jake2034

Hi all, I'm hoping someone could help me decide between two similar models of Columbia folding bikes. Everything is the same except the frame. I'll be getting one of the two since it's a good price for a full sized folding bike, and the 20" models have 4 star reviews on Amazon.

I'll be keeping it inside when not riding, so weathering should be a non-factor. And I'd only be commuting 12 miles a day on it.

Is the alloy worth the $70 difference? And for what reason? I'd be spending the difference on some nonessential gear.

Steel: Columba SP26S Folding Bike Silver

Alloy: Columba RJ26A Alloy Folding Bike Silver

Thanks much!

NormanF

I may be biased but I'd get a Raleigh Twenty off the Bay.

The late Sheldon Brown - eternal guru of blessed memory of these forums has a write up of it here:
'
Sheldon Brown's Raleigh Twenty Bicycle Page

I love and miss mine already.

jake2034

Sorry, I appreciate the reply; but that doesn't help answer my question. I'm specifically asking about of those two, which is a better purchase.

I'm looking at these bikes because:
-Full Sized
-Folding bike
-26" wheels
-Under $300 direct from seller (plus I can save on shipping by taking a trip to pick it up)

If there is a better bike that meets my criteria, is be interested. But as of now I'm more interested in if the "Alloy" frame model is worth $70 more than the steel frame. And, for bonus points, does the steel frame seem to be of good quality?

Thanks

huizar

In general, an aluminum bike will be lighter than a steel bike, and that's typically the reason people will opt for them over steel, although both steel and aluminum bikes can often be found at the same price-point. Also, steel typically affords the rider a more comfortable ride as aluminum is known to transfer a lot more "road feel" (read vibrations) to the rider. The seller describes the "alloy" version as being only a pound lighter than the steel version, not enough of a difference to justify the added expense in my book. Can't speak to the quality though, never come across this particular brand. I'd scour the net for reviews before purchasing and try to see if anyone mentions any specific differences between the two bikes.

NormanF

A full-size folding bicycle doesn't have commuting possibilities. It still takes up a lot of room. You didn't say what your living circumstances are but in an apartment, a more traditional folder is your best bet.

alan s 

To be honest with you, I know almost nothing about folding bikes, but that frame locking mechanism does not inspire confidence. I think both bikes are probably such low quality, you'll end up trashing after a season.

Penny Farting

The steel version Columba 20" wheel model appears to be a close copy of the Pashley Fold-It 7, a Klapradder-type folder designed by Cresswell, one of the most rugged can-do-it-all folders ever built but discontinued around 2007 as the tidal wave of China folders began to strike. The worst criticism about the Columba 20" appears to be that the gearing may suit the more sedate rider and this means that it is rather slow. For the 26" wheel alloy model, the cheap plastic brake levers attract plenty of comment. If you need to carry your bike up stairs, alloy is worth considering but may lack the endurance and ride quality of the steel model.

steve0257

I would go with the steel. I just have problems trusting a full suspension folding bike at that price range.

kingston 

You are paying extra for the "suspension" on the alloy bike; not worth it.

oddjob2

I would suggest you follow the advice above and investigate further. The two Columba bikes you identified are built of cheap, low quality components that won't last long. The frames are built of low grade steel or aluminum, requiring extra thickness or tubing dimension to add strength, and unfortunately weight. At 34-35 lbs each, they certainly are not easy to carry if you combine use with public transit or up and down stairs. That is almost as heavy as the infamous boat anchor Chicago built Schwinn Varsity.

If you insist on a folder, there are always lightly used Dahon folders in any market. They are not lightweight either, but the components are more robust and the chrome plating is decent.

If you can elaborate why you need a folder, members here can point you in the right direction.

fietsbob

Cheap 26" wheel Folding bikes Both .. The big wheel takes away a lot of the folding Bike Benefits of Buing a decent a 20" wheel one .

I abstain from supporting either ..

I like My 3 speed IGH folding Bike ..



Lighter and still compact is the Type Mini Velo, They dont fold , saving all that hinge weight, but has smaller wheels so wont take up as Much Room parked inside ..

That makes them popular in the smaller Living spaces in Japan and parts of Asia And Europe.

folding bikes have their own sub section ..https://www.bikeforums.net/folding-bikes/

jfowler85

I found the differences between steel and aluminum negligible, but then again I'd rather have a Genesee Cream Ale than the latest over-hopped crap, I mean craft, beer...so perhaps I am just not refined enough to pick up on the difference.

If you go with the aluminum, you can forgo rust frame. This may be important if this brand has no real reputation behind it to vouch for how well they prime/paint their steel frames to prevent rust. Otherwise, get the cheaper of the two.