Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 50
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    New Folding Road Bike Concept For Commuting

    Hello, My names Jack England. Im a young designer that is currently studying A Level product design. Over the last year i have been developing and designing a product that i feel that solves a gap in the market. In terms of folding bikes there are very few opinions. From these opinions they all have heavy frames, poor gear ratios and small wheel making it hard to ride them. However i have designed a folding bike based off a road bike. The design incorporates parts and features that you find on a road bike. For example

    • 700cc Road BIke Wheels,
    • Drop Down Handle Bars
    • Carbon Fibre seat post and forks,
    • Aluminium frame
    • Road bike gears


    The design uses a full sized frame. The aim of the design is to make commuting easier as you as now you have the opinion to ride faster, harder and longer as you aren't limited by the low performance folding bikes that are out there.

    Im posting on this forum to get your opinions on the design and your feedback. Please view the images that i have attached. I look forward to hearing your opinions

    1.jpgfold without hold.jpggear.jpghoo.jpgleft side.jpgsaddle.jpg

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    341
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Folded, it's still big enough I probably wouldn't be able to take it on a bus if there was no space on the rack in front.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you for your feedback. The bike uses full sized road bike wheels and other parts so there's a limit to how small it will go. It folds to half the size of it's original size so around 450mm long folded. The cad model that is shown doesn't show the folded size very effectively. Thankyou for my feedback

  4. #4
    Super Moderator no1mad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NE OK
    My Bikes
    '06 Kona Smoke
    Posts
    7,741
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So where are the fenders and the rack? How wide of a tire will it take? Where does one put the bottle cage(s) for those longer rides? What is the maximum load rating (rider, rider + gear)?
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyril View Post
    Ride what and in what manner pleases you. Those that mind don't matter, and those that matter don't mind. srsly.
    Community guidelines

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thankyou for your reply. From the research that i carried out most people used a bag to carry their things therefore i felt that i didnt need a rack furthermore its a road bike which don't have racks. The bike is designed to take the standard 700cc road bike tires. I have not thought about a bottle cage on this design however i will add a place for one now. The bike can take (in theory) the exact same as standard road bike so Rider weight limit of 275lb. Thanks for the feedback

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Champlin, MN
    My Bikes
    1994 Mongoose Switchback, 1983 Schwinn Voyageur SP, Cheap unnamed ssfg road bike
    Posts
    141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It looks like the pedals are behind the saddle, that would be uncomfortable for even the most fit athlete.

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thankyou for the feedback. I think thats just the CAD design. IF this was made for real this wont be the case

  8. #8
    Senior Member jrickards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sudbury, ON, CA
    My Bikes
    2002 Norco Bigfoot, 2012 KHS Tempe, 1988 Bianchi Strada, 2012 Kona Sutra
    Posts
    1,459
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My concern is the weight. The current bike shape (2 triangles) is strong, this design of yours could be made as strong but would seem to require (I'm not an engineer so I'm not doing much more than guessing) much more material. Weight may not be as much of a concern amongst commuters as it is for racers but there is a limit, especially when commuters have to also accommodate the weight of what they're carrying (tools, work clothes, rain gear, lunch, computer).
    A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice. Bill Cosby

  9. #9
    No one carries the DogBoy
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,255
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm looking at the top tube. How wide is that? My current steel bike is only about 1" diameter. If I put a beam rack on my seatpost, my legs hit the quick release. I would think that if there were a several inch wide top-tube, I'd constantly be rubbing against it in an uncomfortable way.

  10. #10
    Senior Member MEversbergII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Lexington Park, Maryland
    My Bikes
    2012 Schwinn Trailway, Early 70's All Pro, Trek 1200
    Posts
    1,053
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Frame rigidity could be a problem.

    M.

  11. #11
    Senior Member NOS88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    6,386
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm seeing a design that I suspect would cause problems with riders having their thighs rub against the wide segment with is normally a narrow top tube.
    A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking. - S. Wright

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thankyou for your feedback. the bike will be made from carbon fibre and aluminium by using cad software and calculations i bike should weight around 10kg which is the standard bike weight. In regards to storage i believe that most people use a bag as this is what my research showed

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thankyou for your feedback, i will look into these problems further

  14. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thankyou for your feedback, i will look into these problems further

  15. #15
    Super Moderator no1mad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NE OK
    My Bikes
    '06 Kona Smoke
    Posts
    7,741
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DogBoy View Post
    I'm looking at the top tube. How wide is that? My current steel bike is only about 1" diameter. If I put a beam rack on my seatpost, my legs hit the quick release. I would think that if there were a several inch wide top-tube, I'd constantly be rubbing against it in an uncomfortable way.
    Probably one of the reasons why folding bikes tend to have 20" wheels and longer seat and steerer tubes.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyril View Post
    Ride what and in what manner pleases you. Those that mind don't matter, and those that matter don't mind. srsly.
    Community guidelines

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Champlin, MN
    My Bikes
    1994 Mongoose Switchback, 1983 Schwinn Voyageur SP, Cheap unnamed ssfg road bike
    Posts
    141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Perhaps first explain what you feel are an issue with the current folding bikes available, as many people already use folding bikes and praise them.

  17. #17
    Super Moderator no1mad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NE OK
    My Bikes
    '06 Kona Smoke
    Posts
    7,741
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jmilleronaire View Post
    Perhaps first explain what you feel are an issue with the current folding bikes available, as many people already use folding bikes and praise them.
    He covered that in the OP "...they all have heavy frames, poor gear ratios and small wheel making it hard to ride them..." and
    "
    The design uses a full sized frame. The aim of the design is to make commuting easier as you as now you have the opinion to ride faster, harder and longer as you aren't limited by the low performance folding bikes that are out there. "

    I get the impression that the OP isn't a commuter himself, has no or limited experience with a bad example of a folder, and quite probably doesn't even own a bicycle of any kind.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyril View Post
    Ride what and in what manner pleases you. Those that mind don't matter, and those that matter don't mind. srsly.
    Community guidelines

  18. #18
    Senior Member Cyclosaurus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chicago Western 'burbs
    My Bikes
    1993 Mt Shasta Tempest, 2011 Motobecane Fantom Cross CX, 2012ish Dahon Speed D7
    Posts
    316
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Great project! It takes some courage to come here and invite criticism at an early stage of developing a product. I wish you the best of luck with this and would love to see the final product.

    I ride a 20" folder and it is plenty light and fast for my commute. I've commuted 17 mi each way to downtown Chicago on both the folder and my full-size drop bar bike. I can tell you that in real-world terms, there's not that much difference in overall speed. The most limiting factors are
    1) the motor (me)
    2) traffic
    and possibly 3) wind direction

    I can see the appeal of a full size folder (which does exist by the way) but I don't think your target market is commuters, because they are more utilitarian riders and I would be willing to bet that the advantages of a smaller bike for multimodal commuting far outweigh the advantages of bigger wheels for most (they certainly do for me). Certainly there will be some who think differently, but there are already solutions for people who want that, e.g., this 26.5 lb 700c folder: Montague FIT Folding Bike - 30 Speed 700c - Commuter Bike Store.

    Also, the bike looks cool but I think you will want to work on the aesthetics. Here's a 26" folder that you would be competing with on looks.




  19. #19
    Senior Member jdswitters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Fort Collins CO
    My Bikes
    Torker Graduate, Schwinn windwood, Salsa Fargo, 2010 Felt NBBcruiser, '59 magneet path racer, mongoose beast
    Posts
    724
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    1. Rear Brake.

    2. Cable routing for rear derailleur and rear brake, going to be more of a hassle than you might think at this point.

    3. In this forum there is a thread called commuter bike pics, about 10 minutes perusing that may change your mind about rack mounts. College students on inexpensive bikes carry back packs. More mature commuters are more likely to be able to afford carbon frame folders and they are more prone to panniers and racks. However I could see the addition of a large frame bag as being one possible compromise.

    Good luck with your endeavors.
    Torker Graduate, 288 rods a day without pub detours.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    3,920
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jbutj View Post
    Thankyou for your reply. From the research that i carried out most people used a bag to carry their things therefore i felt that i didnt need a rack furthermore its a road bike which don't have racks. The bike is designed to take the standard 700cc road bike tires. I have not thought about a bottle cage on this design however i will add a place for one now. The bike can take (in theory) the exact same as standard road bike so Rider weight limit of 275lb. Thanks for the feedback
    I think you should question your research - almost all recommendations on how to carry things here are to get a rack and bag. This is even more true of road bikes than it is of upright style mountain bikes, as carrying a bag on a road bike where you're bent over the bars is more likely to cause problems on your back. Carrying stuff on a rack is generally more comfortable and doesn't leave you with your back sweating through your shirt like a bag will in the summer.

    For something you're marketing as a "commuter", you definitely need a rack (it's not that hard either).

    As another poster pointed out, having a wide top tube is a huge problem for the legs, vertically tall wouldn't be such a problem, but wide is.

  21. #21
    It's MY mountain DiabloScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Mt.Diablo
    Posts
    5,419
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That design has some interesting features - from an engineering perspective, I'm very skeptical of the joints at both ends of the top tube.

    I think your thesis that current folders are hard to ride is off base. There's room for improvement on current designs, or entirely new thinking; but it looks to me like the 700c wheel criteria isn't that important.
    http://diabloscott.blogspot.com/

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    3,920
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DiabloScott View Post
    That design has some interesting features - from an engineering perspective, I'm very skeptical of the joints at both ends of the top tube.

    I think your thesis that current folders are hard to ride is off base. There's room for improvement on current designs, or entirely new thinking; but it looks to me like the 700c wheel criteria isn't that important.
    As a bike commuter, I would disagree.

    If you need to bring it on a bus or subway, I don't have experience with that - that could be the case.

    But despite what some people claim, commuters care a great deal about speed and ride comfort. 700c are faster, they put you up higher so it's a little easier to see over traffic, and they ride over crap on the road better. If your goal is to be able to fit your bike in your office or your apartment, I know I for one haven't bought a folding bike partly because I wasn't willing to compromise on wheel size. I did look around - a folding bike is also easier to throw in a trunk when meeting up for a ride after work.

  23. #23
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    6,809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jbutj View Post
    It folds to half the size of it's original size so around 450mm long folded.
    I don't understand which dimension this is referring to. 700c wheels are wider than that.

    Final folded size is critical for a folding bike. In your image of the folded bike, the two wheels are essentially side-by-side so that would be over four feet. That's a deal breaker for a folding bike. Some people might be willing to tolerate a design that folded down to the width of one wheel plus some vertical extension about. Even that is pretty big for a folding bike.

    The images seem to indicate that you haven't started to consider the bike's geometry yet. That also going to be very important.

  24. #24
    Super Moderator no1mad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NE OK
    My Bikes
    '06 Kona Smoke
    Posts
    7,741
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PaulRivers View Post
    As a bike commuter, I would disagree.

    If you need to bring it on a bus or subway, I don't have experience with that - that could be the case.

    But despite what some people claim, commuters care a great deal about speed and ride comfort. 700c are faster, they put you up higher so it's a little easier to see over traffic, and they ride over crap on the road better. If your goal is to be able to fit your bike in your office or your apartment, I know I for one haven't bought a folding bike partly because I wasn't willing to compromise on wheel size. I did look around - a folding bike is also easier to throw in a trunk when meeting up for a ride after work.
    1. 700c will have the advantage in some- but not all- applications.

    2. I suspect that the difference in rider height between a folder and a road bike may not be as drastic as you think. It would be interesting if anyone who has both could chime in on this to clarify any misconceptions that may exist.

    Ah, Google image search found this-
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyril View Post
    Ride what and in what manner pleases you. Those that mind don't matter, and those that matter don't mind. srsly.
    Community guidelines

  25. #25
    Senior Member alan s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    MD/DC/VA
    Posts
    2,778
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The geo on that bike looks whacked. Understand it's only a concept at this point, but make sure you look at rake/trail, saddle/pedal positioning before building a prototype. Rack and fenders would be nice.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •