What do you think about this MTB upgrade?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What do you think about this MTB upgrade?
Hello everyone
I've had my Trek bike for close to a year now (use it namely for commuting, over less than ideal bike paths and the like); been thinking of upgrading to a Specialized (or maybe get it as a second bike ). Specifically, I've been looking at the Rockhopper models:
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/bik...hopper29#specs
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/bik...ercomp29#specs
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/bik...perpro29#specs
I really want a 29er, but don't know much about the specs (parts) on those 3 bikes to make an informed decision, so I'd like to ask for knowledgeable opinions here There are things that baffle me a little, such as the most expensive of the 3 -the Pro- having only 2 chainrings instead of 3 (alu vs steel, but aren't the two smaller chainrings less functional than 3?)
Perhaps I should get the least expensive one and do the mods I want on that one? (for more torque)
I've also been giving some thought to maybe getting a road bike instead, but the prices are higher, and I'm not sure it would held up as well jumping up and down sidewalks, going over broken pavement sections, etc.
Any opinions or comments really appreciated!
I've had my Trek bike for close to a year now (use it namely for commuting, over less than ideal bike paths and the like); been thinking of upgrading to a Specialized (or maybe get it as a second bike ). Specifically, I've been looking at the Rockhopper models:
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/bik...hopper29#specs
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/bik...ercomp29#specs
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/bik...perpro29#specs
I really want a 29er, but don't know much about the specs (parts) on those 3 bikes to make an informed decision, so I'd like to ask for knowledgeable opinions here There are things that baffle me a little, such as the most expensive of the 3 -the Pro- having only 2 chainrings instead of 3 (alu vs steel, but aren't the two smaller chainrings less functional than 3?)
Perhaps I should get the least expensive one and do the mods I want on that one? (for more torque)
I've also been giving some thought to maybe getting a road bike instead, but the prices are higher, and I'm not sure it would held up as well jumping up and down sidewalks, going over broken pavement sections, etc.
Any opinions or comments really appreciated!
#3
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
The 10 speed set up on the comp is the top of the line mtb group and the variances between the models speaks to the differences in the parts spec where the pro seems to hit the sweet spot for drivetrain and brakes.
You should test ride them all, the 10 speed mtb setup is sweet but perhaps better suited to the trail than the street.
You should test ride them all, the 10 speed mtb setup is sweet but perhaps better suited to the trail than the street.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes, that's my concern, that I'd spend the extra money without getting that much real use out of it (as the bike is for commuting).
Also, because I might end up changing the crankset/cassette/chain for something that gives me a higher ratio.
Also, because I might end up changing the crankset/cassette/chain for something that gives me a higher ratio.
#5
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
The top gear on the 10 speed set up is pretty close to 100 gear inches... Consider that pro riders do not push a gear this high when they are rolling out at 30 mph on the flats and only need the taller gears on a road bike for descending or when you have massive tailwinds.
The 9 speed does offer a little more top end gearing, my xc bike runs nearly the same range as the pro and it is rare that I ever feel the need for more gearing and just spin faster instead.
The 9 speed does offer a little more top end gearing, my xc bike runs nearly the same range as the pro and it is rare that I ever feel the need for more gearing and just spin faster instead.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Indeed, but I'm always looking for more torque (dare I say, a 'faster' bike? haha)
#7
Banned
and I'm not sure it would held up as well jumping up and down sidewalks, going over broken pavement sections, etc.
Hybrid or a "cross " bike depending on choice of Flat bars or drop bars share the 700c
622-35 tire option.. pick one that will be fitted with a rear rack and mudguards.
at point of sale is the best time..
Last edited by fietsbob; 01-06-13 at 03:04 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#11
Banned
They will not take the daily beating, as you suggest is the rubble filled battle field you traverse.
buy one for weekend use..
buy one for weekend use..
#13
Banned
it's too bad you guys don't get more bikes like this...
622x40 tires (700c)
48T up front
wide-spaced cassette in the rear
fenders
dynamo
integrated lights
suspension fork with all fender/light mounting points
adjustable stem to really dial in the proper fit
shimano XT seems to be the sweet spot for durability vs. cost
it's really similar to an 29er MTB that been equipped for commuting
622x40 tires (700c)
48T up front
wide-spaced cassette in the rear
fenders
dynamo
integrated lights
suspension fork with all fender/light mounting points
adjustable stem to really dial in the proper fit
shimano XT seems to be the sweet spot for durability vs. cost
it's really similar to an 29er MTB that been equipped for commuting
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts