Help with a new commuter/mtb/tourer/campe: Surly Troll vs. Velo Orange Camargue vs...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 192
Bikes: Ciocc Designer 84, 1988 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Help with a new commuter/mtb/tourer/campe: Surly Troll vs. Velo Orange Camargue vs...
I'm looking for a commuter, mountain bike, and camper all rolled into one (85%, 10%, 5%). I commute 4 days a week in most weather and would like to be able to utilize trails and come off curbs a little more. I am currently not a mountain biker but would like to get started, and I camp a few times a year (with mtb trails accessible at the camping locations).
Wants listed as follows:
*26-inch or 650b since I'm only around 5'-6".
*Price very little issue, but cheaper is better. I'll take a long time to save though and build it just how I want it, so I'd rather get it right.
*Steel frame only.
*More tire clearance, better.
*Lowish trail - Commute with front randonneuring bag for easy access to essentials. Currently commute on a 1988 Trek 520 with ~55-56mm of trail, about that of the Camargue. I am worried higher trail will be difficult with my commuting setup. This seems unattainable with all the other wants.
The list:
*Surly Troll - Tons of braze ons a plus, massive tire clearances for semi-fat, but highest trail of the bunch
*Surly Ogre - Short guy here, maybe prefer 26 inch
*Surly ECR - Massive wheels, probably too big for short person
*Gunnar Rock Tour
*Bruce Gordon Rock 'n Road Tour EX
*Soma B-Side
*Rivendell Hunqapillar - Doesn't really seem to fit the mountain bike role
*Vintage bike with the perfect combination of wants
*Or something else you suggest!
I'm slightly worried I should just quit the quest, keep my Trek 520, and get a dedicated mountain bike. I have some problems with the Trek though, including "minimal" tire clearance (700x38c), built for 27 inch wheels, and incompatible with modern cantilevers, particularly Pauls, and a surprising lack of braze ons (single eyelets front and back, hourglass rack eyelets, and the midfork eyelets are unthreaded).
I've negotiated an eventual 3 bike setup with my wife, and I currently envision Hypothetical Stable Number 1 as the following:
*Road Bike
*Rando/Dirt Road Bike/Gravel Grinder
*Mountain Bike/Camper/Commuter
I guess I could settle for the Hypothetical Stable Number 2 instead:
*Road Bike
*Rando/Dirt Road Bike/Gravel Grinder/Commuter/Camper
*Mountain Bike
I would prefer the Hypothetical Stable Number 1 since I don't see myself as a huge mtb guy, wanting mostly the occasional trail to satisfy a want for adventure. I may get the bug though...Then again, I may be overthinking the requirements on the mtb side. That's why I need your help!
Suggestions? Thanks!
Wants listed as follows:
*26-inch or 650b since I'm only around 5'-6".
*Price very little issue, but cheaper is better. I'll take a long time to save though and build it just how I want it, so I'd rather get it right.
*Steel frame only.
*More tire clearance, better.
*Lowish trail - Commute with front randonneuring bag for easy access to essentials. Currently commute on a 1988 Trek 520 with ~55-56mm of trail, about that of the Camargue. I am worried higher trail will be difficult with my commuting setup. This seems unattainable with all the other wants.
The list:
*Surly Troll - Tons of braze ons a plus, massive tire clearances for semi-fat, but highest trail of the bunch
*Surly Ogre - Short guy here, maybe prefer 26 inch
*Surly ECR - Massive wheels, probably too big for short person
*Gunnar Rock Tour
*Bruce Gordon Rock 'n Road Tour EX
*Soma B-Side
*Rivendell Hunqapillar - Doesn't really seem to fit the mountain bike role
*Vintage bike with the perfect combination of wants
*Or something else you suggest!
I'm slightly worried I should just quit the quest, keep my Trek 520, and get a dedicated mountain bike. I have some problems with the Trek though, including "minimal" tire clearance (700x38c), built for 27 inch wheels, and incompatible with modern cantilevers, particularly Pauls, and a surprising lack of braze ons (single eyelets front and back, hourglass rack eyelets, and the midfork eyelets are unthreaded).
I've negotiated an eventual 3 bike setup with my wife, and I currently envision Hypothetical Stable Number 1 as the following:
*Road Bike
*Rando/Dirt Road Bike/Gravel Grinder
*Mountain Bike/Camper/Commuter
I guess I could settle for the Hypothetical Stable Number 2 instead:
*Road Bike
*Rando/Dirt Road Bike/Gravel Grinder/Commuter/Camper
*Mountain Bike
I would prefer the Hypothetical Stable Number 1 since I don't see myself as a huge mtb guy, wanting mostly the occasional trail to satisfy a want for adventure. I may get the bug though...Then again, I may be overthinking the requirements on the mtb side. That's why I need your help!
Suggestions? Thanks!
Last edited by amgarcia; 09-16-14 at 11:34 AM.
#2
Aspiring curmudgeon
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 2,486
Bikes: Guerciotti, Serotta, Gaulzetti
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
13 Posts
I know you mentioned the Camargue, but have you looked at the VO Polyvalent? It has much lower trail (30 something), and is designed specifically for 650b.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 192
Bikes: Ciocc Designer 84, 1988 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I certainly have, but it doesn't do the offroad thing of Hypothetical Stable Number 1 and seems to burly for Hypothetical Stable Number 2. I will add that too the list and consider it a bit more though!
Last edited by amgarcia; 09-16-14 at 11:33 AM.
#4
Banned
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2495 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
I don't think the trail of a bike is something I would dwell on. And as for 650B? I don't think so. Terry makes bikes for women using 650B wheels because some of them a 4'10"!! The ones that are 5'6" (like mine) have plenty of choices in 26" (even 700C). I have seven bikes so the o.p. will not get much sympathy from me. IMO this is a classic n+1 situation.
H
H
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 192
Bikes: Ciocc Designer 84, 1988 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't think the trail of a bike is something I would dwell on. And as for 650B? I don't think so. Terry makes bikes for women using 650B wheels because some of them a 4'10"!! The ones that are 5'6" (like mine) have plenty of choices in 26" (even 700C). I have seven bikes so the o.p. will not get much sympathy from me. IMO this is a classic n+1 situation.
H
H
Last edited by amgarcia; 09-16-14 at 11:54 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
The troll is a very versatile bike.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Really, it sounds to me like you could get by with Hypothetical Stable Number 3:
*Road Bike/Rando/Dirt Road Bike/Gravel Grinder/Commuter/Camper/Mountain Bike
...if you picked the right bike and had several sets of wheels.
Mountain bikes are like SUV's. Everybody thinks they need one but hardly anyone actually ends up putting it to serious off-road use. The mountain bike market is constantly diversifying and inventing new segments, but most people end up settling on trail/XC bikes and the fact is that pretty much anything that a trail bike is suitable for can be ridden pretty easily on a cyclocross bike that weighs 15 pounds less.
At the other end of the spectrum, unless you're racing on road a cyclocross bike with slick tires makes a pretty competent road bike and is typically more comfortable than most road bikes.
The cyclocross bike segment is in the process of splitting too as the gravel/adventure bike segment emerges, and this is a very good thing for you. You mention 700x38 as a "minimal" tire clearance. Frankly I think it's plenty and nearly any cross bike will have about that same clearance, but gravel/adventure bikes often have room for wider tires.
I don't know how easy it would be to get one to the U.S., but here's your bike:
*Road Bike/Rando/Dirt Road Bike/Gravel Grinder/Commuter/Camper/Mountain Bike
...if you picked the right bike and had several sets of wheels.
Mountain bikes are like SUV's. Everybody thinks they need one but hardly anyone actually ends up putting it to serious off-road use. The mountain bike market is constantly diversifying and inventing new segments, but most people end up settling on trail/XC bikes and the fact is that pretty much anything that a trail bike is suitable for can be ridden pretty easily on a cyclocross bike that weighs 15 pounds less.
At the other end of the spectrum, unless you're racing on road a cyclocross bike with slick tires makes a pretty competent road bike and is typically more comfortable than most road bikes.
The cyclocross bike segment is in the process of splitting too as the gravel/adventure bike segment emerges, and this is a very good thing for you. You mention 700x38 as a "minimal" tire clearance. Frankly I think it's plenty and nearly any cross bike will have about that same clearance, but gravel/adventure bikes often have room for wider tires.
I don't know how easy it would be to get one to the U.S., but here's your bike:
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2495 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
Available here (U.S.):KONA BIKES | 2015 BIKES | FREERANGE | ROVE AL
Available in steel for twice the price. Make mine AL thank you very much.
Available in steel for twice the price. Make mine AL thank you very much.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 192
Bikes: Ciocc Designer 84, 1988 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am probably overthinking the trail thing, but I would rather overthink than end up with a squirrelly front end.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 192
Bikes: Ciocc Designer 84, 1988 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Really, it sounds to me like you could get by with Hypothetical Stable Number 3:
*Road Bike/Rando/Dirt Road Bike/Gravel Grinder/Commuter/Camper/Mountain Bike
...if you picked the right bike and had several sets of wheels.
Mountain bikes are like SUV's. Everybody thinks they need one but hardly anyone actually ends up putting it to serious off-road use. The mountain bike market is constantly diversifying and inventing new segments, but most people end up settling on trail/XC bikes and the fact is that pretty much anything that a trail bike is suitable for can be ridden pretty easily on a cyclocross bike that weighs 15 pounds less.
At the other end of the spectrum, unless you're racing on road a cyclocross bike with slick tires makes a pretty competent road bike and is typically more comfortable than most road bikes.
The cyclocross bike segment is in the process of splitting too as the gravel/adventure bike segment emerges, and this is a very good thing for you. You mention 700x38 as a "minimal" tire clearance. Frankly I think it's plenty and nearly any cross bike will have about that same clearance, but gravel/adventure bikes often have room for wider tires.
I don't know how easy it would be to get one to the U.S., but here's your bike:
*Road Bike/Rando/Dirt Road Bike/Gravel Grinder/Commuter/Camper/Mountain Bike
...if you picked the right bike and had several sets of wheels.
Mountain bikes are like SUV's. Everybody thinks they need one but hardly anyone actually ends up putting it to serious off-road use. The mountain bike market is constantly diversifying and inventing new segments, but most people end up settling on trail/XC bikes and the fact is that pretty much anything that a trail bike is suitable for can be ridden pretty easily on a cyclocross bike that weighs 15 pounds less.
At the other end of the spectrum, unless you're racing on road a cyclocross bike with slick tires makes a pretty competent road bike and is typically more comfortable than most road bikes.
The cyclocross bike segment is in the process of splitting too as the gravel/adventure bike segment emerges, and this is a very good thing for you. You mention 700x38 as a "minimal" tire clearance. Frankly I think it's plenty and nearly any cross bike will have about that same clearance, but gravel/adventure bikes often have room for wider tires.
I don't know how easy it would be to get one to the U.S., but here's your bike:
On your mountain bike point, you may be correct - I rode my old Surly Cross Check on a local trail and it went "okay". I didn't have enough standover, but I could have handled it if I wasn't worried about racking myself all the time. Maybe a gravel or monstercross bike would do what I'm hoping, but most are 700c or 29ers and I had a lot of trouble with toe overlap on my CC. I'd like to eliminate that - any good 650b options?
Or does the fact that I'm only looking at rigid options make the mtb point void? I'm really not looking for a modern mtb in any regard.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 192
Bikes: Ciocc Designer 84, 1988 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Consider:
26" wheels, steel, clearance for 2" tires with fenders, widely available for around $100 -- excessive trail might be the biggest issue. Otherwise, it's a decent commuter and camp bike.
As for other options, check out the Salsa Vaya. The two smallest sizes come with 26" wheels.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Napa, California
Posts: 470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
I don't think the trail of a bike is something I would dwell on. And as for 650B? I don't think so. Terry makes bikes for women using 650B wheels because some of them a 4'10"!! The ones that are 5'6" (like mine) have plenty of choices in 26" (even 700C). I have seven bikes so the o.p. will not get much sympathy from me. IMO this is a classic n+1 situation.
H
H
26" bead diameter = 559mm
I think you might have misheard their reasons for choosing that size (650b is generally chosen for shorter rider instead of 700c, not instead of 26". Considering 26" is the smallest of the three.) or aren't thinking of the fact that OP is already asking for certain thickness tires. While 650b is available in thin "road" type tires, it is also widely available in large, chunky off road tires, and voluminous touring/trekking tires as well. So, in OP's case a 650b will be MORE tire than a 26" of the same width.
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Amish Country, PA
Posts: 88
Bikes: Jones Plus LWB
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I recommend the Troll. More braze ons than I have yet figured out a use for, ran well with the stock Kenda Kinniption 26x2.3's, runs better as a daily commuter with Schwalbe Marathon 26x1.5's. Plenty of options in the rear dropout, and everywhere else. I've found my N+0.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Valley Forge: Birthplace of Freedom
Posts: 1,299
Bikes: Novara Safari, CAAD9, WABI Classic, WABI Thunder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 366 Post(s)
Liked 457 Times
in
240 Posts
I was going to suggest a Novara Safari. Their small has 650b's. They've been running a sale on them for $638.00 which is a steal. Unfortunately online they only have the XL's left. You might be able to find one in stock at a store and have it shipped. They have clearance for at least 2.35's. At least the XL does. The rims handle on the low side 32's (at least) and the upper could fit 2.35's.
That price leaves a lot of wiggle room for personalizing it.
That price leaves a lot of wiggle room for personalizing it.
__________________
Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong. Let all that you do be done in love.
Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong. Let all that you do be done in love.
Last edited by stevel610; 09-17-14 at 04:08 AM.
#19
Senior Member
Don't know about the other bikes you mention, but the Troll will do what you need. I commute 150 miles a week mostly on 700c wheels, and tour offroad with 26" wide tires. Not really into MTBing, but you can do that as well. Racks and fenders and a wide range of tires will fit the bike. Here are a few pics in different configurations.
Commuter with wide tires
Commuter with skinny tires
Touring mode
Winter with 26" studded tires
MTB
Commuter with wide tires
Commuter with skinny tires
Touring mode
Winter with 26" studded tires
MTB
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,411
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
18 Posts
Based on your OP, I think you have a misunderstanding about the RBW Hunqapillar. It's very, very similar to the Camargue but I would argue that the Hunqapillar is more MTB than the Camargue. The Hunqapillar has a longer top-tube and more trail, both characteristics of MTB's. The only area where the Hunqapillar gives up anything to the Camargue is in bottom bracket drop. The Hunq has 80mm (low BB) and the Camargue has 70mm (higher BB...more typical of MTB's.
The guy who runs the Gypsybytrade blog has experience with the Hunqapillar and he said it's well designed as a dirt road tourer. He also worked for Velo-Orange and had some input into the creation of the Camargue and he felt the one area where the Hunqapillar was lacking was in it's low bottom bracket. He recommended the higher BB on the Camargue for better clearance off-road.
Having said all that, I have test ridden an Ogre and a Troll and both are amazing bikes!! I would buy a Troll based on my type of riding and a preference for smaller wheels but if I was planning on riding mega-miles, I would probably choose the Ogre. It's hard to define but 700c wheels just seem to travel better. 26" wheels are more fun for just "riding around".
The guy who runs the Gypsybytrade blog has experience with the Hunqapillar and he said it's well designed as a dirt road tourer. He also worked for Velo-Orange and had some input into the creation of the Camargue and he felt the one area where the Hunqapillar was lacking was in it's low bottom bracket. He recommended the higher BB on the Camargue for better clearance off-road.
Having said all that, I have test ridden an Ogre and a Troll and both are amazing bikes!! I would buy a Troll based on my type of riding and a preference for smaller wheels but if I was planning on riding mega-miles, I would probably choose the Ogre. It's hard to define but 700c wheels just seem to travel better. 26" wheels are more fun for just "riding around".
#22
Senior Member
#23
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 192
Bikes: Ciocc Designer 84, 1988 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
All the recommendations for a Troll. Now I need to find a frameset my size! If anyone has a 16-inch available...
I think the answer is n+1. My commute is fairly short (6 miles round trip), so maybe the geometric trail won't bother me over that distance (I hope!), even with a front load. Then I'll just have to get a cyclocross bike or "off-road" rando bike.
I think the answer is n+1. My commute is fairly short (6 miles round trip), so maybe the geometric trail won't bother me over that distance (I hope!), even with a front load. Then I'll just have to get a cyclocross bike or "off-road" rando bike.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Moorhead, MN
Posts: 997
Bikes: A few ;)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Another plug for the Troll here. I originally built mine as a 26" wheel super commuter, which gets fenders and studded tires for winter. This summer I converted it to a 650B mountain bike, and it just plain rips! This winter it'll turn into a drop bar, 26", fendered, dynamo lighted, studded tire go everywhere machine. It can handle all the racks, fenders, bottle cages and wheel sizes you can throw at it.