Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-14-12, 09:50 AM   #1
bjorke
Idealistic Troublemaker
Thread Starter
 
bjorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SF Bay Area + Surrounding Planet
Bikes: Bike Friday, Soma, Fuji, Haro, No_Name...
Posts: 610
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Cyclists at Fault

A local PD is doing analysis of auto/bike/pedestrian accidents

http://mv-voice.com/news/show_story.php?id=6312

For pedestrians, the cars are usually at fault and are hitting people IN CROSSWALKS

For cyclists, the cyclists appear to be at fault in the majority of cases -- cutting traffic, not stopping, etc.

Argue for or against, I think it's good info to know and I hope everyone can use it as another bit of data in managing their own rides.
bjorke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 10:14 AM   #2
pallen 
Descends like a rock
 
pallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Bikes: Scott Foil, Surly Pacer
Posts: 4,022
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If the data is gathered in a fair and non-biased way, it is what it is and everyone can learn from it.
pallen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 10:28 AM   #3
acidfast7
http://www.538.nl
 
acidfast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid
Posts: 6,017
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i find that the cyclists here have every dedicated piece of infrastructure and they still ride like ****.
acidfast7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 11:00 AM   #4
squegeeboo
******
 
squegeeboo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Specalized Tri-Cross
Posts: 951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The 'riding to fast in slow traffic' bit seems questionable. If I have a full shoulder, or a bike lane, why can't I go faster than cars? That said, when on a shoulder you still have to look for cars with blinkers on, but in a bike lane, a car should be merging into it, safely, to make a turn across it.
__________________
In the words of Einstein
"And now I think I'll take a bath"
squegeeboo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 11:08 AM   #5
acidfast7
http://www.538.nl
 
acidfast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid
Posts: 6,017
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by squegeeboo View Post
a car should be merging into it, safely
acidfast7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 11:14 AM   #6
CommuteCommando
Senior Member
 
CommuteCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern CaliFORNIA.
Bikes: KHS Alite 500, Trek 7.2 FX , Masi Partenza, Masi Fixed Special, Masi Cran Criterium
Posts: 3,010
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You will find idiots at the wheel, and morons at the handlebars. A statistic I saw at a presentation was that about 65% of "reportable collisions" involving cars and bikes, the blame was put on the cyclists by the reporting agency, usually police. From my personal observation of the behavior of vehiculists, motor, and human powered, I have no reason to doubt it.
CommuteCommando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 11:17 AM   #7
maidenfan
Senior Member
 
maidenfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, Or
Bikes:
Posts: 570
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommuteCommando View Post
You will find idiots at the wheel, and morons at the handlebars. A statistic I saw at a presentation was that about 65% of "reportable collisions" involving cars and bikes, the blame was put on the cyclists by the reporting agency, usually police. From my personal observation of the behavior of vehiculists, motor, and human powered, I have no reason to doubt it.
+1
maidenfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 11:20 AM   #8
gmt13
Half way there
 
gmt13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Durham, NC
Bikes: 69 Hercules, 73 Raleigh Sports, 74 Raliegh Competition, 78 Nishiki Professional, 79 Nishiki International, 83 Colnago Super, 83 Viner Junior
Posts: 1,107
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Another big mistake is riding too fast in slow-moving traffic, where drivers aren't looking for faster moving cyclists and turn in front of them, Lopez said.
To routinely blame a cyclist for not being visible is common. This quote seems to say that cyclists should not filter up at all. Filtering can be done in a manner that visibility should not be an issue, although some cyclists do put themselves in harm's way.

The study does look promising.

-G
gmt13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 11:39 AM   #9
Notso_fastLane
Senior Member
 
Notso_fastLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Medford, OR
Bikes: Kona MTN bike, Bent TW Elegance
Posts: 710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by acidfast7 View Post
i find that the cyclists here have every dedicated piece of infrastructure and they still ride like ****.
Hamburg was kinda the same way when I lived there. I remember stopping for red lights,and other cyclists getting irritated because they had to go by me to run the light.....

Luckily, I had the excuse of being an Americaner.
Notso_fastLane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 12:10 PM   #10
squegeeboo
******
 
squegeeboo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Specalized Tri-Cross
Posts: 951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmt13 View Post
To routinely blame a cyclist for not being visible is common. This quote seems to say that cyclists should not filter up at all. Filtering can be done in a manner that visibility should not be an issue, although some cyclists do put themselves in harm's way.

The study does look promising.

-G
Isn't filtering illegal in most states? If you get hit filtering how is it not the cyclists fault?
__________________
In the words of Einstein
"And now I think I'll take a bath"
squegeeboo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 01:08 PM   #11
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Bikes:
Posts: 14,577
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
why would filtering be illegal. Passing on the right isn't illegal except in New Jersey. If you are specifically allowed to ride on the shoulder, then that wouldn't be illegal either. Filtering can be dangerous, but I don't see how it is illegal
unterhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 01:54 PM   #12
squegeeboo
******
 
squegeeboo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Specalized Tri-Cross
Posts: 951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
why would filtering be illegal. Passing on the right isn't illegal except in New Jersey. If you are specifically allowed to ride on the shoulder, then that wouldn't be illegal either. Filtering can be dangerous, but I don't see how it is illegal
Maybe I don't understand what filtering is then? To me, if you're passing people on the shoulder you're not filtering. Filtering is moving up between two lanes of traffic going in the same direction. That said, if you are moving up on the shoulder, and someone who was already in front of you right hooks you, you're still at fault. The shoulder isn't a lane.
__________________
In the words of Einstein
"And now I think I'll take a bath"
squegeeboo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 01:57 PM   #13
Commodus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by squegeeboo View Post
Maybe I don't understand what filtering is then? To me, if you're passing people on the shoulder you're not filtering. Filtering is moving up between two lanes of traffic going in the same direction. That said, if you are moving up on the shoulder, and someone who was already in front of you right hooks you, you're still at fault. The shoulder isn't a lane.
If this was true, you would never be allowed to ride on a shoulder. I'm sure there are places with such idiotic laws, but no one could reasonably conclude that the cyclist was at fault in such a situation.
Commodus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 02:04 PM   #14
squegeeboo
******
 
squegeeboo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Bikes: Specalized Tri-Cross
Posts: 951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodus View Post
If this was true, you would never be allowed to ride on a shoulder. I'm sure there are places with such idiotic laws, but no one could reasonably conclude that the cyclist was at fault in such a situation.
A cyclist passing cars, on the right, on the shoulder, at an intersection? That's totally the cyclists fault for a right hook. Now if cars are passing you, it's the cars fault. Always take your lane at intersections, that way it's much less likely to become an issue.
__________________
In the words of Einstein
"And now I think I'll take a bath"
squegeeboo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 02:24 PM   #15
Ns1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Well, if you take this out:

Police say the biggest mistake bicyclists make is riding on the wrong side of the road, which accounts for 41 of the collisions. "Drivers are not expecting a bicyclist coming up the wrong side of the road,"


This is the stat that's ****ing it up for us, not the "riders going too fast" or riders blowing through stops or w/e
Ns1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 02:36 PM   #16
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint
Posts: 14,201
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
I'm always at fault, whether I am on foot, on 2 wheels or behind 4 wheels
rumrunn6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 03:46 PM   #17
Commodus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burnaby, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by squegeeboo View Post
A cyclist passing cars, on the right, on the shoulder, at an intersection? That's totally the cyclists fault for a right hook. Now if cars are passing you, it's the cars fault. Always take your lane at intersections, that way it's much less likely to become an issue.
That's not what fault means. It may be wise to take the lane in various situations, including this one, but this is not a requirement and does not absolve a motorist of the basic requirement to look where the fugg he is driving.
Commodus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 04:31 PM   #18
mr_pedro
Senior Member
 
mr_pedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Let's not jump to conclusions here.

Quote:
When cars and pedestrians collide it is overwhelmingly the car driver's fault, not the pedestrian's fault," Lopez said, adding that it was the case in 73 of the 113 pedestrian collisions.

I don't know about you but 73 vs 40 does not sound like "overwhelming" to me, maybe as the result of an American Football game but not in this case.

In the case of cyclists it is 124 vs 92 cases, statistically this is practically 50%-50% as a distribution of 52%-48% can already not be rejected given the data (In English that means that if we assume cyclists have a 52% chance of being at fault when in an accident with a car, the 124 vs 92 observations can very well have occurred due to random variance).
mr_pedro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 05:24 PM   #19
squirtdad
Senior Member
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Bikes: '89 Miyata 1400, '82 nishiski (current utilty/commuter project)
Posts: 4,118
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmt13 View Post
To routinely blame a cyclist for not being visible is common. This quote seems to say that cyclists should not filter up at all. Filtering can be done in a manner that visibility should not be an issue, although some cyclists do put themselves in harm's way.

The study does look promising.

-G
Quote:
Originally Posted by squegeeboo View Post
Isn't filtering illegal in most states? If you get hit filtering how is it not the cyclists fault?
I did not read that this was filtering...more like bikes going faster than drivers expected either in the bike lane or in general.

Filtering is legal in California.....you should see what the motorcycle guys do on the freeways (many not all). I fully expect to see a motorcycle go down because of high speed filtering.
__________________
'82 Nishiski commuter/utility
'83 Torpado Super Strada ... cafe commuter
'89 Miyata 1400
Soma rush Fixie
06 Haro x3 (son's bmx)
Electra cruiser (wife's bike)
squirtdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 06:13 PM   #20
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 187 Post(s)
When cyclist vs motorist collisions includes data with child cyclist, then the cyclist are at fault just over 50% of the time.

When cyclist vs motorist collisions excludes data with child cyclist, then the motorist are at fault 65-90% of the time (depending on which study you look at). I forget which study had 65%, Honolulu came out at 75% and Australia had 90 or 95%. Listening to the reports of Australia cyclist, I can believe 90% there.

A San Francisco paper reviewed SFPD accident reports and SFPD blamed cyclist just over 50% of the time. When those reports were closely reviewed, SFPD was blaming cyclist for the collisions claiming "excessive speed". Now who speeds most of the time, cyclist or motorist?
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 06:38 PM   #21
nashvillwill
Senior Member
 
nashvillwill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: East Bay
Bikes: Globe Vienna 3 Disc
Posts: 273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What about dual fault?

The only serious automobile accident I've ever been in (as a 16 yr old), I was turning left across two lanes of stopped traffic, after being waved on by both drivers. A third driver coming down the emergency shoulder hit me at 50mph. Destroyed both of our cars. The policeman called it dual-fault, since I "failed to yield to oncoming traffic". Even though he was in the lane illegally (and speeding), he was "oncoming" which I didn't yield too.

I wonder if the same would have been said at that moment if it was a cyclist.
nashvillwill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 07:05 PM   #22
treadtread
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
Bikes: 2012 Specialized Sirrus
Posts: 1,254
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A helpful person in my company pointed me to this link:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21755.htm

A bike passing a car from the right, on the shoulder, isn't illegal - at least in California. May not be directly applicable in the MV case, since the article doesn't have any specifics - but thought Californians here might want to know.
treadtread is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 07:14 PM   #23
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Bikes: 2013 Kona Jake, 2015 Kona Jake the Snake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 2006 Kona Kula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2001 LeMond Buenos Aires, 1984 Pinarello Gran Turismo, 1982 Trek 614, 1979 Austro-Daimler, 1974 Steyr Clubman
Posts: 8,716
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommuteCommando View Post
You will find idiots at the wheel, and morons at the handlebars. A statistic I saw at a presentation was that about 65% of "reportable collisions" involving cars and bikes, the blame was put on the cyclists by the reporting agency, usually police. From my personal observation of the behavior of vehiculists, motor, and human powered, I have no reason to doubt it.
And in the other 35% the motorist said "I didn't see him" and it was reported as "no fault"?
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 08:03 PM   #24
ItsJustMe
Seņior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Posts: 13,023
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
From what I've seen on these boards many times on studies like this, if you eliminate cases where the cyclists doing something idiotic like riding on the wrong side or riding at speed on sidewalks in front of driveways and proceeding at speed off a sidewalk and into a crosswalk at an intersection, and eliminate children who don't even know the traffic laws and are riding randomly in the street or lose control due to lack of skills, cars move to being at fault most of the time.

If you don't ride like an idiot, the odds are far above 50% that if you're involved in an accident, it will not be your fault. I recall seeing numbers here pretty close to 90%.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-12, 08:08 PM   #25
ben4345
Kitten Legion Master
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon
Bikes: Fuji silhouette, Dawes SST-aL
Posts: 898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That page reads like an anti-gun ad.
ben4345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:43 PM.