Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-27-09, 02:39 PM   #1
TrekJapan
Each Drop of Sweat Counts
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Iwakuni Japan
Bikes: MASI Speciale Road, Specialized Rockhopper 29'er, Dahon Jetstream XP, Dahon Speed P8, Dahon Speed TR, Dahon Speed TT, Ignio Folding bike
Posts: 825
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Fenders and Schwalbe Big Apples

Got a set of 26 x 2" Big Apples for my Trek SU 2.0 yesterday. I want to throw some fenders on the bike and can't decide between 45 or 60 mm.

I prefer the looks of the 45's but realize it'll take 60 to cover the whole tire.

That being said I have two folding bikes with Big Apples and the water tosses right from the middle of the tires on the Big Apps.

Is 45 enough to keep the road goop off.
TrekJapan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-09, 06:51 PM   #2
xB_Nutt
Get on your bikes & ride!
 
xB_Nutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lextown
Bikes: See signature (it varys day to day)
Posts: 1,070
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would go with the 60 mm ones. I am running 26x2.0 big apples and it looks fine with 60 mm fenders.





__________________
Litespeed Classic
Soma Double Cross DC
xB_Nutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-09, 06:45 AM   #3
lambo_vt
member. heh.
 
lambo_vt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,631
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, my Buzz has 26x2.0 Big Apples and the 60mm Planet Bike Cascadia ATB fenders. I think 45mm would be just a bit too narrow... I had to do some chopping to fit them into the frame though.
lambo_vt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-09, 07:43 AM   #4
Cfd
Lives2ride
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Surly Crosscheck
Posts: 102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The 60mm would give you the coverage you need for 2" tires.
It is always better that they are a little wide than narrow.
If your fenders don't come with mudflaps, be sure to make some.

Last edited by Cfd; 04-28-09 at 07:45 AM. Reason: addition
Cfd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-09, 08:53 AM   #5
HardyWeinberg
GATC
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: south Puget Sound
Bikes:
Posts: 7,556
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
I have Cascadia 60s over my 2.0 BAs. If you're worried about 60s 'looking' too big (relative to 45s), believe me, w/ those tires, they won't.
HardyWeinberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 PM.