Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > > >

Eastern Canada New Brunswick | Newfoundland and Labrador | Nova Scotia | Ontario | Prince Edward Island | Quebec

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-12-09, 11:56 AM   #126
flyboy9503
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
cycling safer in amsterdam

how is it that amsterdam has the safest cycling statistics in the world and they don't wear helmets
you are more likely to get injured in canada as a pedestrian and this is proven by statistics so why
aren't we legislating helmets to be worn at all times. our government picks a weak group of people
and legislates whatever they want. ie children cycling. the kids can't o
flyboy9503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-09, 12:10 PM   #127
flyboy9503
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
continued: the kids can't oppose this, the ontario police don't enforce it so why are we introducing new laws that have no meaning. this governent is out of control. we could certainly do better. speak up, you are supposed to have rights. this is a long and slippery
slope that the government is embarking on and it is difficult to stop them. i never said helmets couldn't help in the rare case where you fall and hit your head but this doesn't
account for the fact that most injuries are not head related. one expert even states that
with rounded helmets your injuries could be more severe so why aren't you told this as
part of the education process. if our government believes in the "if one life can be saved"
policy in bringing in new laws then they must stop all activities with even a minor risk.
stop hockey , there are fights all of the time. stop skydiving, stop roller skating etc. the
government has no business in the affairs of everyday activities. there job is to educate
not legislate. enjoy your freedoms because they may not last long!
flyboy9503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-09, 02:48 PM   #128
aMull
Senior Member
 
aMull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto
Bikes: Leader 735TR 09 58cm 46/17
Posts: 1,779
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
**** that, wearing a helmet should be a personal choice. Cycling is no more dangerous than walking around.
aMull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-09, 09:01 PM   #129
flickerx
rave machine
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: mutha****n RIVERDALE
Bikes: Specialized Langster, one fixie self-build, one hybrid self-build
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I dont know why people are still getting worked up on this thread - the chances of a protest against a helmet law actually materialising are none.
flickerx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 02:23 PM   #130
flyboy9503
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
we won without protesting

the ontario government announced that they will not prosecute cyclists without helmet. for the time
being they have given us back our freedom of choice. look around and you will see many cyclists
demonstrating their freedom of choice. as for British Columbia and the eastern provinces it looks like
their freedom of choice will not prevail. i will ride when i can and without a helmet. i will also ski
without a helmet. and yes i will still be alive in 20 years to tell the tale!
flyboy9503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 04:31 PM   #131
CerpinTaxt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD3 Saeco
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyboy9503 View Post
i will ride when i can and without a helmet. i will also ski
without a helmet.

Won't matter. Seems like you have already received head injury at some point.
CerpinTaxt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 04:43 PM   #132
danarnold
Kaffee Nazi
 
danarnold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Richland, WA
Bikes: 2009 Kestrel RT800, 2007 Roubaix, 1976 Lambert-Viscount
Posts: 1,374
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by flickerx View Post
I dont know why people are still getting worked up on this thread - the chances of a protest against a helmet law actually materialising are none.
I dunno. Study after study have shown two things:

1. Bicycling is no more dangerous than a variety of activities where helmets are not worn and not mandated.

2. Helmet laws have resulted in a decrease in cycling. The decrease in cycling results in a net health benefit loss that outweighs the health benefit of wearing helmets.

In addition, the cost of enforcing such silly laws easily outweighs the non benefit of the law.

These are powerful arguments that merely need exposure to the public to be effective in preventing or repealing such silliness. This is NOT to say that wearing helmets does not have some minor benefit [it might], but argues against helmet laws.
danarnold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 08:17 PM   #133
Dan Burkhart 
Senior member
 
Dan Burkhart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oakville Ontario
Bikes:
Posts: 5,980
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
The most mileage ever out of an April Fools joke.
Dan Burkhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-09, 09:42 AM   #134
flyboy9503
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
not an april fools joke

i am quite serious to say it is our right to decide on whether to wear a helmet. do you really want the government to tell you what you can and cannot do. education is the key to getting people to join in conforming. you will win some people but you won't win them all and this is why the gov't legislates whatever they feel they can get away with. stand up for your right to freedom of choice! i don't smoke but i can see how rediculous the gov't is getting with enforcement. a trucker got a ticket for smoking in his own truck and he was the only person in it. getting back to cycling, why would the gov't discourage such a safe activity as cycling? common sense doesn't prevail. the u.s. allows freedom of choice on whether to wear a motorclycle helmet in over 15 states. so that is what this is all about. freedom!
the fact that the ontario government backed down is a good sign. so if you feel a helmet is beneficial to you then feel free to wear one but i don't like them so i won't wear one.
flyboy9503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-09, 10:01 AM   #135
Metzinger
Primate
 
Metzinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: gone
Bikes: Concorde Columbus SL, Rocky Mountain Edge, Sparta stadfiets
Posts: 2,582
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My english not good.
What means rediculous?
Metzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-09, 06:30 PM   #136
Turd Ferguson
LMLN
 
Turd Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto,On
Bikes: Marin Novato, Argon Krypton, Jamis Aurora, IRO Mark V
Posts: 567
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
stupid is as stupid does
Turd Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:14 AM.