Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 32
  1. #1
    I fear angry birds Santaria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Recalculating
    My Bikes
    2013 Salsa Vaya
    Posts
    2,154
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    to avoid hijacking the BD thread

    So I'm down to the wire on buying my new bike (saved and now its time to enjoy the profit of riding)

    It's down to two bikes

    Surly LHT (My dream bike. Something I've done a lot of research, talked to a lot of folks and really just am impressed with this bike all around. I have a Karate Monkey and couldn't be happier with it)

    2010 Motobecane Fantom Cross Outlaw. I know it seems odd, but this bike looks REALLY sharp and offers the disc brake setup I wanted on a road bike. The only problem I have with this bike is I hate (HATE) the fork. I'm not a fan of carbon fiber. At a wet/dry weight of between 185/225 lbs. depending on the time of the year, and what I'm doing, I don't want a fork that is going to break down on me.

    Here's the catch. I use my bike for everything. I ride to work, school, grocery store. I'm looking into a trailer and my wife has even agreed NOT to utilize her mini-van anymore than we absolutely need to. So what that means is that the bike has to either hold up to a load on a rear rack, or be stable enough to hold me+my backpack with anywhere from 15-45 lbs. of junk/books/food at any given time.

    So my question - which would you jump on? There is a $200ish dollar difference. I figure I might put my money where my mouth is and be able to give a valid report on the strengths of the BD.com bike under commuter/lifestyle use.
    THE DEVIL

    Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
    If that was my house and you put your stupid bike in my flower garden to take a picture, I would come outside in my underwear and light you on fire.

  2. #2
    Galveston County Texas 10 Wheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    In The Wind
    Posts
    25,048
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Motobecane has a double chain ring.

    Does the SLHT have a triple?
    [SIZE=1][B]What I like about Texas[/B]
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGukLuXzH1E

    Set F1re To The Ra1n ( NY Night Rain Ride)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7jfcWEkSrI

  3. #3
    Senior Member squirtdad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
    My Bikes
    '89 Miyata 1400, '82 nishiski (current utilty/commuter project)
    Posts
    3,204
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My input is go for your dream bike...... the $ difference will be made up rapidly with your stated usage.
    '82 Nishiski commuter/utility
    '83 Torpado Super Strada ... cafe commuter
    '89 Miyata 1400
    Soma rush Fixie
    '78 Univega gran turismo (son's Fixie/SS)
    06 Haro x3 (son's bmx)
    Electra cruiser (wife's bike)

    looking for: De Rosa 58cm ELOS frame and fork internal cable routing

  4. #4
    Senior Member jr59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    2,164
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why over think?

    You are happy with the karate monkey, and have done alot of research into a LHT.
    Why not get the trucker? I don't know how much time you spend riding in the rain,so I can't tell if you need discs or not.
    But if I were you ,I would go the LHT route. It does everything you want it to, has a proven track record, and some resale value.
    The moto I am not so sure on.
    In the long run, it will be the comfort, load hauling, and reliability of the bike that will give you the good feeling.
    Not the pretty looks.

    It's JMO;

    BTW; I have a cross check and wish I would have bought the trucker.

  5. #5
    Life is good RonH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Between Lecanto and Hernando Florida, 6 miles west of the Withlacoochee Trail
    My Bikes
    I've had several since 1999 but have settled on my beloved 2001 Litespeed Tuscany and my latest, a 2013 Cannondale CAAD 10.
    Posts
    13,506
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Santaria View Post
    Here's the catch. I use my bike for everything. I ride to work, school, grocery store. I'm looking into a trailer and my wife has even agreed NOT to utilize her mini-van anymore than we absolutely need to. So what that means is that the bike has to either hold up to a load on a rear rack, or be stable enough to hold me+my backpack with anywhere from 15-45 lbs. of junk/books/food at any given time.
    Sounds like you may want to consider an Xtracycle. --> http://www.xtracycle.com/
    My bikes --> 2001 Litespeed Tuscany---2013 Cannondale CAAD 10 2 (5) "Racing Edition"

    Life is like a 10-speed bicycle. Most of us have gears we never use. ~ Charles Schultz

  6. #6
    Fat Guy on a Little Bike KonAaron Snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Two wheeled ones
    Posts
    12,067
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by squirtdad View Post
    My input is go for your dream bike...... the $ difference will be made up rapidly with your stated usage.
    +1...once you're spending that kind of money, is the dollar difference really significant? If you get the other you'll be thinking "damn, I wish I had an LHT" whenever you see one.

    From experience...I wish damn, I wish I had splurged on some Campy whenever I ride my Koga Miyata.

  7. #7
    Senior Member tjspiel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's a substantial investment either way. $200 is nothing to sneeze at but it's not so significant that I'd let it decide for you which bike to get.

    So, let's say the bikes cost exactly the same. Which one would you get?

  8. #8
    I fear angry birds Santaria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Recalculating
    My Bikes
    2013 Salsa Vaya
    Posts
    2,154
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Honestly, the Surly. I just can't get over that fork. Ugh.
    THE DEVIL

    Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
    If that was my house and you put your stupid bike in my flower garden to take a picture, I would come outside in my underwear and light you on fire.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    347
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 10 Wheels View Post
    The Motobecane has a double chain ring.

    Does the SLHT have a triple?
    solution: buy the frame... build it yourself to your very exacting specifications and have a wicked awesome bike.

    say it: wicked....awesome.

    WICKED AWESOME /beefcake, Beefcake...BEEEEFFCAAAAKKKEEE

  10. #10
    RT
    RT is offline
    The Weird Beard RT's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    COS
    Posts
    8,525
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As a fellow former Clyde who has gone from 240 to 180, the carbon forks I have used (from a Winwood Dusty to the one on my Fuji Cross Comp to a no-name fork), I have never had trouble and love the way it takes the buzz out of the road. I was concerned about the stopping power of my V-brake setup with Kool Stop salmons and discs on the one bike, but the guys over in Mechanics assured me that I would go over the bars at this weight before a fork ever snapped on me.

    Just to quell your concerns about the stability of CF on a fork. The Outlaw looks like a rad bike.

  11. #11
    stringbreaker stringbreaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    wa. State
    My Bikes
    specialized crossroads hybrid 2006 Raleigh Cadent 2 1971 Schwinn Varsity, 1972 Schwinn Continental, 1977 Schwinn Volare (frame)
    Posts
    4,443
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    LHT is more of an all around bike I would say. Get it.
    (Life is too short to play crappy guitars) 2006 Raleigh Cadent 3.0, 1977 Schwinn Volare, 2010 Windsor tourist. ( I didn't fall , I attacked the floor)

  12. #12
    of Clan Nrubso ChrisO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Kitsap
    My Bikes
    Cannondale F400, Surly LHT,Motobecane Le Champion Ti, Novara Veloce
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I too was facing the same decision earlier in the year- LHT of Synapse in my case; I went with the LHT for the simple fact that you can do anything on that bike. I have never even come close to regretting it. Love the bike, and have no lingering fear about sudden catastrophic failure of my fork.

  13. #13
    Fat Guy on a Little Bike KonAaron Snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Two wheeled ones
    Posts
    12,067
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    If I hadn't lucked into my Koga-Miyata frame, I'd have gone the LHT route.

  14. #14
    commuter and barbarian scroca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Potomac, MT, USA
    Posts
    1,991
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm pretty happy with my LHT. It was well worth the price.

    10 Wheels, Yes it has a triple chain ring.

    But I don't know anything about the Motobecane. It might be just fine for you.

  15. #15
    Goathead Magnet aley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    My Bikes
    Surly LHT, Cannondale Caffeine F3
    Posts
    670
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Buy the LHT - you yourself describe it as a "dream bike."

    But don't overthink carbon forks - I weigh in at 240 or so, and was riding with 30 lbs. of panniers as well when I bent the frame on my Jamis Aurora around the carbon fork. Trashed frame, no visible damage to the fork (and no, I don't plan to reuse it without getting an expert to inspect it - but I anticipate that it will get a clean bill of health if I do that).

    FWIW, though, I replaced the bent bike with a LHT, and couldn't be happier.

  16. #16
    Ridin' South Cackalacky dahut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,924
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Buck the trend to name brand love and get the Motobecane.
    "Watch out for giants; they are boorish fools with tongues wagging, drunk upon their own words.
    They will try to teach you a lesson if given the chance, and you will stumble over their stinking feet."

  17. #17
    Allez means go. bengreen79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Two Rivers, WI
    Posts
    804
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I vote the LHT unless you really think you need the disc brakes. Rim brakes are cheaper and easier to maintain. Modern rim brakes on aluminum rims are totally usuable when wet. It's not like the steel rim plus crappy center pull brakes of the 70's anymore.

    Sure, after years the rims might get damaged from road grime but that's just a good excuse to upgrade. $200 more is worth it for something you describe as your dream bike.

  18. #18
    Fat Guy on a Little Bike KonAaron Snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Two wheeled ones
    Posts
    12,067
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    My "crappy" Weinmann 990 center pulls with kool stops work nearly as well as any of my double pivot side pulls, as well as single pivot and better than the older center pivot side pulls...granted they're a bit trickier to adjust. This is assuming a decent aluminum rim.

  19. #19
    Ridin' South Cackalacky dahut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,924
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ...And just whats wrong with hijacking a BD thread??
    "Watch out for giants; they are boorish fools with tongues wagging, drunk upon their own words.
    They will try to teach you a lesson if given the chance, and you will stumble over their stinking feet."

  20. #20
    I fear angry birds Santaria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Recalculating
    My Bikes
    2013 Salsa Vaya
    Posts
    2,154
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dahut View Post
    ...And just whats wrong with hijacking a BD thread??
    That thread got me thinking about it, but its not fair to take something that I'm thinking about and chase a rabbit in the same thread.

    My problem with the BD bike is the fork is not designed to hold a rack, or weight. My fear isn't that it's not able to handle my body weight, but rather - I don't think the fork is designed to handle loaded weight.


    Where is the 'savings' associated with the bike. There is absolutely zero way that BD is able to sell a bike at less than 50% of his competitors without some part of the bike being below the standard of the rest. Is it in the rims? The hubs? The frame? The fork? Obviously the components are not the weak link. My true question is what really is?
    THE DEVIL

    Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
    If that was my house and you put your stupid bike in my flower garden to take a picture, I would come outside in my underwear and light you on fire.

  21. #21
    RT
    RT is offline
    The Weird Beard RT's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    COS
    Posts
    8,525
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you're going to attach anything but a fender to the Cross bike, then the other option is your answer.

  22. #22
    Ridin' South Cackalacky dahut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,924
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Santaria View Post
    That thread got me thinking about it, but its not fair to take something that I'm thinking about and chase a rabbit in the same thread.

    My problem with the BD bike is the fork is not designed to hold a rack, or weight. My fear isn't that it's not able to handle my body weight, but rather - I don't think the fork is designed to handle loaded weight.


    Where is the 'savings' associated with the bike. There is absolutely zero way that BD is able to sell a bike at less than 50% of his competitors without some part of the bike being below the standard of the rest. Is it in the rims? The hubs? The frame? The fork? Obviously the components are not the weak link. My true question is what really is?
    With the name brand, shop sold bikes, it's things like transport, distribution, reputation, retail markups, wages and shop overheads, wages and manufacturers overheads, some small attention to detail, esoteric name "value," territorial protection, price fixing, etc.

    All these add to the cost, without affecting the product itself.
    "Watch out for giants; they are boorish fools with tongues wagging, drunk upon their own words.
    They will try to teach you a lesson if given the chance, and you will stumble over their stinking feet."

  23. #23
    stringbreaker stringbreaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    wa. State
    My Bikes
    specialized crossroads hybrid 2006 Raleigh Cadent 2 1971 Schwinn Varsity, 1972 Schwinn Continental, 1977 Schwinn Volare (frame)
    Posts
    4,443
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Santaria View Post
    That thread got me thinking about it, but its not fair to take something that I'm thinking about and chase a rabbit in the same thread.

    My problem with the BD bike is the fork is not designed to hold a rack, or weight. My fear isn't that it's not able to handle my body weight, but rather - I don't think the fork is designed to handle loaded weight.


    Where is the 'savings' associated with the bike. There is absolutely zero way that BD is able to sell a bike at less than 50% of his competitors without some part of the bike being below the standard of the rest. Is it in the rims? The hubs? The frame? The fork? Obviously the components are not the weak link. My true question is what really is?
    My Tourist came with crummy tires and brake pads the pedals sucked (too narrow) and the saddle wasn't very good. I changed the saddle to a Brooks B-17 from another bike I sold. The rims were not true and the preload on the front hub and the bottom bracket bearings was too tight. The fork stem is an old fashion style threaded 1" where the upper echelon models of touring bikes are normally 1 1/4" threadless I think thats the size anyway. The rims are plain jane but so far very serviceable. I changed out the crummy cheapo stuff for more quality items. With the changes I made I'm still way under what I would have paid for a LHT which is what I wanted but the budget wasn't going to bear it this year. So, yeah there are trade offs but what I have is a so far very reliable and extremely comfortable bike. As posted above the overhead of a storefront and employees and shipping costs are going to add up fast on a bike purchased from a LBS.
    (Life is too short to play crappy guitars) 2006 Raleigh Cadent 3.0, 1977 Schwinn Volare, 2010 Windsor tourist. ( I didn't fall , I attacked the floor)

  24. #24
    Fat Guy on a Little Bike KonAaron Snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Two wheeled ones
    Posts
    12,067
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Santaria View Post
    That thread got me thinking about it, but its not fair to take something that I'm thinking about and chase a rabbit in the same thread.

    My problem with the BD bike is the fork is not designed to hold a rack, or weight. My fear isn't that it's not able to handle my body weight, but rather - I don't think the fork is designed to handle loaded weight.


    Where is the 'savings' associated with the bike. There is absolutely zero way that BD is able to sell a bike at less than 50% of his competitors without some part of the bike being below the standard of the rest. Is it in the rims? The hubs? The frame? The fork? Obviously the components are not the weak link. My true question is what really is?
    This is a great question...

    I suspect that they are selling and buying at such volume that they're able to make a few dollars less and also get favorable pricing on components. I've also noticed that a lot of them do frequently go off brand for some things...like cheaper hubs, or no name stem. I think they're also often using no name frame materials which probably save some dollars. By selling strictly on line they don't have the costs associated with a bricks and mortar store.

  25. #25
    Gearhead old's'cool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Chicago SW burbs
    My Bikes
    2 many 2 fit here
    Posts
    2,876
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake View Post
    My "crappy" Weinmann 990 center pulls with kool stops work nearly as well as any of my double pivot side pulls, as well as single pivot and better than the older center pivot side pulls...granted they're a bit trickier to adjust. This is assuming a decent aluminum rim.
    +1
    Geoff
    "I think that I think, therefore I think that I am"

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •