Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    middle of Montana
    Posts
    111
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cross Check single speed rear hub 130 vs 135

    Hi all,
    I will be building a CC for commuting and other adventures. I want to build a set of single speed wheels with the Velocity A23 rims and probably the Surly ultra new hub. I do have a set of road wheels for geared setup, but would like wider rims for snow tires. Have gotten a little input from MTBR, looking for a road perspective also.
    Thanks in advance, MikeB

  2. #2
    7-speed doomsday prepper ThermionicScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    CID
    My Bikes
    1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX
    Posts
    8,277
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The hub width doesn't make a difference as to the width of your rims or tires you can use. I vote 130mm just to keep them compatible with other things.
    Quote Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
    There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
    RUSA #7498

  3. #3
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    514
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Since many Road frames are vertical dropouts for compatibility , maybe this is the hub to use

    http://www.whiteind.com/eno-single-speed-rear-hubs.html..

    the eccentric version .. will tension the chain, within a half link length

    in what ever width the rear of the frame happens to be..
    Last edited by fietsbob; 08-21-13 at 10:06 AM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    869
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would say if you are leaning towards road type riding then 130mm might be more appropriate but if you are leaning toward more "adventure cycling" then I'd go 135 since most touring/adventure bikes have 135 dropouts. This is assuming you might want to move the wheel to a more specialized bike in the future.

    I will say my bike has 132.5mm forward facing dropouts and I find them to be a PITA. I would much rather just have vertical 135's.
    Currently riding a 1995 Trek 730 Multitrack converted to 26" wheels.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    middle of Montana
    Posts
    111
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by corwin1968 View Post
    I would say if you are leaning towards road type riding then 130mm might be more appropriate but if you are leaning toward more "adventure cycling" then I'd go 135 since most touring/adventure bikes have 135 dropouts. This is assuming you might want to move the wheel to a more specialized bike in the future.

    I will say my bike has 132.5mm forward facing dropouts and I find them to be a PITA. I would much rather just have vertical 135's.
    Why do you say they are a PITA? I have that type on an old Bianchi. I plan to run single speed in winter and add gears for non-winter use. The Cross Check seems to be made for that. Also like the ability to run wide tires.

  6. #6
    PatronSaintOfDiscBrakes dynaryder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    dropped and lost in Washington DC
    Posts
    5,910
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    130,you'll need spacers;135,you'll have to spread the frame a little every time you insert the wheel. Decide which you'd rather deal with.

    Quote Originally Posted by fietsbob View Post
    Since many Road frames are vertical dropouts for compatibility , maybe this is the hub to use
    Dude,he's got a Cross Check,they have semi-horizontal dropouts.

    C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport/Qualifier,Brompton S6L,Dahon Speed Pro TT

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    869
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WMBIGS View Post
    Why do you say they are a PITA? I have that type on an old Bianchi. I plan to run single speed in winter and add gears for non-winter use. The Cross Check seems to be made for that. Also like the ability to run wide tires.
    Because the wheel comes into the dropout from the direction of the front of the bike, I have to deflate my 40mm tire to get the wheel far enough forward to get into the dropouts. Also, stretching the stays to get the wheel in is a pain. Neither is a huge deal, just a couple of extra steps over using vertical dropouts. If you plan to swap from from SS to geared then those extra steps would be a fair trade-off for that capability. If you already own a bike with this type of dropout then it's likely a non-issue for you.
    Currently riding a 1995 Trek 730 Multitrack converted to 26" wheels.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    47
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cross Checks have 132.5 rear spacing. Road or mountain hubs will work; couldn't be any easier. I have a 950 series Shimano XTR hub laced to a Velocity Dyad set up singlespeed and no tensioner. Currently shod with 28c Gatorskins, but have a set of 35c City Rides that work really well too.

  9. #9
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    514
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dude,he's got a Cross Check,they have semi-horizontal dropouts.
    I was under the illusion they wanted to also use the wheel on their road bike..

    Excuuuuse Me!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •