Disc brakes worth it? Gravity Liberty CX vs Zilla?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Disc brakes worth it? Gravity Liberty CX vs Zilla?
I am looking to get some sort of road or CX bike for commuting when I move offices in June and live 12-14 miles away from work. I'm thinking either the Gravity Liberty CX ($400 at BD) or the Gravity Zilla ($600). I was really hoping for something with discs, as I ride in the rain and winter, but at these prices I'm not thinking it is worth it.
Fenders are a necessity as is a rear rack/panniers. I've done quite a bit of reading on the Zilla but there isn't a lot I can find about the CX. Is there any reason the Zilla would be worth 50% more? Cheap disc brakes can't be that great.
Thanks!
Save up to 60% off new Road Bikes - Gravity Liberty 2 | Save up to 60% off new road bikes
Save up to 60% off new Road Bikes - Gravity Liberty 2 | Save up to 60% off new road bikes
Fenders are a necessity as is a rear rack/panniers. I've done quite a bit of reading on the Zilla but there isn't a lot I can find about the CX. Is there any reason the Zilla would be worth 50% more? Cheap disc brakes can't be that great.
Thanks!
Save up to 60% off new Road Bikes - Gravity Liberty 2 | Save up to 60% off new road bikes
Save up to 60% off new Road Bikes - Gravity Liberty 2 | Save up to 60% off new road bikes
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,706
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5779 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times
in
1,427 Posts
Plenty of debate about disc brake for road bikes on the mechanic forum. It's a call you have to make for yourself.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#3
Rides Majestic
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Westfield, MA
Posts: 1,339
Bikes: 1983 Univega Gran Turismo, 1970 Schwinn Super Sport, 2001 Univega Modo Vincere, Self-Built Nashbar Touring, 1974 Peugeot U08, 1974 Atala Grand Prix, 1986 Ross Mt. Hood, 80's Maruishi MT-18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
The Zilla has more upgrades than just disks. Better r.derailleur, 27 vs. 24 speed, WTB speed disk rims, WTB saddle, Truvativ cranks/BB, SRAM cassette, and may have more clearance for wide tires/fenders. You are not comparing apples to apples.
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the reply. This is really the kind of information I am looking for. The most obvious difference to me is the discs, but I honestly don't know enough about the different components to know if it is worth an extra $200. The bike I have been using for the past five years is a 1980s Peugeot mountain bike I got from my dad. That was great (especially with fenders) to use through college and for riding 5 miles roundtrip to work. Now that it's going to be 25-30 miles roundtrip, I'm looking for something much faster.
#5
contiuniously variable
Just make sure you wipe the rotors off after a wet ride....
- Andy
- Andy
#6
Plays in traffic
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,971
Bikes: 1996 Litespeed Classic, 2006 Trek Portland, 2013 Ribble Winter/Audax, 2016 Giant Talon 4
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
9 Posts
The issues are a bit different for those of us, like the OP, who are four-seasons, all-conditions commuters. It's all about where the rubber meets the road, as the old tire commercials used to say.
My 2006 Trek Portland is a modified CX bike with Avid BB7s. I bought it NOS already a year old in late 2007. Seven years of commuting with discs in the rain and snow--and yes, sometimes even in the fair weather (!) but we don't get much of that. Tens of thousands of miles on this bike have convinced me that in the four-seasons, all-condtions, take-no-prisoners daily commuting role, disc brakes, while not 100% essential, are incredibly nice to have.
There's plenty enough to think about jammed into a four-lane in rush-hour traffic without having to calculate how wet your rims are and how much extra distance you'll need to brake when some JAM comes out of nowhere you right hook you. It's all about reducing variables in contexts such as those. Disc brakes do that.
Coupled with good rain tires--I run Conti 4-Seasons in the three seasons--and you pretty much eliminate that variable too. Studded snows in the winter control that little slip-slide problem.
The discs don't collect snow and freeze up in the winter either.
Between them all, my brake feel and stopping distance are the same or nearly so, no matter what the conditions. Stopping is so predicatable I could fax it in from home before leaving for work. One less thing to factor in on the road, which means my limited brain cells can process other information instead.
Plus, I no longer have to replace rims every spring.
My three-seasons commuter and my weekend roadie get by with rim brakes. I see no compelling reason to change the braking systems on those bikes. My four-seasons, all-conditions commuter will always have disc brakes.
Last edited by tsl; 05-08-14 at 07:23 AM.
#8
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
I don't change wheels every season neither, without disc brakes. Just the regular v-brakes. I commute in the flat lands - for those conditions, v-brakes are more than adequate.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lexington KY
Posts: 476
Bikes: Salsa Casseroll for Street and Airborne Hobgoblin for dirt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't give a damn about all the theoreticals discussed in the road and mechanics fora. Besides, they're usually a bunch of candy-ass fair-weather riders anyway, who aren't duking it out between granite curbs with half-asleep, texting commuters, who all seem to be running late, and who left their morality and goodwill towards others in the pew on Sunday.
The issues are a bit different for those of us, like the OP, who are four-seasons, all-conditions commuters. It's all about where the rubber meets the road, as the old tire commercials used to say.
My 2006 Trek Portland is a modified CX bike with Avid BB7s. I bought it NOS already a year old in late 2007. Seven years of commuting with discs in the rain and snow--and yes, sometimes even in the fair weather (!) but we don't get much of that. Tens of thousands of miles on this bike have convinced me that in the four-seasons, all-condtions, take-no-prisoners daily commuting role, disc brakes, while not 100% essential, are incredibly nice to have.
There's plenty enough to think about jammed into a four-lane in rush-hour traffic without having to calculate how wet your rims are and how much extra distance you'll need to brake when some JAM comes out of nowhere you right hook you. It's all about reducing variables in contexts such as those. Disc brakes do that.
Coupled with good rain tires--I run Conti 4-Seasons in the three seasons--and you pretty much eliminate that variable too. Studded snows in the winter control that little slip-slide problem.
The discs don't collect snow and freeze up in the winter either.
Between them all, my brake feel and stopping distance are the same or nearly so, no matter what the conditions. Stopping is so predicatable I could fax it in from home before leaving for work. One less thing to factor in on the road, which means my limited brain cells can process other information instead.
Plus, I no longer have to replace rims every spring.
My three-seasons commuter and my weekend roadie get by with rim brakes. I see no compelling reason to change the braking systems on those bikes. My four-seasons, all-conditions commuter will always have disc brakes.
The issues are a bit different for those of us, like the OP, who are four-seasons, all-conditions commuters. It's all about where the rubber meets the road, as the old tire commercials used to say.
My 2006 Trek Portland is a modified CX bike with Avid BB7s. I bought it NOS already a year old in late 2007. Seven years of commuting with discs in the rain and snow--and yes, sometimes even in the fair weather (!) but we don't get much of that. Tens of thousands of miles on this bike have convinced me that in the four-seasons, all-condtions, take-no-prisoners daily commuting role, disc brakes, while not 100% essential, are incredibly nice to have.
There's plenty enough to think about jammed into a four-lane in rush-hour traffic without having to calculate how wet your rims are and how much extra distance you'll need to brake when some JAM comes out of nowhere you right hook you. It's all about reducing variables in contexts such as those. Disc brakes do that.
Coupled with good rain tires--I run Conti 4-Seasons in the three seasons--and you pretty much eliminate that variable too. Studded snows in the winter control that little slip-slide problem.
The discs don't collect snow and freeze up in the winter either.
Between them all, my brake feel and stopping distance are the same or nearly so, no matter what the conditions. Stopping is so predicatable I could fax it in from home before leaving for work. One less thing to factor in on the road, which means my limited brain cells can process other information instead.
Plus, I no longer have to replace rims every spring.
My three-seasons commuter and my weekend roadie get by with rim brakes. I see no compelling reason to change the braking systems on those bikes. My four-seasons, all-conditions commuter will always have disc brakes.
#10
Plays in traffic
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,971
Bikes: 1996 Litespeed Classic, 2006 Trek Portland, 2013 Ribble Winter/Audax, 2016 Giant Talon 4
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
9 Posts
They don't.
Real-world stopping "power" is limited at the tire/road interface, not the brake. (I'll grant that in the lab, discs do have better "power", but I don't ride in a lab. But as soon as you mount a tire on teh rim, put it on a bike, and head for the road, that "advantage" disappears and is replaced by the tire/road interface. This is why I don't give a damn about thoreticals.)
In everyday, real-world cycling, what disc brakes give you is greater predicability and control.
They stop the same way every single time, no matter what the conditions. Then, all you have to worry about is the tire/road interface.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lexington KY
Posts: 476
Bikes: Salsa Casseroll for Street and Airborne Hobgoblin for dirt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So same wheels/Tire road condition you are saying discs have no more stopping power then tradition rim brakes?
#12
Rides Majestic
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Westfield, MA
Posts: 1,339
Bikes: 1983 Univega Gran Turismo, 1970 Schwinn Super Sport, 2001 Univega Modo Vincere, Self-Built Nashbar Touring, 1974 Peugeot U08, 1974 Atala Grand Prix, 1986 Ross Mt. Hood, 80's Maruishi MT-18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Thanks for the reply. This is really the kind of information I am looking for. The most obvious difference to me is the discs, but I honestly don't know enough about the different components to know if it is worth an extra $200. The bike I have been using for the past five years is a 1980s Peugeot mountain bike I got from my dad. That was great (especially with fenders) to use through college and for riding 5 miles roundtrip to work. Now that it's going to be 25-30 miles roundtrip, I'm looking for something much faster.
#13
contiuniously variable
Most of the folks i know do this for the reasons listed.....
- Andy
#14
Full Member
I'll echo what tsl said. Rim brakes are great most of the time and if you don't ride in bad weather probably all you need. For me it only took one time in the pouring rain when no one can really see and the driver's are erratic that I hit my brakes hard and kept rolling into the intersection to put a disc brake on my bike. It may be conditions that only happen once a year, but in that moment you want the most reliable brakes you can have.
Aside from weather hills and riding style matter. I work on top of a hill and I'm a very defensive rider during rush hour so I brake a lot (versus other's who bomb down the hill). When I had rim brakes I had to buy new wheels every year. That quickly makes discs worth it. If you don't have hills or don't use your brakes much it probably doesn't matter.
Aside from weather hills and riding style matter. I work on top of a hill and I'm a very defensive rider during rush hour so I brake a lot (versus other's who bomb down the hill). When I had rim brakes I had to buy new wheels every year. That quickly makes discs worth it. If you don't have hills or don't use your brakes much it probably doesn't matter.
#15
Plays in traffic
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,971
Bikes: 1996 Litespeed Classic, 2006 Trek Portland, 2013 Ribble Winter/Audax, 2016 Giant Talon 4
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
9 Posts
So "power" isn't the issue--at least not for me, an everyday bike commuter. For me, the issues are predictability in all conditions, and controlling that power. That's what discs give me.
#16
Plays in traffic
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,971
Bikes: 1996 Litespeed Classic, 2006 Trek Portland, 2013 Ribble Winter/Audax, 2016 Giant Talon 4
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
9 Posts
A few things... For one.... I live car free. Added to that, automotive brakes are nothing like those found on bicycles and the drums & rotors often weigh more than a single seat bike. I wiped the rims down on both of my old rim brake bikes after wet rides. It made a difference the next time i took them out in stopping distance & decel rate, and it made the pads last longer. Also, keeping the critical safety parts of any human powered vehicle clean should be a priority. A quick spin of the wheel with a cloth on the rotor, simple. In winter when you get the salt & grit on the roads it can cause abrasion to the rotor and pads.
Most of the folks i know do this for the reasons listed.....
- Andy
Most of the folks i know do this for the reasons listed.....
- Andy
For the record, I've been car-free since April 1999.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 85
Bikes: Raleigh RX 1.0; Late 90's Trek 830
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Newbie here, looking at the Liberty CXD as a possibility - and this is why I'm looking at discs. I was tooling around on the Trek 830 I'm using now, ended up chatting with another rider I ran across. With all the hills by me (my commute would involve some spots with 20-30% grade), spots where water and gunk and other stuff gets trapped, so on, he said he went disc and never looked back. He knows how it will handle it every time, and that is why he will never go back. I definitely appreciated his input there.
#18
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 523
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Not sure if you've figured this out yet, but the BD bikes aren't spec'ed with avids. They're spec'ed with ultra low end tektro lyra's.
I don't give a damn about all the theoreticals discussed in the road and mechanics fora. Besides, they're usually a bunch of candy-ass fair-weather riders anyway, who aren't duking it out between granite curbs with half-asleep, texting commuters, who all seem to be running late, and who left their morality and goodwill towards others in the pew on Sunday.
The issues are a bit different for those of us, like the OP, who are four-seasons, all-conditions commuters. It's all about where the rubber meets the road, as the old tire commercials used to say.
My 2006 Trek Portland is a modified CX bike with Avid BB7s. I bought it NOS already a year old in late 2007. Seven years of commuting with discs in the rain and snow--and yes, sometimes even in the fair weather (!) but we don't get much of that. Tens of thousands of miles on this bike have convinced me that in the four-seasons, all-condtions, take-no-prisoners daily commuting role, disc brakes, while not 100% essential, are incredibly nice to have.
There's plenty enough to think about jammed into a four-lane in rush-hour traffic without having to calculate how wet your rims are and how much extra distance you'll need to brake when some JAM comes out of nowhere you right hook you. It's all about reducing variables in contexts such as those. Disc brakes do that.
Coupled with good rain tires--I run Conti 4-Seasons in the three seasons--and you pretty much eliminate that variable too. Studded snows in the winter control that little slip-slide problem.
The discs don't collect snow and freeze up in the winter either.
Between them all, my brake feel and stopping distance are the same or nearly so, no matter what the conditions. Stopping is so predicatable I could fax it in from home before leaving for work. One less thing to factor in on the road, which means my limited brain cells can process other information instead.
Plus, I no longer have to replace rims every spring.
My three-seasons commuter and my weekend roadie get by with rim brakes. I see no compelling reason to change the braking systems on those bikes. My four-seasons, all-conditions commuter will always have disc brakes.
The issues are a bit different for those of us, like the OP, who are four-seasons, all-conditions commuters. It's all about where the rubber meets the road, as the old tire commercials used to say.
My 2006 Trek Portland is a modified CX bike with Avid BB7s. I bought it NOS already a year old in late 2007. Seven years of commuting with discs in the rain and snow--and yes, sometimes even in the fair weather (!) but we don't get much of that. Tens of thousands of miles on this bike have convinced me that in the four-seasons, all-condtions, take-no-prisoners daily commuting role, disc brakes, while not 100% essential, are incredibly nice to have.
There's plenty enough to think about jammed into a four-lane in rush-hour traffic without having to calculate how wet your rims are and how much extra distance you'll need to brake when some JAM comes out of nowhere you right hook you. It's all about reducing variables in contexts such as those. Disc brakes do that.
Coupled with good rain tires--I run Conti 4-Seasons in the three seasons--and you pretty much eliminate that variable too. Studded snows in the winter control that little slip-slide problem.
The discs don't collect snow and freeze up in the winter either.
Between them all, my brake feel and stopping distance are the same or nearly so, no matter what the conditions. Stopping is so predicatable I could fax it in from home before leaving for work. One less thing to factor in on the road, which means my limited brain cells can process other information instead.
Plus, I no longer have to replace rims every spring.
My three-seasons commuter and my weekend roadie get by with rim brakes. I see no compelling reason to change the braking systems on those bikes. My four-seasons, all-conditions commuter will always have disc brakes.
#19
No one carries the DogBoy
OOOHHHH! Where can I get one of those!
My experience. Dry weather, brakes is brakes. Wet weather: Caliper = vbrake = Discs > canti. Snow on the road (3+"): Discs > vbrake > canti (never ridden my roadbike in these conditions, so caliper is excluded). Adjusting brakes: Discs > vbrakes = caliper >>>>>>>canti.
I like disc brakes, never wipe down the rotors after rain/snow. Never had an issue. I like them for the same reason as tsl: reliability and ease of use.
My experience. Dry weather, brakes is brakes. Wet weather: Caliper = vbrake = Discs > canti. Snow on the road (3+"): Discs > vbrake > canti (never ridden my roadbike in these conditions, so caliper is excluded). Adjusting brakes: Discs > vbrakes = caliper >>>>>>>canti.
I like disc brakes, never wipe down the rotors after rain/snow. Never had an issue. I like them for the same reason as tsl: reliability and ease of use.
#20
Senior Member
Like my roller brakes for 4 season commuting but like disk brakes more. The latest model of my bicycle (torker graduate) now comes with disk brakes and if I ever have to build up or buy another townie it will have BB7s.
I have BB5s on a low end fat bike, I can live with those on simple single track and they are fine for around town. Rails to trails tourer has BB7s, love them, cant imagine going back to cantis on a tourer.
My father has some costco mountain bike with low end tektros, they are okay if you spend the time to get them adjusted and can find straight rotors.
Advice, get the one with disks and start putting a little back for the upgrade later.
cheers,
I have BB5s on a low end fat bike, I can live with those on simple single track and they are fine for around town. Rails to trails tourer has BB7s, love them, cant imagine going back to cantis on a tourer.
My father has some costco mountain bike with low end tektros, they are okay if you spend the time to get them adjusted and can find straight rotors.
Advice, get the one with disks and start putting a little back for the upgrade later.
cheers,
#21
Banned
Un like a bike sold in a LBS, Bikes Direct depends on your mechanical skills to get it all to work right . good luck .
those who work in the shops will be there to help you, but its fee for service .
those who work in the shops will be there to help you, but its fee for service .
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2494 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
A few things... For one.... I live car free. Added to that, automotive brakes are nothing like those found on bicycles and the drums & rotors often weigh more than a single seat bike. I wiped the rims down on both of my old rim brake bikes after wet rides. It made a difference the next time i took them out in stopping distance & decel rate, and it made the pads last longer. Also, keeping the critical safety parts of any human powered vehicle clean should be a priority. A quick spin of the wheel with a cloth on the rotor, simple. In winter when you get the salt & grit on the roads it can cause abrasion to the rotor and pads.
Most of the folks i know do this for the reasons listed.....
- Andy
Most of the folks i know do this for the reasons listed.....
- Andy
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2494 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
H
#24
contiuniously variable
- Andy
#25
Banned
Wheel suck behind the trucks & busses , its overcoming the air resistance that is most of the work and its more the faster you try to go..