Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-14-13, 09:10 AM   #26
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
Posts: 2,856
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
I've been car-free or car-light for decades. I can't think of a single instance where an airzound, a 10000 lumen light, a reflective vest, high viz clothing, or a big red flag would have made me safer. Not one.

#bike stockholm syndrome
You're not advocating that lights and the capability of being seen by car drivers doesn't matter, are you?

J.
JohnJ80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 09:25 AM   #27
iconicflux
Fredly
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Trucker w/ SRAM Rival, & 36H 38's, Late 70's Santana Tandem w/ Double Diamond frame
Posts: 471
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm probably only alive because of my airzound horn. I think it has saved my life at least 3 times now and I *don't* ride dangerously. The first time it saved me I was walking my bike across a crosswalk at an intersection with a light telling me to cross. The driver of the car that almost hit me was staring at cross traffic and not paying attention to what was in front of him. The airzound got his attention and he ran off the road to avoid hitting me and hit one of the metal streetlamp poles.

Cheers,
Kevin

Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
I've been car-free or car-light for decades. I can't think of a single instance where an airzound, a 10000 lumen light, a reflective vest, high viz clothing, or a big red flag would have made me safer. Not one.

#bike stockholm syndrome
iconicflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 09:39 AM   #28
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint
Posts: 14,265
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
chilling to watch
rumrunn6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 09:44 AM   #29
italktocats
Senior Member
 
italktocats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
People who look but dont see, dont see

Until policebikes (inc lights) dont get hit anymore, lights wont save you
italktocats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 01:02 PM   #30
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
You're not advocating that lights and the capability of being seen by car drivers doesn't matter, are you?
J.
I am arguing that cycling for transportation is safe. I am also arguing that the value of safety prophylactics is over-rated.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 01:17 PM   #31
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by iconicflux View Post
I'm probably only alive because of my airzound horn. I think it has saved my life at least 3 times now and I *don't* ride dangerously. The first time it saved me I was walking my bike across a crosswalk at an intersection with a light telling me to cross. The driver of the car that almost hit me was staring at cross traffic and not paying attention to what was in front of him. The airzound got his attention and he ran off the road to avoid hitting me and hit one of the metal streetlamp poles.

Cheers,
Kevin

the vast majority of cyclists do not have an airzound and yet somehow cycling is still safe. morover, the relatively small risk of injury or death is due to negligence and criminal behavior by motorists (and cyclists), not because cyclists fail to decorate themselves like christmas trees.

anyone who rides around central amsterdam at night will note many cyclists without bike lights. the same is also true in portland. safety is the primary responsibility of the people driving the killing machines, not their victims.

Last edited by spare_wheel; 10-14-13 at 05:41 PM. Reason: it's not only cagers...cyclists also have brain farts
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 01:30 PM   #32
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
Posts: 2,856
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
If you can't see the cyclist because they are not properly visible, then I think you will find that it's a shared responsibility.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 01:36 PM   #33
Dwayne
Rocketship Underpants
 
Dwayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Bikes: '94 RS Bikes Stampede (commuter), Scattante XRL Team road bike (formerly '05 Cannondale R5000), '05 Cannondale Prophet 1000
Posts: 328
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Do you know where his front light is/was mounted? Just asking because towards the end of the video I see the flashing, but it's also lighting up his forearms and the rear of his cable coming off the bars, so the light wasn't mounted on the handlebar? There's also a shadow cast on his right forearm, possibly from the handlebar... was the light pointing upwards? Makes me wonder whether the light was mounted such that it made it much less effective from the front.
Dwayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 01:49 PM   #34
CommuteCommando
Senior Member
 
CommuteCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern CaliFORNIA.
Bikes: KHS Alite 500, Trek 7.2 FX , Masi Partenza, Masi Fixed Special, Masi Cran Criterium
Posts: 3,010
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Glad the cyclist is OK. Brakes or no brakes, it wouldn't have helped in that situation. Clearly the motorist was at fault. One thing I would have done differently is take the entire lane, which was obviously "sharrowed". Being more out in the traffic lane would have made him more visible. (No guarantee of not getting hit, of course, but it does improve the odds, and gives a split second more reaction time to the biker.) There are sharrow lanes where I live, and I have found that "owning" the lane is very safe, otherwise cars will try to squeeze you as one car did at about 1:20 in the video. I have not done those sharrow lanes at night, and rarely ride at night, so can't say for sure on that. I do run a very bright flasher on the rear, and a very bright light on front (Steady at night, flash in the daylight)

Last edited by CommuteCommando; 10-14-13 at 01:54 PM.
CommuteCommando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 03:36 PM   #35
boattail71
boattail71
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colorado
Bikes: Too many to list. Raleigh carbon racer (17 lbs.) and fast to a '37 Columbia (17 lbs. wheels alone) Even an Aerocycle (not ridable yet), love the middleweights too.
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by koolerb View Post
What with so many trying to blame the guy on the bike? The car was at fault.
At night, if a bike does not have lights, the car is NOT at fault. That this bike had sufficient lighting is the question. In my area legally the solid white light in front must be bright enough to see (a long distance, forgot the # of feet). This video shows little if no light cast on the darker parts of the street (this one would not be legal in my area). If I were this cyclist with this minimal lighting at that speed I would assume I am invisible to those in front of me. That is, I would expect vehicles might turn in front therefore I would give my self an out (by speed/stopping ability, or escape route L or R) if I have no out then I would slow my speed and proceed when I'm sure the driver sees me. Sorry, I fear my opinion will be unpopular and I feel sorry for this cyclist as I occasionally find myself in situations at night with no lights (or only a rear blinky) and I'll continue to try not to put myself in these kinds of situations.
boattail71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 03:51 PM   #36
longbeachgary
Senior Member
 
longbeachgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beautiful Long Beach California
Bikes: Eddy Merckx Sallanches 64 (2); Eddy Merckx MXL; 2012 CAAD10; 2013 Cannondale CAAD10 DI2, The Black Mambo
Posts: 3,399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Why are so many of you such dicks? You expect this cyclist to blow his air horn while applying the brakes AND jump on the sidewalk to avoid the collission. Sure when you slow things down on youtube it's much easier to avoid this stuff. Try getting out and actually riding.
longbeachgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 03:56 PM   #37
boattail71
boattail71
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colorado
Bikes: Too many to list. Raleigh carbon racer (17 lbs.) and fast to a '37 Columbia (17 lbs. wheels alone) Even an Aerocycle (not ridable yet), love the middleweights too.
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
the vast majority of cyclists do not have an airzound and yet somehow cycling is still safe. morover, the relatively small risk of injury or death is due to endemic negligence and criminal behavior by motorists, not because cyclists fail to decorate themselves like christmas trees.

anyone who rides around central amsterdam at night will note many cyclists without bike lights. the same is also true in portland. safety is the primary responsibility of the people driving the killing machines, not their victims.
Agree spare_wheel. As a driver of 30+ years, I have never (yes, never!) hit nor almost hit a cyclist (or even caused a cyclist a scare), day or night. NEVER! But obvioulsy we cyclists need not put ourselves into overly dangerous situations i.e., busy/fast streets at night especially w/o sufficient lighting. No-brainer kind of stuff.
boattail71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 04:01 PM   #38
boattail71
boattail71
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colorado
Bikes: Too many to list. Raleigh carbon racer (17 lbs.) and fast to a '37 Columbia (17 lbs. wheels alone) Even an Aerocycle (not ridable yet), love the middleweights too.
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by longbeachgary View Post
Why are so many of you such dicks? You expect this cyclist to blow his air horn while applying the brakes AND jump on the sidewalk to avoid the collission. Sure when you slow things down on youtube it's much easier to avoid this stuff. Try getting out and actually riding.
Gary, open your mind. No one's trying to be a dick. This is good commentary - we're exploring different ways of thinking. No one here wants to see a cyclist get vitimized. What factors contribute to our safety or unsafe practices?
boattail71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 04:03 PM   #39
DX-MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 4,789
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
I've been car-free or car-light for decades. I can't think of a single instance where an airzound, a 10000 lumen light, a reflective vest, high viz clothing, or a big red flag would have made me safer. Not one.

#bike stockholm syndrome
Airzound WILL get someone's attention if you're close enough; the example in the video, not necessarily so. I've gotten people's attention VOCALLY, from more than 3 car lengths away. I've also had cars flash their brights at me because my 144-lumen headlight was adjusted a bit high. Your other examples, I have little experience with; ONCE, I had a kid trailer with a flag attached, and got a LOT of space on the road.

Blinkie tail light, though, is a BIG thing; I've had several drivers pull up next to me at stop signs and lights, and TELL me they were pleased that I had the light, they could SEE me!
DX-MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 04:09 PM   #40
boattail71
boattail71
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colorado
Bikes: Too many to list. Raleigh carbon racer (17 lbs.) and fast to a '37 Columbia (17 lbs. wheels alone) Even an Aerocycle (not ridable yet), love the middleweights too.
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by iconicflux View Post
I'm probably only alive because of my airzound horn. I think it has saved my life at least 3 times now and I *don't* ride dangerously. Kevin
Airzounds are kinda cool and interesting and I'd like to try one but I've not seen any around here (bunch of bikes too, I live in a platinum cycling city). In my panic situations (maybe one or two every five years or so) I scream/yell to get the drivers' attention - so far never been hit (knocking wood). With a horn, I wonder if I'd have the wherewithall to fine my horn button? Though fun to blast away once I did find it.
boattail71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 04:21 PM   #41
boattail71
boattail71
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colorado
Bikes: Too many to list. Raleigh carbon racer (17 lbs.) and fast to a '37 Columbia (17 lbs. wheels alone) Even an Aerocycle (not ridable yet), love the middleweights too.
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
[QUOTE=longbeachgary;16160669] You expect this cyclist to... applying the brakes AND/OR jump on the sidewalk to avoid the collission. QUOTE]

Um, well, I'd guess I'd say yes to that question. I think we all do this in some ways or others whether we're conscious of it or not - those of us who've been doing this for many decades anyway. Not saying that some very rare cases we have no options but... self preservation, ya know?
boattail71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 04:56 PM   #42
longbeachgary
Senior Member
 
longbeachgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beautiful Long Beach California
Bikes: Eddy Merckx Sallanches 64 (2); Eddy Merckx MXL; 2012 CAAD10; 2013 Cannondale CAAD10 DI2, The Black Mambo
Posts: 3,399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
[QUOTE=boattail71;16160740]
Quote:
Originally Posted by longbeachgary View Post
You expect this cyclist to... applying the brakes AND jump on the sidewalk to avoid the collission. QUOTE]

Um, well, I'd guess I'd say yes to that question. I think we all do this in some ways or others whether we're conscious of it or not - those of us who've been doing this for many decades anyway. Not saying that some very rare cases we have no options but... self preservation, ya know?
Quote me right Dude.
longbeachgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 05:14 PM   #43
the sci guy 
bill nyecycles
 
the sci guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston TX
Bikes:
Posts: 2,051
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
if you look you can clearly see he's got blinky lights because its shining on his forearm and brake cables. AND if you try to take it frame by frame right before/at impact, you can see the light shine very brightly on the back of the car right above the wheelwell/door handle level.

its not the cyclists fault. clearly the cars fault.

also, a cyclist who is wearing a camera during a ride is definitely the same kind of person who knows to have a bright light on the front.

stop *****ing and blaming the cyclist. guy knew what he was doing.
__________________
Twitter@theSurlyBiker
Instagram@theSurlyBiker
the sci guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 05:29 PM   #44
boattail71
boattail71
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colorado
Bikes: Too many to list. Raleigh carbon racer (17 lbs.) and fast to a '37 Columbia (17 lbs. wheels alone) Even an Aerocycle (not ridable yet), love the middleweights too.
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by the sci guy View Post
if you look you can clearly see he's got blinky lights because its shining on his forearm and brake cables. AND if you try to take it frame by frame right before/at impact, you can see the light shine very brightly on the back of the car right above the wheelwell/door handle level.

its not the cyclists fault. clearly the cars fault.

also, a cyclist who is wearing a camera during a ride is definitely the same kind of person who knows to have a bright light on the front.

stop *****ing and blaming the cyclist. guy knew what he was doing.
Shadows!

Explain then why we can see his shadow in front of him every time he rides under a street light or a car approaches from behind? My commuter light is much too bright to see my shadow in those cases.


I'm sure the cyclist knows plenty with the camera and all and maybe the crash was unavoidable. I'm just sayin' that light sure wasn't very bright.
boattail71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 05:32 PM   #45
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Bikes:
Posts: 14,664
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by boattail71 View Post
Gary, open your mind. No one's trying to be a dick. This is good commentary - we're exploring different ways of thinking. No one here wants to see a cyclist get vitimized. What factors contribute to our safety or unsafe practices?
I've been around long enough to know that most of this discussion is people rationalizing to themselves why these incidents would not happen to them. in any event, if people insist on talking about that we will move the thread to A&S
unterhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 05:39 PM   #46
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by boattail71 View Post
Agree spare_wheel. As a driver of 30+ years, I have never (yes, never!) hit nor almost hit a cyclist (or even caused a cyclist a scare), day or night. NEVER! But obvioulsy we cyclists need not put ourselves into overly dangerous situations i.e., busy/fast streets at night especially w/o sufficient lighting. No-brainer kind of stuff.
i definitely think lights are a prudent thing. i also think that many cyclists would benefit from a cycling class.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 07:15 PM   #47
Dahon.Steve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Bikes:
Posts: 6,849
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rumrunn6 View Post
chilling to watch
Agreed.

I thought the cyclist was hit from behind. It looks like the rear wheel of the bike lifted before impact.
Dahon.Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 07:29 PM   #48
the sci guy 
bill nyecycles
 
the sci guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston TX
Bikes:
Posts: 2,051
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by boattail71 View Post
Shadows!

Explain then why we can see his shadow in front of him every time he rides under a street light or a car approaches from behind? My commuter light is much too bright to see my shadow in those cases.


I'm sure the cyclist knows plenty with the camera and all and maybe the crash was unavoidable. I'm just sayin' that light sure wasn't very bright.
because maybe it wasn't pointed at the ground, but more ahead so it wasn't strong enough on the bottom periphery to block out a shadow.
this can be backed up by looking where the light hits the car just a split second before impact. it's pointed straight forward, not down.
__________________
Twitter@theSurlyBiker
Instagram@theSurlyBiker
the sci guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 09:40 PM   #49
Slaninar
Bike Gremlin
 
Slaninar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Bikes: Custom made on Scott Speedster frame, Custom made on a 1996. steel MTB frame (all but frame changed at least once in the past 20 years).
Posts: 2,395
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 139 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommuteCommando View Post
Glad the cyclist is OK. Brakes or no brakes, it wouldn't have helped in that situation.
Since the car started pulling in, before the contact, whole 2 seconds I counted. The car is at fault, especially for running away (bastard), but biker didn't even try to slow down when he saw the problem starting. That was not wise.

I've had cars pull out in front of me, several crashes, so know what I'm talking about. One learns from one's mistakes if they live...
Slaninar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-13, 10:16 PM   #50
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
Posts: 2,856
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by the sci guy View Post
because maybe it wasn't pointed at the ground, but more ahead so it wasn't strong enough on the bottom periphery to block out a shadow.
this can be backed up by looking where the light hits the car just a split second before impact. it's pointed straight forward, not down.
It's not much of a light. Even a low lumen count light would show some beam spill on the pavement. Look at 1:00 to 1:10 in the shadows (for example). Maybe the OP could confirm, but I think it's just a weak white blinkie. It doesn't even have any spill onto the car alongside at 1:25 (a shiny thing/reflective). The only way it would have not shown up on that car is if it were a laser beam with no spill. In fact, it barely even shows in the side of the car an instant before he hits it in the rear qtr panel.

Finally, it looks like the cyclist has a black or very dark shirt on. The accident occurs as he comes out of a very dark area (not a light) and the car pulls out in front of him and then the cyclist hits the car in the rear qtr panel. To me, it looks like the cyclist hit the car and not the car hitting the cyclist when I stepped through it frame by frame at the end. Would be interesting to see what the accident investigators come back with in terms of right of way etc...

I'd attribute this to poor visibility and would guess that as far as the collision goes, there would be blame assigned on both sides in some proportion depending on how precisely where the car is vis a vis in the intersection when/if the accident investigators get into it. It's not clear from the video's limited perspective.

Of course, the driver should not have driven off and will get appropriately nailed for that. That's the big hit in this incident.


J.
JohnJ80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 AM.