Back-Pack Drag - Revealed!
#51
Senior Member
When I would wear a backpack, I found that the straps would start to stress my chest / pecs causing me to be more tired than riding without it. But this was a general backpack... probably the higher end ones are more aero and I would hope that they would have a chest strap to alleviate strain...
#52
Keepin it Wheel
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 10,244
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 3,417 Times
in
2,526 Posts
I think droy45 was just talking about the comfort factor of weight on the torso (adding to pressure at the butt/seat interface) vs weight on the bike. But perhaps you meant to respond to Aravilar, who was asking about mass and speed...
#53
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,965
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,529 Times
in
1,042 Posts
Good info real useful to bicycle commuters
Obviously filling the large backpack with greased bowling balls will allow a speed obsessed commuter to shave a few micro seconds off the commute, especially if the commute is on the face of the moon.
Obviously filling the large backpack with greased bowling balls will allow a speed obsessed commuter to shave a few micro seconds off the commute, especially if the commute is on the face of the moon.
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: southeastern PA - a mile west of Philadelphia
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Earth's atmosphere is not a vacuum. Conceptually, the gravitational force scales linearly with mass (since gravitational acceleration is constant, for this anyway) but the air resistance (drag) does not.
Longer explanation is here: https://sites.google.com/a/mpstraini...nlighterriders
Longer explanation is here: https://sites.google.com/a/mpstraini...nlighterriders
#55
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: California
Posts: 7
Bikes: 2014 Kestrel Legend Ultegra, 2014 Windsor Bristol, 2014 Windsor Wellington 3.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#56
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I'm just letting the side conversation run, although I will say that weight matters on the coast-down due to higher density objects having a higher terminal velocity. And more momentum per drag area when the slope levels off. Not sure where a vacuum enters into it.
#57
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: California
Posts: 7
Bikes: 2014 Kestrel Legend Ultegra, 2014 Windsor Bristol, 2014 Windsor Wellington 3.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Precisely so, I must have clicked on the wrong post to quote.
I'm just letting the side conversation run, although I will say that weight matters on the coast-down due to higher density objects having a higher terminal velocity. And more momentum per drag area when the slope levels off. Not sure where a vacuum enters into it.
I'm just letting the side conversation run, although I will say that weight matters on the coast-down due to higher density objects having a higher terminal velocity. And more momentum per drag area when the slope levels off. Not sure where a vacuum enters into it.
That said, are you serious? There is no air in a vacuum, hence there is no drag. If there is no drag, terminal velocity is only limited by how far you have to fall until you reach relativistic speeds.
#58
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Thanks for doing this experiment. Do you mind uploading or sending me the source data?
That said, are you serious? There is no air in a vacuum, hence there is no drag. If there is no drag, terminal velocity is only limited by how far you have to fall until you reach relativistic speeds.
That said, are you serious? There is no air in a vacuum, hence there is no drag. If there is no drag, terminal velocity is only limited by how far you have to fall until you reach relativistic speeds.
Re vacuum, it's not very pertinent to coasting down a hill or biking to work. That's sufficiently handled with rho in the drag equations, which you utilize for terminal velocity. I think for our purposes we can consider the air density to be constant during a ride, and even disregard the actual value entirely if you're just looking for a ratio of drag coefficients (it divides out).
#59
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: California
Posts: 7
Bikes: 2014 Kestrel Legend Ultegra, 2014 Windsor Bristol, 2014 Windsor Wellington 3.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If I can dig it up I could just post it here.
Re vacuum, it's not very pertinent to coasting down a hill or biking to work. That's sufficiently handled with rho in the drag equations, which you utilize for terminal velocity. I think for our purposes we can consider the air density to be constant during a ride, and even disregard the actual value entirely if you're just looking for a ratio of drag coefficients (it divides out).
Re vacuum, it's not very pertinent to coasting down a hill or biking to work. That's sufficiently handled with rho in the drag equations, which you utilize for terminal velocity. I think for our purposes we can consider the air density to be constant during a ride, and even disregard the actual value entirely if you're just looking for a ratio of drag coefficients (it divides out).
We're talking about two different things; for your experiment, the drag coefficient is essentially constant. I was speaking re: vacuum regarding the other conversation about falling in atmosphere and falling in vacuum.
#60
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,366 Posts
Good experiment, especially given the budget...
If you had a barometer and a thermometer you'd have enough info to solve P=rho*R*T but over the course of your test series it seems unlikely to change much and not enough overall to change the conclusions for different weather.
If you are interested in a condition where drag doesn't matter - one of my longtime online aquaintances was a judge recently at the NASA rover challenge where high school teams build folding 4-wheel offroad HPV's and ride them around Redstone. I can't think of any way that streamlining would help those guys.
If you had a barometer and a thermometer you'd have enough info to solve P=rho*R*T but over the course of your test series it seems unlikely to change much and not enough overall to change the conclusions for different weather.
If you are interested in a condition where drag doesn't matter - one of my longtime online aquaintances was a judge recently at the NASA rover challenge where high school teams build folding 4-wheel offroad HPV's and ride them around Redstone. I can't think of any way that streamlining would help those guys.
Last edited by Darth Lefty; 04-16-14 at 05:29 PM.