Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31
  1. #1
    Long Live Long Rides
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    KCMO
    My Bikes
    1988 Specialized Rockhopper Comp, converted for touring/commuting. 1984 Raleigh Team USA road bike.
    Posts
    717
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cyclists struck by car!

    I just read some of the threads on being intimidated by traffic. How ironic. I just watched on the news tonight about two cyclists who were struck by a car on a park road in KCMO. This is a fairly popular cycling road. However, it is busy during rush hour. Also, no shoulder to ride. A nice winding park road.

    The driver said he came upon two cyclists riding abreast. He said he slowed and honked. The cyclist furthest from the edge didn't move. The driver then said as he tried to pass he clipped one of the cyclists with his side view mirror. both cyclists went down.

    The cyclists said the driver intentionally swerved to hit them.

    I have been a commuter/tourist for almost 25 years. I have a rule if you ride with me. In traffic, single file.

    It really bothers me when two or more cyclists ride abreast in traffic or on semi busy streets. I have ridden with multitudes of other cyclists on nice winding country roads. MS150 is a great example. Also, very little to no traffic.

    Just curious what your thoughts are on a subject like this.

    It is nice to vent once in a while!
    Jharte
    Touring...therapy for the soul.

  2. #2
    Riding is Praying Shorty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Boston
    My Bikes
    Jamis Nova, Fisher Tassajara, Indy Fab Crown Jewel; Titan NOS fixed
    Posts
    206
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think its perfectly legal to ride abreast, and in any case the car driver is an idiot if he can't avoid hitting a clearly visable cyclist. That being said, its not a great idea to encorage road rage by riding abreast.

  3. #3
    Retrogrouch in Training bostontrevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Knee-deep in the day-to-day
    Posts
    5,484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Local laws will vary. It's illegal to ride two abreast here and in many other states.

    Still, if they were in the lane, my personal feeling is that the driver is at fault as he violated the other lane. The cyclist struck could just have easily been executing an in-lane passing manuver.

    Sorry, the I-ran-them-over-because-they-wouldn't-move defense doesn't fly with this guy here.

  4. #4
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,029
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think riding two abreast on a two lane road (one lane in their direction) when it impedes a motorist is rude, if not illegal (in some states it is, in others it is not).

    That said, the driver is still at fault for hitting them when passing, of course.

  5. #5
    dp/dt pablo27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Marion, NC
    My Bikes
    Madone 5.5; Trek 1200; Trek 3700
    Posts
    52
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My sense is that the motorist was acting out his frustrations by passing so close. He was making an effort to intimidate his fellow citizens and maybe not so accidentally struck the inside rider.

    Riding two abreast can be a factor especiallly when a motorist tries to pass while remaining right of the centerline. Though the law in my state is that the motorist must give half the lane width while passing, drivers overtake me "inside the yellow" all the time.

  6. #6
    \m/
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    JAX
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    [QUOTE=jharte] Also, no shoulder to ride. A nice winding park road.QUOTE]

    you have the right, if not the responsability, to take the lane in this situation.

  7. #7
    INP
    INP is offline
    Back In The Saddle
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    My Bikes
    Raleigh Tarantula - with peeling decals, scratched paint, some green paint on the bars, purple aluminum brake levers - it was a freebie, and at least no one wants to steal it!!!!
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Shorty
    I think its perfectly legal to ride abreast, and in any case the car driver is an idiot if he can't avoid hitting a clearly visable cyclist. That being said, its not a great idea to encorage road rage by riding abreast.
    Depends on location. BC Motor Vehicle Act prohibits riding abreast, as any slow-moving vehicle (the class into which bikes are placed) is to stay "as close to the shoulder as practical." (note: it does state explicitly riding two abreast is not allowed, if I remember correctly. As well, many local bylaws reinforce the same).


    Quote Originally Posted by jwad
    you have the right, if not the responsability, to take the lane in this situation.
    I would not necessarily support this, depending on the length of the road stretch, how many periods of visibility along the stretch, blind corners, etc. I have encountered far too many cyclists who "take a lane" when it is not warranted. While I think that cyclists (and I am one) need to be granted respect on the road, many cyclists carry it too far, taking a superiority complex ("Look at me on my environmentally friendly machine!") and are not willing to return the courtesy to vehicles (passing on the right pass vehicles signalling a right turn, riding abreast on busy roads, etc). Although the motorist is definitely not excused for his loss of patience (that's never an excuse to take out a biker, another car, a pedestrian), the cyclists probably need to take a share of the responsibility, as well.
    Duc in Altum!

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,251
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In Houston, I get this sort of thing on a regular basis. First the guy honks. If I don't dive for the curb, he swings over to give my a "nudge" with his side mirror. Always a male, age 20 to 30. Usually in a big truck.

    AND, this is why I am against cyclists carrying guns. The temptation would be overpowering.

  9. #9
    Toyota Racing Dev. PWRDbyTRD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knoxville, TN baby!
    My Bikes
    2004 Kona Hoss Dee-Lux
    Posts
    3,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    he's attempting to strike you with a deadly weapon...sounds like a reason to defend myself.
    Linkage...My 2004 Kona Hoss Dee-Lux My Mindless Banter
    Disclaimer: I'm 425lb...I put unnormal loads on my bike. This should help you in answering any of my questions.

  10. #10
    \m/
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    JAX
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    [QUOTE=INP] "as close to the shoulder as practical." (note: it does state explicitly riding two abreast is not allowed, if I remember correctly. As well, many local bylaws reinforce the same).




    I would not necessarily support this, depending on the length of the road stretch, how many periods of visibility along the stretch, blind corners, etc. I have encountered far too many cyclists who "take a lane" when it is not warranted. QUOTE]


    I was assuming that the cyclist in question had a reason for not moving over to allow the car to pass. I think most of us understand that picking a fight with a truck is a loosing battle.
    Also, if the road is winding and narrow, it becomes unsafe for the cyclist, the driver in the vehicle trying to pass, and any vehical that may be coming around the next curve to try and move over to the edge of the road, when there is not room for the vehicle to get through safely. Being in front of the car, and not having blind spots, probably gives the cyclist a greater ability to determine when it is unsafe to pass. Its probably a good idea to signal to the driver that you know he/she is there, and that you dont want him to pass at that moment though.

  11. #11
    Toyota Racing Dev. PWRDbyTRD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knoxville, TN baby!
    My Bikes
    2004 Kona Hoss Dee-Lux
    Posts
    3,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    [QUOTE=jwad]
    Quote Originally Posted by INP
    "as close to the shoulder as practical." (note: it does state explicitly riding two abreast is not allowed, if I remember correctly. As well, many local bylaws reinforce the same).




    I would not necessarily support this, depending on the length of the road stretch, how many periods of visibility along the stretch, blind corners, etc. I have encountered far too many cyclists who "take a lane" when it is not warranted. QUOTE]


    I was assuming that the cyclist in question had a reason for not moving over to allow the car to pass. I think most of us understand that picking a fight with a truck is a loosing battle.
    Also, if the road is winding and narrow, it becomes unsafe for the cyclist, the driver in the vehicle trying to pass, and any vehical that may be coming around the next curve to try and move over to the edge of the road, when there is not room for the vehicle to get through safely. Being in front of the car, and not having blind spots, probably gives the cyclist a greater ability to determine when it is unsafe to pass. Its probably a good idea to signal to the driver that you know he/she is there, and that you dont want him to pass at that moment though.
    how would you properly signal a driver to NOT pass
    Linkage...My 2004 Kona Hoss Dee-Lux My Mindless Banter
    Disclaimer: I'm 425lb...I put unnormal loads on my bike. This should help you in answering any of my questions.

  12. #12
    cyclotourist
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    calgary, canada
    Posts
    560
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    how would you properly signal a driver to NOT pass

    With your *** of course!

  13. #13
    INP
    INP is offline
    Back In The Saddle
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    My Bikes
    Raleigh Tarantula - with peeling decals, scratched paint, some green paint on the bars, purple aluminum brake levers - it was a freebie, and at least no one wants to steal it!!!!
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jwad
    I was assuming that the cyclist in question had a reason for not moving over to allow the car to pass.
    I was mainly taking issue with riding two abreast on a narrow windy road - I agree with you (obviously) that if a cyclist cannot move to the shoulder for safety issues it is better to "take the lane."
    Duc in Altum!

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Irving, TX
    Posts
    406
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm with someone else we take the lane, slightly staggered or side by side, just depends on the road and how hard we are riding.
    If I'm by myself I usually ride ever so slightly to the right of the center of the lane. If the right lane is wide enought for a car and bike to fit comfortably, I'll get to the right as much as is comfortable. If the lane is narrow, I am in the center or maybe even to the left of center (because narrow lanes are often in dense areas where you need to see people making right turns into your lane and a left posture is best for both visibility and manueverability.)
    In all cases the general principle is that if the lane isn't big enough for a car and me, I don't want to give the impression to the driver behind me that he can pass without making sure the next lane to his left is completely clear because he'll need to utilize a good portion or all of that lane. If the da poor, poor baby has to swow down or move his wittle wrist more than he'd like, tough. I don't find it disturbing if they only move halfway into that next lane to pass as long as I'm given proper space, but what I don't want and discourage by my positioning is the thinking that they can basically squeeze by in my lane (again, unless the lane is plenty wide for it).

    Who wants to ride single file all the time? It makes talking nearly impossible and isn't a sociable way to ride. In any case the car needs an entirely clear lane to pass, so what does it matter if he has to put 50, 75, or 100 percent of his car into that lane?

    I don't know about the law in other places, but in Texas it's legal for the cyclist to take the lane in lanes than are under 14ft. wide. That seems fair to me. I'm not sure what, if anything it says about riding abreast, but if one bike can take most lanes I don't see why two bikes couldn't ride abreast.


    I don't have much patience for the blame the bicyclist argument in this situation. The blame sounds like it was wholly the motorist's. People act as if because they ride bikes alot they can't possible have the car-washed convenience-philia of cagers who think bicyclists should be happy for the privilege of using the road. The dude who hit these guys was being lazy, hostile and cowardly. End of story.

  15. #15
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by skookum
    With your *** of course!
    LMFAO. touch-ay.

  16. #16
    Belt drive! vtjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Burlington, Vermont
    My Bikes
    2011 Trek Soho DLX
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In Vermont it's legal to ride abreast as long as you're not obstructing other traffic.

    Sufficiently nebulous?

  17. #17
    aspiring dirtbag commuter max-a-mill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    philly
    Posts
    2,116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i do blame the cyclists a little....

    why go out on a narrow road during rush hour for a friendly coffee chat style ride??? your an idiot... if your gonna ride during those times find a nice wide quiet stratch of road or even better a multi-use path! if they were commuters i humbly apologize, but even they must know of safer routes or better ways to conduct themselves on unsafe routes.

    of course it is still the drivers fault completely, but in my opinion but these cyclists were asking for a confrontation in which they will never win.

    if i am on a narrow road i am sure as ***** gonna ride single file and often if i can feel a nervous driver on my ass while i am solo i'll give him a couple hands signals... like a big stop for please don't pass me over this blind hill or around this blind corner; but then as soon as i see the coast is clear i get over as far as possible and try and wave them through...

    blocking traffic is pretty lame unless you really have too... and who the h@ll can enjoy the ride anyway with the sound of an engine right behind you???
    - the revolution will not be motorized -

  18. #18
    Caffeinated. Camel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Waltham, MA
    My Bikes
    Waterford 1900, Quintana Roo Borrego, Trek 8700zx, Bianchi Pista Concept
    Posts
    1,541
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by max-a-mill
    why go out on a narrow road during rush hour for a friendly coffee chat style ride??? your an idiot... if your gonna ride during those times find a nice wide quiet stratch of road or even better a multi-use path! if they were commuters i humbly apologize...
    Yikes! Who says they weren't out on a nice fitness ride, riding at the posted speed limit? *(yes I know I'm an idiot, but don't run me down just for that-particularly if you've seen me) Perhaps the driver was speeding, or wanted to? MUP's are not suited for all kinds of cycling, perhaps they were on there way to one?

    In short, nothing I say really matters. The driver saw them, slowed, then opted to pass them in an unsafe manner, hitting one. Not an accident, rather a deliberate action.

  19. #19
    aspiring dirtbag commuter max-a-mill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    philly
    Posts
    2,116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Camel
    The driver saw them, slowed, then opted to pass them in an unsafe manner, hitting one. Not an accident, rather a deliberate action.
    but wasn't it BECAUSE they didn't get out of the way??? in the article it seemed that they contiued riding abreast even after they knew the car was there, making it impossible for the car to pass... way to make new friends on the road and be good ambassadors for the rest of us; IDIOTS....

    of course it is still the drivers fault but.....
    - the revolution will not be motorized -

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Irving, TX
    Posts
    406
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by max-a-mill
    i do blame the cyclists a little....


    of course it is still the drivers fault completely
    I'm glad we straightened that up.

  21. #21
    aspiring dirtbag commuter max-a-mill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    philly
    Posts
    2,116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony King
    I'm glad we straightened that up.
    so you can't figure out what i'm saying???? REALLY??? or are you just the coolest wise@ss on the internet?

    i do blame the cyclists a little.... - for getting themselves into the situation in the first place


    of course it is still the drivers fault completely - for hitting them
    - the revolution will not be motorized -

  22. #22
    Senior Member billh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,254
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It is legal to ride abreast in Missouri . . . "when not impeding traffic". See link below to St Louis BikeFed, click on Education: Laws for summary.

    http://stlbikefed.org


    Riding to right, required for bicycles and motorized bicycles.
    307.190. Every person operating a bicycle or motorized bicycle at less than the posted speed or slower than the flow of traffic upon a street or highway shall ride as near to the right side of the roadway as safe, exercising due care when passing a standing vehicle or one proceeding in the same direction,
    EXCEPT
    when making a left turn, when avoiding hazardous conditions, when the lane is too narrow to share with another vehicle, or when on a one-way street. Bicyclists may ride abreast when not impeding other vehicles.

  23. #23
    Caffeinated. Camel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Waltham, MA
    My Bikes
    Waterford 1900, Quintana Roo Borrego, Trek 8700zx, Bianchi Pista Concept
    Posts
    1,541
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by max-a-mill
    but wasn't it BECAUSE they didn't get out of the way??? in the article it seemed that they contiued riding abreast even after they knew the car was there, making it impossible for the car to pass... way to make new friends on the road and be good ambassadors for the rest of us; IDIOTS....

    of course it is still the drivers fault but.....
    Driving a motorized vehicle does not give an operator the rite to hit visible slow vehicles in the motorway. Following operators must slow to a safe speed so as not to collide, then wait for a safe oportunity to pass (usually a clear site line of several hundred feet or more into the oposite travel lane). The cyclists in this example are not "obstructions", they are considered slower moving vehicles.

    If a lane is not safe to share with a car & a cyclist side by side-the cyclist has every LEGAL rite to occupy the lane. Riding two abreast does not change the width of the lane, nor the amount of space available to pass (oncoming traffic still has to be clear).

    ...making friends? good embassadors? Idiots? I disagree with your logic.

  24. #24
    Alien lifeform
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Houston, TX
    My Bikes
    2002 Specialized Expedition Elite, 2005 Jamis Aurora
    Posts
    263
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Legal in Texas. Not smart, but legal:

    From the Texas drivers handbook, chapter 13:
    7. Persons riding two abreast shall not impede the normal and reasonable
    flow of traffic on the roadway. Persons riding two abreast on a laned roadway
    must ride in a single lane.

  25. #25
    Senior Member kb0tnv's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    St. Louis MO
    My Bikes
    Kona Tiki
    Posts
    273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My wife and I took a ride on a short winding rode to get to the next bike trail (Illinois). We were riding as close to the side as possible and single file. This lady started honking at us in her big white "bubba truck". She then passed us and stopped about 30 or so feet ahead. We just got off the side of the road and just stared at her. She was about to kick it in reverse when she saw she was obstructing traffic. She revved up the engine and high tailed it out of there. We just shook our heads in disbelief... and went on our way. I believe there are some real "nut cases" that can't deal with bikes riding in their "lane" or being on the road. Even with us riding single file and close to the shoulder isn't enough. Pleople need to be educated... I just don't know why there aren't some national PSA's or education in school? Sad world we live in.

    Keep Cycling!
    "Work to Eat, Eat to Live, Live to Bike, Bike to Work"

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •