Frame Recommendation
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 51
Bikes: Gunnar Roadie, Yeti 575
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Frame Recommendation
Hello everyone. I am looking for some frame recommendations for my new commuter build. I would like something road based and moderately aggressive, along the lines of a cross bike. Mostly, this bike will be used for my 13 mile commute via bike paths, but is something I would like to be able to potentially do some short tours on. I have obviously been looking at the CrossCheck, but am wondering if there are some others i am missing. I like the braze ons for fenders and racks, with thick(er) steel tubing, capability of running 32c, and v-brake bosses. I know the LHT is another option, but based on reviews sounds like it might be a little sluggish for me.
Anyone have any ideas?
Anyone have any ideas?
#3
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 79
Bikes: Soma DoubleCross Disc for cross, Motobecane 700HT for cross-country, Monty for trials, IRO Angus for fixed, 83' Gitane Sprint for communting
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Soma Doublecross with disc brake mounts.
#4
Banned
Anything will do, , sluggish is not putting the effort into the pedals ..
for wet weather stopping disc or drum brakes are the winners .
Though kool stop salmon pads on rim brakes are close.
zillion bikeshops in portland ... test ride stuff.
for wet weather stopping disc or drum brakes are the winners .
Though kool stop salmon pads on rim brakes are close.
zillion bikeshops in portland ... test ride stuff.
#5
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
I've been hunting for something similar and have come across a very nice one called the Vassago Fisticuff...substantially lighter than the 4130 cross-check. My 4130 Karate Monkey rides like total garbage...I would NOT buy a 4130 bike again. A few friends in the c and v section recommended it and I looked at one two nights ago...it's fairly light and it rode fantastic.
I'm in love with the Gunnar frames...but it depends on your price limits and what you're looking for. I'm also a big fan of what VO does, and I think the Polyvent is fairly reeasonable.
Have you thought about a used Lemond Poprad?
I'm in love with the Gunnar frames...but it depends on your price limits and what you're looking for. I'm also a big fan of what VO does, and I think the Polyvent is fairly reeasonable.
Have you thought about a used Lemond Poprad?
Last edited by KonAaron Snake; 08-26-10 at 02:15 PM.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 51
Bikes: Gunnar Roadie, Yeti 575
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The Doublecross, Gunnar, and Propad all sound great. I actually already have one Gunnar, a roadie, and love it... Amazing frame. I am a little worried about the thinwall steel tubes though.. I want something that can take a beating and I wont have to worry about riding in the rain (yea, i know about framesaver). I am really drawn to the crosscheck because of its relatively low cost.. $420 for a frameset is pretty hard to beat, though I would honestly prefer picking up used stuff
#7
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
The Doublecross, Gunnar, and Propad all sound great. I actually already have one Gunnar, a roadie, and love it... Amazing frame. I am a little worried about the thinwall steel tubes though.. I want something that can take a beating and I wont have to worry about riding in the rain (yea, i know about framesaver). I am really drawn to the crosscheck because of its relatively low cost.. $420 for a frameset is pretty hard to beat, though I would honestly prefer picking up used stuff
Have you considered a Raleigh International? I LOVE mine...though they're often pricey. I mean an old one...not the newly released tribute one.
Honestly...I still think the perfect commuter bike (except cost) would be titanium. At some point I'd like to get a Spectrum ti built with clearance for 32c tires, fenders and rack mounts. Essentially I want a modern, titanium version (maybe internally geared) of my Raleigh Intl.
Last edited by KonAaron Snake; 08-26-10 at 02:55 PM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
The weight weenie in me must also note that a 54cm Soma Double Cross DC (567mm top tube) has a claimed weight of 4.2 pounds. No weight is listed for the 50cm Double Cross which is more equivalently sized (548mm top tube) to the above bikes. Of course, it's still less than half a pound lighter.
#9
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
Not to quibble, but according to the respective web sites a 54cm Fisticuff (546mm top tube) weighs 4.4 pounds, while a a 52cm Cross Check (545mm top tube) weighs 4.57 pounds. The Fisticuff is lighter, but not a lot lighter.
The weight weenie in me must also note that a 54cm Soma Double Cross DC (567mm top tube) has a claimed weight of 4.2 pounds. No weight is listed for the 50cm Double Cross which is more equivalently sized (548mm top tube) to the above bikes. Of course, it's still less than half a pound lighter.
The weight weenie in me must also note that a 54cm Soma Double Cross DC (567mm top tube) has a claimed weight of 4.2 pounds. No weight is listed for the 50cm Double Cross which is more equivalently sized (548mm top tube) to the above bikes. Of course, it's still less than half a pound lighter.
If that's true, the weight is certainly not significant. I honestly don't have enough experience with either bike to truly have an opinion...and I don't recall which tires either had, so who knows what differences were the frame anyway. I do have an opinion on the Karate Monkey because I've ridden it enough to say it rides like a cannondale (which is NOT a compliment). I would avoid frames from that material again because of this experience. I also thought the Fisticuff looked a little more polished, and it's not as common as the Cross Check.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
If that's true, the weight is certainly not significant. I honestly don't have enough experience with either bike to truly have an opinion...and I don't recall which tires either had, so who knows what differences were the frame anyway. I do have an opinion on the Karate Monkey because I've ridden it enough to say it rides like a cannondale (which is NOT a compliment). I would avoid frames from that material again because of this experience. I also thought the Fisticuff looked a little more polished, and it's not as common as the Cross Check.
I guess I'm ultimately saying the same thing you are, assuming you are essentially saying, "You just never know."
With regard to frame material, my understanding is that 4130 and Reynolds 520 are essentially the same material -- the Reynolds is just a branded tubing. Different bikes made with 4130 can have totally different feel (and weight) depending on how the tubes are butted and shaped, not to mention the geometry. I have a Marin Muirwoods 29er made of 4130 that weighs around 30 pounds and rides like a tank, whereas my Cross Check (also 4130, of course) weighs around 22 pounds and feels pretty snappy (to me).
Of course, you're right that Cross Checks are a bit ubiquitous.
#12
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
A surprising number of things can change the way a bike feels. I originally built up my Cross Check as a fixie, and I thought it felt sluggish compared to the '77 Gitane conversion I had been riding. So I rebuilt it 2x10 with a 46-36 crankset. For a while I used mostly the 36T ring and didn't like it like this a lot either. Then I started using the bigger chain ring more and suddenly it felt quick. Recently, I swapped in a 50-39-30 triple, and now I absolutely love it.
I guess I'm ultimately saying the same thing you are, assuming you are essentially saying, "You just never know."
With regard to frame material, my understanding is that 4130 and Reynolds 520 are essentially the same material -- the Reynolds is just a branded tubing. Different bikes made with 4130 can have totally different feel (and weight) depending on how the tubes are butted and shaped, not to mention the geometry. I have a Marin Muirwoods 29er made of 4130 that weighs around 30 pounds and rides like a tank, whereas my Cross Check (also 4130, of course) weighs around 22 pounds and feels pretty snappy (to me).
Of course, you're right that Cross Checks are a bit ubiquitous.
I guess I'm ultimately saying the same thing you are, assuming you are essentially saying, "You just never know."
With regard to frame material, my understanding is that 4130 and Reynolds 520 are essentially the same material -- the Reynolds is just a branded tubing. Different bikes made with 4130 can have totally different feel (and weight) depending on how the tubes are butted and shaped, not to mention the geometry. I have a Marin Muirwoods 29er made of 4130 that weighs around 30 pounds and rides like a tank, whereas my Cross Check (also 4130, of course) weighs around 22 pounds and feels pretty snappy (to me).
Of course, you're right that Cross Checks are a bit ubiquitous.
I'm much more of a vintage guy. Reynolds 520? It's 11 less than 531, it must not be as good 4130 has two things working against it...I don't know much about it (ARGHHH, it's new and scary! and it's TIG'D! BURN IT!) and the only bike I really know made with it rides poorly.
Whatever my biases and opinions are, it can't hurt to give the OP another less well known option.
#13
Señor Wences
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,035
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
[QUOTE=Andy_K;11361833Of course, you're right that Cross Checks are a bit ubiquitous.[/QUOTE]
For a reason. The Cross-Check is exceptionally versatile and tough as nails.
For a reason. The Cross-Check is exceptionally versatile and tough as nails.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mtnclimber
Commuting
15
04-01-12 09:07 AM