Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Dumb Rack/Fender install question

Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Dumb Rack/Fender install question

Old 09-13-08, 09:39 PM
  #1  
Car free Sept 08
Thread Starter
 
citylove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 24

Bikes: 2007 Surly Cross Check, cloaked as commuter, grocery getter, stuff-hauler

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Dumb Rack/Fender install question

I'm really sorry. I know there are so many threads about fenders, and I have read many after my search, but I'm thinking my question must be really silly.

I have a Cross Check, which I love, love, love. We're going car-free in 7 days (YAY!), and due to other circumstances I'm only just now adding fenders to the bike. I have a rack rear installed already, but I'm afraid I installed it on the wrong eyelet.

The question is: I have two eyelets - which one, the lower or upper, should the fenders be installed on?

Thanks!

Jessica
citylove is offline  
Old 09-13-08, 09:42 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Lamplight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 2,769
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
It will probably be easier to install the fender on the lower eyelet. Otherwise, the fender stay will have to cross over the rack at some point (assuming your rack and fender are basically normal.)
Lamplight is offline  
Old 09-13-08, 09:48 PM
  #3  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,275

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,093 Times in 2,325 Posts
Originally Posted by Lamplight
It will probably be easier to install the fender on the lower eyelet. Otherwise, the fender stay will have to cross over the rack at some point (assuming your rack and fender are basically normal.)
I'd use the lower mount for the rack and the upper for the fenders. This would make the rack sit lower but it would only be a minor difference.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is online now  
Old 09-13-08, 09:54 PM
  #4  
Car free Sept 08
Thread Starter
 
citylove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 24

Bikes: 2007 Surly Cross Check, cloaked as commuter, grocery getter, stuff-hauler

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank you, lamplight and cyccommute. cyccommute, why would you install them that way? I (mostly) understand lamplight's reasoning, and I'm just looking for the complete answer! Thanks!
citylove is offline  
Old 09-13-08, 09:54 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,787

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 522 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3228 Post(s)
Liked 3,854 Times in 1,436 Posts
I've got both rack and fender on the same eyelet on my bike. I can't remember if it's the upper or lower -- I think it's the upper. I seem to remember reading somewhere that there was some benefit to having both on the some eyelet, but I can't imagine what it was.
Andy_K is offline  
Old 09-13-08, 09:57 PM
  #6  
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Posts: 14,723

Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times in 44 Posts
Bottom line is- unless the fender stay and the rack crash into each other when the rack is on the lower eyelet, it doesn't really matter. Try it both ways and leave it the way you like best.
Doohickie is offline  
Old 09-13-08, 10:08 PM
  #7  
Car free Sept 08
Thread Starter
 
citylove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 24

Bikes: 2007 Surly Cross Check, cloaked as commuter, grocery getter, stuff-hauler

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Doohickie
Bottom line is- unless the fender stay and the rack crash into each other when the rack is on the lower eyelet, it doesn't really matter. Try it both ways and leave it the way you like best.
Perhaps this is why I couldn't find a straight answer!?! That works. I'm getting my new rack by the end of the week, maybe I'll just wait til I get that (Tubus Cargo, time to upgrade!) to install the rear fender. So I just want to make sure the fender and the rack don't cross over in a weird way? Well, I can manage that. Anything else to worry about?

Thanks, all.
citylove is offline  
Old 09-13-08, 10:35 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
neilfein's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Highland Park, NJ, USA
Posts: 3,798

Bikes: "Hildy", a Novara Randonee touring bike; a 16-speed Bike Friday Tikit; and a Specialized Stumpjumper frame-based built-up MTB, now serving as the kid-carrier, grocery-getter.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
(Are you installing full fenders? If not, disregard the rest of this.)

Getting fenders to sit just right is more important than getting a rack exactly level. You want them to hug the tires, but not rub against them.

Find out which pair of eyelets will get the fenders juuuust right, then then use what's left over for the rack.
__________________
Tour Journals, Blog, ride pix

My bands:
neilfein is offline  
Old 09-14-08, 01:19 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 222

Bikes: '86 Koga Miyata Randonneur

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As to putting the two together, I would think that if you are going to carry heavy stuff, you will want the rack on its own mounts so as to shorten the screws and lower the "opportunity" for the weight of the load on the rack to sheer the bolts. But that's just me probably being over-cautious. :-)

-Jon
joninkrakow is offline  
Old 09-14-08, 09:54 AM
  #10  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,275

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6147 Post(s)
Liked 4,093 Times in 2,325 Posts
Originally Posted by citylove
Thank you, lamplight and cyccommute. cyccommute, why would you install them that way? I (mostly) understand lamplight's reasoning, and I'm just looking for the complete answer! Thanks!
Lower rack = lower center of gravity. But it's not going to make much of a difference. However, it's moot if you are get that Tubus Cargo. It has it's own fender mounts that are better than the bike's mounts. Like this



The advantage is you can mount the fenders a little higher for more clearance.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is online now  
Old 09-14-08, 12:46 PM
  #11  
Je pose, donc je suis.
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Back. Here.
Posts: 2,898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by citylove
I'm really sorry. I know there are so many threads about fenders, and I have read many after my search, but I'm thinking my question must be really silly.

I have a Cross Check, which I love, love, love. We're going car-free in 7 days (YAY!), and due to other circumstances I'm only just now adding fenders to the bike. I have a rack rear installed already, but I'm afraid I installed it on the wrong eyelet.

The question is: I have two eyelets - which one, the lower or upper, should the fenders be installed on?

Thanks!

Jessica
Whichever one works best, in terms of crossed support members. In the end, it's nothing to fret over.

(for the record, I have the same bike. At some point I switched them because I thought it would work better, and then decided that it didn't matter.)
Pedaleur is offline  
Old 09-14-08, 01:49 PM
  #12  
Golden Member
 
JR97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Salt Lick City
Posts: 599
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've got my rack and fenders on the same lower eyelight. Rack is much better lower. My fenders can't get to the upper with the rack on the lower. But with my rack so low, the fender needs to be low. I could raise the rack since it's a Delta Universal Mega, but what would be the point of that?
JR97 is offline  
Old 09-14-08, 02:36 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Lamplight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 2,769
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Mounting the rack on the lower eyelet would put the rack a little lower, which is usually a good thing. It may also put the rack a little further toward the rear of the bike, which could also be good if you'll be using panniers. I put mine on the top eyelet just to keep the fender stay from having to cross it, although on my bike the top eyelet is directly over the axle and the bottom eyelet is just hanging off the rear of the dropout. I would think it would be slightly stronger because of this, though it's probably not enough to make any noticeable difference. No reason you can try it both ways and see which you like better!
Lamplight is offline  
Old 09-14-08, 03:58 PM
  #14  
Car free Sept 08
Thread Starter
 
citylove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 24

Bikes: 2007 Surly Cross Check, cloaked as commuter, grocery getter, stuff-hauler

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cool, thanks all. For now, I've installed the fenders on the upper eyelet, and I'll see what happens when I try to install my rear rack next weekend. I appreciate the advice!
citylove is offline  
Old 09-15-08, 06:42 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
neilfein's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Highland Park, NJ, USA
Posts: 3,798

Bikes: "Hildy", a Novara Randonee touring bike; a 16-speed Bike Friday Tikit; and a Specialized Stumpjumper frame-based built-up MTB, now serving as the kid-carrier, grocery-getter.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Lamplight
Mounting the rack on the lower eyelet would put the rack a little lower, which is usually a good thing. It may also put the rack a little further toward the rear of the bike, which could also be good if you'll be using panniers.
Keep in mind, this could introduce toe strike. (Edit: Not likely unless you have weird geometry.)
__________________
Tour Journals, Blog, ride pix

My bands:

Last edited by neilfein; 09-15-08 at 06:44 AM. Reason: See text
neilfein is offline  
Old 09-15-08, 07:56 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Lamplight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 2,769
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by neilfein
Keep in mind, this could introduce toe strike. (Edit: Not likely unless you have weird geometry.)
Are you talking about a rear rack? I'm not sure I understand how toes could strike a rear rack?
Lamplight is offline  
Old 09-15-08, 08:33 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
neilfein's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Highland Park, NJ, USA
Posts: 3,798

Bikes: "Hildy", a Novara Randonee touring bike; a 16-speed Bike Friday Tikit; and a Specialized Stumpjumper frame-based built-up MTB, now serving as the kid-carrier, grocery-getter.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Lamplight
Are you talking about a rear rack? I'm not sure I understand how toes could strike a rear rack?
That's why I added that it's unlikely, you'd need weird geometry for that.
__________________
Tour Journals, Blog, ride pix

My bands:
neilfein is offline  
Old 09-16-08, 02:22 PM
  #18  
Johnny G.
 
Pragmatik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Baltimore City
Posts: 103

Bikes: 2009 Jamis Coda (black), 2006 Giant Cypress DX (in repair after crash)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I can't offer any info, but congrats on going car-free!
Pragmatik is offline  
Old 09-16-08, 03:01 PM
  #19  
Car free Sept 08
Thread Starter
 
citylove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 24

Bikes: 2007 Surly Cross Check, cloaked as commuter, grocery getter, stuff-hauler

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks, Pragmatik! I feel so relieved already!
citylove is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.