Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 76 to 99 of 99

Thread: Hit & Run

  1. #76
    Senior Member alan s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    MD/DC/VA
    Posts
    3,137
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cobrabyte View Post
    if that's your opinion, cool. Still doesn't explain why you asked if I was the guy in the video though...
    Not literally "the guy in the video," but whether is that how you ride? Are you "that guy?" If so, hopefully some day you'll learn how dangerous it is out there from others, not from actually experiencing a collision with a vehicle.

  2. #77
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    North of Boston
    My Bikes
    Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,
    Posts
    2,118
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cobrabyte View Post
    some of you safety guys with your 100,000 lumens lights, truck horns, etc...

    just...lol
    Come ride a mile in my shoes on some "nice" Boston, MA area roads. Do you ride a lot at night? My set up works for me, YRMV. I'm guessing FL does not get a lot of snowy nights.

  3. #78
    one life on two wheels cobrabyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    2,446
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Safety is cool guys, but yes, some of you take it to extremes and that amuses me. Not so much the equipment itself, but the attitude behind it. I have some safety-o-phile friends, and they are so preoccupied with this stuff that it keeps them from enjoying their ride. They're out there like those little shaking Chihuahuas, expecting death at every turn. But y'all keep on keepin' on as they say...

  4. #79
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Minnesota
    My Bikes
    N+1=4
    Posts
    1,526
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cobrabyte View Post
    some of you safety guys with your 100,000 lumens lights, truck horns, etc...

    just...lol

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...01457509000645

    "This study explored the beliefs and attitudes of cyclists and drivers regarding cyclist visibility, use of visibility aids and crashes involving cyclists and motorists. Data are presented for 1460 participants (622 drivers and 838 cyclists) and demonstrate that there are high rates of cyclist–vehicle crashes, many of which were reported to be due to the driver not seeing the cyclist in time to avoid a collision. A divergence in attitudes was also apparent in terms of attribution of responsibility in cyclist–vehicle conflicts on the road. While the use of visibility aids was advocated by cyclists, this was not reflected in self-reported wearing patterns, and cyclists reported that the distance at which they would be first recognised by a driver was twice that estimated by the drivers. Collectively, these results suggest that interventions should target cyclists’ use of visibility aids, which is less than optimal in this population, as well as re-educating both groups regarding visibility issues."


    Still think it's funny?

    J.

  5. #80
    http://www.538.nl acidfast7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    England / CPH
    My Bikes
    2010 Cube Acid
    Posts
    5,513
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...01457509000645

    "This study explored the beliefs and attitudes of cyclists and drivers regarding cyclist visibility, use of visibility aids and crashes involving cyclists and motorists. Data are presented for 1460 participants (622 drivers and 838 cyclists) and demonstrate that there are high rates of cyclist–vehicle crashes, many of which were reported to be due to the driver not seeing the cyclist in time to avoid a collision. A divergence in attitudes was also apparent in terms of attribution of responsibility in cyclist–vehicle conflicts on the road. While the use of visibility aids was advocated by cyclists, this was not reflected in self-reported wearing patterns, and cyclists reported that the distance at which they would be first recognised by a driver was twice that estimated by the drivers. Collectively, these results suggest that interventions should target cyclists’ use of visibility aids, which is less than optimal in this population, as well as re-educating both groups regarding visibility issues."


    Still think it's funny?

    J.
    beliefs and attitudes

    show me some real data
    Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S)
    Rohloffs seen on the commute: 3

  6. #81
    one life on two wheels cobrabyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    2,446
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...01457509000645

    "This study explored the beliefs and attitudes of cyclists and drivers regarding cyclist visibility, use of visibility aids and crashes involving cyclists and motorists. Data are presented for 1460 participants (622 drivers and 838 cyclists) and demonstrate that there are high rates of cyclist–vehicle crashes, many of which were reported to be due to the driver not seeing the cyclist in time to avoid a collision. A divergence in attitudes was also apparent in terms of attribution of responsibility in cyclist–vehicle conflicts on the road. While the use of visibility aids was advocated by cyclists, this was not reflected in self-reported wearing patterns, and cyclists reported that the distance at which they would be first recognised by a driver was twice that estimated by the drivers. Collectively, these results suggest that interventions should target cyclists’ use of visibility aids, which is less than optimal in this population, as well as re-educating both groups regarding visibility issues."


    Still think it's funny?

    J.
    Actually I find statistics even more hilarious than safety equipment.


    I think you're having trouble understanding. I advocate precautionary safety procedures, but find the extreme measures some take to be silly. Yes, even safety can be taken to an irrational level. I apologize that I don't have a study to present regarding my feelings towards this matter to aid in your ability to understand my point of view.

  7. #82
    one life on two wheels cobrabyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    2,446
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Personally I do not fault the cyclist in the video. The driver of the vehicle is obviously a jerk. One that not only did not take the time to ensure it was safe to proceed, but one that also left the scene of an accident.

    Some here feel as though a flood light is needed to be seen. Others (like myself) see the light the rider was using as adiquate. An anattentive driver can miss a brighter light, too. And I don't see that the cyclist had enough time to engage a horn had they had one, and even if they did, would the driver had had enough time to react to it? Lots of variables here, leaving the entire scenario up to speculative "solutions" to the problem presented.

    Shockingly, sometimes cars even crash into other cars at night...headlights and all. Would the folks here argue that the car that was hit should have had a strip of KC lights attached to their roof in order to be seen by the unattentive driver of the other vehicle?

    I don't see the logic.

  8. #83
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    North of Boston
    My Bikes
    Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,
    Posts
    2,118
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cobrabyte View Post
    Safety is cool guys, but yes, some of you take it to extremes and that amuses me. Not so much the equipment itself, but the attitude behind it. I have some safety-o-phile friends, and they are so preoccupied with this stuff that it keeps them from enjoying their ride. They're out there like those little shaking Chihuahuas, expecting death at every turn. But y'all keep on keepin' on as they say...
    Obviously, the lights were not adequate. MA law says the front light needs to seen 500' away. Not extremes, but to help counter the selfish, self important driver attitudes I face on a daily basis. If his lights are not lighting up the side of the car from 50-100 feet away, that IMHO, is not enough. I enjoy my ride, I also enjoy not getting hit by a car, and being seen at night. I wear a vest and use side and wheel lights too. How much is too much? I do not want to outrun my lights at 25 mph in the dark. Maybe this rider will rethink his brakes and night riding style. FL is not even close to MA drivers' attitude or arrogance.
    Last edited by Leebo; 10-16-13 at 02:55 PM.

  9. #84
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Minnesota
    My Bikes
    N+1=4
    Posts
    1,526
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by acidfast7 View Post
    beliefs and attitudes

    show me some real data
    http://www.news.qut.edu.au/cgi-bin/W...sEventID=63515
    http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/us...d/CD003438.pdf

    Not to mention that it's obviously a big problem if a motorist cannot see a cyclist in an adequate amount of time.

    But, do what you want. I want to be seen and have their be no question that I am a cyclist, where I am and to have it easy to ascertain my speed and position. While it's anecdotal, I've been riding at night for almost 20 years and have never had an accident. I'm well lit and visible.

    J.

  10. #85
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    pdx
    My Bikes
    2007 carpe diem frame custom build, trek 7.9 frame custom build, custom built chinese carbon fiber road bike, shopping bike
    Posts
    3,307
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...01457509000645

    "This study explored the beliefs and attitudes of cyclists and drivers regarding cyclist visibility, use of visibility aids and crashes involving cyclists and motorists. Data are presented for 1460 participants (622 drivers and 838 cyclists) and demonstrate that there are high rates of cyclist–vehicle crashes, many of which were reported to be due to the driver not seeing the cyclist in time to avoid a collision. A divergence in attitudes was also apparent in terms of attribution of responsibility in cyclist–vehicle conflicts on the road. While the use of visibility aids was advocated by cyclists, this was not reflected in self-reported wearing patterns, and cyclists reported that the distance at which they would be first recognised by a driver was twice that estimated by the drivers. Collectively, these results suggest that interventions should target cyclists’ use of visibility aids, which is less than optimal in this population, as well as re-educating both groups regarding visibility issues."


    Still think it's funny?

    J.
    Cycling injury and death rates in North America are pathetically high in comparison to Northern Eruope because:

    1. We tolerate sociopathic behavior by people who operate lethal heavy machinery.
    2. Sport cycling injuries/deaths are combined with commuting injuries/deaths.
    This is why motorists hate us, and why I've given up riding on the road...You should be ashamed yourself, and you should be reviled by cyclists everywhere.

  11. #86
    http://www.538.nl acidfast7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    England / CPH
    My Bikes
    2010 Cube Acid
    Posts
    5,513
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
    http://www.news.qut.edu.au/cgi-bin/W...sEventID=63515
    http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/us...d/CD003438.pdf

    Not to mention that it's obviously a big problem if a motorist cannot see a cyclist in an adequate amount of time.

    But, do what you want. I want to be seen and have their be no question that I am a cyclist, where I am and to have it easy to ascertain my speed and position. While it's anecdotal, I've been riding at night for almost 20 years and have never had an accident. I'm well lit and visible.

    J.
    Neither of the two studies you provided demonstrate that enhanced visibility correlates with a reduction in accident rate.

    The first analyses beliefs and attitudes, while second is an Intervention.

    I'd like to see some real analysis.

    Here are a few summarised links to actual infrastructure studies.

    http://ianbrettcooper.blogspot.co.uk...e-studies.html
    Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S)
    Rohloffs seen on the commute: 3

  12. #87
    http://www.538.nl acidfast7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    England / CPH
    My Bikes
    2010 Cube Acid
    Posts
    5,513
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
    Cycling injury and death rates in North America are pathetically high in comparison to Northern Eruope because:

    1. We tolerate sociopathic behavior by people who operate lethal heavy machinery.
    2. Sport cycling injuries/deaths are combined with commuting injuries/deaths.
    3. Getting a driving license in America is way too easy and requires almost no training/expense.
    Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S)
    Rohloffs seen on the commute: 3

  13. #88
    one life on two wheels cobrabyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Posts
    2,446
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by acidfast7 View Post
    3. Getting a driving license in America is way too easy and requires almost no training/expense.
    It is mind blowing how many people behnid the wheel are completely unaware of the right of way laws, cycling laws, proper lane change procedures, etc... and how little the infractions are actually enforced.

  14. #89
    http://www.538.nl acidfast7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    England / CPH
    My Bikes
    2010 Cube Acid
    Posts
    5,513
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cobrabyte View Post
    It is mind blowing how many people behnid the wheel are completely unaware of the right of way laws, cycling laws, proper lane change procedures, etc... and how little the infractions are actually enforced.
    I'm still shocked with how cheap it is in the US compared to most other places.

    http://duisburgbunny.blogspot.co.uk/...s-license.html
    Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S)
    Rohloffs seen on the commute: 3

  15. #90
    bill nyecycles the sci guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Houston TX
    Posts
    1,347
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cobrabyte View Post
    It is mind blowing how many people behnid the wheel are completely unaware of the right of way laws, cycling laws, proper lane change procedures, etc... and how little the infractions are actually enforced.
    i agree with unaware, but i'd also toss out there "don't care"

    i've lived in houston for just over a month, and i can easily say, even after living in DC for 3 years, people here are by far the absolute worst drivers. unsafe, fast, rude, and oblivious to whats going on around them.
    Twitter@theSurlyBiker

  16. #91
    Senior Member alan s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    MD/DC/VA
    Posts
    3,137
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by the sci guy View Post
    i agree with unaware, but i'd also toss out there "don't care"

    i've lived in houston for just over a month, and i can easily say, even after living in DC for 3 years, people here are by far the absolute worst drivers. unsafe, fast, rude, and oblivious to whats going on around them.
    Whoa there, cowboy. DC is ranked worst.

  17. #92
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Minnesota
    My Bikes
    N+1=4
    Posts
    1,526
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by acidfast7 View Post
    Neither of the two studies you provided demonstrate that enhanced visibility correlates with a reduction in accident rate.

    The first analyses beliefs and attitudes, while second is an Intervention.

    I'd like to see some real analysis.

    Here are a few summarised links to actual infrastructure studies.

    http://ianbrettcooper.blogspot.co.uk...e-studies.html

    Got it. So we don't need lights and to be visible then?

    J.

  18. #93
    http://www.538.nl acidfast7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    England / CPH
    My Bikes
    2010 Cube Acid
    Posts
    5,513
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
    Got it. So we don't need lights and to be visible then?

    J.
    No. Once again, you're spouting bollocks. I assume that you don't do that well on Verbal Reasoning examinations.

    The evidence you provided doesn't support what you conclude ... did you just discover PubMed?
    Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S)
    Rohloffs seen on the commute: 3

  19. #94
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Minnesota
    My Bikes
    N+1=4
    Posts
    1,526
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well then what's the argument? Or is this just because you want to argue?

    So cyclists needs lights at night and to be visible. We agree.

    Are we done now? Or is there something else you want to beat into pulp just because?

    J.

  20. #95
    http://www.538.nl acidfast7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    England / CPH
    My Bikes
    2010 Cube Acid
    Posts
    5,513
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
    Well then what's the argument? Or is this just because you want to argue?

    So cyclists needs lights at night and to be visible. We agree.

    Are we done now? Or is there something else you want to beat into pulp just because?

    J.
    What you posted as evidence undermines your credibility. If you said that at a university, I would leave the room under the premise that my time is being wasted.

    Just save us all some time, OK?
    Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S)
    Rohloffs seen on the commute: 3

  21. #96
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Minnesota
    My Bikes
    N+1=4
    Posts
    1,526
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well then, what are you doing here - this whole social internet thing probably drives you nuts. I wasn't aware we were under university debate rules for forum posting. But it is pompous, I'll give you that. You must be the life of the party.

    All that over no argument? And you're worried about time wasted? Wow.

    J.

  22. #97
    http://www.538.nl acidfast7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    England / CPH
    My Bikes
    2010 Cube Acid
    Posts
    5,513
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnJ80 View Post
    Well then, what are you doing here - this whole social internet thing probably drives you nuts. I wasn't aware we were under university debate rules for forum posting. But it is pompous, I'll give you that. You must be the life of the party.

    All that over no argument? And you're worried about time wasted? Wow.

    J.
    I'm always the life of the party. I'm taking my colleagues on a bike ride from Krakow to Budapest over 10 days with ample beer stops and camping.

    I just don't like you, which means that you're ignored and I usually scroll over you ... but when I have a slight bit of time like now ... I click and try to determine if you're worth reading again.
    Last edited by acidfast7; 10-16-13 at 04:51 PM.
    Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S)
    Rohloffs seen on the commute: 3

  23. #98
    PatronSaintOfDiscBrakes dynaryder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    dropped and lost in Washington DC
    Posts
    6,231
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    All this talk about lights and horns...

    I have a different take. I think he should've mounted his brake lever up on the horn where he seems to spend most of his time. I don't know if he would've been able to stop,but I'm certain he would've slowed down more,which would have reduced the severity of the impact.

    C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport/Qualifier,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L

  24. #99
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    pdx
    My Bikes
    2007 carpe diem frame custom build, trek 7.9 frame custom build, custom built chinese carbon fiber road bike, shopping bike
    Posts
    3,307
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    but I'm certain he would've slowed down more,which would have reduced the severity of the impact.
    definitely a good point.
    i also think that occupying the middle or left side of the lane would have made him more visible and would have given him more time to react to the pull out.
    This is why motorists hate us, and why I've given up riding on the road...You should be ashamed yourself, and you should be reviled by cyclists everywhere.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •