Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 54
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,247
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Took the rack of my bike/heaviest components on your bike

    Hey, so I decided to remove the Surly Nice Rack rear from my Cross Check because I just haven't been using it as much as I thought I would here in Korea where I don't commute much anymore since the school I work at is only 2 blocks away and everything really is just very close and convenient. Seriously, I live above a convenience store. No more long hauls loaded down with crap in my panniers. These days, I mostly just do recreational rides and sometimes I'll take it to go the bar, department store or bank...

    Anyway, I just figured it was a useless dead weight penalty and thought I'd see how it handles without the 3 lb (1.3kg) rack. I'm actually kind of surprised that the difference is very noticeable, at least in my mind. Maybe it's a placebo effect but I really think that the bike accelerates faster, is more responsive to my hip steering (as opposed to handlebar steering), and is just a lot easier to haul up the stairs. I'm now only using my Wingnut backpack. Thoughts? Could removing 3lbs really make that much of a difference?


    This got me thinking about the other weighty items on my bike. I don't think the stock wheels are the lightest, but that's okay with me for now. I think they're pretty strong. I also got the 420g MKS King Grip or Lambda pedals and a 860g sprung Brooks Flyer. I'm not willing to part with either of those for weight's sake but I might upgrade the wheels some day. So what's the heaviest component on your bikes? Is it worth it to you?
    Last edited by SurlyLaika; 06-07-12 at 04:33 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Durham, NC
    My Bikes
    LHT + FreeRadical
    Posts
    453
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    N+1. If your bike is too heavy it's time to get a lighter bike.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,247
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by benda18 View Post
    N+1. If your bike is too heavy it's time to get a lighter bike.
    I thinkk it was topping out at 30lbs, but now it's 3lbs lighter and feels so good and zippy!

  4. #4
    Sprinter linus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    1,068
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Me. And next to that is my Kryptonite Evo 5. It's definitely not coming off my bike tho.

  5. #5
    Senior Member tarwheel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    My Bikes
    Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Gunnar Crosshairs, De Bernardi SL
    Posts
    6,111
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    The weight of a single component usually doesn't make much difference, but it all starts to add up pretty quickly. My touring bike weighed only about 22 lbs when built up with no fenders, rear rack, seat bags, etc. However, it weighs closer to 30 lbs when fenders, front and rear racks and other parts -- not even including panniers, water bottles, etc. I also took the rear rack off my touring bike when I was using it for commuting. Not only did it add more weight, but I found that it made the frame ride a lot stiffer. I'm using that bike for actual touring now, however, so I have reinstalled the rear rack, added a front rack, Brooks saddle, frame pump, etc. and it feels like it weighs a ton.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,247
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by linus View Post
    Me. And next to that is my Kryptonite Evo 5. It's definitely not coming off my bike tho.
    haha, yea I know what you mean. I'm not overweight but I'm definitely not in optimal condition either. Just checked the weight on that Evo 5, 2.3 lbs compared to the Faghettaboutit's 4.5lbs. holy cow, right? I'm having seconds thoughts about buying the Faghettaboutit now. How much do you weigh?

  7. #7
    The Left Coast, USA FrenchFit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,327
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Surly Nice was a monster, I eBayed mine last year. I've been lightened my tourer, including my beloved double kickstand - probably another 1.5 lbs right there. My hold-out on that bike so far is the Jandd rear rack, it's simply too practicable to lose. But I'm eyeing the saddle and seatpost, wheelset, probably another couple of pounds to pick up there.

    I just like how much livelier the bike feels on a diet. Yes, I could lose the same lbs, but a lighter bike is a lighter bike.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,247
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tarwheel View Post
    The weight of a single component usually doesn't make much difference, but it all starts to add up pretty quickly. My touring bike weighed only about 22 lbs when built up with no fenders, rear rack, seat bags, etc. However, it weighs closer to 30 lbs when fenders, front and rear racks and other parts -- not even including panniers, water bottles, etc. I also took the rear rack off my touring bike when I was using it for commuting. Not only did it add more weight, but I found that it made the frame ride a lot stiffer. I'm using that bike for actual touring now, however, so I have reinstalled the rear rack, added a front rack, Brooks saddle, frame pump, etc. and it feels like it weighs a ton.
    I'm not a gram counter, by any means...but I'd rather put my grams in where they're most useful like my pedals and saddle.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,247
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FrenchFit View Post
    The Surly Nice was a monster, I eBayed mine last year. I've been lightened my tourer, including my beloved double kickstand - probably another 1.5 lbs right there. My hold-out on that bike so far is the Jandd rear rack, it's simply too practicable to lose. But I'm eyeing the saddle and seatpost, wheelset, probably another couple of pounds to pick up there.

    I just like how much livelier the bike feels on a diet. Yes, I could lose the same lbs, but a lighter bike is a lighter bike.
    I was thinking about saving my beastly Surly Nice Rack for my touring bike when I get one and getting a lighter, more practical rack for my uh commuter. I forget if it was a Jandd but I heard about one a while ago that was quite light and had a good cargo weight capacity.

    Also, Frenchfit, I've been running 6 out of 7 days the last 2 weeks...only 1.5 miles every day but at least it's consistent. I feel good, in a different way than I do when I bike. I mean, I just feel a little more springy, lively, etc. Try it out, even if it isn't far. Any plans to lose a few lbs? I'd like to get down 15lbs, not much but damn it's hard when you're not actually fat. Just little motivation.

  10. #10
    Sprinter linus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    1,068
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SurlyLaika View Post
    haha, yea I know what you mean. I'm not overweight but I'm definitely not in optimal condition either. Just checked the weight on that Evo 5, 2.3 lbs compared to the Faghettaboutit's 4.5lbs. holy cow, right? I'm having seconds thoughts about buying the Faghettaboutit now. How much do you weigh?
    I also have the Faghettaboutit and NY Standard. Awesome but I need to see a chiropractor after carrying them around.

    I'm 190lbs now.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,218
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Surlylaika, if you're thinking of putting a rack back on for carrying panniers consider one of the narrow ones like the Axiom StreamlinerDLX or Tubus Airy. I had various wide platform rear racks on my Cross-Check and noticed the handling was noticably better with a narrow rack like the Axiom Streamliner DLX.

  12. #12
    Senior Member groovestew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    My Bikes
    2012 Surly Disc Trucker custom build, 2009 Kona Jake the Snake, 198? Bianchi road bike, 2012 Scott OTG-20
    Posts
    1,239
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SurlyLaika View Post
    ...Maybe it's a placebo effect but I really think that the bike accelerates faster, is more responsive to my hip steering (as opposed to handlebar steering), and is just a lot easier to haul up the stairs. I'm now only using my Wingnut backpack. Thoughts? Could removing 3lbs really make that much of a difference?...
    ...So what's the heaviest component on your bikes? Is it worth it to you?
    I certainly like a nice, light bike, but I don't mind riding a heavy bike for commuting. When I do really long rides on the weekend (300+km) when I need extra room for carrying layers, food, etc., I will sometimes put a seatpost rack with a trunk bag (about 10lbs) on my bike, and I absolutely hate how it makes the bike handle. It's not really noticeable 98% of the time, which is why I tolerate it, but that other 2% (climbing, accelerating) is really annoying.

    For commuting, I keep my light bike light, and use a backpack to maintain good handling characteristics. My all-weather commuter is heavy, so I just don't expect as much from it.

  13. #13
    dazed and confused newkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ireland
    My Bikes
    2011 Cube Hyde Team Alfine 8 IGH, 2007 Giant Rock hardtail mtb
    Posts
    246
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a fully built up commuter with IGH, fenders, 2 stands, ring lock, u-lock. Depending on my route, I have to lift the bike over a chest-high wall. I always notice how heavy the rear is on this monster. With the front so light and the rear so ladden when I first got it I really noticed the handling was different and a bit squirrely. I've since gotten used to it and when I take my beater to the pub, the beater is the one that feels strange. It makes a difference yes, but your physical and mental memory can learn anything.

  14. #14
    http://www.538.nl acidfast7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    England / CPH
    My Bikes
    2010 Cube Acid
    Posts
    4,863
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    2.95kg is more like 6.5 lbs.

    you're removing 3 1L milk tetra-paks from over the back wheel ... of course it will make a difference.
    Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S)
    Rohloffs seen on the commute: 3

  15. #15
    GATC
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    south Puget Sound
    Posts
    6,604
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't think of a single chunkier piece of anything to hang on a bike than a surly nice rack. Other than that they fit pugsley wheels and cost less than OMM racks that do the same, I honestly can't figure out how they sell those at all.


    I do have one on my pugsley though, which itself is a giant chunky piece of a lot of stuff.

  16. #16
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    39,195
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Surly's racks are rather excessively heavy.. Front one definitely.
    Tubus are a bit more reasonable, of the steel tube racks.

  17. #17
    7-speed doomsday prepper ThermionicScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    CID
    My Bikes
    1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX
    Posts
    7,744
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Who makes a really light, dare I say it, "flimsy" rear rack? I'm looking to get rid of the backpack, but won't need more than 10lbs of capacity.
    Quote Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
    There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
    RUSA #7498

  18. #18
    ROM 6:23 flipped4bikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Coastal Maine
    My Bikes
    Specialized Tricross Comp, Lemond Tourmalet, Bridgestone MB-5
    Posts
    1,713
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by acidfast7 View Post
    2.95kg is more like 6.5 lbs.

    you're removing 3 1L milk tetra-paks from over the back wheel ... of course it will make a difference.
    Not sure where the OP got 2.95 kg. Surly lists the Nice rear rack at 1260g = 2.78 lbs.

    It took me a second to figure out why they named it Nice. Too funny.
    Every time we let a vehicle pass there is a little bit of compromise. But compromise allows the city to function and allows cyclists to function in the city. The trick is not to eliminate compromise but to learn how to work safely within it.

    --Robert Hurst

  19. #19
    GATC
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    south Puget Sound
    Posts
    6,604
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by fietsbob View Post
    Surly's racks are rather excessively heavy.. Front one definitely.
    Tubus are a bit more reasonable, of the steel tube racks.
    A bit more reasonable in the sense of 30% of the weight but 90% of the capacity... (and ~80% of the cost)

  20. #20
    ROM 6:23 flipped4bikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Coastal Maine
    My Bikes
    Specialized Tricross Comp, Lemond Tourmalet, Bridgestone MB-5
    Posts
    1,713
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HardyWeinberg View Post
    I can't think of a single chunkier piece of anything to hang on a bike than a surly nice rack. Other than that they fit pugsley wheels and cost less than OMM racks that do the same, I honestly can't figure out how they sell those at all.


    I do have one on my pugsley though, which itself is a giant chunky piece of a lot of stuff.
    I own a OMM Sherpa, and the Surly Nice is rated to carry TWICE the weight of the Sherpa. So here's my question: say you even load up a Nice to 80 lbs, something's got to give, right? Can you break off a bolt/screw with that kind of load?
    Every time we let a vehicle pass there is a little bit of compromise. But compromise allows the city to function and allows cyclists to function in the city. The trick is not to eliminate compromise but to learn how to work safely within it.

    --Robert Hurst

  21. #21
    The Left Coast, USA FrenchFit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,327
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SurlyLaika View Post
    I was thinking about saving my beastly Surly Nice Rack for my touring bike when I get one and getting a lighter, more practical rack for my uh commuter. I forget if it was a Jandd but I heard about one a while ago that was quite light and had a good cargo weight capacity.

    Also, Frenchfit, I've been running 6 out of 7 days the last 2 weeks...only 1.5 miles every day but at least it's consistent. I feel good, in a different way than I do when I bike. I mean, I just feel a little more springy, lively, etc. Try it out, even if it isn't far. Any plans to lose a few lbs? I'd like to get down 15lbs, not much but damn it's hard when you're not actually fat. Just little motivation.
    I am a fairly regular runner, 30-40 minutes 2 or 3 times a week. Love it, probably as much as cycling. But my knees won't take the concrete, I'm confined to treadmills or the soft track at the local HS. Great for climbing stamina.

  22. #22
    Insane Member Onions's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Arlington, TX
    My Bikes
    Huffy Grand Prairie 15sp MTB (don't hate!), 1980 Schwinn World Tourist, 1976 Schwinn Traveler, 1974 Romic Custom (project bike!)
    Posts
    125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For my commuter, I got the lightest one I could afford on Amazon with decent reviews. It's a tad small, but big enough to hold my panniers, and, properly installed, is pretty sturdy. I've carried both panniers and two crates full of groceries bungeed on a few times, and it didn't even try to give way. I've been pretty impressed. replace the crappy aluminum bolts that come with it, though. they're awful.

    http://www.amazon.com/Avenir-Rear-AT...dp/B0014URFPS/
    This man is no ordinary man. This is Mr. F. G. Superman. To all appearances, he looks like any other law-abiding citizen. But Mr F. G. Superman has a secret identity...

  23. #23
    ROM 6:23 flipped4bikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Coastal Maine
    My Bikes
    Specialized Tricross Comp, Lemond Tourmalet, Bridgestone MB-5
    Posts
    1,713
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    And to answer your question, the heaviest component other than my Sherpa rack is my Brooks Imperial saddle. 530g (1.16 lbs) and worth it. I use do to be a weight weenie, thinking that saddles that weight 200g were the shiznit. Until certain things went numb.
    Every time we let a vehicle pass there is a little bit of compromise. But compromise allows the city to function and allows cyclists to function in the city. The trick is not to eliminate compromise but to learn how to work safely within it.

    --Robert Hurst

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,247
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by acidfast7 View Post
    2.95kg is more like 6.5 lbs.

    you're removing 3 1L milk tetra-paks from over the back wheel ... of course it will make a difference.
    sorry, that was a type I met 2.95lbs or 1.3kg. Not 6.5lbs haha, but yea...it feels like a new bike to me. I don't think I've ever not had the rack on there and now I'm able to just use my backpack for just about everything.

  25. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,247
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by flipped4bikes View Post
    And to answer your question, the heaviest component other than my Sherpa rack is my Brooks Imperial saddle. 530g (1.16 lbs) and worth it. I use do to be a weight weenie, thinking that saddles that weight 200g were the shiznit. Until certain things went numb.
    I've only ever had Brooks. I rode the stock WTB SST saddle for a while but it was a pain in the ass. If I were to ever try a synthetic saddle, it might be Fizik's saddles.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •