Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-16-13, 12:15 PM   #76
Leebo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of Boston
Bikes: Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,
Posts: 3,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by cobrabyte View Post
some of you safety guys with your 100,000 lumens lights, truck horns, etc...

just...lol
Come ride a mile in my shoes on some "nice" Boston, MA area roads. Do you ride a lot at night? My set up works for me, YRMV. I'm guessing FL does not get a lot of snowy nights.
Leebo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 12:32 PM   #77
cobrabyte
one life on two wheels
 
cobrabyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes:
Posts: 2,556
Safety is cool guys, but yes, some of you take it to extremes and that amuses me. Not so much the equipment itself, but the attitude behind it. I have some safety-o-phile friends, and they are so preoccupied with this stuff that it keeps them from enjoying their ride. They're out there like those little shaking Chihuahuas, expecting death at every turn. But y'all keep on keepin' on as they say...
cobrabyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 01:08 PM   #78
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
Posts: 2,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by cobrabyte View Post
some of you safety guys with your 100,000 lumens lights, truck horns, etc...

just...lol

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...01457509000645

"This study explored the beliefs and attitudes of cyclists and drivers regarding cyclist visibility, use of visibility aids and crashes involving cyclists and motorists. Data are presented for 1460 participants (622 drivers and 838 cyclists) and demonstrate that there are high rates of cyclist–vehicle crashes, many of which were reported to be due to the driver not seeing the cyclist in time to avoid a collision. A divergence in attitudes was also apparent in terms of attribution of responsibility in cyclist–vehicle conflicts on the road. While the use of visibility aids was advocated by cyclists, this was not reflected in self-reported wearing patterns, and cyclists reported that the distance at which they would be first recognised by a driver was twice that estimated by the drivers. Collectively, these results suggest that interventions should target cyclists’ use of visibility aids, which is less than optimal in this population, as well as re-educating both groups regarding visibility issues."


Still think it's funny?

J.
JohnJ80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 01:17 PM   #79
acidfast7
http://www.538.nl
 
acidfast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid
Posts: 6,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...01457509000645

"This study explored the beliefs and attitudes of cyclists and drivers regarding cyclist visibility, use of visibility aids and crashes involving cyclists and motorists. Data are presented for 1460 participants (622 drivers and 838 cyclists) and demonstrate that there are high rates of cyclist–vehicle crashes, many of which were reported to be due to the driver not seeing the cyclist in time to avoid a collision. A divergence in attitudes was also apparent in terms of attribution of responsibility in cyclist–vehicle conflicts on the road. While the use of visibility aids was advocated by cyclists, this was not reflected in self-reported wearing patterns, and cyclists reported that the distance at which they would be first recognised by a driver was twice that estimated by the drivers. Collectively, these results suggest that interventions should target cyclists’ use of visibility aids, which is less than optimal in this population, as well as re-educating both groups regarding visibility issues."


Still think it's funny?

J.
beliefs and attitudes

show me some real data
acidfast7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 01:19 PM   #80
cobrabyte
one life on two wheels
 
cobrabyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes:
Posts: 2,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...01457509000645

"This study explored the beliefs and attitudes of cyclists and drivers regarding cyclist visibility, use of visibility aids and crashes involving cyclists and motorists. Data are presented for 1460 participants (622 drivers and 838 cyclists) and demonstrate that there are high rates of cyclist–vehicle crashes, many of which were reported to be due to the driver not seeing the cyclist in time to avoid a collision. A divergence in attitudes was also apparent in terms of attribution of responsibility in cyclist–vehicle conflicts on the road. While the use of visibility aids was advocated by cyclists, this was not reflected in self-reported wearing patterns, and cyclists reported that the distance at which they would be first recognised by a driver was twice that estimated by the drivers. Collectively, these results suggest that interventions should target cyclists’ use of visibility aids, which is less than optimal in this population, as well as re-educating both groups regarding visibility issues."


Still think it's funny?

J.
Actually I find statistics even more hilarious than safety equipment.


I think you're having trouble understanding. I advocate precautionary safety procedures, but find the extreme measures some take to be silly. Yes, even safety can be taken to an irrational level. I apologize that I don't have a study to present regarding my feelings towards this matter to aid in your ability to understand my point of view.
cobrabyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 01:29 PM   #81
cobrabyte
one life on two wheels
 
cobrabyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes:
Posts: 2,556
Personally I do not fault the cyclist in the video. The driver of the vehicle is obviously a jerk. One that not only did not take the time to ensure it was safe to proceed, but one that also left the scene of an accident.

Some here feel as though a flood light is needed to be seen. Others (like myself) see the light the rider was using as adiquate. An anattentive driver can miss a brighter light, too. And I don't see that the cyclist had enough time to engage a horn had they had one, and even if they did, would the driver had had enough time to react to it? Lots of variables here, leaving the entire scenario up to speculative "solutions" to the problem presented.

Shockingly, sometimes cars even crash into other cars at night...headlights and all. Would the folks here argue that the car that was hit should have had a strip of KC lights attached to their roof in order to be seen by the unattentive driver of the other vehicle?

I don't see the logic.
cobrabyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 01:50 PM   #82
Leebo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of Boston
Bikes: Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,
Posts: 3,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by cobrabyte View Post
Safety is cool guys, but yes, some of you take it to extremes and that amuses me. Not so much the equipment itself, but the attitude behind it. I have some safety-o-phile friends, and they are so preoccupied with this stuff that it keeps them from enjoying their ride. They're out there like those little shaking Chihuahuas, expecting death at every turn. But y'all keep on keepin' on as they say...
Obviously, the lights were not adequate. MA law says the front light needs to seen 500' away. Not extremes, but to help counter the selfish, self important driver attitudes I face on a daily basis. If his lights are not lighting up the side of the car from 50-100 feet away, that IMHO, is not enough. I enjoy my ride, I also enjoy not getting hit by a car, and being seen at night. I wear a vest and use side and wheel lights too. How much is too much? I do not want to outrun my lights at 25 mph in the dark. Maybe this rider will rethink his brakes and night riding style. FL is not even close to MA drivers' attitude or arrogance.

Last edited by Leebo; 10-16-13 at 01:55 PM.
Leebo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 01:58 PM   #83
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
Posts: 2,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by acidfast7 View Post
beliefs and attitudes

show me some real data
http://www.news.qut.edu.au/cgi-bin/W...sEventID=63515
http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/us...d/CD003438.pdf

Not to mention that it's obviously a big problem if a motorist cannot see a cyclist in an adequate amount of time.

But, do what you want. I want to be seen and have their be no question that I am a cyclist, where I am and to have it easy to ascertain my speed and position. While it's anecdotal, I've been riding at night for almost 20 years and have never had an accident. I'm well lit and visible.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 02:04 PM   #84
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...01457509000645

"This study explored the beliefs and attitudes of cyclists and drivers regarding cyclist visibility, use of visibility aids and crashes involving cyclists and motorists. Data are presented for 1460 participants (622 drivers and 838 cyclists) and demonstrate that there are high rates of cyclist–vehicle crashes, many of which were reported to be due to the driver not seeing the cyclist in time to avoid a collision. A divergence in attitudes was also apparent in terms of attribution of responsibility in cyclist–vehicle conflicts on the road. While the use of visibility aids was advocated by cyclists, this was not reflected in self-reported wearing patterns, and cyclists reported that the distance at which they would be first recognised by a driver was twice that estimated by the drivers. Collectively, these results suggest that interventions should target cyclists’ use of visibility aids, which is less than optimal in this population, as well as re-educating both groups regarding visibility issues."


Still think it's funny?

J.
Cycling injury and death rates in North America are pathetically high in comparison to Northern Eruope because:

1. We tolerate sociopathic behavior by people who operate lethal heavy machinery.
2. Sport cycling injuries/deaths are combined with commuting injuries/deaths.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 02:09 PM   #85
acidfast7
http://www.538.nl
 
acidfast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid
Posts: 6,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
http://www.news.qut.edu.au/cgi-bin/W...sEventID=63515
http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/us...d/CD003438.pdf

Not to mention that it's obviously a big problem if a motorist cannot see a cyclist in an adequate amount of time.

But, do what you want. I want to be seen and have their be no question that I am a cyclist, where I am and to have it easy to ascertain my speed and position. While it's anecdotal, I've been riding at night for almost 20 years and have never had an accident. I'm well lit and visible.

J.
Neither of the two studies you provided demonstrate that enhanced visibility correlates with a reduction in accident rate.

The first analyses beliefs and attitudes, while second is an Intervention.

I'd like to see some real analysis.

Here are a few summarised links to actual infrastructure studies.

http://ianbrettcooper.blogspot.co.uk...e-studies.html
acidfast7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 02:10 PM   #86
acidfast7
http://www.538.nl
 
acidfast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid
Posts: 6,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
Cycling injury and death rates in North America are pathetically high in comparison to Northern Eruope because:

1. We tolerate sociopathic behavior by people who operate lethal heavy machinery.
2. Sport cycling injuries/deaths are combined with commuting injuries/deaths.
3. Getting a driving license in America is way too easy and requires almost no training/expense.
acidfast7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 02:23 PM   #87
cobrabyte
one life on two wheels
 
cobrabyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes:
Posts: 2,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by acidfast7 View Post
3. Getting a driving license in America is way too easy and requires almost no training/expense.
It is mind blowing how many people behnid the wheel are completely unaware of the right of way laws, cycling laws, proper lane change procedures, etc... and how little the infractions are actually enforced.
cobrabyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 02:31 PM   #88
acidfast7
http://www.538.nl
 
acidfast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid
Posts: 6,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by cobrabyte View Post
It is mind blowing how many people behnid the wheel are completely unaware of the right of way laws, cycling laws, proper lane change procedures, etc... and how little the infractions are actually enforced.
I'm still shocked with how cheap it is in the US compared to most other places.

http://duisburgbunny.blogspot.co.uk/...s-license.html
acidfast7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 02:45 PM   #89
the sci guy 
bill nyecycles
 
the sci guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston TX
Bikes:
Posts: 1,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by cobrabyte View Post
It is mind blowing how many people behnid the wheel are completely unaware of the right of way laws, cycling laws, proper lane change procedures, etc... and how little the infractions are actually enforced.
i agree with unaware, but i'd also toss out there "don't care"

i've lived in houston for just over a month, and i can easily say, even after living in DC for 3 years, people here are by far the absolute worst drivers. unsafe, fast, rude, and oblivious to whats going on around them.
__________________
Twitter@theSurlyBiker
Instagram@theSurlyBiker
the sci guy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 02:47 PM   #90
alan s 
Senior Member
 
alan s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Bikes:
Posts: 4,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by the sci guy View Post
i agree with unaware, but i'd also toss out there "don't care"

i've lived in houston for just over a month, and i can easily say, even after living in DC for 3 years, people here are by far the absolute worst drivers. unsafe, fast, rude, and oblivious to whats going on around them.
Whoa there, cowboy. DC is ranked worst.
alan s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 02:58 PM   #91
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
Posts: 2,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by acidfast7 View Post
Neither of the two studies you provided demonstrate that enhanced visibility correlates with a reduction in accident rate.

The first analyses beliefs and attitudes, while second is an Intervention.

I'd like to see some real analysis.

Here are a few summarised links to actual infrastructure studies.

http://ianbrettcooper.blogspot.co.uk...e-studies.html

Got it. So we don't need lights and to be visible then?

J.
JohnJ80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 03:01 PM   #92
acidfast7
http://www.538.nl
 
acidfast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid
Posts: 6,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
Got it. So we don't need lights and to be visible then?

J.
No. Once again, you're spouting bollocks. I assume that you don't do that well on Verbal Reasoning examinations.

The evidence you provided doesn't support what you conclude ... did you just discover PubMed?
acidfast7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 03:31 PM   #93
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
Posts: 2,740
Well then what's the argument? Or is this just because you want to argue?

So cyclists needs lights at night and to be visible. We agree.

Are we done now? Or is there something else you want to beat into pulp just because?

J.
JohnJ80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 03:34 PM   #94
acidfast7
http://www.538.nl
 
acidfast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid
Posts: 6,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
Well then what's the argument? Or is this just because you want to argue?

So cyclists needs lights at night and to be visible. We agree.

Are we done now? Or is there something else you want to beat into pulp just because?

J.
What you posted as evidence undermines your credibility. If you said that at a university, I would leave the room under the premise that my time is being wasted.

Just save us all some time, OK?
acidfast7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 03:42 PM   #95
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
Posts: 2,740
Well then, what are you doing here - this whole social internet thing probably drives you nuts. I wasn't aware we were under university debate rules for forum posting. But it is pompous, I'll give you that. You must be the life of the party.

All that over no argument? And you're worried about time wasted? Wow.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 03:47 PM   #96
acidfast7
http://www.538.nl
 
acidfast7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England / CPH
Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid
Posts: 6,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
Well then, what are you doing here - this whole social internet thing probably drives you nuts. I wasn't aware we were under university debate rules for forum posting. But it is pompous, I'll give you that. You must be the life of the party.

All that over no argument? And you're worried about time wasted? Wow.

J.
I'm always the life of the party. I'm taking my colleagues on a bike ride from Krakow to Budapest over 10 days with ample beer stops and camping.

I just don't like you, which means that you're ignored and I usually scroll over you ... but when I have a slight bit of time like now ... I click and try to determine if you're worth reading again.

Last edited by acidfast7; 10-16-13 at 03:51 PM.
acidfast7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 03:49 PM   #97
dynaryder
PatronSaintOfDiscBrakes
 
dynaryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: BicycleSPACE warehouse in SW Washington DC
Bikes:
Posts: 6,985
All this talk about lights and horns...

I have a different take. I think he should've mounted his brake lever up on the horn where he seems to spend most of his time. I don't know if he would've been able to stop,but I'm certain he would've slowed down more,which would have reduced the severity of the impact.
__________________

C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
dynaryder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-13, 05:04 PM   #98
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Quote:
but I'm certain he would've slowed down more,which would have reduced the severity of the impact.
definitely a good point.
i also think that occupying the middle or left side of the lane would have made him more visible and would have given him more time to react to the pull out.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:35 AM.