Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 23 of 23
  1. #1
    Has opinion, will express
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    12,994
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Council doubles parking fees for SUVs

    I heard on the TV news last night that the North Sydney Council is about to double parking fees for SUVs. I can't remember the details, but it seems everyone there is getting a bit jack of the space they seem to take up.

  2. #2
    Senior Member PaulBravey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    San Rafael, CA
    Posts
    532
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I presume they're not going to start charging smart cars and (old) minis half price? They're a pain here when they decide to park their huge great SUV in a spot that's marked 'compact' and then leave dents in the doors of cars next to them 'cos there's no room to open the door.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Oregon
    My Bikes
    2003 Jamis Nova - commuter setup
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Socialism at it's best.

  4. #4
    contrarian lala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    CO Springs
    My Bikes
    80's ross road bike/commuter, 80's team miyata, 90's haro mtb xtracycle conversion, koga mitaya world traveler
    Posts
    2,848
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    woot!
    Higher ground for the apocalypse!

  5. #5
    Has opinion, will express
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    12,994
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mikdes
    Socialism at it's best.
    How so? I would have thought commercial entrepreneurship at its best. I bet the privately owned car parking stations will follow suit very quickly.

  6. #6
    Every lane is a bike lane Chris L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia - passionfruit capital of the universe!
    Posts
    9,622
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rowan
    How so? I would have thought commercial entrepreneurship at its best. I bet the privately owned car parking stations will follow suit very quickly.
    I think the only thing that stopped them from doing so previously was being accused of discrimination.
    "I am never going to flirt with idleness again" - Roy Keane
    "We invite everyone to question the entire culture we take for granted." - Manic Street Preachers.
    My blog.
    My bike tours. Japan tour page under construction.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Ziemas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Riga, Latvia
    Posts
    10,072
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mikdes
    Socialism at it's best.
    Socialism would make everyone pay the SAME price, regardless of how much space they take. Conservative capitalism would have everyone pay for EXACTLY what they use.

  8. #8
    Just riding andygates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Exeter, UK
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Bad Boy / Mercian track / BOB trailer / Moulton recumbent project
    Posts
    651
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Socialism would also have them driving the same cars, of course. How else could it be equitable and fair?

    This is nothing of the sort: it's resource pricing. Consumer pays. Don't see how that can be objected to in a market economy.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Bolo Grubb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    1,749
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I read or heard somewhere that a state in the USA (maybe Oregon?) is watning to charge a road tax based on how many miles are driven. I like the theory of "pay for what you use" but it all depends on how it is enforced.

    I think large SUVs should pay more then my Honda Civic.

  10. #10
    Senior Member FXjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    NE Indiana
    Posts
    12,670
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Define an SUV.

    Does a Subaru count?

  11. #11
    He drop me Grasschopper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Central PA
    My Bikes
    '03 Marin Mill Valley, '06 Cannondale Rush, '02 Eddy Merckx Corsa 0.1, '07 Bottecchia Euro Sprint Tour Comp Elite Pro 1000
    Posts
    11,436
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FXjohn
    Define an SUV.

    Does a Subaru count?
    As much as Subaru would like you to think the Forester is an SUV so they can sell more...no it is a station wagon. No other model is even in question IMO, they are cars.
    The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.

  12. #12
    Retrogrouch in Training bostontrevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Knee-deep in the day-to-day
    Posts
    5,484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Actually the Forester and Outback are both SUV's. It's a definition based on ground clearance and curb weight. That makes them light trucks and relaxes fuel economy standards. Last year's Outback was intentionally raised up because the fuel economy had become so bad that they couldn't keep it in the sedan class anymore without hurting their fleet ratings.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Oregon
    My Bikes
    2003 Jamis Nova - commuter setup
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rowan
    How so? I would have thought commercial entrepreneurship at its best. I bet the privately owned car parking stations will follow suit very quickly.
    The difference is that this is a government entity doing this. If an SUV takes up one spot just like a sedan, why charge more? It's probably an overly environmentally "conscious" council that has decided that it's their responsibility to penalize people just because they drive less fuel-efficient vehicles.

    As long as they're doing this, maybe they should lower parking fees for hybrid cars and motorcycles. Do you think that will happen? Likely not.

  14. #14
    Fred Zen Kabloink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    598
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know if I agree with doubling fines for legally parked suvs, but I would strongly agree with doubling fines for suv and truck owners that take up more than one space. I am sure you have seen these drivers. The ones that somehow need to park at an angle taking up two spaces or even worse parking in the wrong direction taking up 3 or 4 spaces.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Oregon
    My Bikes
    2003 Jamis Nova - commuter setup
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kabloink
    I don't know if I agree with doubling fines for legally parked suvs, but I would strongly agree with doubling fines for suv and truck owners that take up more than one space. I am sure you have seen these drivers. The ones that somehow need to park at an angle taking up two spaces or even worse parking in the wrong direction taking up 3 or 4 spaces.
    I agree. That goes for anyone, not just SUV drivers. I've seen plently of BMW and Mercedes sedans doing exactly the same thing.

  16. #16
    Senior Member FXjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    NE Indiana
    Posts
    12,670
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mikdes
    I agree. That goes for anyone, not just SUV drivers. I've seen plently of BMW and Mercedes sedans doing exactly the same thing.
    So we've come to the logical conclusion that SUV's are just being scapegoated and all the other cars on the road are pretty much just as bad.

  17. #17
    No one carries the DogBoy
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,254
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if you charge me twice as much, I'm going to straddle a line and take up two spots. Heck, I paid for 'em. See what happens to parking availablity then.

  18. #18
    Senior Member nick burns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Absecon, NJ
    My Bikes
    Puch Luzern, Puch Mistral SLE, Bianchi Pista, Motobecane Grand Touring, Austro-Daimler Ultima, Legnano, Raleigh MountainTour, Cannondale SM600
    Posts
    2,943
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How about just reducing the size of the parking spots so that larger vehicles (regardless of if they are suv's) will be forced to pay double since they're taking up two spots?

  19. #19
    Senior Member FXjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    NE Indiana
    Posts
    12,670
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nick burns
    How about just reducing the size of the parking spots so that larger vehicles (regardless of if they are suv's) will be forced to pay double since they're taking up two spots?
    That MIGHT work..but also there might be odd size spots left in between vehicles that no one could use though.

  20. #20
    dangerous with tools halfbiked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    minneapolis
    My Bikes
    fat, long, single & fast
    Posts
    4,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bolo Grubb
    I read or heard somewhere that a state in the USA (maybe Oregon?) is watning to charge a road tax based on how many miles are driven. I like the theory of "pay for what you use" but it all depends on how it is enforced.

    I think large SUVs should pay more then my Honda Civic.
    Mileage isn't a good variable for calculating 'use'. A long commute in a compact car does much less damage than a short commute in an SUV. If you want to penalize large vehicles for what they use, then set a tax rate based on vehicle weight. Heavier vehicles do more damage to the roads, make 'em pay more.

  21. #21
    No one carries the DogBoy
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,254
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by halfbiked
    Mileage isn't a good variable for calculating 'use'. A long commute in a compact car does much less damage than a short commute in an SUV. If you want to penalize large vehicles for what they use, then set a tax rate based on vehicle weight. Heavier vehicles do more damage to the roads, make 'em pay more.
    Seems like the time to do this is with vehicle registration/license renewal since they know the vehicle make/model at that time.

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    86
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Capitalism doesn't make people pay for what they use. Capitalism is all about getting other people to wipe your booty so you can think your stuff doesn't smell. Remember what happened to all those buffalo?

  23. #23
    Just riding andygates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Exeter, UK
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Bad Boy / Mercian track / BOB trailer / Moulton recumbent project
    Posts
    651
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well yeah, capitalism is a fundamentally unfair and unsustainable model, but let's not get bogged down in details

    As for variable pricing, hell, there exists a tax based on engine size (ie environmental impact) and vehicle weight (ie mpg) - fuel tax. But I understand that you chaps don't like paying $2 for a gallon of gas?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •