Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-20-05, 06:56 PM   #1
Portis
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
Posts: 6,019
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
MTB Slicks. 1.25 vs 1.50

I am looking to get some slicks for my mountain bike. Most recommendations i have read on these forums, suggest a 1.5 instead of the thinner 1.25. Aside from maybe the 1.25 having a more harsh ride, are there any other reasons why most suggest the 1.5? Or do they?
Portis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-05, 07:08 PM   #2
solo
here
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 87
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I mounted 1.25in 95psi tires for a mtb commuter conversion. There's a big difference in rolling resistance compared to a +2in heavy tread. It's used only on pavement and the ride isn't harsh.
Generally a wider tire offers a more comfortable ride...no other advantage that I know of.
solo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-05, 07:24 PM   #3
Dchiefransom
Senior Member
 
Dchiefransom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
Bikes:
Posts: 6,205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
It usually depends on the width of your original rims. The wider ones might not take the 1.25" tires.
Dchiefransom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-05, 10:18 PM   #4
vincenzosi
Senior Member
 
vincenzosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bronx, NY
Bikes: 2005 Trek 1200 T (Mostly stock), 2005 Raleigh C30
Posts: 673
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think the rule of thumb (from someone who has done exactly this) is that if your bike originally took 26 x 2.0, you can safely go down to 26 x 1.5, and any smaller than that you're kind of pushing it. I remember someone here giving me that answer and pointing me to Sheldon Brown's site to a chart with compatible tire sizes, but I'll be damned if I can find it now.

Anyway, I went and got a set of 26 x 1.6 Conti Sport Contacts and was totally in love with them. Best tires I ever owned. Now that I have the Raleigh coming, I can't even use them and I only put about 30 miles on 'em :-(
vincenzosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-05, 10:26 PM   #5
slvoid
2-Cyl, 1/2 HP @ 90 RPM
 
slvoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NYC
Bikes: 04' Specialized Hardrock Sport, 03' Giant OCR2 (SOLD!), 04' Litespeed Firenze, 04' Giant OCR Touring, 07' Specialized Langster Comp
Posts: 15,762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I measured my rims as 0.944" wide. They used to have 2.1" tires on em. I now have 1.5" nimbus armadillo's, sheldonbrown's site says that 1.5"'s are probably the smallest I can put on it though the LBS told me I can safely go down to 1.25"

I don't really believe there's a diff other than weight. The contact patch on my 1.5" nimbus was exactly the same as the last pair of tires I had, the 1.95" hemisphere's.
slvoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-05, 10:28 PM   #6
vincenzosi
Senior Member
 
vincenzosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bronx, NY
Bikes: 2005 Trek 1200 T (Mostly stock), 2005 Raleigh C30
Posts: 673
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just a side note: You may want to make sure your rims can tolerate the increased pressure of a thinner tire. I've heard on this forum (and God knows if it's true) of rims blowing apart from the doubled pressure of the smaller tires.

I don't know how true that is, but I figured I'd pass it along in case you hadn't seen it.
vincenzosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-05, 12:14 AM   #7
Raiyn
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Posts: 15,061
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger
I am looking to get some slicks for my mountain bike. Most recommendations i have read on these forums, suggest a 1.5 instead of the thinner 1.25. Aside from maybe the 1.25 having a more harsh ride, are there any other reasons why most suggest the 1.5? Or do they?
I usually recommend the 1.5. I like having that small bit of extra tire. I personally wouldn't dare go with a 1" as I feel for the way I ride that's just not enough tire
__________________
Raiyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-05, 12:26 PM   #8
Wasn't
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 32
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Assuming your rim can handle the tire widths you're considering, I think your decision should be based more on the type of terrain you expect to ride. I originally put 1.5" wide road tires on my hard-tail mountain bike when I decided to convert it to a tourer / commuter. When those tires wore out, I installed a tire that's closer to 1.25" wide, which I don't like as much. Now, my commute covers a rail-trail and a fair amount of gravel on the choppy road shoulders. So maybe it's psychological for me, but I prefer the wider tire even though I haven't had a problem with the narrower one.

It could also be the differences in the tires-- they are not the same models or even the same brand. I also ran the wider tire until the casing showed. Tires worn that far get really slow, so the new tire felt quicker in several aspects. Maybe this made the new tire feel "less stable".

The narrower tire, a Michelin Transworld City, is labeled as being 1.5" wide, but measures closer to 1.25". It's really noticeably thinner than the Bontrager I used before. The Michelin is also avaialable in a 2" model and I may try that one next time.

That's my experience.
Wasn't is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-05, 08:06 PM   #9
marnan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford, CT
Bikes:
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
1.4" Ritchey Tommy Slicks
marnan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-05, 08:12 PM   #10
marnan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford, CT
Bikes:
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ranger - It really depends on what you are using the bike for. If this is a fair weather bike, only on pavement, I would go with the 1.25" for less resistance. I use the 1.4" Tommy Slicks on my beater mountain bike as a foul weather commuter. I like the extra stability and wider tire if I am riding in rain, sandy/salt roads, ice, or the occasional off road excursion.
marnan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-05, 12:07 PM   #11
balto charlie
Senior Member
 
balto charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore/DC
Bikes:
Posts: 2,477
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vincenzosi
Just a side note: You may want to make sure your rims can tolerate the increased pressure of a thinner tire. I've heard on this forum (and God knows if it's true) of rims blowing apart from the doubled pressure of the smaller tires.

I don't know how true that is, but I figured I'd pass it along in case you hadn't seen it.
I think mnt. bike wheels are much stronger than road wheels. The pressure is no problem. I ride all size bike tires and coming from a mnt. bike 2.1 to a slick 1.25 is a BIG change. I would go to a 1.5, get use to them and go smaller(if you want) when they wear out. Specialized Nimbus Armadillos is one of the toughest tires out there. Not the most comfortable though, a little harsh. Truely a commuter tire. Charlie
balto charlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-05, 12:20 PM   #12
DanO220
SoCal Commuter
 
DanO220's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Agua Dulce, CA
Bikes: Surly Crosscheck single/9 speed convertible, Novara Buzz beater
Posts: 592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I got away with running 100 psi, 1" slicks on a Sun Ringle XC rim that I'm sure was meant to mount 2" tires. I was willing to forgo comfort for rolling resistance. The ride was downright punnishing, and I don't know how long the rims would have held up, but I did put enough miles on them to demonstrate that the tires wouldn't blow of or anything. So you can confidently mount your 1.25's if you wish.

DanO
DanO220 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-05, 12:59 PM   #13
Ebbtide
Senior Member
 
Ebbtide's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ohio's Cycling Capital, America's North Coast.
Bikes:
Posts: 4,617
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I ride 1.0 top slicks on my standard Mtb wheels @ 120 psi. No problems in over 800 miles.
Ebbtide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-05, 05:55 AM   #14
andygates
Just riding
 
andygates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Exeter, UK
Bikes: Cannondale Bad Boy / Mercian track / BOB trailer / Moulton recumbent project
Posts: 651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Those top slicks are a superb ride, easily the fastest, sharpest, most grin-inducing ride I've had: I swear that the Cannondale Bad Boy was such a success primarily because it was running those tyres.

As you can tell, I'm a skinnies fan.
andygates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-05, 04:23 AM   #15
Iffacus
Senior Member
 
Iffacus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: trying to find my way home on Cannock Chase
Bikes:
Posts: 213
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I used to run Specilized Turbo S 1" tyres on my MTB, ride was nice and fast, but used to get a lot of blowouts

As such I would advise going for a wider tyre 1.25 should be fine
Iffacus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-05, 09:09 PM   #16
Portis
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
Posts: 6,019
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Is it easy to find 1.25 tubes with shrader valves?
Portis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-05, 09:34 PM   #17
solo
here
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 87
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
http://www.performancebike.com/shop/...TOKEN=95613231
...and inexpensive.
solo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 PM.