Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Nobody mconlonx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,324
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Afine Di2 drop bar commuter?



    Purported on Bikerumor to be a new Raleigh model...
    I know next to nothing. I am frequently wrong.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    meh

    I'm not sure I quite understand the point of the electronic shifting thing. It just seems like a marketing tactic to sell stuff we don't need. The bicycle is a very simple, incredibly efficient tool for transportation. Why does it need electronics? This of course excludes cycle computers and the like as you can still ride the bike if they fail.

  3. #3
    Fat Guy on a Little Bike KonAaron Snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Two wheeled ones
    Posts
    12,436
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    People said the same thing about indexed shifting, sti...and if you go back far enough, probably pneumatic tires. If it makes for smoother shifting and it eliminates trim issues, it's good by me.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^^ There are no trim issues with an IGH, and the mechanical shifting is already smooth. I understand the reason for Di2 at the Dura-Ace and even Ultegra levels, but I still don't see the point of the Alfine Di2, except to get an IGH with brifters using only Shimano parts.

  5. #5
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    1,571
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ... for when you don't drive the Lotus or Mclaren to work?

    .. in the wings: hydraulic disc+ electronic shifting..
    the brake gets the space in the lever, shifting only needs the paddle space.

    A mechanical brifter and hydraulic master need 200% of the available space.

    where are the Carbon Fiber mudguards on this thing?
    Last edited by fietsbob; 03-31-12 at 10:02 AM.

  6. #6
    Mirror slap survivor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sunny Florida
    My Bikes
    Gunnar Sport, Surly Pacer, Access MTB, Ibex Corrida, one day a Simple City
    Posts
    1,297
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wow. Way to drop the ball, Raleigh. I have no problem with the electronic shifting. I mean, I don't see the need for it, but it's kind of interesting. It might even make sense on a commuter bike, especially paired with discs. But why, when you have such a skill for making functional commuter bikes, WOULD YOU PUT IT ON ONE THAT ISN'T USEFUL? Why market a "commuter" bike that doesn't have fenders and looks like it won't carry a load? That's just a road bike, IMHO.

    Now, you stick that group on a nice functional steel frame, like the Port Townsend or the Clubman, and you have something.

    If the electronic setup is sealed and can deal with rain and road grime, that's just one less thing to worry about. Now, make it a belt drive and it's probably perfect.
    "When I'm on a bike, it's like I'm 14 again, racing off to the arcade with a pocket full of quarters."

  7. #7
    Nobody mconlonx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,324
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Schwinnrider View Post
    Wow. Way to drop the ball, Raleigh. I have no problem with the electronic shifting. I mean, I don't see the need for it, but it's kind of interesting. It might even make sense on a commuter bike, especially paired with discs. But why, when you have such a skill for making functional commuter bikes, WOULD YOU PUT IT ON ONE THAT ISN'T USEFUL? Why market a "commuter" bike that doesn't have fenders and looks like it won't carry a load? That's just a road bike, IMHO.

    Now, you stick that group on a nice functional steel frame, like the Port Townsend or the Clubman, and you have something.

    If the electronic setup is sealed and can deal with rain and road grime, that's just one less thing to worry about. Now, make it a belt drive and it's probably perfect.
    Actually not sure if Raleigh is marketing this as a commuter bike, but that's the nearest role I can see for it. I'd surely rock it on my commute.
    I know next to nothing. I am frequently wrong.

  8. #8
    Fat Guy on a Little Bike KonAaron Snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Two wheeled ones
    Posts
    12,436
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffpoulin View Post
    ^^^ There are no trim issues with an IGH, and the mechanical shifting is already smooth. I understand the reason for Di2 at the Dura-Ace and even Ultegra levels, but I still don't see the point of the Alfine Di2, except to get an IGH with brifters using only Shimano parts.
    I withdrawal my statement...you're absolutely right.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    2012 Jamis Coda Comp; early 80s Univega Nuovo Sport
    Posts
    542
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hobbitman View Post
    I'm not sure I quite understand the point of the electronic shifting thing. It just seems like a marketing tactic to sell stuff we don't need. The bicycle is a very simple, incredibly efficient tool for transportation. Why does it need electronics? This of course excludes cycle computers and the like as you can still ride the bike if they fail.
    I'm with Bike Snob when it comes to these "innovations" (he's talking about belt drives, but I'll extend it to electronic shifting on a "commuter" bike:
    http://bikesnobnyc.blogspot.com/2012...-contrary.html

  10. #10
    Real Men Ride Ordinaries fuzz2050's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffpoulin View Post
    ^^^ There are no trim issues with an IGH, and the mechanical shifting is already smooth. I understand the reason for Di2 at the Dura-Ace and even Ultegra levels, but I still don't see the point of the Alfine Di2, except to get an IGH with brifters using only Shimano parts.
    Well, there are no cables to mess with for one. A bike with Di2, an igh, a belt drive and hydraulic disks would need practically no attention.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by fuzz2050 View Post
    Well, there are no cables to mess with for one. A bike with Di2, an igh, a belt drive and hydraulic disks would need practically no attention.
    Except for charging the battery. I don't hear people with mechanical IGH's complaining about their cable maintenance. Once it's adjusted, it doesn't require attention either, and since there are no batteries, it probably takes even less attention than the Di2. I'm not against electronic shifting at all. I think it makes perfect sense for professional racing, especially for time trial bikes. I just don't get it for the Alfine. I'm I missing something?

  12. #12
    Real Men Ride Ordinaries fuzz2050's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffpoulin View Post
    Except for charging the battery. I don't hear people with mechanical IGH's complaining about their cable maintenance. Once it's adjusted, it doesn't require attention either, and since there are no batteries, it probably takes even less attention than the Di2. I'm not against electronic shifting at all. I think it makes perfect sense for professional racing, especially for time trial bikes. I just don't get it for the Alfine. I'm I missing something?
    With any system that has indexing in the shifter there is going to be a modicum of maintenance needed to account for cable stretch. I'm pretty sure both the occasional turn of the barrel adjuster and the charging of the battery are once every six month kind of things.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Breathegood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Castle Rock, CO
    My Bikes
    '09 Gary Fisher "Kaitai, '09 Raleigh Team", '91 Trek 8700, '97 Cannondale SR500, '12 Raleigh Twin Six
    Posts
    329
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by fuzz2050 View Post
    Well, there are no cables to mess with for one. A bike with Di2, an igh, a belt drive and hydraulic disks would need practically no attention.
    No shift cables would be awesome. This bike looks remarkably similar to my Twin Six. Since my 66 is intended to be a SS it doesn't have accommodations for shifter cables. I'm using the Jtech bar-end shifter and cable ties. Wireless shifting would clean up my bike a little bit. I'm guessing the brifter is the same as the DA so it would seem a natural progression to apply electronic shifting to the IGH lineup. Hydraulic discs would be nice for aesthetics and the low maintenance factor, but probably overkill in terms of stopping prowess. The cantis on my 66 have PLENTY of stopping power. Might be good for a loaded toured, but the bike pictured doesn't look like like it would ever carry a substantial load.
    1991 Trek 8700 - SS conversion, 2009 Gary Fisher "Kaitai", 2009 Raleigh Team, 2012 Raleigh Twin Six,1996 Cannondale SR500

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •