedly pressed against Dunleavy’s knee, pushing him off the road, and the mirror was in position to topple him over, so Dunleavy attempted to push off the truck’s mirror; as he did so, the mirror broke.

Now the driver was really mad — “He went nuts," Dunleavy said. "He gunned it right into us and knocked me over. I was dragged along for a little while and pulled my knees back just as he ran over the bike."


Miraculously, Dunleavy wasn’t injured…But the driver wasn’t done with his rampage. After running Dunleavy down, the driver stopped, and jumped out of his truck, intending to continue his assault on the cyclists…at which point, he soon discovered that without his pickup truck, he was no match for the cyclists he was threatening. Dunleavy’s training partner, Patrick Fasse, reportedly grabbed the driver — 41 year old Alexander Barto — by the hair, and began punching him in the face. Dunleavy and Fasse then threw Barto against his truck and held him there while they waited for police to arrive. Other cyclists who arrived on the scene immediately afterwards informed Dunleavy that Barto had just harassed them moments before. When the Utah Highway Patrol arrived, Barto was arrested for investigation of aggravated assault.

For the media, and for the new cyclists who, lured by the combination of warm weather and high gas prices, are venturing out onto the road for the first time, these stories of road violence, one after the other, may indeed have seemed like “a new kind of road rage.” For seasoned cyclists, the stories were more an indication that the daily violence cyclists encounter had finally managed to capture the attention of the public-at-large. But underlying the “bikes vs. cars” eruptions of violence, the larger questions remained unasked, and unanswered in the media: Why are cyclists the daily targets of road violence, and what can cyclists do to change that reality?

Fortunately, for every cyclist who has ever asked those questions, there are answers; next week, we’re going to delve deeper into this issue for answers to those deeper questions.
Bob
Also, LOL at the "gashole" comment.
Throwmeabone is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 06:41 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
lil brown bat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Boston (sort of)
Posts: 3,878

Bikes: 1 road, 1 Urban Assault Vehicle

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Throwmeabone
I know of course that a cyclist is no match for a 3,000 pound vehicle but I never thought anyone would stoop low enough to literally use a car as a weapon!
You're kidding, right? Look, there are drivers who use their cars as weapons towards other drivers, you hear about them all the time. Why would their actions towards cyclists be any different? it's a combination of a small number of sociopaths and a somewhat larger number of morons who are incapable of predicting the consequences of their actions. Doctors are included in both categories.
lil brown bat is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 07:11 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 392

Bikes: Trek SU100, Surly Cross Check

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What I don't get is how being behind the wheel of a car can turn more or less rational people into total ******wads.
itsthewoo is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 07:33 AM
  #4  
SA[in]NE
 
FredOak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: WNY
Posts: 576

Bikes: Trek 7200

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have to agree I see that anger regardless if I'm on my bike or in the car. It just seems amplified on the bike because these a**holes see themselves as judge and jury because they are in their car and "we" are some how interfering with their "domain".
FredOak is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 07:51 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
closetbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
well how should you deal with angry drivers?

"the larger questions remained unasked, and unanswered in the media: Why are cyclists the daily targets of road violence, and what can cyclists do to change that reality?"

I guess we have to wait until next week for answers to those deeper questions.
closetbiker is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 07:56 AM
  #6  
The Haberdasher
 
BroadSTPhilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,018

Bikes: Panasonic AL-7000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Dunleavy’s training partner, Patrick Fasse, reportedly grabbed the driver — 41 year old Alexander Barto — by the hair, and began punching him in the face. Dunleavy and Fasse then threw Barto against his truck and held him there while they waited for police to arrive.

Awesome.
BroadSTPhilly is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 08:04 AM
  #7  
Sensible shoes.
 
CastIron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Paul,MN
Posts: 8,798

Bikes: A few.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
With garden variety harassment and poor driving, I refuse to engage or even appear to notice. The main reason is it works. I get where I'm going with less delay or drama and the driver gets no reward. The other reason--the one folks seem to ignore--is court defensibility. Should something happen, a witness won't be able to offer anything inflammatory on my part. You want justice later, that counts for a lot.

I do draw the line at trading paint or overt acts where the person was clearly trying hurt me. Not scare me or be a jerk, but actually directly cause physical harm. You simply have to set you ego and judgmental tendencies aside on the road. Most folks don't.
__________________
Mike
Originally Posted by cedricbosch
It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
Originally Posted by cedricbosch
Why am I in your signature.
CastIron is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 05:08 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Throwmeabone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by closetbiker
well how should you deal with angry drivers?
Like the poster above me said I think the best way is to simply do your best to ignore their actions and let it roll off your back. I think the true masters can take it to the next level and smile and wave.
Throwmeabone is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 05:22 PM
  #9  
RacingBear
 
UmneyDurak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,053
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 280 Post(s)
Liked 68 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by itsthewoo
What I don't get is how being behind the wheel of a car can turn more or less rational people into total ******wads.
Feeling of anonymity. Similar thing happens on the internet forums, with insulting posts, trolling, flame wars, etc.
UmneyDurak is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 05:39 PM
  #10  
Needing more power Scotty
 
riddei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Northern New England (USA)
Posts: 588

Bikes: 2006 Trek T-80 (commuter) 1982 Bianchi SS (classic 12 speed)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Please, never engage a motorist! Road rage happens between cars. It is even worse when one of the people are on a bike. Smile and wave. De-escalate the situation, never escalate. The bike loses every time.
riddei is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 05:53 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
surgeonstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 11,218

Bikes: 1976 FRESCHI, 2004 Crumpton.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 925 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 10 Posts
I Remember an incident 15 years ago, I was riding down into the Cayaguha Valley in Ohio. The road was 2 lane, I veered slightly left to avoid a deep pothole on the right edge of the road. An enraged motorist driving home from work had to slow for me, pulled by shouting obcenities, pulled in front of me blocking my path and forcing a stop. He was red with rage, yelling. I listened to him, apologized to him and said I would be more careful in the future. The result. You could see the color and rage drain away, he turned and got into his car and drove away.
People beware, when riding we are already pumped with adrenaline and ready to react to percieved or real threats in a violent manner and they have the truck/car. A little patience and politeness can defuse many situations and improve relations for all. Each side in this war is convinced of their rightness creating an ongoing middle-east like scenario of violence and retribution. No one wins and we get hurt or killed.
surgeonstone is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 07:20 PM
  #12  
Where am I?
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 179

Bikes: Old Centurion Accordo (in the process of being SS'ed), Cannondale Quick 5 (racks/panniers/fenders, utility bike), Trek XO1 (fun/fast/main ride)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Although the Los Angeles Police Department promptly investigated the March incident, the Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley declined to file charges against Dr. Thompson, saying the case wasn’t “a winner.”
Did anyone else catch this big steaming pile of crap?

When a DA declines to defend the rights of the people within his jurisdiction, simply because he might not win, that is a wake-up call to the citizens of that county. County residents should have been in an uproar over that one, and need to make it known that they will not condone a DA who is simply there to polish his record.




And as far as angry drivers go, if you don't want to stand up to them, then don't. It is your choice as to whether you want to risk your safety (and your life). Every situation is different, and every situation needs an on-the-spot judgment call. I have been threatened while cycling, but I also have never felt that I was in danger and as a result did not back down. If we give in every time, it will embolden jackhole drivers even more.

I would hope that we would all learn when it is a good idea to stand up for our rights and when it is a better idea to get off the road, get the license plate number, and get the police involved.
surveyor is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 07:32 PM
  #13  
bulletproof tiger
 
ok_commuter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,934

Bikes: Waterford 2200, Litespeed Tuscany, Salsa La Cruz, Kona Fire Mountain

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^^

+1 and well said. I've never been in a fight in my adult life, but I've been involved in many conflicts, some with weapons involved. De-escalation is a survival art. Check the ego at the door, let the scary angry dude be right, apologize or say nothing, and ride on.
ok_commuter is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 08:22 PM
  #14  
Barbieri Telefonico
 
huhenio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 3,522

Bikes: Crappy but operational secondhand Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I have a point on not backing off ... i know i may pay dearly for it ... but i won't be pushed around by some human sized anus.
__________________
Giving Haircuts Over The Phone
huhenio is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 08:49 PM
  #15  
bulletproof tiger
 
ok_commuter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,934

Bikes: Waterford 2200, Litespeed Tuscany, Salsa La Cruz, Kona Fire Mountain

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by huhenio
I have a point on not backing off ... i know i may pay dearly for it ... but i won't be pushed around by some human sized anus.
pushed around is one thing, honking and yelling is another. i do love the phrase "human sized anus".
ok_commuter is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 08:53 PM
  #16  
bragi
 
bragi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: seattle, WA
Posts: 2,911

Bikes: LHT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I've been the victim of a guy with a car who intentionally tried to hurt me, so I can understand the anger towards some motorists (I was totally enraged and so intent on trying to kick the guy's a** that it never even occurred to me to get his license plate number).

However, an element that's missing from this conversation is the fact that bicyclists are not all pure, innocent victims of big, bad drivers. I personally see bicyclists behave like idiots and/or jerks pretty much every single day. In fact, I'm even willing to say that the number of bicyclists I see acting badly is quite a bit larger than the number of drivers behaving badly. Most of it is just run-of-the-mill idiot stuff, like not obeying traffic signals, cutting to the front of the line at intersections, jumping on and off the sidewalk multiple times, etc. Sometimes, though, I also see cyclists intentionally provoking conflicts with motorists, flipping drivers off for not yielding when the cyclist is the one that should yield, yelling at motorists at intersections, etc. When drivers experience several situations where the bicyclist is needlessly behaving in a petulant, provocative manner, or just being totally unpredictable, over time, the drivers see all cyclists as a menace on the roads, whether the judgment is deserved or not. We bring part of this upon ourselves by tolerating behavior in other cyclists that, in our role as motorists, we would never tolerate from other drivers. We need to get our own house in order before we point the finger too enthusiastically at people in cars.

I'm not saying that there are not drivers out there who will get completely enraged simply because anyone at all, including a person on a bicycle, is in their way. There are even a few who are in fact sociopaths and who should prevented from driving at all. But we would serve ourselves and other cyclists well if we all remembered to play by the rules, act like adults ourselves, and kept in mind the simple fact that being on a bicycle doesn't automatically mean you're morally superior to the guy in a Ford.
bragi is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 09:03 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
aMull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,779

Bikes: Leader 735TR 09 58cm 46/17

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bragi
Most of it is just run-of-the-mill idiot stuff, like not obeying traffic signals, cutting to the front of the line at intersections, jumping on and off the sidewalk multiple times, etc.
It's called taking advantage of being on a bike, try it sometime.
aMull is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 09:25 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 864

Bikes: MTB Agressor for now.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think people look for reasons to critisize cyclists, because they don't like their presence on the road. Motorists complain that bikes disobey traffic laws, such as running stop signs, not wearing a helmet, and many other things. When in reality drivers disobey more laws IMHO than the cyclists. Motorists never obey the speed limits, even they run stop signs, they don't wear seatbelts, they put on makeup in the car, they talk on cell phones and the list is endless. They want to be able to drive their car comftorably without having think of whats going on around them except huge vehicles like thiers. The fact of the matter is that there is a bunch more of them than there is us and its going to continue to become a tough battle.
kmac27 is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 09:30 PM
  #19  
bragi
 
bragi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: seattle, WA
Posts: 2,911

Bikes: LHT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by aMull
It's called taking advantage of being on a bike, try it sometime.
The behaviors I described, and you apparently are defending, are not "taking advantage of being on a bike." They're stupid, childish, annoying, sometimes dangerous behaviors, get you to your destination no sooner, and they cause a lot of harm to the reputation of the majority of cyclists out there who, you know, obey traffic laws on public roads. Most rational drivers, if they have any complaint about bicyclists at all, say that they're unpredictable; for example, they can't be sure if the cyclist they see is going to blow through the four-way stop or not, so they have to wait and see what he/she does. That sort of thing, if it happens often enough, can ruin your attitude about a whole group of road users.
bragi is offline  
Old 08-19-08, 11:08 PM
  #20  
i won't f us over
 
Vodalus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 100

Bikes: Raleigh Detour 3.0, Specialized Allez SE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
in my mind there is nothing more satisfying than when somebody honks at me because i slowed them down sooo much but then 2 or 3 traffic lights later i'm still essentially right there with them. instead of getting upset at them right when they act like "human-sized anuses," I use that energy to stay right there with them because even if i rarely actually confront them, it feels damn good to be able to keep up with them.
Vodalus is offline  
Old 08-20-08, 07:02 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
lil brown bat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Boston (sort of)
Posts: 3,878

Bikes: 1 road, 1 Urban Assault Vehicle

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by bragi
However, an element that's missing from this conversation is the fact that bicyclists are not all pure, innocent victims of big, bad drivers. I personally see bicyclists behave like idiots and/or jerks pretty much every single day.
...which, of course, entitles everyone in a motor vehicle to be judge, jury and executioner.

Look, this is very simple, and if they didn't teach it in your driver's ed, they should have. Someone pulls a bonehead move in traffic? You don't get to ram them. You don't get to perform a maneuver calculated to try and get them to crash. You don't get to threaten to kill them. You don't get to use your vehicle or anything in your vehicle or your body as a weapon to dispense summary justice.

"Yeah, but..."

No.

"But he was..."

No.

"But don't you see..."

NO.

End of discussion.
lil brown bat is offline  
Old 08-20-08, 08:33 AM
  #22  
dabbler
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bragi
The behaviors I described, and you apparently are defending, are not "taking advantage of being on a bike." They're stupid, childish, annoying, sometimes dangerous behaviors, get you to your destination no sooner, and they cause a lot of harm to the reputation of the majority of cyclists out there who, you know, obey traffic laws on public roads.
I agree with almost all of your earlier post, but a few things are quite legitimate in many jurisdictions, like riding to the front of a traffic queue. It's just fine and legal in MA, and I'd consider it absurd to not be able to do it.

To my mind the key issue is more whether a cyclist is bending or breaking the laws in ways which interfere with other people's right of way. That's never justified.

Last edited by sping; 08-20-08 at 08:45 AM.
sping is offline  
Old 08-20-08, 08:36 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
closetbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by bragi
... an element that's missing from this conversation is the fact that bicyclists are not all pure, innocent victims of big, bad drivers. I personally see bicyclists behave like idiots and/or jerks pretty much every single day ...

we would serve ourselves and other cyclists well if we all remembered to play by the rules, act like adults ...

but that's just the problem. Everybody has a different idea of what a jerk is.

To many just being on a bike or in a car makes that person a jerk, despite their good behavior.

It seems to me, those who confront each other in a jerk-like manner, most often are jerks.

Thank goodness those jerks only make up a small portion of road users and most people act like adults.
closetbiker is offline  
Old 08-20-08, 09:47 AM
  #24  
Señior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749

Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by sping
To my mind the key issue is more whether a cyclist is bending or breaking the laws in ways which interfere with other people's right of way. That's never justified.
That's a pretty good summary. Personally I'd add "being unpredictable" such as moving between sidewalk and road, or not holding a consistent line. That's at least as much for the cyclist's safety as anything else. But the interfering with right of way thing is really good.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline  
Old 08-20-08, 10:04 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
closetbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by sping
... to my mind the key issue is more whether a cyclist is bending or breaking the laws in ways which interfere with other people's right of way. That's never justified.
Drivers do that twice as much as cyclists do.

from

https://www.bikesense.bc.ca/appendices.htm#common

Most common collisions

The following statistics are from a 1996 study, which analyzed the reported 6,000 collisions between bicycles and motor vehicles that occurred in BC during a three-year period.

Contributing factors

The most common error among cyclists was to ride without due care. Among motorists the most frequent fault was failure to yield right-of-way.

Operating vehicle without due care - Cyclists: 23% Car drivers: 14%

Failure to yield right-of-way - Cyclists: 13% Car drivers: 27%

Last edited by closetbiker; 08-20-08 at 12:06 PM.
closetbiker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.