Best $100 Headlight
#51
?
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
All you have to do is ask yourself if you'd be happy living under their government, economic system, and work place "culture". If not, then there is clearly something deficient about it. Next you ask yourself if sending your dollars into that system is going to help keep it in place or replace it with something more fair. I believe the former, as the majority of the money always goes to the bosses. I'm not comfortable using a less-than-free people as my cheap labor force just to save me a few bucks.
Cheap labour force is the result of massive supply of labour and the demand isn't as high, it's not due to exploitation, a price ceiling on wages, or some government clamp down on labour force and this so-called slave labour. 900 million people and ~300-400 million low paying jobs to go around, how in the world do expect higher wages unless they are more jobs for these people? Implementing a minimum wage is detrimental on the long run, that is why the government isn't doing that either, they want to get these people out of poverty ASAP.
Exploitation.
#52
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 18
Bikes: 2009 Kona Jake
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm loving the info on all the lighting but it's getting tedious sifting through all the political side discussions.
#53
cyclepath
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: "The Last Best Place"
Posts: 3,550
Bikes: 2005 Trek Pilot 5.0, 2001 Specialized Sirrus Pro, Kona Lava Dome, Raleigh hardtail converted to commuter, 87 Takara steel road bike, 2008 Trek Soho
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I just used the Dinotte tail light I got for $100 for the first time today. Love it!
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Without music, life would be a mistake."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Without music, life would be a mistake."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
#54
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Not being 'sold' on LED lighting for a headlight system yet, my recommendation would be a 10w Halogen Niterider Trail Rat available @ pricepoint for 99.98. I've got 3 of these and have found them to be consistant and plenty bright enough for my 40 mi rt rural commute. Brandscycle used to have them @ the same price w/no shipping, but it appears they've gone over to the Minewt system for all their NR HL products.
Admittedly, that $100 doesn't buy battery or charger, so in the end they are more, but many people already have a pile of AA NiMHs and a charger (I do, so I went this way).
I had a halogen for several years, and was pretty happy with it, but I'm much more happy with the Dinotte.
As far as LED versus halogen, if you're talking a 10W halogen then the ONLY advantage halogen has is it's cheap. LEDs have definitely surpassed 10W halogens. Some have surpassed 20W overvoltaged halogens.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brownsville, TX
Posts: 2,174
Bikes: Surly CC
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
On point one - https://www.ar15armory.com/forums/200...GHT-t6827.html
2000 lumens of badboy power (for 5 minutes). After that, you'll be blind anyways so the remaining 55 minutes of darkness will feel cool on your retinas. I gotta say I'm buying two p7s though if that gives you any idea of how great a deal I personally think they are.
On the politics - If you seriously tried to limit your purchases to things made in America, you'd find you couldn't live. Welcome to the year 2009, where global economy exists. Perhaps you'd care for a return trip to Isolationist America, circa 1913?
2000 lumens of badboy power (for 5 minutes). After that, you'll be blind anyways so the remaining 55 minutes of darkness will feel cool on your retinas. I gotta say I'm buying two p7s though if that gives you any idea of how great a deal I personally think they are.
On the politics - If you seriously tried to limit your purchases to things made in America, you'd find you couldn't live. Welcome to the year 2009, where global economy exists. Perhaps you'd care for a return trip to Isolationist America, circa 1913?
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brownsville, TX
Posts: 2,174
Bikes: Surly CC
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I recant:
https://www.wickedlasers.com/lasers/W...ghts-74-0.html will be my next light.
Means I can stop carrying mace for the hobos...light can cook eggs....burn paper...smiting hobos since 2009...
https://www.wickedlasers.com/lasers/W...ghts-74-0.html will be my next light.
Means I can stop carrying mace for the hobos...light can cook eggs....burn paper...smiting hobos since 2009...
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 8,896
Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 196 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
I'm very familiar with inexpensive bike lights. I started out with a CygoLite Nite Rover (NiCad version that cost about $60 on sale at the time) and then switched to a Fenix L2D flashlight ($62). I also use a Dinotte 140 tail-light ($103).
The Fenix is much brighter, smaller, lighter than the CygoLite with comparable run times. It uses inexpensive AA batteries that are simple to recharge. Although my Dinotte is a tail-light, they sell a headlight version for the same price (without the charger). I don't think the Dinotte is much if any brighter than the Fenix, but it has more beam patterns and a low-battery indicator. It's probably worth the extra money, although it weighs more with the battery pack.
The Fenix is much brighter, smaller, lighter than the CygoLite with comparable run times. It uses inexpensive AA batteries that are simple to recharge. Although my Dinotte is a tail-light, they sell a headlight version for the same price (without the charger). I don't think the Dinotte is much if any brighter than the Fenix, but it has more beam patterns and a low-battery indicator. It's probably worth the extra money, although it weighs more with the battery pack.
#58
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
P7 sources?
Aside from that, the P7 is the best value in lighting right now. Anywhere from 500-700 lumens (depending upon who's "official" rating you look at) for $40-60. Just bought two with charger and extra batteries for $120. That's over 10-lumens/dollar, nothing comes close!
Can you recommend a source(s)?
(If there is anyone else with recommendations, please also feel free to post.)
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
5-Mode P7 or 8-Mode P7 (this one has the slight advantage of having a copper heatsink versus brass)
Batteries
Charger (this is better than the gray one often recommended because it charges faster)
Handlebar mount
Last edited by Throwmeabone; 01-07-09 at 06:12 PM.
#60
Bye Bye
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
fan of the ixon iq for about town.
my rando rig is awaiting an upgrade from dual e6 lights powered by a SON to an eDelux - but that will set you back.
my rando rig is awaiting an upgrade from dual e6 lights powered by a SON to an eDelux - but that will set you back.
__________________
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
#61
-
My recommendation (the same setup I have):
5-Mode P7 or 8-Mode P7 (this one has the slight advantage of having a copper heatsink versus brass)
Batteries
Charger (this is better than the gray one often recommended because it charges faster)
Handlebar mount
5-Mode P7 or 8-Mode P7 (this one has the slight advantage of having a copper heatsink versus brass)
Batteries
Charger (this is better than the gray one often recommended because it charges faster)
Handlebar mount
Neither of these flashlights are regulated at constant current. The 16092 is clearly not pulling 2.8A, and output is far less than the claimed 900 lumens. They both run about 80-90 minutes before getting too dim to use for biking. Probably using 1.5A-hr of battery capacity in this 1.5 hours, so an average pull of 1A in my estimation. It's probably 2A for the first 5-10 minutes, gradually tapering to 0.5A after an hour. My 13060 does burn a little longer, pulls a little less current than 16092.
My 16092 is significantly brighter than 13060. I noticed it right away, even before comparing beamshots on the wall. It's a compelling reason to get the 16092 for $5 more.
16092 has mode memory, 13060 doesn't - this alone is a big advantage, especially when the no memory model has only 2 useful modes and 6 useless modes to cycle thru to get to them.
Batteries rattle in both lights. Add tape to improve fit / reduce rattle. Also, good idea to try and isolate flashlight from shock / vibration, which could break the circuit. I'm using a piece of ensolite foam and plastic tie straps - not pretty but works.
Finally, my 13060 intermittently flickers/dims/changes modes/shuts off - even sitting on a countertop untouched. I returned it, going to get a second 16092. I'm not the only one who's had this problem - maybe just my bad luck - maybe a problem with that model - I can't say for sure.
A 16092, 6105 and 2x2500 18650 cost $67 from DX - leaves the OP with $33 (that's 3 trips to the buffet restaurant here).
Last edited by seeker333; 01-07-09 at 08:34 PM.
#62
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Any thoughts on this one for about $60 shipped from ebay? AA batteries and a claimed 200 lumens with a bike specific mount. I am thinking of getting one because I am tired of proprietary replacement batteries costing about $30 less than a whole lighting system.
https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=380093513429
Item no. Z200
New !! SpiderFire CREE Q5 LED Bike Bicycle Light #Z200
Zoom in / Zoom out for Spot or Flood Beam !!!
*
Extremely Bright CREE Q5 LED with 200 Lumens white light output
*
Light Head can Step less Zoom in / Zoom out for Spot or Flood Beam
*
3 Mode : Low, High, Slow Flash
*
Small Size, Light Weight & Long Lasting
*
Smart IC Inside ! using 4.5V input with 200 Lumens output !!
*
Waterproof
*
Operates on 3x 2AA Alkaline or Rechargeable NiMH Batteries
*
Run Time : 4hrs - Alkaline Batteries / 6hrs - 2700mah
*
Rechargeable NiMH Batteries
*Remark : Battery not included
More information for CREE : https://www.cree.com
https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=380093513429
Item no. Z200
New !! SpiderFire CREE Q5 LED Bike Bicycle Light #Z200
Zoom in / Zoom out for Spot or Flood Beam !!!
*
Extremely Bright CREE Q5 LED with 200 Lumens white light output
*
Light Head can Step less Zoom in / Zoom out for Spot or Flood Beam
*
3 Mode : Low, High, Slow Flash
*
Small Size, Light Weight & Long Lasting
*
Smart IC Inside ! using 4.5V input with 200 Lumens output !!
*
Waterproof
*
Operates on 3x 2AA Alkaline or Rechargeable NiMH Batteries
*
Run Time : 4hrs - Alkaline Batteries / 6hrs - 2700mah
*
Rechargeable NiMH Batteries
*Remark : Battery not included
More information for CREE : https://www.cree.com
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have these too and agree with your charger and battery recommendation. I wonder if there are better flashlights at DX than these two models - either p7 or mc-e.
Neither of these flashlights are regulated at constant current. The 16092 is clearly not pulling 2.8A, and output is far less than the claimed 900 lumens. They both run about 80-90 minutes before getting too dim to use for biking. Probably using 1.5A-hr of battery capacity in this 1.5 hours, so an average pull of 1A in my estimation. It's probably 2A for the first 5-10 minutes, gradually tapering to 0.5A after an hour. My 13060 does burn a little longer, pulls a little less current than 16092.
My 16092 is significantly brighter than 13060. I noticed it right away, even before comparing beamshots on the wall. It's a compelling reason to get the 16092 for $5 more.
16092 has mode memory, 13060 doesn't - this alone is a big advantage, especially when the no memory model has only 2 useful modes and 6 useless modes to cycle thru to get to them.
Batteries rattle in both lights. Add tape to improve fit / reduce rattle. Also, good idea to try and isolate flashlight from shock / vibration, which could break the circuit. I'm using a piece of ensolite foam and plastic tie straps - not pretty but works.
Finally, my 13060 intermittently flickers/dims/changes modes/shuts off - even sitting on a countertop untouched. I returned it, going to get a second 16092. I'm not the only one who's had this problem - maybe just my bad luck - maybe a problem with that model - I can't say for sure.
A 16092, 6105 and 2x2500 18650 cost $67 from DX - leaves the OP with $33 (that's 3 trips to the buffet restaurant here).
Neither of these flashlights are regulated at constant current. The 16092 is clearly not pulling 2.8A, and output is far less than the claimed 900 lumens. They both run about 80-90 minutes before getting too dim to use for biking. Probably using 1.5A-hr of battery capacity in this 1.5 hours, so an average pull of 1A in my estimation. It's probably 2A for the first 5-10 minutes, gradually tapering to 0.5A after an hour. My 13060 does burn a little longer, pulls a little less current than 16092.
My 16092 is significantly brighter than 13060. I noticed it right away, even before comparing beamshots on the wall. It's a compelling reason to get the 16092 for $5 more.
16092 has mode memory, 13060 doesn't - this alone is a big advantage, especially when the no memory model has only 2 useful modes and 6 useless modes to cycle thru to get to them.
Batteries rattle in both lights. Add tape to improve fit / reduce rattle. Also, good idea to try and isolate flashlight from shock / vibration, which could break the circuit. I'm using a piece of ensolite foam and plastic tie straps - not pretty but works.
Finally, my 13060 intermittently flickers/dims/changes modes/shuts off - even sitting on a countertop untouched. I returned it, going to get a second 16092. I'm not the only one who's had this problem - maybe just my bad luck - maybe a problem with that model - I can't say for sure.
A 16092, 6105 and 2x2500 18650 cost $67 from DX - leaves the OP with $33 (that's 3 trips to the buffet restaurant here).
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My recommendation (the same setup I have):
5-Mode P7 or 8-Mode P7 (this one has the slight advantage of having a copper heatsink versus brass)
Batteries
Charger (this is better than the gray one often recommended because it charges faster)
Handlebar mount
5-Mode P7 or 8-Mode P7 (this one has the slight advantage of having a copper heatsink versus brass)
Batteries
Charger (this is better than the gray one often recommended because it charges faster)
Handlebar mount
#65
-
I have several P4 and Q5 lights; the best ones pale in comparison to a P7 light (even the half-ass attempts coming from DX, kaidomain, etc). P7 produces a wide angle, flood light; Q5 in contrast produces a narrower spot light. The beam can be changed with optics somewhat but not enough to overcome the basic output characteristics of the emitter. P7 is rated to 900 lumens (although most lights using this emitter produce far less due to lack of proper regulating driver), Q5 is less than 1/3 this amount. If you had them in your hands to compare outdoors, I believe you'd pick the P7 - in about 3 seconds.
I like AAs too. I have $70 in AA and AAA sanyo eneloops - they're simply the best you can buy due to their very low rate of self-discharge. Full charge them to 1.6v, 18 months later down to only 1.3v. A normal NiMH would self-discharge the same amount in a matter of days.
The 18650 (18mm diameter, 650mm length, nominal) used for laptops and most P7 flashlights is a great cell. They weigh ~47g and store a charge of 3.7v x 2000ma. A AA cell weighs ~28g and holds 1.2v x 2000ma. The 18650 is Li chemistry and has nearly no self-discharge. It would take 3 AAs to match the charge of an 18650, at 175% of a 18650's mass, and the AAs would have to be recharged immediately before use to get this performance. The 18650s are easier to live with due to lack of self discharge - unless you use eneloops. 3 eneloops cost $10, 1 18650 from DX costs $5. So, I think you can see how advantageous it is to use 18650 cell for your application. Given that most P7 flashlights use this cell, you don't really have much choice.
#66
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rechargeable lithium batteries have a drawback that causes some concern. Apparently many of them have a short shelf life -- not due to self-discharge, but due to irreversible aging from internal oxidation.
Isador Buchmann (Battery University, Cadex, online battery book) discusses this in some of his writings.
Some lithium batteries may be better than others. Toshiba is among the companies that seem to be working on improved designs. Someone said that Toshiba (and possibly others) have some lithium batteries now that have much longer useful lifespans.
Does anyone know where these or other longer-lifespan lithium rechargeables can be purchased?
Isador Buchmann (Battery University, Cadex, online battery book) discusses this in some of his writings.
Some lithium batteries may be better than others. Toshiba is among the companies that seem to be working on improved designs. Someone said that Toshiba (and possibly others) have some lithium batteries now that have much longer useful lifespans.
Does anyone know where these or other longer-lifespan lithium rechargeables can be purchased?
#67
Surf Bum
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 2,184
Bikes: Lapierre Pulsium 500 FdJ, Ritchey breakaway cyclocross, vintage trek mtb.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
I like AAs too. I have $70 in AA and AAA sanyo eneloops - they're simply the best you can buy due to their very low rate of self-discharge. Full charge them to 1.6v, 18 months later down to only 1.3v. A normal NiMH would self-discharge the same amount in a matter of days.
#68
?
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I know nothing about rechargeable batteries so can I ask a quick question? I see the NiMH batteries like the eneloops listed as "1.2v" batteries, but above you say they charge to 1.6v. I just want to verify that these batteries when fully charged will power a flashlight (I have a Romisen RC-N3 Q5) as brightly as regular 1.5v AA alkalines. Also, anyone have an idea on what the run time would be like with these rechargable NiMH batteries?
Eneloops are 2000mAH (or 2A), if the flashlight draws 1A, a pair of Eneloop should theoretically run for 2 hours max.
#69
-
I know nothing about rechargeable batteries so can I ask a quick question? I see the NiMH batteries like the eneloops listed as "1.2v" batteries, but above you say they charge to 1.6v. I just want to verify that these batteries when fully charged will power a flashlight (I have a Romisen RC-N3 Q5) as brightly as regular 1.5v AA alkalines. Also, anyone have an idea on what the run time would be like with these rechargable NiMH batteries?
I have 4 rc-n3 from sb. Good inexpensive light. It can handle a little over 4v total. I usually run 16340s in mine that are 4.15v fresh off charger. So, you could run 1.75v AA lithium primaries, std alkaline AA 1.5v nominal (which are usually closer to 1.6v fresh), 1.2v nominal AA NiMH (which again are 1.2-1.4v) and even my previously-mentioned fictional 1.6v eneloops.
BTW AA eneloops won't be quite as bright as fresh alkaline AAs in the rc-n3 since its a direct driven cree q5 emitter; however its unlikely you'll be able to discern the difference with your own eyes. After some burning time the eneloops should be as bright or brighter than the alkalines due to the flatter discharge curve of eneloops and other NiMH batteries - again a minor difference. If you're that hard up for lumens you should ditch the Q5 lights and move to P7 based lights. Once you get a P7, your Q5s and less will be relegated to home/work/hobby duty, since you'll then consider them pretty puny for a bike light.
I haven't checked run time with eneloops on rc-n3, however mrbubbles estimate is correct.
Last edited by seeker333; 01-09-09 at 12:03 PM.
#70
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I know nothing about rechargeable batteries so can I ask a quick question? I see the NiMH batteries like the eneloops listed as "1.2v" batteries, but above you say they charge to 1.6v. I just want to verify that these batteries when fully charged will power a flashlight (I have a Romisen RC-N3 Q5) as brightly as regular 1.5v AA alkalines. Also, anyone have an idea on what the run time would be like with these rechargable NiMH batteries?
A proper charger doesn't go by absolute voltage, it uses what's called "negative delta V" - they charge for a second, then remove power from the cell for a fraction of a second and measure the voltage, then go back to charging. They keep charging as long as the measured voltage keeps going up or staying steady. At the instant that the cell is fully charged, the voltage will drop just a fraction, then the charger stops and drops into maintenance mode.
A good light will have a voltage regulator in it which will allow the light to keep running at full output as long as the battery voltage is within its range. If your light runs brighter on 1.5V batteries than 1.2V, it doesn't have a voltage regulator in it.
It's hard to calculate run time. To some extent it's amp-hours divided by amps drawn. But batteries are funny - if you draw enough current to make them start heating up, they start losing power faster (I guess it's lost as heat). So you might be able to draw 1/2 amp for 4 hours, but a full amp for maybe only 1.5 hours.
Also it depends on the circuitry in your light and if it was designed to work with NiMH cells. Some lights will see the cells at 1.15 volts and decide they're dead and shut off, when in reality they still have half their life left in them. Most devices these days though can work just fine on 1.2v cells.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#71
All Bikes All The Time
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 2,343
Bikes: Giant TCR 0, Lemond Zurich, Giant NRS 1, Jamis Explorer Beater/Commuter, Peugeot converted single speed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
MAN!!!! This thread is good shiz! Thanks guys.
#72
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Duracell has NiMH rechargeables that are very similar to the Eneloops. According to some people, they are manufactured by the same company (Sanyo), and are virtually identical.
These and other Duracell rechargeables are sold with a good promotional deal at Amazon.com. The promotion happens periodically, and it can give you some very good prices on these batteries -- ten dollars off if you buy twenty-five dollars or more of the batteries that are included in the promotion.
The 2650 mAh Duracells are great batteries. You can buy sixteen of them for less than twenty dollars with the promotion. There is free shipping from Amazon on orders over twenty-five dollars.
I just bought some of these a few weeks ago and am very pleased with their performance. The extra power (2650 mAh vs 2000 mAh) was the deciding factor in choosing them over the Eneloops or the similar/identical Duracell batteries.
For some applications, the self-discharge issue is less important than the runtime issue. Also, the 2650 mAh Duracells apparently do not self-discharge as quickly as most other NiMH rechargeables.
There is another possible advantage to the low-self-discharge batteries, though. They seem to have (at least they are claimed to have -- I haven't yet seen third-party objective tests that confirm this) a longer cycle life. They are good for more charge-discharge cycles.
I decided that, for my usage patterns, this was not so important. The 2650 mAh Duracells would be good for maybe 400 cycles; the 2000 mAh Duracells (and Eneloops) might be good for up to 1000 cycles. But then there is the aging issue. If you charge and discharge once a week on average, 400 cycles is something like seven or eight years. That is beyond the self life, so it doesn't really matter so much.
However, it is possible that the pre-charged batteries also have longer shelf lives. Haven't seen good data on this yet, though.
These and other Duracell rechargeables are sold with a good promotional deal at Amazon.com. The promotion happens periodically, and it can give you some very good prices on these batteries -- ten dollars off if you buy twenty-five dollars or more of the batteries that are included in the promotion.
The 2650 mAh Duracells are great batteries. You can buy sixteen of them for less than twenty dollars with the promotion. There is free shipping from Amazon on orders over twenty-five dollars.
I just bought some of these a few weeks ago and am very pleased with their performance. The extra power (2650 mAh vs 2000 mAh) was the deciding factor in choosing them over the Eneloops or the similar/identical Duracell batteries.
For some applications, the self-discharge issue is less important than the runtime issue. Also, the 2650 mAh Duracells apparently do not self-discharge as quickly as most other NiMH rechargeables.
There is another possible advantage to the low-self-discharge batteries, though. They seem to have (at least they are claimed to have -- I haven't yet seen third-party objective tests that confirm this) a longer cycle life. They are good for more charge-discharge cycles.
I decided that, for my usage patterns, this was not so important. The 2650 mAh Duracells would be good for maybe 400 cycles; the 2000 mAh Duracells (and Eneloops) might be good for up to 1000 cycles. But then there is the aging issue. If you charge and discharge once a week on average, 400 cycles is something like seven or eight years. That is beyond the self life, so it doesn't really matter so much.
However, it is possible that the pre-charged batteries also have longer shelf lives. Haven't seen good data on this yet, though.
#73
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
BTW, yeah, eneloops are pretty nice. I can put them in my digicam and a month and a few dozen pics later they're still in great shape. With regular NiMHs I have to rotate all my batteries out every 2 weeks or so.
If I ever find a deal on Eneloops I'll probably buy a dozen or so.
If I ever find a deal on Eneloops I'll probably buy a dozen or so.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#74
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some Chinese-made NiMHs are not very well made. The Japanese ones (Sanyo, and Japanese-made Duracells for example) are much higher quality than average.
I'll look up the monthly self-discharge rates and post.
They should be fine for a month or two, if the batteries are good ones.
#75
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
In my case it's exacerbated by the fact that my camera got wet in my panniers a few months back, and it tends to drain batteries when it's off. It doesn't seem to bother the Sanyos quite as badly.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.