Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electric Bikes
Reload this Page >

The Bionx transformer

Search
Notices
Electric Bikes Here's a place to discuss ebikes, from home grown to high-tech.

The Bionx transformer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-07, 05:12 PM
  #1  
e-Biker
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 951

Bikes: Gary Fisher, Strong GT-S eBike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The Bionx transformer

My Bionx powered mountain bike has now become a transformer. This is the human powered only off-road form.



AUTOBOTS TRANSFORM!



And that's in it's Bionx eBike form.

In one form it has no battery or motor. The Bionx cabling, controller and mounting rack stay on the bike. These only add a few ounces to the overall weight. This is the offroad form where it uses knobby offroad tires and can only be human powered. You'll notice that right in the middle, slightly ahead and up of the crank is a cap that goes over the Bionx connector to protect it from debris.

In its other form it becomes a road going eBike. The protective cap gets moved to the bike rack. The rear wheel gets swapped out for the Bionx electric wheel which has a street tire. The cables are reconnected. The Battery is mounted to the Bionx rack. The front wheel is swapped out for one with a street tire. It's now a street configured eBike.

For the anti-eBikers... ha... I've got the best of both worlds! I can work, sweat and get full of mud with the off-roader and I can commute to work without breaking a sweat, and not stink, with the electric on-roader. It's my choice. It only takes 2 minutes to go from one form to another including minor adjustments to ensure the disc brakes aren't rubbing.

TRANSFORMATION COMPLETE

PS: Sorry for the transformers movie "theme". I just have a sense of humor.
Zeuser is offline  
Old 07-27-07, 10:16 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
The7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 146
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Zeuser,

This is the bike that I am thinking for adding motor. The bike is very light and pleasure to pedal.

It has an 7005 Aluminum frame with no suspension which is a "Trek" bike came together with an VW purchase. It is made in USA.

If I am going for BionX system, should I keep the whole set of the rear wheel (rim, tire and gear spocket) so that it could be a "transformer" like your?

In such case, a new rear tire and gear spocket are needed for the BionX. The new tire would look different from the front! Will it look odd?

Do you think that this bike is strong enough for adding motor?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
DSCN7185 copy.jpg (75.4 KB, 64 views)
The7 is offline  
Old 08-13-07, 11:02 AM
  #3  
e-Biker
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 951

Bikes: Gary Fisher, Strong GT-S eBike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by The7
Zeuser,

This is the bike that I am thinking for adding motor. The bike is very light and pleasure to pedal.

It has an 7005 Aluminum frame with no suspension which is a "Trek" bike came together with an VW purchase. It is made in USA.

If I am going for BionX system, should I keep the whole set of the rear wheel (rim, tire and gear spocket) so that it could be a "transformer" like your?

In such case, a new rear tire and gear spocket are needed for the BionX. The new tire would look different from the front! Will it look odd?

Do you think that this bike is strong enough for adding motor?
It looks fine for a Bionx system. You really ought to get a new tire and gear for the rear wheel. Bionx doesn't use a cassette system so you may have to anyway.

You can set it up as a "transformer" like mine easily. All you need is a spare rear wheel+tire and front wheel_tire. You can put the same tire on the Bionx wheel as your human powered wheel. But Why? The whole point of my setup was to use the mountain bike chassis as a eBike commuter and offroad toy. I've found the Bionx to be less enjoyable offroad so this is why I switch over to human power offroad.
Zeuser is offline  
Old 08-30-07, 06:19 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by Zeuser
I've found the Bionx to be less enjoyable offroad so this is why I switch over to human power offroad.
Could you tell us why you've found the Bionx to be less enjoyable offroad ?
mikalo is offline  
Old 09-02-07, 08:59 PM
  #5  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sioux Falls, SD, USA
Posts: 3

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is your Bionx hub the same width as your standard hub? No need to spread the dropouts to get it to fit?
davintosh is offline  
Old 09-03-07, 01:11 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Could you tell us if the Bionx is good at "pulling" a trailer ?
mikalo is offline  
Old 09-04-07, 08:53 AM
  #7  
e-Biker
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 951

Bikes: Gary Fisher, Strong GT-S eBike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've found the Bionx less enjoyable offroad because the wheel isn't well suited for rough terrain. It really was built for on-road usage and I'll be sticking to that type of usage as well.

The Bionx hub uses the same dropout as a regular bike. No need to spread anything. It's just as easy as removing any other rear wheel.

I've never tried pulling a trailer so I don't really know. But I can't see why not.
Zeuser is offline  
Old 09-05-07, 12:21 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 635

Bikes: Soma cyclocross with Bionx PL500HS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikalo
Could you tell us if the Bionx is good at "pulling" a trailer ?
Yes, it's great for that. I pull my kid in a trailer up steep hills often and there's a world of a difference between using my regular bike and the bionx bike.
adamtki is offline  
Old 09-10-07, 08:07 AM
  #9  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sioux Falls, SD, USA
Posts: 3

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The7
Zeuser,

This is the bike that I am thinking for adding motor. The bike is very light and pleasure to pedal.

It has an 7005 Aluminum frame with no suspension which is a "Trek" bike came together with an VW purchase. It is made in USA.

If I am going for BionX system, should I keep the whole set of the rear wheel (rim, tire and gear spocket) so that it could be a "transformer" like your?

In such case, a new rear tire and gear spocket are needed for the BionX. The new tire would look different from the front! Will it look odd?

Do you think that this bike is strong enough for adding motor?
If the dropouts on that frame are also made of aluminum, you may need to add a steel torque arm to the axle on the motorized hub to keep it from spreading the dropouts. All of the torque from the motor is applied through the axle, which has parallel flats that to keep it from spinning. On a frame with steel dropouts a torque arm isn't always necessary -- depends on how well the axle fits inside the dropout and how strong it is -- but I'd definitely want one on aluminum dropouts.
davintosh is offline  
Old 09-10-07, 09:55 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
The7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 146
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by davintosh
If the dropouts on that frame are also made of aluminum, you may need to add a steel torque arm to the axle on the motorized hub to keep it from spreading the dropouts. All of the torque from the motor is applied through the axle, which has parallel flats that to keep it from spinning. On a frame with steel dropouts a torque arm isn't always necessary -- depends on how well the axle fits inside the dropout and how strong it is -- but I'd definitely want one on aluminum dropouts.
Thanks for the advice.
Use an magnet to test.
The rear dropout is aluminum.
The front fork dropout is non-aluminium and is marked "chro-molly".
What is "chro-molly"? Some kind of steel alloy? Is it stronger than steel?

If it strong enough, may install the hub motor in front.
Where is the best place for hub, front or rear?
The7 is offline  
Old 09-11-07, 03:09 AM
  #11  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: vancouver, BC.
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes, chrome-molly is a steel alloy. Light, strong and can handle being welded. You should be ok to put a motor on your frt forks. It isn't recommended to put a motor on alum frt forks. The torque arm idea..Hmmmm. I never thought about the jaws spreading. But when you think about it..What is the difference between the torque of the motor or the torque from the rider? My 406 puts out some where around 35lbs-ft. (as per online simulator) I weigh over 250lbs x crank throw= Lets say a lot more then 35 lbs ft of torque.. I think the key is to check the axle mount nuts regularly*. If they loosen and the axle does rock back and forth, it will pound out the jaw and re-tightening the nut will do little as the main struct. support feature (jaw) has been ruined. Specially if flat washers are used.

"depends on how well the axle fits inside the dropout and how strong it is"..I agree with that line. If the jaws are poorly machined to start with..You'll have a problem with a motor axle because the only thing holding the axle in place will be the compression of the axle nut/washer to the side of the drop out. There isn't as much strength with that.

*Using nuts that have a built in washer with locking serrations, and kept tight will help to hold the jaw together also.

Last edited by HalfLifeT1; 09-11-07 at 03:28 AM.
HalfLifeT1 is offline  
Old 09-17-07, 06:03 AM
  #12  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sioux Falls, SD, USA
Posts: 3

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HalfLifeT1
The torque arm idea..Hmmmm. I never thought about the jaws spreading. But when you think about it.. What is the difference between the torque of the motor or the torque from the rider? My 406 puts out some where around 35lbs-ft. (as per online simulator) I weigh over 250lbs x crank throw= Lets say a lot more then 35 lbs ft of torque.. I think the key is to check the axle mount nuts regularly*. If they loosen and the axle does rock back and forth, it will pound out the jaw and re-tightening the nut will do little as the main struct. support feature (jaw) has been ruined. Specially if flat washers are used.
The torque applied by a rider is much different than with a hub motor. With a rider, all the torque is applied through the crank to the chain and then to the freewheel/freehub pawls, which then transfer it to the hub. There is no torque between the wheel and the frame as in a hub motor. With the hub motor, you have the windings that are attached to the axle, which stays stationary by means of the flats that are held inside the dropouts. Torque is applied to turn the wheel, and the axle flats against the dropouts allow the wheel to turn instead of the axle turning.
davintosh is offline  
Old 09-18-07, 03:05 AM
  #13  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: vancouver, BC.
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Having a re-think about the hub motor applied torque, you're right...ooopps.

Last edited by HalfLifeT1; 09-18-07 at 03:18 AM.
HalfLifeT1 is offline  
Old 09-20-07, 01:32 AM
  #14  
Bicycling Gnome
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 55.0N 1.59W
Posts: 1,877
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm sure a steel torque arm would be easily fitted to an aluminium rear end. The motor firms must provide them since so many bikes are aluminum now, and the torque of the axle trying to spin in the drop out would wreck them easily. It isn't just about the quality of the machining in the drop out, the flats on the axle must mean some space between the flat and the drop out, unless the axles are oversized and the flats take the dimension down just enough to slot them in. Anyway, there's no penalty in clamping a torque arm onto the rear fork. It's only a few ounces of steel. By comparison with the other weight you'd have added t would be nothing.
EvilV is offline  
Old 09-23-07, 07:38 PM
  #15  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hello guys,

I have read a few things about this and note that if the hub were to spin in the drop outs (worst case scenario) the wires could spaghetti around the axle and be pulled and any wire damage might be undetectable when repaired and put back together, possibly seeming like a bearing failure, when electronics may be permanately damaged, needing for new imput cables if at all possible.
I am a machinist by trade and think that the torque are would make a great addition to the aluminum drop outs, but also would add some type of metal sleeve to transfer some of the minor torque left after the torque arm is installed. The aluminum on my Rock Hopper looks pretty flimsy at best and obviously from an as intended design standpoint is not an issue in stock configuration.
This discussion has intrigued me not to think about just buying a system, bolting it on, and riding without taking this into consideration from the get go, its kind of like being in a hurry to try out the car you just put together and only had 3 lugnuts on a wheel instead of 5, it will work, but will surely fail with time.

Awesome community to learn from.







Looking at the Bionx but want more than the 20 mph max as Illinois allows 25



Braxas

Last edited by braxas; 09-24-07 at 09:43 PM. Reason: Too many newbie questions, spelling issues,and not enough reading yet!
braxas is offline  
Old 11-03-07, 04:20 PM
  #16  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
bionX up hill with a trailer

Originally Posted by adamtki
Yes, it's great for that. I pull my kid in a trailer up steep hills often and there's a world of a difference between using my regular bike and the bionx bike.
hello adamtki. did you setup your bionX to have a good support driving uphill? the following codes seem to me important if bionX should drive uphill with a trailer (more weight..)... codes 3773 - speed, 1234 - reaction of a sensor, 0007, 0008. do you have any experience with programming those codes? i have 3773 20 mph, 1234 = 3, 0007 = 1.2, 0008 = 1. ... and the support is not very good when i drive strong uphill. thank you. tt_ch
tt_ch is offline  
Old 11-03-07, 05:55 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
geebee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 540

Bikes: GT3 trike,Viper chopper, electric assist Viper chopper,Electric moped(Vespa style)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Direct drive hubs ie. Bionx have limitations on steep hills and or big loads, they don't have a lot of torque.
If you want to do steep hills your best bet short of going to a 72 volt monster system is a geared hub or if you are a tinkerer a BB drive.
geebee is offline  
Old 11-03-07, 09:24 PM
  #18  
No cud for foil.
 
DasProfezzional's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD and Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zeuser
For the anti-eBikers... ha... I've got the best of both worlds! I can work, sweat and get full of mud with the off-roader and I can commute to work without breaking a sweat, and not stink, with the electric on-roader. It's my choice. It only takes 2 minutes to go from one form to another including minor adjustments to ensure the disc brakes aren't rubbing.
For the e-bikers...

Ha! I can have two different bikes: one for the road, one for off-road. I can dress appropriately, change my clothes, and wear deodorant so I don't stink when I get to work. And I can maintain my dignity by not looking like an extra from "Minority Report!" Shazam!
DasProfezzional is offline  
Old 11-03-07, 11:53 PM
  #19  
Hooligan
 
Abneycat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Base of the Rocky Mountains, Canada. Wonderous things!
Posts: 1,431

Bikes: 2010 Cannondale Hooligan 3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
You can add the BionX to any bicycle you please, provided that the dropouts are 135mm. The BionX is a very lightweight system as far as demands are concerned, it doesn't require special frame considerations, torque arms or any sort of special additions. Put it on as you would any other wheel, and as long as you haven't screwed anything up, it will be fine. Oh, you do have to make sure that the frame case will mount on your bike too, otherwise you'll need the rack bag instead: pretty simple logic there

As geebee has pointed out, the torque output of a BionX is low, even relative to some other direct drive hub motors. These kits are pretty timid compared to most other systems as far as power output.

As an addition to his comment however, this depends on the design of the hub motor. Picking up one with more winds of copper like a 408 will get you significant hill climbing capacity. A 408@36v will handle steep grades pretty well, my kit running at 48v is quite a mountain goat. No exact specifics on it, but it'll take me, my university books, and this weeks groceries up any hill in Calgary faster than some people will ride on flat ground.
Abneycat is offline  
Old 11-04-07, 08:52 AM
  #20  
e-Biker
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 951

Bikes: Gary Fisher, Strong GT-S eBike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by DasProfezzional
For the e-bikers...

Ha! I can have two different bikes: one for the road, one for off-road. I can dress appropriately, change my clothes, and wear deodorant so I don't stink when I get to work. And I can maintain my dignity by not looking like an extra from "Minority Report!" Shazam!
Ha! I can do that too but if I want to go electric, I can do that too. It's my choice. e-Bikes = more choice.
Zeuser is offline  
Old 11-04-07, 01:39 PM
  #21  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
support uphill

hello. i've got my bionX since two days.. so i'm really a bionx newbie. i was just wondering why i have such a big difference with the assistance when i'm driving uphill. the first 300 meters the bike goes very fast and from one moment to the other the assistance is very low. i tought i could change somethin with the 1234, 2007, 2008 codes for better support uphill...i was testing today... couldn't find any logic adjustment with the codes 1234,2007,2008... : (. the difference how the bike gives assistance is very big after a few 100 meters uphill!...as soon as the battery is a little bit used almost 0 support. does anyone have any experience with bad quality battery/motor or configuration the codes? i couldn't find one info on the interent... bionx canada has removed their files and users do not have access anymore to learn how to config the bionx.thanks a lot for ideas...tom
tt_ch is offline  
Old 11-05-07, 11:37 AM
  #22  
e-Biker
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 951

Bikes: Gary Fisher, Strong GT-S eBike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Depends on the effort you put in. If you put in a lot of effort, so does the Bionx. If you don't pedal quite as strong, the Bionx backs off a bit.

The motor has a torque sensor. The more torque the rider puts in, the more torque the Bionx adds.

I don't have hill climbing issues at all. Of course I have to shift down to a lower gear but if I pedal hard enough, the Bionx rewards me with more power. Pretty soon I find myself upshifting because I'm pedaling too fast going up the hill.
Zeuser is offline  
Old 11-05-07, 11:52 AM
  #23  
Both Coasts...
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 299
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Zeuser
Depends on the effort you put in. If you put in a lot of effort, so does the Bionx. If you don't pedal quite as strong, the Bionx backs off a bit.
Interesting??? The Panasonic drive I'm familiar with seems to offer (in many instances) more assist the lighter you pedal. In fact, one of my "tricks" is to pedal in an uneven (pulse) fashion - more force on one pedal than the other - to help make the controller think it should deliver more average motor power.

Obviously, different logic for different products - but another example of the wide design variations constantly evolving in this industry.
BroadwayJoe is offline  
Old 11-06-07, 04:04 PM
  #24  
e-Biker
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 951

Bikes: Gary Fisher, Strong GT-S eBike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by DasProfezzional
For the e-bikers...

Ha! I can have two different bikes: one for the road, one for off-road. I can dress appropriately, change my clothes, and wear deodorant so I don't stink when I get to work. And I can maintain my dignity by not looking like an extra from "Minority Report!" Shazam!
Us non snobs don't have showers, change rooms and the like at our offices.

PS: Looking like an extra from Minority Report is actually cool man! Get with the program... geek is chic!
Zeuser is offline  
Old 11-11-08, 11:39 PM
  #25  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tt_ch
hello. i've got my bionX since two days.. so i'm really a bionx newbie. i was just wondering why i have such a big difference with the assistance when i'm driving uphill. the first 300 meters the bike goes very fast and from one moment to the other the assistance is very low. i tought i could change somethin with the 1234, 2007, 2008 codes for better support uphill...i was testing today... couldn't find any logic adjustment with the codes 1234,2007,2008... : (. the difference how the bike gives assistance is very big after a few 100 meters uphill!...as soon as the battery is a little bit used almost 0 support. does anyone have any experience with bad quality battery/motor or configuration the codes? i couldn't find one info on the interent... bionx canada has removed their files and users do not have access anymore to learn how to config the bionx.thanks a lot for ideas...tom
Try code 1234 = 0 (OFF). I used to use 1234 = 3 and my motor died on the long uphill. I got this change from a telephone talk with a BIONX engineer. I use codes 0007, 0008 = 3 and get smooth power assist up a five mile hill in middle gears on my mountain bike with PL350. I believe that setting code 1234 to bigger numbers gets quicker assist, but also gets quicker loss of power, causing rapid on/off assist because uphill pedaling is not measured constant in the strain gauge sensor. I think this on/off behavior eventually kills the motor. He also pointed out that a few degree misalignment of the sensor is NOT critical to the strain measurement. Try those codes - let us know if performance improves.
luckylindy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.