Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

'11 Crux Expert Carbon vs. '12 Crux Comp alloy

Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

'11 Crux Expert Carbon vs. '12 Crux Comp alloy

Old 10-27-11, 01:11 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sibeliusnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sheridan, WY
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
'11 Crux Expert Carbon vs. '12 Crux Comp alloy

I was set on buying a new '12 Crux Comp for use on paved and gravel/forest service roads but also have the opportunity to get a 2011 Crux Expert carbon for about the same price. They seem very similar but the carbon Crux appears to be the renaming of the Tri-cross Carbon and is different than the the alloy Crux'. There's a Walter Mittyish chance I'd take up 'cross racing, but that said, any opinions on which would be more enjoyable for a roadie who wants to ride both asphalt and dirt roads, with lots of hills I might add?
sibeliusnick is offline  
Old 10-27-11, 09:28 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
igknighted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Somerville, MA
Posts: 414
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The carbon crux is indeed a tricross. Not that that is a bad thing per se, just ride them both and see which you prefer. The Alu version should feel snappier and more aggressive, while the carbon version should be a tad lighter, and more forgiving if you try to overcorrect. Also, due to the longer chainstays the carbon version will likely handle better at higher speeds, while the alu version should handle better at lower speeds (and probably climb better).

Both are good options. Get the one that fits your riding style better.
igknighted is offline  
Old 10-27-11, 03:07 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sibeliusnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sheridan, WY
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by igknighted
Also, due to the longer chainstays the carbon version will likely handle better at higher speeds, while the alu version should handle better at lower speeds (and probably climb better).
Thanks for that reply. All good advise. Sounds like the carbon with the longer stays might actually be safer descending a steep mountain pass even if it is slower on the ascent?
sibeliusnick is offline  
Old 10-27-11, 03:11 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have the S- works carbon and its for sale. what size you looking for ?
Surfer34 is offline  
Old 10-27-11, 03:18 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sibeliusnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sheridan, WY
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Still don't know what size is best (58 or 60) 'till I can test ride the bikes, but I do have a line on an '11 Crux Expert carbon for very low price and doubt I can afford an S-works. Never imagined getting a full carbon bike anyway so that's the dilemma between the new aluminum Crux or slightly used carbon.
sibeliusnick is offline  
Old 10-27-11, 03:27 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
oh mine is a 52. its light as heck though, lol
Surfer34 is offline  
Old 10-27-11, 03:39 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sibeliusnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sheridan, WY
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd crush it (see "Clydesdale" forum).
sibeliusnick is offline  
Old 11-30-11, 12:23 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sibeliusnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sheridan, WY
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Alright, finally bought the barely used 2011 Crux Expert carbon cx bike and love it! Seeing as how I'm not a serious racer (not a racer at all, in fact) the carbon Crux, a TriCross renamed, really was the best choice although I loved the look of the new 2012 Crux comp. Here's a couple photos. One at the start of the day and the other after a fun ride on some slushy back-roads.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Clean Bike.jpg (72.3 KB, 32 views)
File Type: jpg
Muddy Bike.jpg (55.9 KB, 34 views)
sibeliusnick is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jamawani
Touring
77
05-19-17 05:41 AM
WRB@Southampton
General Cycling Discussion
9
08-05-15 04:25 AM
99Klein
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
34
12-07-12 11:41 AM
fstshrk
Road Cycling
8
05-20-12 06:40 AM
avidcyclist83
Road Cycling
18
03-02-11 09:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.