Are trail tires more flat resistant than slicks when used on the street?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 204
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Are trail tires more flat resistant than slicks when used on the street?
I have a Trek 820 with Bontrager Connection Trail, 26x2.0" tires . I would like to try slicks for my 20 mile round trip city street commute but wonder if the slicks will be more prone to flats, I have not had a flat yet in about 1,000 miles of commuting over glass and debris strewn city streets. I would also like to add that flat prevention is more important to me than a quicker commute.
#2
I drink your MILKSHAKE
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Nope they aren't. Trail tires are just as vulnerable if not more so due to the thinner rubber between the tread blocks. Get a quality flat resistant slick like the All-conditions from Specialized or my favorite [url=https://www.specialized.com/SBCEqProduct.jsp?spid=5532&JServSessionIdroot=3gnu8nrrhx.j27010[The Specialized Nimbus Armadillo[/url] and you'll do fine.
#3
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
I don't have experience with either tire, but can tell you that I have 1500mi of no flats with Specialized Crossroads ex tires (slick center of tire, knobs on edges) on city streets, glass, bits of wire, etc.
I wouldn't recommend them for street use only as the ride was still a bit rough on turning compared to slicks and they are heavy.
Al
I wouldn't recommend them for street use only as the ride was still a bit rough on turning compared to slicks and they are heavy.
Al
#4
I drink your MILKSHAKE
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
I don't have experience with either tire, but can tell you that I have 1500mi of no flats with Specialized Crossroads ex tires (slick center of tire, knobs on edges) on city streets, glass, bits of wire, etc.
I wouldn't recommend them for street use only as the ride was still a bit rough on turning compared to slicks and they are heavy.
Al
I wouldn't recommend them for street use only as the ride was still a bit rough on turning compared to slicks and they are heavy.
Al
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 566
Bikes: Vision R40 - recumbent, Gunnar Crosshairs
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just wish Specialized would make something like the Nimbus in a 406...
#6
Senior Member
Go with a good pair of slicks. On pavement, they're actually more flat resistent than knobbies. I used to have a mountain bike for commuting, and whenever I had knobbies, they wore quickly. Also, knobbies are inefficient on pavement. With a 20 mile commute, efficiency is very important. Get a tire with a flat, but not smooth tread; you want some groves for a little better traction.
I'd like to throw in another endoresment of Specialized Armadillo tires. I've had a pair on my cyclocross bike for over two years, and only had one flat, and that was probably because I over-inflated the tube. These tires can take just about anything.
I'd like to throw in another endoresment of Specialized Armadillo tires. I've had a pair on my cyclocross bike for over two years, and only had one flat, and that was probably because I over-inflated the tube. These tires can take just about anything.
#7
Devilmaycare Cycling Fool
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wynnum, Australia
Posts: 3,819
Bikes: 1998 Cannondale F700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Off road tyres have a larger surface patch in contact with the road, they have large treads that pick up and hold debris more readily, giving it time to work into the tyre, they are generally run at softer pressures, which also aids in picking up debris. On top of that, they are slow, heavy and noisy.
The rule of thumb I go by with tyres is that you choose a tyre with features that match the surface they'll be used on. Soft bumpy tyres are best suited to soft bumpy trails. For hard, smooth roads, hard smooth tyres are best. The need for tread on a road tyre is a myth, even in the wet, according to Sheldon Brown. However, using the above rule of thumb, if you are likely to encounter gravel patches or other debris that makes the road slightly loose, some amount of tread would be potentially useful.
That said, in my experience, knobbies are no more or less resistant to punctures than slicks, but the added efficiency of slicks makes the choice a no-brainer for me. I couldn't get the Specialised ones mentioned above here in Aus. I run Geax Streetrunners at 100psi, which while not puncture proof, they do have a reasonably thick layer of rubber in contact with the road and soak up a bit more glass than the IRC Metros I used to use.
The rule of thumb I go by with tyres is that you choose a tyre with features that match the surface they'll be used on. Soft bumpy tyres are best suited to soft bumpy trails. For hard, smooth roads, hard smooth tyres are best. The need for tread on a road tyre is a myth, even in the wet, according to Sheldon Brown. However, using the above rule of thumb, if you are likely to encounter gravel patches or other debris that makes the road slightly loose, some amount of tread would be potentially useful.
That said, in my experience, knobbies are no more or less resistant to punctures than slicks, but the added efficiency of slicks makes the choice a no-brainer for me. I couldn't get the Specialised ones mentioned above here in Aus. I run Geax Streetrunners at 100psi, which while not puncture proof, they do have a reasonably thick layer of rubber in contact with the road and soak up a bit more glass than the IRC Metros I used to use.
#8
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by AlanK
knobbies are inefficient on pavement.
Al
#9
kipuka explorer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hilo Town, East Hawai'i
Posts: 3,297
Bikes: 1994 Trek 820, 2004 Fuji Absolute, 2005 Jamis Nova, 1977 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I commuted for 10 years on the same pair of stock Trek 820 knobbies with just 1 flat. They had a narrow connected center tread strip for lower resistance, so I was only really grinding the knobbies up the hills if I kept 'em pumped up. I'm sure that extra 1/4 inch of rubber between the road and my innertubes helped prevent flats, but the tread should be wide and deep enough that it will throw most small bits of glass rather than trap them.
__________________
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.
#10
kipuka explorer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hilo Town, East Hawai'i
Posts: 3,297
Bikes: 1994 Trek 820, 2004 Fuji Absolute, 2005 Jamis Nova, 1977 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
This is very true, but it is not just the inefficiency that makes knobbies a bad choice for pavement, it is also the rougher ride resulting vibrations which are both irritating and harder on joints and muscles making one tired more quickly. Traction on corners seems to be worse as well compared to slicks.
Al
Al
__________________
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.
#11
Mr. Cellophane
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 3,037
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rather than actual slicks you might try Specialized Infinity Armadillos. They have a shallow tread and a narrow stip of tread down the center that is the primary contact surface. I find that they don't seem to make any more noise than slicks as long as you are going straight nor do I notice significantly more rolling resistance. I have a 32 mm on the front and 35 on the back. It is a combo that works for me on my commute that includes some gravel and grass.
__________________
If it ain't broke, mess with it anyway!
If it ain't broke, mess with it anyway!
#12
BFSSFG old timer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Fredrock
Posts: 1,912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Avocet Cross Tires, low rolling resistance, thick inverted tread, virtually flat proof.
#13
Mr. Cellophane
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 3,037
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Riderx is right. Besides the above mentioned Armadillos on one bike, I have Avocet Cross II K 28 mm on another. These are great tires. Like the Armadillos they have a narrow stip of tread at the contact surface that minimizes rolling resistance. There may be a 26" mtb equivalent from Avocet.
__________________
If it ain't broke, mess with it anyway!
If it ain't broke, mess with it anyway!
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 543
Bikes: Jamis Satellite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RainmanP
Riderx is right. Besides the above mentioned Armadillos on one bike, I have Avocet Cross II K 28 mm on another. These are great tires. Like the Armadillos they have a narrow stip of tread at the contact surface that minimizes rolling resistance. There may be a 26" mtb equivalent from Avocet.
Wire Bead
Carbon 12 Smooth Tread
Model Size Weight g psi tpi
City 26 X 1.25 375 95 66
City 26 X 1.5 475 45-85 66
City 26 X 1.9 635 40-80 66
Wire Bead
Carbon 12 Smooth Tread
Protective Composite Shield
Model Size Weight g psi tpi
City 26 X 1.25 395 95 66
City 26 X 1.5 495 45-85 66
City 26 X 1.9 655 40-80 66
#15
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by bkrownd
Huh? My slicked road bike is a much harsher ride than my knobbied mountain bike ever was. 125psi vs. 45psi? Maybe at the same psi a fat slick wouldn't feel so rough, but it wouldn't be way more efficient, either. However, not all knobbies are created equal. The ride will depend on the exact tread pattern you've got.
In my experience if I 'compare apples to apples': In this case an 80psi 1.9" knobbie to an 80psi Specialized Crossroads ex (slick center, knobs on corners) the Crossroads was definitely less harsh and less fatiguing from the vibration.
In my experience if I 'compare apples to oranges': In this case the above 80psi Specialized Crossroads on a steel mtb to 100psi 700x28mm Continental ultra gatorskin (almost a slick) on a steel frame cyclocross bike the Crossroads are much harsher and more fatiguing due to vibration on every corner. I was surprised how much smoother this cross bike is even though the tires were narrower and higher pressure.
Al
#16
kipuka explorer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hilo Town, East Hawai'i
Posts: 3,297
Bikes: 1994 Trek 820, 2004 Fuji Absolute, 2005 Jamis Nova, 1977 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
If you 'compare apples to apples': For example an 80psi slick to an 80psi same width knobby there will be less vibration with the slick.
My ex had a mtb with some really nasty off-road-only Earth-shredding knobbies a a a a a n n n n n d d d d d i i i i i t t t t t w w w w w a a a a a s s s s s s s s s s o o o o o n n n n n a a a a a s s s s s t t t t t y y y y y t t t t t o o o o o r r r r r i i i i i d d d d d e e e e e o o o o o n n n n n p p p p p a a a a a v v v v v e e e e e m m m m m e e e e e n n n n n t t t t t . . . . .
Well this thread was originally about puncture resistance. Some knobbies are naturally puncture resistant by creating more space between the tube and the road, but that takes extra rubber, so for the same weight I'm sure you could get thick/armored slicks that are similarly puncture resistant.
__________________
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.
--
-=- '05 Jamis Nova -=- '04 Fuji Absolute -=- '94 Trek 820 -=- '77 Schwinn Scrambler 36/36 -=-
Friends don't let friends use brifters.
Last edited by bkrownd; 09-03-04 at 05:35 PM.
#17
Senior Member
Originally Posted by RainmanP
Rather than actual slicks you might try Specialized Infinity Armadillos. They have a shallow tread and a narrow stip of tread down the center that is the primary contact surface. I find that they don't seem to make any more noise than slicks as long as you are going straight nor do I notice significantly more rolling resistance. I have a 32 mm on the front and 35 on the back. It is a combo that works for me on my commute that includes some gravel and grass.
I'm not a big fan of thin, slick tires because they greatly reduce stability and ride quality. The only riders who need ultra-thin slicks are racers because they're noticeably faster. I have a pair of 700x26 slicks I haven't used in two years because the ride is harsh and the thin width is unstable in wet conditions.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: phlia
Posts: 819
Bikes: paratrooper, bullhead, cdale bad boy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've been using the Continental Traffic 26/2" for about the past 5 months and have had good success as my commute on occasion takes me over some cinder pack trails. I have about 1000 mikes on these and have not had any problems.
As with everybody else, on my cross bike I ride the armadillos 700/28 for the past year and have had no flats. Before that ........is was a flat at least every other week.
As with everybody else, on my cross bike I ride the armadillos 700/28 for the past year and have had no flats. Before that ........is was a flat at least every other week.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,293
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There's a lot to be said for cheap knobbie tires (the thick heavy ones that are almost made of plastic) They don't get flats, the're dirt cheap and they last for a really long time.
Of course they are heavy, perform like crap and have a harsh ride-- but cheap MTB tires will outlast any $$$$ touring style tire with less flats.
It all depends on how far you're planning to ride your bike. For longer commutes, get good thick touring style tires. For bopping around the 'hood, those cheap knobbies can't really be beat. Strip off all the derailers and shifters while your at it! Take an old MTB, convert it to single speed, spray paint it pink or neon green or some other shade not found in nature and put on those cheapo *motocross* tires.
Sure the beast will have a little road hum, but you won't get flats, it won't beak down and you can leave it unlocked outside the quicke mart becuase unless you're the biggest bike nerd on the planet, who would ride such a pile of junk?
Of course they are heavy, perform like crap and have a harsh ride-- but cheap MTB tires will outlast any $$$$ touring style tire with less flats.
It all depends on how far you're planning to ride your bike. For longer commutes, get good thick touring style tires. For bopping around the 'hood, those cheap knobbies can't really be beat. Strip off all the derailers and shifters while your at it! Take an old MTB, convert it to single speed, spray paint it pink or neon green or some other shade not found in nature and put on those cheapo *motocross* tires.
Sure the beast will have a little road hum, but you won't get flats, it won't beak down and you can leave it unlocked outside the quicke mart becuase unless you're the biggest bike nerd on the planet, who would ride such a pile of junk?