Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 23 of 23
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    What is the best Hybrid bike for around 400?

    Hi guys, i'm brand new to this forum so I hope I get more responses than I did on yahoo answer.

    I currently have a mountain bike which I've had for several years since school and it hasn't been ridden for about 5 years. It has a heavy frame and by now the gears, chain, tyres, brakes etc will all be in serious need of an expensive service. I am looking to replace it with a Hybrid bike which is faster and lighter, with no suspension. I am interested in some fairly short road trips, commuting and keeping fit. I won't be taking it off road. Some people suggested getting road tyres for the mountain bike but I think it isn't in good shape and it may be too small a frame by now. I'm inside leg 34" so I presume frame should be 20-22"?

    Anyway I've found some good bikes but I would like to know what is the best bike I can buy for around 400? I am very interested in the Specialized sirrus elite 2008 and the sport 2009. Also the trek 7.3 Fx 2009 looks great but slightly pricey. Let me know if there are any i've missed out, and tell me what your suggestion is and why.

    Specialized Sirrus Elite 2008
    Specialized Sirrus Sport 2009
    Pinnacle Borealis 3.0
    Pinnacle Stratus 3.0 2009
    Giant FCR 2 2008.5
    Giant FCR 4 2009
    Trek 7.2 FX 2009
    Trek 7.3 FX 2009
    Trek SOHO 2009
    Gary Fisher Wingra 2009
    Scott Sub 20 2008

    I would really appreciate any help, ideas or suggestions because I want to buy this bike as soon as possible. Thanks so much for your time.

    Daniel P

  2. #2
    aka Phil Jungels Wanderer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Aurora, IL
    My Bikes
    08 Specialized Crosstrail Sport, 05 Sirrus Comp
    Posts
    5,904
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The 2008 Sirrus will have better componentry than the 2009, probably for less money.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Specialized and Trek

    Quote Originally Posted by Wanderer View Post
    The 2008 Sirrus will have better componentry than the 2009, probably for less money.
    Thankyou so much for your reply. I've looked into it and would agree the 08 elite is better than the 09 sport. I don't see a massive difference in price but both are in budget. The 2009 elite is also available - but is over budget at 530. Would it be worth the extra 130? What do you think of the Trek bikes in comparison to Specialized? Thanks again!

  4. #4
    Commuter Anthony87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    My Bikes
    2005 Specialized Hardrock Comp Disc, 2009 Trek 7.3FX
    Posts
    94
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Trek or Specialized Bicycles are both great. 400 pounds is $800 and that will get you a quality bicycle that will last you for a while. Just be sure and keep it locked up well. I'm considering a Trek 7.3fx myself because it has the best parts for the price. I like drop handle bars but they have "steal me" all over'em. Hey I assume you are from the UK. Go M.U.F.C!!!!
    Cool that aching head!

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Trek 7.3 2009

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony87 View Post
    Trek or Specialized Bicycles are both great. 400 pounds is $800 and that will get you a quality bicycle that will last you for a while. Just be sure and keep it locked up well. I'm considering a Trek 7.3fx myself because it has the best parts for the price. I like drop handle bars but they have "steal me" all over'em. Hey I assume you are from the UK. Go M.U.F.C!!!!
    Thankyou so much for your advice. Can I just ask you a couple more questions so I can clarify this in my head. Would I be best looking for a Trek 7.3 fx 2008 which I could get for about 350 or should I stick with the 2009 at 420? Also what if I could get a Specialized Sirrus Elite 2008 for around 400?

    Thanks a lot!
    Daniel

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Can I just add to that - I've noticed that I could probably get a Specialized Sirrus Comp 2007 for a similar price. So basically what would you suggest:

    Trek 7.3 fx 2008?
    Trek 7.3 fx 2009?
    Specialized Sirrus Elite 2008?
    Specialized Sirrus Comp 2007?

    Cheers,
    Daniel

  7. #7
    Velocommuter Commando Sirrus Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    My Bikes
    '88 Specialized Sirrus, '89 Alpine Monitor Pass, two '70 Raligh Twenties, '07 Schwinn Town & Country Trike, '07 Specialized Sirrus Hybrid
    Posts
    2,558
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by danielcpaterson View Post
    Can I just add to that - I've noticed that I could probably get a Specialized Sirrus Comp 2007 for a similar price. So basically what would you suggest:

    Trek 7.3 fx 2008?
    Trek 7.3 fx 2009?
    Specialized Sirrus Elite 2008?
    Specialized Sirrus Comp 2007?

    Cheers,
    Daniel
    My vote is for the Specialized Sirrus Comp 2007. I have the base level of '07 and I like the frame better than the two later models.
    Riding 19 Years of Specialized Sirrus Tradition.
    Live in Houston? Come to http://bicyclecommutehouston.blogspot.com/
    1988 Specialized Sirrus, 1989 Alpine Monitor Pass MTB, 2007 Specialized Sirrus 700C hybrid, 2007 Schwinn Town & Country trike, 1970 "Resto-Improved" Raleigh 20, 1970 "WIP" Raleigh 20, and 1980 "WIP" Schwinn Town & Country trike

  8. #8
    Senior Member mrbrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    My Bikes
    Upgraded Scott Sub 20 in silver; Specialized Hardrock Comp Disc 2006 in limited edition Army green; Dahon Curve D3 foldable in white; Dahon MU P24 in blue.
    Posts
    342
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am riding a Scott Sub 20 (07) right now. Love it very much. I did kinda change some things, most notably the cassette to a 9-speed Ultegra. But the bike, even stock, rides very well. It is very nimble in traffic (for a full-sized bike, though not as nimble as my foldies) and has a forward riding position which I like (lets me speed a little). The included slicks are ok, though down the line, more puncture resistant tires like Panaracers will be better.

    I ride the 26-inch wheels model, though I am told the 700C one is better if one likes go to a little faster.
    Mercy overtakes
    even when you push fifty
    pedaling His paths


    My blog | My podcasts | My Flickr | My Rides

  9. #9
    some call me fred marcoocram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Corrales, NM
    My Bikes
    Panasonic DX 1000, Gary Fisher Marlin, Specialized Crossroads
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Pounds of what? Wow, I bet that was not funny.
    I have to get up in the morning at ten o'clock at night, half an hour before I go to bed, eat a lump of cold poison, work twenty-nine hours a day then ride to work.

  10. #10
    delman
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony87 View Post
    Trek or Specialized Bicycles are both great. 400 pounds is $800 and that will get you a quality bicycle that will last you for a while. Just be sure and keep it locked up well. I'm considering a Trek 7.3fx myself because it has the best parts for the price. I like drop handle bars but they have "steal me" all over'em. Hey I assume you are from the UK. Go M.U.F.C!!!!
    On that exchange rate the pound is really weak and it equals $1.4233 as of yesterday. So more like $570. Plus the fee for conversion if needed. It was just a gap of several hundred so I figured that it should be noted.

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi guys,

    Thanks for your responses. I'm buying the bike with pounds in the UK, so there is no problem with exchange rate. All the bikes I mentioned can be bought for roughly 400, however I just noticed EvansCycles are not selling either the Specialized Sirrus Comp 2007 or the Elite 2008 any more - they were by far the cheapest retailer! The Comp 2007 is now out as it is over budget at 700.

    I can actually get the Elite 2008 for 450 but wondered about the Specialized Sirrus Sport 2009 at 390 or do you think I should even push it up to 537 for the Elite 2009? As you say the 2008 frame may be better and it is a similar bike but much cheaper.

    The Trek 7.3 fx 2008 is also an idea however it is slower than the Sirrus range apparently, although the Sirrus is unforgiving on any rough road surfaces and apparently the back end is quite volatile in certain conditions. The Sirrus are flat bar road bikes whereas the Trek is a hybrid - is that basically correct?
    I can get the Trek 7.3 fx 2008 for 342.55 and the 2009 for 424. Any thoughts?

    I'm aiming to order and buy in the next couple of days.
    Which would you buy?

    Thanks,
    Daniel

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey guys, thanks for your responses!

    I have noticed that Evans Cycles have now stopped selling the Sirrus Comp 2007 and the Elite 2008 - they were by far the cheapest retailer! The Comp 2007 is now out of the question as it is very hard to find and above budget at 700.

    I can get the Elite 2008 somewhere else for 450 which seems like a fairly good deal. However, would you suggest the Sport 2009 at 390 or pushing it up to 537 for the Elite 2009? Perhaps the 2008 is the best idea as it is cheaper, similar components and possibly better frame?
    The Trek 7.3 fx is still an idea. I can get the 2008 for 342 and 2009 for 424.

    Based on quality, components and prices which bike would you go for?
    I'm going to order and buy in the next couple of days so please respond.
    Any help is so appreciated because I really need a good bike.

    Thanks a lot,
    Daniel

  13. #13
    Flying Under the Radar X-LinkedRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Northeast PA
    My Bikes
    10' SuperiorLite SL Club | 06' Giant FCR3 | 2010 GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc
    Posts
    4,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Personally, if you are looking to go more road than comfort in a commuter, which I would and did for a multitude of reasons. I have a giant FCR3 (2006) which was around 500 american. It has served every purpose I could throw at it. I toured cross country or at least 1400 miles worth, use it to commute for work/errands/social, and go hang with some of the roadies for a 40-50 miler no problem. I love my Giant and pretty much every giant I can remember owning. I would pick up that 2008.5 FCR2 if I were you.
    12' SuperiorLite SL Pro w/ Sram Rival | 10' SuperiorLite SL Club w/ Sram Force | 06' Giant FCR (Dropbar) w/ Shimano 5700 | 10' GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,325
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I test rode both trek and specialized globe sport disc and found the trek a much harsher ride so went with the specialized.

    From my own experience I'd go with disc brakes and drop handlebars, but test ride extensively first.

  15. #15
    Dutch bornintime22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Delco, PA
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I own a Trek 7100.

    You can grab one around 300-400 US.

    Good bike, serves it's purpose. Shifting is cheap and it is a bit heavy. Other then that if you're on flat ground this bike can fly!

  16. #16
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Giants?

    Hi guys thanks again for your useful replies. I have realised that I could get a Trek 7.5 fx 2008 at 444 instead of a 7.3 fx 2009. How much better is the 7.5? Also, many people have said that Trek and Specialized are quite harsh rides. So I looked into the Giant FCR range which apparently is almost as fast, more comfortable and higher-spec bikes in general. I can get a FCR1 2007 for 440 and the 2008 for 464. The CRS Alliance is also highly praised at 447. Anyway is the FCR1 2008 the best Giant here? I would think so.

    If so my final decision is probably between the Trek 7.5 fx 2008, the Specialized Sirrus Elite 2008 and the Giant FCR1 2008?

    Please reply, thanks people

  17. #17
    Flying Under the Radar X-LinkedRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Northeast PA
    My Bikes
    10' SuperiorLite SL Club | 06' Giant FCR3 | 2010 GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc
    Posts
    4,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes the best Giant on the list int he Road hybrid category. FCR1 is better than the 2 is better than the 3. The next step up is the TCR and then the always coveted OCR.

    I cannot state enough, how much I love my Giant. Specialized does make some cool looking water bottle holders though.
    12' SuperiorLite SL Pro w/ Sram Rival | 10' SuperiorLite SL Club w/ Sram Force | 06' Giant FCR (Dropbar) w/ Shimano 5700 | 10' GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc

  18. #18
    delman
    Guest
    Currently if my ordered bike falls through I think that I may get the trek 7.3 but the 7.5 would be better in your case but that is only off of what I can get my hands on here easilly.

    If you have it down to those three, try them and decide which one you like most. Specs only go so far.

    I am in close to the same situation but I had my mind set on what I wanted so it is on order but it doesn't really compare as much especially equipment wise but I plan on using it as a solid foundation that will last through the upgrades that I plan to make.
    Last edited by delman; 03-07-09 at 11:02 PM.

  19. #19
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thanks guys

    Hi guys thanks for your responses. I am leaning toward the FCR 1 2008 mainly because of the higher-spec components and its solidity and fairly comfortable ride. However, what would you say the main noticeable differences are between it and the Sirrus and 7.5 FX? Ie. Handling, speed, comfort, maintenance, factory default tyres etc. The Sirrus seems to be getting many votes as I have posted this thread on a couple of other forums. It seems very popular but I think the Giant is better value.

    Many thanks,
    Daniel

  20. #20
    Flying Under the Radar X-LinkedRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Northeast PA
    My Bikes
    10' SuperiorLite SL Club | 06' Giant FCR3 | 2010 GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc
    Posts
    4,117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They are all good bikes. I found the same thing, the Giant to be best value and better than the sirrus which was better than the trek. I like the ride and the cost of the giant the best. In the end, I defintiely made the right decision.

    Plus the Giant had the least amount of decals and such.

    3000 miles later I could not think of a better bike for me to have gotten.
    12' SuperiorLite SL Pro w/ Sram Rival | 10' SuperiorLite SL Club w/ Sram Force | 06' Giant FCR (Dropbar) w/ Shimano 5700 | 10' GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,611
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by danielcpaterson View Post
    Hi guys thanks for your responses. I am leaning toward the FCR 1 2008 mainly because of the higher-spec components and its solidity and fairly comfortable ride. However, what would you say the main noticeable differences are between it and the Sirrus and 7.5 FX? Ie. Handling, speed, comfort, maintenance, factory default tyres etc. The Sirrus seems to be getting many votes as I have posted this thread on a couple of other forums. It seems very popular but I think the Giant is better value.

    Many thanks,
    Daniel
    Some general "rules" (for road bicycles).

    * Generally, for the same model (eg, Specialized Sirrus Elite), companies downgrade the components slightly each year to keep the price of that model relatively constant. This means "last year's" model will tend to be the better buy.

    * Generally, the quality of components for a given price range will be fairly close in performance. (Note that it's possible that a particular model of a particular component might have design/reliablity issues but this problem should be rare.

    * Beyond the inexpensive range, the reliability and maintenance costs of components doesn't really improve much with the cost of the component. That is, a lot of "midrange" components last just as long as the high end. It's the midrange where the value lies. Keep in mind that midrange is also cheaper to replace if they wear out or get damaged. (It's possible that this "rule" does not apply to tires!) A lot of what you are paying for with expensive components is reduced weight. You also get better looking stuff with more money (but better looking isn't necessarily better functioning).

    * $800 should get you quite a nice bicycle from any reputable company (Specialized, Trek, Giant are all reputable companies).
    Last edited by njkayaker; 03-10-09 at 11:32 AM.

  22. #22
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Hi guys

    Hi guys,
    Remember that I am looking for something that WILL be able to cope with city roads, hills, the occasional pot-hole, uneven slabs and perhaps some rougher pavements and roads. I want to use it in the city and on 40mile road trips and some bike paths. However, I will NOT be using it on tracks or off road, so not on any very loose, rocky, muddy, gravelly surfaces.
    With this in mind, the Specialized Sirrus Elite 2008 may be out of the question because several people on various forums have suggested that it is quite a harsh ride and doesn't cope with city roads particularly well. Also they complain of frequent punctures with the factory default tyres and say the handlebars shake considerably on even semi-rough surfaces. Also the Giant FCR 1 2008 is a road bike with flatbars. It is really designed only for the road so someone suggested I look at the Giant CRS Alliance 2008 which is apparently comfortable, fast and more versatile.
    I am already aware that the Trek 7.5 Fx 2008 is highly rated, very popular, light, versatile, quite fast and can cope with some long road trips and some rough surfaces. People say the cons of this bike are the narrow hand grips and hard seat - both of which can be easily upgraded.
    There are very few reviews of the Giant CRS Alliance so I would appreciate it if anyone could give me the heads up on it? What are the pros and cons? How does it compare to the Trek 7.5 fx?
    I think I am almost at a decision of what to test-ride.

    Any help would be great and thanks for your help so far, you've been great!
    Daniel

  23. #23
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Conclusion, your opinion?

    Hello, I have narrowed my search down to the Trek 7.5 FX 2008 and the Giant CRS Alliance 2008.
    Both cost roughly the same. Below are their specs. There are some differences in materials used, the crank, the frame and even tyres so I would appreciate your idea on which would my needs better ie. some city cycling and some short road trips.

    Trek: Aluminium frame, carbon fork, 32mm Bontrager tyres, cassette 11-26, 9 speed, crank 48/36/26, alloy pedals, avid brakes.

    Giant: Composite frame, carbon composite fork w/ aluminium steerer, 35mm Kenda tyres, cassette 12-26, 27 speed, crank 12-26, steel pedals, shimano brakes.

    Please answer and I promise not to post again on this topic hehe!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •