Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Electric Bikes Here's a place to discuss ebikes, from home grown to high-tech.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-22-12, 05:38 AM   #1
ulugeyik
A biking donkey.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Spain
Bikes: Yubo Mundo, SE Draft, Iron Horse Warrior MTB
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Choice of components and models

I am looking into buying a BH Emotion pedelec ( http://www.bh-emotion.com/en/ ) -- and being in Spain I have many options. I have test ridden two models and I really like them. My goal is to use it for commuting ~7km each way to/from work. The return trip (after a ~10 hour work day) involves climbing up through a windy road of about 150-200m with very sharp slopes at few points. Unless I am in a hurry, I plan to pedal unassisted to the work and in the way back with minimum assist until I hit the hill and use the assist to enable my climb without exhausting me completely. So I want to pick a bike that rides nice unassisted.

This is where my confusion arises. I have narrowed my choices to between two lines of bikes (Neo vs 700 series) and within the series two types (Cross vs City). City & cross versions in both series cost the same, the 700 series are about ~300 Euros cheaper than the Neo series.

Neo series:
http://www.bh-emotion.com/en/familia/neo/
700 Cross:
http://www.bh-emotion.com/en/catalogo/cross-700/
700 City:
http://www.bh-emotion.com/en/catalogo/city-700/

As far as I can tell, the main differences are in the components and possibly the clunkiness. I am worried specially about the latter.

There are so few reviews of these bikes so I could not get good information. IF anyone has used both or have any insights, I would really appreciate it.


Specific questions I have:

1- In case of NEO, am I paying for the fancy design of integrated battery pack or are the components really better than the 700 series?
2- Is the fancy, curved battery pack a call for more expense and possibly the inability to utilize the bike in the future if they stop making that battery pack?
3- Sport vs City:
- Test rode Neo sport. It felt good. It does not come with a rack, lights, mud-guards. I am pretty sure I would install them sooner or later. Lights immediately. Has disk brakes.
- City comes with a rack, lights, mud-guards etc installed but it is a step through bicycle, has v-brakes. It is basically ready for me to ride.
Q: Based on the specs and/or experience, is the city one expected to be really clunky unassisted?
Q: I think disk brakes will have a better lifetime and be safer when descending this hill. Is that true?
4- Neo vs 700:
- Neo is rear drive, 700 is mid-drive. What is better for the hills?
- Neo has 350W motor , 700 has 250 W motor. Both have mph limitations to comply with local laws. I did not test drive the 250W. Is the difference so huge?
- Neo has fancy, curved battery back, 700 is the usual one with a holder. Does it matter?
5 - My way to work involves this descent. Neo has brake sensors that stop the assist and charge the battery when braking, 700 has no sensors. Is that important?

Thanks
ulugeyik is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:20 PM.