Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26
  1. #1
    bulletproof tiger ok_commuter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Waterford 2200, Litespeed Tuscany, Salsa La Cruz, Kona Fire Mountain
    Posts
    1,934
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Hot New Cannondales

    Apologies if somebody has already posted this Velonews article about Cannondale's new urban bikelineup.

    The Quick CX Ultimate is part of the Quick urban bike series, showed last year as a concept. It's part of what Cannondale calls its “Urban Mobility Project,” and illustrates how exciting a high-tech commuter bike can be.

    The Quick Carbon urban bikes bring a number of top-end technologies like BB30 and integrated headsets to a sleek carbon frame that retains practical features like rack and fender eyelets. Of course 700C wheels and clearance for cyclocross tires don’t hurt, and the flat bar is more suited to heads-up urban riding than a drop bar might be.

    The Quick line also includes a series of aluminum bikes at lower prices. Quick Carbon bikes are slated for October availability.
    sic

  2. #2
    Real Men Ride Ordinaries fuzz2050's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,637
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The On is scary. I just can't get over the fact that a good half of the bike just isn't there.

    That, and the fact they mix a lefty fork with a righty bike. That's just wrong.

  3. #3
    Beer is delicious! Quickbeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    549
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by fuzz2050 View Post
    The On is scary. I just can't get over the fact that a good half of the bike just isn't there.

    That, and the fact they mix a lefty fork with a righty bike. That's just wrong.
    Fixing flats without have to remove the wheels would be SWEET though! Especially for a commuter.
    Rebellion without purpose is worse than conformity.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Shimagnolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Zang's Spur, CO
    Posts
    6,353
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by fuzz2050 View Post
    The On is scary. I just can't get over the fact that a good half of the bike just isn't there.

    That, and the fact they mix a lefty fork with a righty bike. That's just wrong.
    I just don't get C'dales compulsion to make a bike as ugly as possible.
    I wouldn't use a Lefty fork if they gave me one, let alone this abomination.
    Last edited by Shimagnolo; 09-22-09 at 10:27 AM.

  5. #5
    ride for a change modernjess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-check & Moonlander, Pivot Mach 429, Ted Wojcik Sof-Trac, Ridley Orion. Santa Cruz Stigmata
    Posts
    2,021
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the On = a solution in search of a problem.

  6. #6
    Senior Member canyoneagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Palisade, CO
    My Bikes
    Singular Gryphon fully rigid 29er multi-use. Nuvinci N360 IGH
    Posts
    4,237
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Generally some sharp looking bikes, but I think most people know how I feel about carbon..........

    The on looks like a structural engineer's nightmare (I have a civil/structural background, though I have specialized in project management).
    Not only does the vertical axis torque have to be fully compensated near the bottom bracket, but the off-axis load (single mounting point at the hub, 60-65mm off the centerline of the bicycle) would create a nasty off-axis rotational force as well.

    No thanks. If they were looking for ease of wheel removal with the IGH, I'd have gone the same route as the Swobo Baxter and designed it with paragon sliders and vertical dropouts.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Boise, ID.
    Posts
    1,253
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Screw Cannondale.

    I used to rant about them, used to love them.

    However now that they've fired most of their American frame builders, I have a hard time taking them seriously.

    That On design looks typical though, they always have to be different.

    All that being said, my 2003 Cannondale F500 is a sweet frame.
    1993 Cannondale T700 - 1994 Specialized Rockhopper - Actionbent T1 (Electrification in progress!)

  8. #8
    Eurotrash viplala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    66
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by oakback View Post
    Yeah, I can't imagine how much engineering went in to overcome the huge forces on that bracket piece, that could easily be solved with a simple seat stay, just to look cool.
    Not much. Single sided swingarms have been used on motorcycles for over 2 decades now. The puny forces going through a bicycle frame are nothing compared to forces going through a motorcycle frame.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,791
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The On has no rear triangle, no seat stays and no chainstay! What keeps the bike anchored to the wheel is the fully enclosed chaincase. Yours for a MSRP of $3900!

  10. #10
    Senior Member canyoneagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Palisade, CO
    My Bikes
    Singular Gryphon fully rigid 29er multi-use. Nuvinci N360 IGH
    Posts
    4,237
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by viplala View Post
    Not much. Single sided swingarms have been used on motorcycles for over 2 decades now. The puny forces going through a bicycle frame are nothing compared to forces going through a motorcycle frame.
    motorcycle frames <> bicycle frames. Wayyyyy different in many ways.

    Still, your point is taken, and I'm not saying that bicycle frames can't be designed with a single-sided frame system. I'm expressing some concerns with this particular design.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Shimagnolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Zang's Spur, CO
    Posts
    6,353
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by canyoneagle View Post
    motorcycle frames <> bicycle frames. Wayyyyy different in many ways.

    Still, your point is taken, and I'm not saying that bicycle frames can't be designed with a single-sided frame system. I'm expressing some concerns with this particular design.
    A very wise man (senior networking engineer) once told me:
    "Just because something *can* be done, doesn't mean it *should* be done."

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    My Bikes
    2000 Univega 300 Rover
    Posts
    182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So I guess they don't expect buyers of the On to mount a rack on their bike?

  13. #13
    King of the Ramsey Hills specq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Saint Paul
    Posts
    322
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NormanF View Post
    The On has no rear triangle, no seat stays and no chainstay! What keeps the bike anchored to the wheel is the fully enclosed chaincase. Yours for a MSRP of $3900!
    Rear fender mount is a $1000 extra.

  14. #14
    Eurotrash viplala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    66
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by oakback View Post
    Yes, but motorcycles have one or 2 big springs/dampers between the swing arm and the chassis (edit: same position as a seatstay, just with suspension). I think if there were some sort of (I don't know the name of this) rotational spring mechanism in the front of the hub to absorb shock, it would be pretty nifty.

    Rotary dampers actually exist, although i've never seen one small enough to fit into a bicycle frame.

  15. #15
    Not a legend
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    379
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NormanF View Post
    The On has no rear triangle, no seat stays and no chainstay! What keeps the bike anchored to the wheel is the fully enclosed chaincase. Yours for a MSRP of $3900!

    *seatstays and chainstays not included.

  16. #16
    Jet Jockey Banzai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Leavenworth, KS
    My Bikes
    Cannondale CAAD9 SRAM Red, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Nashbar X-frame
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by modernjess View Post
    the On = a solution in search of a problem.
    +1.

    And I can't imagine where they'll find that problem. Never put it past marketers though to think of something...
    Good night...and good luck

  17. #17
    Senior Member cycle16v's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    DFW
    My Bikes
    Cannondale, Giant, Specialized
    Posts
    172
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by corkscrew View Post
    Screw Cannondale.

    I used to rant about them, used to love them.

    However now that they've fired most of their American frame builders, I have a hard time taking them seriously.

    That On design looks typical though, they always have to be different.

    All that being said, my 2003 Cannondale F500 is a sweet frame.
    I'm not sure I dig their new frames either but I still love my Cannondale CAAD9 R2 road bike. I particularly like the "Made in USA" branding on the bike but I guess that's going away too.

  18. #18
    Real Men Ride Ordinaries fuzz2050's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,637
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    a bit of perspective that makes the ON make a little more sense

    it was meant to be a folding bike-the Jackknife

    That idea has some merits, but I guess the engineering was just too much.

  19. #19
    member. heh. lambo_vt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Williamsburg, VA
    Posts
    1,631
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They're manufacturing 200 Ons, 100 of which will be sold in the US. Let's not fly off the handle on how it represents the death of good bicycle design quite yet.

  20. #20
    Eurotrash viplala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    66
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That On will be sold to a handful of rich hipsters. The kind of people who refer to every item in their household as "design".

  21. #21
    Not a legend
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    379
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I gotta say, I am not rich, not a hipster, yet even I can appreciate even the most lowly Walmart bike as "design". We've had many years to refine the bicycle, and we've done well. I'm not saying there's never going to be improvements, but the traditional design we have now does have a lot going for it.

  22. #22
    Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped. BarracksSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    My Bikes
    Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
    Posts
    13,857
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by fuzz2050 View Post
    a bit of perspective that makes the ON make a little more sense

    it was meant to be a folding bike-the Jackknife
    [IMG][/IMG]
    That idea has some merits, but I guess the engineering was just too much.
    That also evolved into the On Concept in 2008, seen in the wall art here:
    http://velonews.com/photo/98086
    And at Cannondale's site:
    http://www.cannondalecommunity.com/s...sp?item=298976

    It had a "Righty" fork instead of a Lefty so that, when folded, it could fold pretty flat, with the fork leg on one side and the drivetrain case on the other. What just occurred to me is how loud the chain could be as it rattles around inside the case; wonder how they'll approach that.

    The new carbon Quick frame looks hot. I'd just be afraid of a light pole scraping it up.

  23. #23
    Senior Member d2create's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Houston we have a problem
    Posts
    2,911
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Those are some nasty (in a bad way) looking bikes.
    2008 Rivendell A. Homer Hilsen
    Pics and Specs Here!

    2010 Specialized Rockhopper 29er

  24. #24
    not a role model JeffS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    4,645
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by d2create View Post
    Those are some nasty (in a bad way) looking bikes.
    I bet if I put on on rivbike.com you would change your mind

  25. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Flagstaff, AZ
    My Bikes
    Marin Pt. Reyes, Gary Fisher HiFi Pro, Easy Racers Gold Rush recumbent, Cannondale F600
    Posts
    976
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've owned several Cannondales over the years and I like all the innovation they do... but they walk away from so much of their stuff after a few years. Try getting parts to rebuild a headshock from 2000 from them... I did, and you can't. I don't blame them entirely, that's part of being an innovator. For my commuting bikes, though, I'd like to have something I can rebuild in a decade.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •