Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

cs (chain stay) question

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

cs (chain stay) question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-04, 06:42 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bluemando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
cs (chain stay) question

I've been considering buying the Soma Smoothie ES frame and, after I put some components on it from another bike, will use it as a commuter/light touring bike. The cs length on the smoothie is 16.93 inches. Will that be long enough to use with average sized panniers? I don't want the heals of my shoes scrapping them. As a comparison, I checked the chain stay lengths of a couple of touring bikes and a cross bike. The cs of Trek 520 touring is 17.7 inches. The Surly Cross-Check's is 16.7 inches. The Surly Long Haul Trucker is 18.1. What cs length should I be considering?
bluemando is offline  
Old 12-01-04, 08:43 PM
  #2  
SoCal Commuter
 
DanO220's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Agua Dulce, CA
Posts: 592

Bikes: Surly Crosscheck single/9 speed convertible, Novara Buzz beater

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have run a rack and paniers on my CrossCheck without any problems. Of course, longer is better if you're planning on getting some big bags. DanO
DanO220 is offline  
Old 12-01-04, 11:17 PM
  #3  
hello
 
roadfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 18,692
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 193 Post(s)
Liked 115 Times in 51 Posts
With shorter stays, your shoe size becomes a factor more than anything else.
roadfix is offline  
Old 12-01-04, 11:40 PM
  #4  
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
you could get a long rack like the Jannd expedition, which is 4" longer than the average rack, I believe. hang those panniers way back.
Bekologist is offline  
Old 12-02-04, 09:31 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bluemando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DanO220
I have run a rack and paniers on my CrossCheck without any problems. Of course, longer is better if you're planning on getting some big bags. DanO
Wow that surprises me! I wear a 10 1/2 shoe and scrape the panniers on my Bridgestone MB, which has --according to my measurement-- 16.9 inch stays. The Surly Cross-Check is 16.7, so I would certainly scrape those. I ruled out the SOMA Double-Cross because, like the Surly C-C, it specs out at 16.7 inches. That's what got me looking at the SOMA Smoothie ES. Those stays are slightly longer (16.93) but, I'm limited to 700-32c tires. That probably would be enough but I'd like the option of going wider. Thanks for your input.
bluemando is offline  
Old 12-02-04, 09:32 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bluemando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist
you could get a long rack like the Jannd expedition, which is 4" longer than the average rack, I believe. hang those panniers way back.
That's worth looking into. Thanks!
bluemando is offline  
Old 12-02-04, 09:35 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bluemando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Fixer
With shorter stays, your shoe size becomes a factor more than anything else.
Makes sense... Thanks.
bluemando is offline  
Old 12-02-04, 09:36 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 6,521

Bikes: Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The Radical Explorack is longer than most. Costs about $45 Cdn.
AndrewP is offline  
Old 12-02-04, 10:33 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Not only shoe size, but crank size affect the heel clearance. Use smaller ones (170) rather than larger (175) cranks. Either will work for an average size male. If you are on the short size, you can go smaller.
Panniers should have a heel cutout. The square cut ones have to be mounted further back, but with cutout, you can mount them forward for better balance. Smaller panniers usually have less problems with heel interference.
The ES seems fairly similar to my commuter, and I dont have any problems (size 9, 170mm cranks, Carradice panniers).
MichaelW is offline  
Old 12-02-04, 02:48 PM
  #10  
SoCal Commuter
 
DanO220's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Agua Dulce, CA
Posts: 592

Bikes: Surly Crosscheck single/9 speed convertible, Novara Buzz beater

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bluemando
Wow that surprises me! I wear a 10 1/2 shoe and scrape the panniers on my Bridgestone MB, which has --according to my measurement-- 16.9 inch stays. The Surly Cross-Check is 16.7, so I would certainly scrape those. I ruled out the SOMA Double-Cross because, like the Surly C-C, it specs out at 16.7 inches. That's what got me looking at the SOMA Smoothie ES. Those stays are slightly longer (16.93) but, I'm limited to 700-32c tires. That probably would be enough but I'd like the option of going wider. Thanks for your input.
For your info: I also wear a 10 1/2 - 11 shoe size and I pedal a 175mm crank. Also; some of the 'long' racks people are menitoning are definately worth researching.

I would definitely get a frame with plenty of tire clearance. It's just too fun to experiment with different widths and tread patterns. It can make a significant difference. I started out with 38's, am currently running 28's, and think that 32's will eventually prove to be a perfect width for me. Tire clearance - not to mention inherent toughness - is what makes cyclocross frames so nice for commuting. You can taylor your wheels and such according to the quality, or crappiness, of the roads on your route.

Have fun. All the best. DanO
DanO220 is offline  
Old 12-02-04, 05:21 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bluemando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MichaelW
Not only shoe size, but crank size affect the heel clearance. Use smaller ones (170) rather than larger (175) cranks. Either will work for an average size male. If you are on the short size, you can go smaller. Panniers should have a heel cutout. The square cut ones have to be mounted further back, but with cutout, you can mount them forward for better balance. Smaller panniers usually have less problems with heel interference. The ES seems fairly similar to my commuter, and I dont have any problems (size 9, 170mm cranks, Carradice panniers).
Good info. Thanks!
bluemando is offline  
Old 12-02-04, 05:25 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bluemando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DanO220
For your info: I also wear a 10 1/2 - 11 shoe size and I pedal a 175mm crank. Also; some of the 'long' racks people are menitoning are definately worth researching.

I would definitely get a frame with plenty of tire clearance. It's just too fun to experiment with different widths and tread patterns. It can make a significant difference. I started out with 38's, am currently running 28's, and think that 32's will eventually prove to be a perfect width for me. Tire clearance - not to mention inherent toughness - is what makes cyclocross frames so nice for commuting. You can taylor your wheels and such according to the quality, or crappiness, of the roads on your route.

Have fun. All the best. DanO
Thanks DanO. After reading your post I surfed about and found the *real* specs for my Bridgestone's chainstays. Turns out my measurement was a bit off. Instead of the stays being 16.9 they are 16.7 (same as your Cross Check). Also found out that my bike's crank length is the same as yours (175mm) I suppose the difference is the length of the the bike rack (mine is a real "cheapo," but very lightweight) At this time my panniers are located all the way back on the rack.... I scrape them with the heal of my shoe a bit, buts it's not too bad really. Nevertheless I figured that if I got a new frame I would want to remedy that. I'll be checking into some of the bike racks that some here have recommend.

I hope that I will be able to go with a cross frame for the reasons you stipulated... The SOMA Double Cross uses 631 steel - I like that feature. One issue I have to find out about is whether it can take V-brakes. The SOMA site doesn't say. It does mention that their Smoothie ES is designed "with long reach caliper brakes in mind." Guess, I'll email them and find out. Thanks again.
bluemando is offline  
Old 12-02-04, 07:01 PM
  #13  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by AndrewP
The Radical Explorack is longer than most. Costs about $45 Cdn.
Great rack for the price (got mine for $34).
operator is offline  
Old 12-02-04, 09:17 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bluemando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by operator
Great rack for the price (got mine for $34).
Can't find them on the Internet. Got a URL?
bluemando is offline  
Old 12-02-04, 10:55 PM
  #15  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by bluemando
Can't find them on the Internet. Got a URL?
They don't sell online, they have several stores around Toronto though. I'm assuming you don't live in Toronto?
operator is offline  
Old 12-03-04, 09:28 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
bluemando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by operator
They don't sell online, they have several stores around Toronto though. I'm assuming you don't live in Toronto?
Assumption correct!
bluemando is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.