Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-10, 10:12 AM   #1
cooleric1234
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Aurora, CO
Bikes: CAAD9-1, Windsor Cliff 29er
Posts: 1,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
B17 or B17N

I've read the existing threads, but I would like some specific advice. I am looking at a Brooks B17 or B17N for my commuter bike. I'm a tall guy, 6'5" and around 190 lbs. As a fact of the way bikes are designed for larger sizes I have a large drop from the saddle to the handlebars (not sure how much, but many inches). It's not really uncomfortable (which, for some reason, I hear is usually the case with tall people). But it makes me wonder if I should get a B17N for less thigh problems while pedaling. I measured my sit bones at home to be around 125-130 mm (I know, not terribly accurate). I don't care about speed or weight, just comfort and getting fewer saddle sores.
cooleric1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-10, 10:14 AM   #2
PlatyPius
Arsehole
 
PlatyPius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 2,280
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In your position, I would go with the B-17N. I have one, and I love it. It's more comfortable to me than the B-17 it replaced.
PlatyPius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-10, 11:43 AM   #3
SoreFeet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 2,058
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If you are riding on a narrow saddle now and don't mind the B17N will work very well. Use Obenhaufs LP to condition the saddle. Brooks proofhide sucks.
SoreFeet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 09:10 AM   #4
rogerstg
Fred-ish
 
rogerstg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Bikes:
Posts: 1,800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
FYI, 125 sit bones are probably too wide for a b17N, putting them over the metal support - ouch.
rogerstg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-10, 10:24 AM   #5
CliftonGK1
Senior Member
 
CliftonGK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc
Posts: 11,380
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
With a few inches of drop from the saddle to bars, you might want to look at the Swallow or Swift instead of the B-17 saddles.
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
CliftonGK1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:21 PM.