Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Very, very Senior Member JPprivate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    2012 Surly Troll, 1999 Hardtail MTB
    Posts
    1,223
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    bike computer questions

    So I just bought a basic wireless bike computer (you know the one that counts the rotations of your tire) and tried it out on my route. I usually have morning route and an afternoon/evening route. The morning route is approx 60% on a MUP along a river (as in curved). I measured the distance using bikely.com and got 7.1 m, but the bike computer spit out 7.356?
    Question: How accurate are the distance measurements on bike computers? Because a large part of my trip is on a MUP, exact measurements are not that easily made on bikely.com.
    I'll try my afternoon route, which is more along streets to see if I get a more accurate reading.
    thanks,

  2. #2
    Cold Rain and Snow Hot Potato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Western Chicagoland
    Posts
    1,762
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They are ase accurate as your measurement of your tire circumference.

    They all mulitply tire revolutions by the circumference to calculate distance. Your computer has a default circumference, and likely a choice of circumference by tire size. But for true accuracy, you measure your tire circumference on the wheel that has the magnet. Mark a spot on the floor, roll one revolution, mark another spot, measure the distance between the mark. Use the valve stem, or some other identifying mark on the tire or rim to see one revolution. Then input your measurement to the computer.
    Quietly elevating being dropped to an art form

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Southeast
    My Bikes
    cyclotank
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ...And the difference is grand 3.5%. Wow. Tire widths are all over the chart, there are 28s that are closer to 25s than some 25s, and vice versa. With MTB tires the difference is even more pronounced - pump it up from 50 to 65 PSI and watch it swell... Even using Hot Potato's method of computer calibration your ride distance recorded will be affected by the difference between pressure at calibration and pressure during ride.

    This is precisely the reason I tell my distances as "about xx miles".

    I guess, in your case the tire is a bit narrower than nominal size so the wheel rotates a bit faster to cover the same distance.

    Geez, listen to me reveling in my geekitude....

    Have fun and ride safe

    SF
    Last edited by sci_femme; 09-21-09 at 08:47 AM. Reason: typo

  4. #4
    Very, very Senior Member JPprivate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    2012 Surly Troll, 1999 Hardtail MTB
    Posts
    1,223
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thank hotpotato, that makes sense. But it sounds like you're suggesting that the tire circumference provided with the bike computer (for my tire size) may not be 100% accurate. Is that the case, have others had the same experience?

  5. #5
    Cycle Dallas MMACH 5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Land of Gar, TX
    My Bikes
    Lucinda--2010 Jamis Aurora Elite & a few others
    Posts
    3,366
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JPprivate View Post
    thank hotpotato, that makes sense. But it sounds like you're suggesting that the tire circumference provided with the bike computer (for my tire size) may not be 100% accurate. Is that the case, have others had the same experience?
    Yes. For the most accurate measurements, use the "roll-out" method for determining the wheel circumference.
    That's gonna leave a mark.

  6. #6
    Cold Rain and Snow Hot Potato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Western Chicagoland
    Posts
    1,762
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think my computers pre-set circumference based upon tire size was 5% off. I have an MUP with mile markers, and it consitently read 1.05 miles for each mile marker I passed. I was just as impressed with the computers consistency as I was with the paths markers. Then I made the circumference measurement and calculated what the circumference distance change should be based upon the mile makers, and they were within a few millimeters, giving me confidence that my measurement and the mile markers were accurate enough.

    Is it a big deal? Not really, like sci femme alludes to. However, I wanted to answer your question, and it would be a bigger deal if you never set the circumference to the correct tire size.

    You could always go GPS, then your tire circumference gets measured and set automatically, updated as you ride for tire wear and pressure changes, or not used at all. A mere 400 bucks will spare you the agony of circumference measurement.
    Last edited by Hot Potato; 09-21-09 at 09:22 AM.
    Quietly elevating being dropped to an art form

  7. #7
    Very, very Senior Member JPprivate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    2012 Surly Troll, 1999 Hardtail MTB
    Posts
    1,223
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I guess, in your case the tire is a bit narrower than nominal size so the wheel rotates a bit faster to cover the same distance.
    scifemme: I think you're on to something, I did change my tires from the original 1.95 to 1.75. While width shouldn't directly influence the circumference I guess the thickness of the tire is of course different too.

  8. #8
    Very, very Senior Member JPprivate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    2012 Surly Troll, 1999 Hardtail MTB
    Posts
    1,223
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have an MUP with mile markers,
    That's an excellent idea, I think I going to go this route. Adjust my computer until MUP mile markers / computer readouts are the same.
    (I don't trust my ability to measure one tire rotations accurately to 1/10 of an inch) :-)

  9. #9
    Older than dirt CCrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Winchester, VA
    My Bikes
    Too darn many.. latest count is 11
    Posts
    5,345
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hot Potato View Post
    You could always go GPS, then your tire circumference gets measured and set automatically, updated as you ride for tire wear and pressure changes, or not used at all. A mere 400 bucks will spare you the agony of circumference measurement.
    Naa, not $400, but look at what ya get This morning's commute:

    http://connect.garmin.com/activity/13736848

    But what can I say... I freely admit to my geekiness.

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Toronto, CA
    My Bikes
    Louis Garneau Motion City 2.0
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wow that GPS thing looks really convenient! (A bit too pricey imo though, even if it's less than you say). That's a great route, it's a trail practically the whole way!

    I just got a computer for my bike and it's <2% error which is more than acceptable on my own terms. At the end of the week it's only gonna make a difference of a couple kms.

  11. #11
    Older than dirt CCrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Winchester, VA
    My Bikes
    Too darn many.. latest count is 11
    Posts
    5,345
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Racergonemad View Post
    (A bit too pricey imo though, even if it's less than you say). That's a great route, it's a trail practically the whole way!
    I paid $169 for it on sale. And yeah, it's a great commute by bike! But I have 50 more miles of it in a car to get to that point

  12. #12
    Cold Rain and Snow Hot Potato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Western Chicagoland
    Posts
    1,762
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CCrew View Post
    I paid $169 for it on sale. And yeah, it's a great commute by bike! But I have 50 more miles of it in a car to get to that point
    I was thinking of the Edge 605. Are maps on a bike computer cool? Yes. Is it worth three or four hundred dollars more? I dunno. I presume you have an edge 305 for that price? Or some other garmin product? They are awesome bike computers, even without the map features of the expensive high end models. I use the on bike map stuff less than once a month, if that, so my edge 705 is a bit overkill. I use the heart rate monitor even less than maps.
    Quietly elevating being dropped to an art form

  13. #13
    aka Phil Jungels Wanderer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Aurora, IL
    My Bikes
    Road & Hybrid
    Posts
    5,509
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rollling the tire out, about 3 complete revolutions, using that average circumference, is the only way you will get accurate measurements. Make sure the tire is loaded like it would be in riding.

    Those mileposts were probably put in by someone using a speedometer in a pickup truck......

    Using the averaged rollout measurement, you will be as accurate as you can be.

  14. #14
    Older than dirt CCrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Winchester, VA
    My Bikes
    Too darn many.. latest count is 11
    Posts
    5,345
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hot Potato View Post
    I was thinking of the Edge 605. Are maps on a bike computer cool? Yes. Is it worth three or four hundred dollars more? I dunno. I presume you have an edge 305 for that price? Or some other garmin product? They are awesome bike computers, even without the map features of the expensive high end models. I use the on bike map stuff less than once a month, if that, so my edge 705 is a bit overkill. I use the heart rate monitor even less than maps.
    It's an Edge 305. I have the HR and Speed/cadence. I pretty much use the commute as training, so I use the HR fairly extensively and track it to the cadence. For what I use it for the 305 is all I need. Don't get me wrong, the 605/705 are nice units, but from owning several other Garmins I've found that the routing via itty screen doesn't work well for me.

  15. #15
    Senior Member cyclefreaksix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Plano Texas
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I put a drop of oil on my tire and roll my bike across my garage floor. Measure the "wet spots" and I've got a purty good idea of my tire circumference.

  16. #16
    GATC
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    south Puget Sound
    Posts
    6,609
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JPprivate View Post
    thank hotpotato, that makes sense. But it sounds like you're suggesting that the tire circumference provided with the bike computer (for my tire size) may not be 100% accurate. Is that the case, have others had the same experience?
    Absolutely. And it varies w/ pressure too.

  17. #17
    Cold Rain and Snow Hot Potato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Western Chicagoland
    Posts
    1,762
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclefreaksix View Post
    I put a drop of oil on my tire and roll my bike across my garage floor. Measure the "wet spots" and I've got a purty good idea of my tire circumference.
    And that is the kind of pearl that sneaks into a BF thread every now and then to make it all worth while.

    Now what do I do with the pink sidewalk chalk I hid from my kids.
    Quietly elevating being dropped to an art form

  18. #18
    `````````````` CaptainCool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    san jose
    Posts
    765
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JPprivate View Post
    Because a large part of my trip is on a MUP, exact measurements are not that easily made on bikely.com.
    Try http://www.gmap-pedometer.com and select "Manually (straight lines)." Zoom in, use hybrid maps, then start laying out your exact route.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •