Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

Mileage/Speed tracking. Wired computer VS phone apps

Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

Mileage/Speed tracking. Wired computer VS phone apps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-16, 12:35 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Scottsdale, Az
Posts: 29

Bikes: Diamondback Century 1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mileage/Speed tracking. Wired computer VS phone apps

Good day to all.
Noob here.......
I currently have my Iphone6 mounted to my bars and use Strava.
My phone is LARGE & bulky on my bars.
I'm considering buying a bike computer to track my data. I'm NOT competitive, just a commuter and weekend fun guy. 100 mi per week prox.
I want to spend less the $50.
I'm assuming a wired computer will be more reliable than a wireless one at this price point ?
Do the wired computers give me similar data as Strava ?
I just want time, mileage, top speed, avg speed & elevation change.
Should I consider a computer or just stick with my phone, and put it in my pocket, instead of the bars ?
Thank you all in advance for your input.
pwcfan is offline  
Old 05-03-16, 12:49 PM
  #2  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,462 Times in 1,433 Posts
If you don't need tracks (exact route you traveled), then a cheap wired computer is fine. I've used some as cheap as $6. They work perfectly well.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 05-03-16, 03:11 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,899

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2602 Post(s)
Liked 1,925 Times in 1,208 Posts
Elevation change is the killer for an inexpensive cyclocomputer from OP's list. Without that, a $15-25 wired computer would work.
pdlamb is offline  
Old 05-03-16, 03:38 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by pwcfan
I'm assuming a wired computer will be more reliable than a wireless one at this price point ?
By reliable do you mean accurate? Any decent bike computer is going to work as long as you have it set up correctly and the battery is good. If you mean accuracy, how much do you really need? A computer that counts wheel rotations is going to be more accurate than GPS but if your ride is 21.3 vs 21.4 miles is that going to ruin your day? Probably not, right? Either one is good enough?

You said you want elevation change, and a cheap but quality bike computer won't do that in your price range. Personally I think elevation gain is more important (as data) than distance; it's easier to ride a flat mile than an uphill one. The elevation data adds context to the rest of what you have.

I'd recommend keeping your phone, maybe in your pocket. If you really want to spend $50 get a Polar H7 chest strap (HRM) and pair it with your phone and then have Strava record that, too.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-03-16, 05:31 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,843

Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 374 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
For $10 more than your budget you can have a Wahoo RFLKT that pairs with your phone and will display time, mileage, top speed, avg speed & elevation change that you want, and you can keep your phone in your pocket.

https://www.amazon.com/Wahoo-RFLKT-Co...keywords=rflkt
dr_lha is offline  
Old 05-03-16, 11:04 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
limbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Tasmania Australia
Posts: 270

Bikes: 2014 Avanti Cadent ERII 2, 2013 Trek DS 8.4, 2008 Norco Wolverine

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Be aware too, that using your phone or GPS elevation can be a bit precarious depending on where you live and ride. When you log a ride with say Strava it uses elevation maps to work out your elevation and these are sometimes a little off, especially where you're on the side of a mountain or similar.

A trail ride down here shows 1300m elevation gain while the "real" elevation gain is really only about 200 metres.

Only reason I purchased a Garmin 500 with barometric sensor. For pure distance and time my Android phone was good but I live in a hilly part so wanted more accurate elevation figures.
limbot is offline  
Old 05-04-16, 05:53 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,843

Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 374 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by limbot
Be aware too, that using your phone or GPS elevation can be a bit precarious depending on where you live and ride. When you log a ride with say Strava it uses elevation maps to work out your elevation and these are sometimes a little off, especially where you're on the side of a mountain or similar.
Many phones now have barometric altimeters. iPhone 6 does for example. Of course, that doesn't stop Strava correcting them.
dr_lha is offline  
Old 05-04-16, 09:58 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
How do the barometers in phones calibrate?

Cliff Mass Weather Blog: The iPhone 6 has a barometer!
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-04-16, 10:08 AM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Scottsdale, Az
Posts: 29

Bikes: Diamondback Century 1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wow...........all great info !!!
Thank you all for your input !!!
pwcfan is offline  
Old 05-04-16, 11:41 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,843

Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 374 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
How do the barometers in phones calibrate?

Cliff Mass Weather Blog: The iPhone 6 has a barometer!
You mean calibrate to an absolute altitude value? Depends on the app I guess, but honestly I usually don't care about the absolute values, only the elevation changes.

Besides, even with a "calibrated" Garmin, a their barometeric altimeters have issues. I did a ride on Sunday with 5 other guys, me with an iPhone 6 and them with various Garmins, and our elevation changes varied from 623ft to 1565ft. My phone read 1319ft (utilizing the barometer) and Strava's "corrected" value was 1236ft. Who knows which one was right?

EDIT: Updated the numbers from Strava rather than memory. BTW 623ft was definitely not right!

Last edited by dr_lha; 05-04-16 at 11:44 AM.
dr_lha is offline  
Old 05-04-16, 12:40 PM
  #11  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,462 Times in 1,433 Posts
I disagree that an altimeter is important. While a hilly ride does take more energy than a flat ride, for a given number of miles, most of us are not really out to find out how many joules we spend on a ride. Comparing your time from one day to the next on a given route is interesting. Comparing your distance from one day to the next is also interesting. Watching your average speed increase as your conditioning improves is interesting and useful. You can do all of these with a cheap computer. For that matter, you can do them with a watch and some paper and pen, but the computer makes it easier.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 05-05-16, 06:48 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by limbot
...A trail ride down here shows 1300m elevation gain while the "real" elevation gain is really only about 200 metres...
What is your definition of "real elevation gain"?
Looigi is offline  
Old 05-05-16, 11:23 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by dr_lha
You mean calibrate to an absolute altitude value?
A barometer is a sensor for air pressure/weight/density. It measures that one thing, and tells you two different things (sea-level air pressure, and elevation above MSL) from that. One dial, two sets of numbers. For that to work properly, it needs to know what the current conditions are. Telling it either the current altitude or the sea-level pressure gives it the information it needs to work properly. This is something that has to be done from time to time (after conditions have changed) for an altimeter to work the way it's supposed to.

Originally Posted by dr_lha
Besides, even with a "calibrated" Garmin, a their barometeric altimeters have issues.
Any altimeter can have issues in certain conditions. Especially if the air pressure changes while you're moving, that will get you wrong relative numbers, not just wrong absolute ones. That's why Suunto and Garmin developed systems to continuously re-calibrate a barometer from GPS data during an activity. Calibrating when necessary reduces or eliminates those issues.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-05-16, 11:25 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
I disagree that an altimeter is important.
But the OP - the person who's in the market for a new computer and asking for advice - thinks altitude is important. And that's the person who's going to use the thing.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-05-16, 11:32 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,843

Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 374 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
A barometer is a sensor for air pressure/weight/density. It measures that one thing, and tells you two different things (sea-level air pressure, and elevation above MSL) from that. One dial, two sets of numbers. For that to work properly, it needs to know what the current conditions are. Telling it either the current altitude or the sea-level pressure gives it the information it needs to work properly. This is something that has to be done from time to time (after conditions have changed) for an altimeter to work the way it's supposed to.



Any altimeter can have issues in certain conditions. Especially if the air pressure changes while you're moving, that will get you wrong relative numbers, not just wrong absolute ones. That's why Suunto and Garmin developed systems to continuously re-calibrate a barometer from GPS data during an activity. Calibrating when necessary reduces or eliminates those issues.
I have no insight as to how the altimeter in a iPhone calibrates. However, I have plenty of experience in comparing "elevation change" numbers on group rides. My experience is that everyone's computer gives a different number, with those variances over a 30 mile ride being usually around 500ft different min to max. The Sunday ride was worse than this mainly because it was raining.

Regardless I see no evidence that the Garmins do a better job than my iPhone's app at estimating elevation changes. None at all. All my evidence tells me is that barometric altimeters mostly suck at calculating consistent elevations changes between units.
dr_lha is offline  
Old 05-05-16, 11:56 AM
  #16  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,462 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
But the OP - the person who's in the market for a new computer and asking for advice - thinks altitude is important. And that's the person who's going to use the thing.
Right. I'm not saying it's unimportant to all. It's unimportant to me, and seeing that, @pwcfan (the OP) might find it useful, and as a result, he might be happy with an altimeterless computer.

Originally Posted by dr_lha
I have no insight as to how the altimeter in a iPhone calibrates. However, I have plenty of experience in comparing "elevation change" numbers on group rides. My experience is that everyone's computer gives a different number, with those variances over a 30 mile ride being usually around 500ft different min to max. The Sunday ride was worse than this mainly because it was raining.

Regardless I see no evidence that the Garmins do a better job than my iPhone's app at estimating elevation changes. None at all. All my evidence tells me is that barometric altimeters mostly suck at calculating consistent elevations changes between units.
iphones have no altimeters. I believe smartphone apps and Garmins use knowledge of elevation built into the map data. This knowledge is not very accurate yet. I might be wrong, and perhaps some Garmins have altimeters, but not all of them.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 05-05-16, 12:01 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,843

Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 374 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
iphones have no altimeters. I believe smartphone apps and Garmins use knowledge of elevation built into the map data. This knowledge is not very accurate yet. I might be wrong, and perhaps some Garmins have altimeters, but not all of them.
You are incorrect. The iPhone 6 and 6s have a barometic altimeter, as do most Garmins Edge units (like the very popular Edge 500).

For my iPhone I use Cyclemeter, which has an option to use the Barometer for elevation over GPS, and I turn this on. Unfortunately Strava corrects all elevation readings from Phones, regardless of the presence of the alitmeter, so my Strava elevation changes do not match my Cyclemeter calculation (although they are usually close). In the case of Garmins, Strava "trusts" the elevation data, leading to rides with vastely different elevations from different riders who road together. They have the option of correcting to Strava's built in elevation maps if they want.

Last edited by dr_lha; 05-05-16 at 12:05 PM.
dr_lha is offline  
Old 05-05-16, 12:08 PM
  #18  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,462 Times in 1,433 Posts
@dr_lha, waddya know! I've had an iphone 6S for a couple of months. I imagine there's a lot in there that I haven't yet explored.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 05-05-16, 12:15 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
iphones have no altimeters. I believe smartphone apps and Garmins use knowledge of elevation built into the map data. This knowledge is not very accurate yet. I might be wrong, and perhaps some Garmins have altimeters, but not all of them.
Read this, it was written by a local meteorology professor about how the barometers in modern smart-phones can revolutionize weather forecasting.

Cliff Mass Weather Blog: The iPhone 6 has a barometer!

It's not terribly relevant to this thread (beyond proving that modern iPhones do have barometers) but it's interesting.

Also I'll point out that my Garmin watch has a hole on the side to let air into the altimeter. If I get water into that hole it will report the wrong altitude until it dries.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-05-16, 12:20 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Central PA
Posts: 4,843

Bikes: 2016 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross v5, 2015 Ritchey Road Logic, 1998 Specialized Rockhopper, 2017 Raleigh Grand Prix

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 374 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
Also I'll point out that my Garmin watch has a hole on the side to let air into the altimeter. If I get water into that hole it will report the wrong altitude until it dries.
Yep, hence my point about my Sunday ride being in the rain. The guy who registered only 623ft obviously had some issues relating to water, and his altitude profile looks totally screwy.
dr_lha is offline  
Old 05-05-16, 04:11 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
My Garmin (the bike one anyway) is a touch screen. I keep it on the stem. So a fair amount of sweat drips onto it. And then it can be, um, somewhat gross. It's also waterproof, so I'll rinse it under the sink for a few seconds to get rid of the sweat after a hard ride. Sometimes I forget and then rinse it before I leave for a ride, then it's completely screwy for a while.

I've heard people complain that the storm alarm goes off after they swim with an alti watch, for the same reason. They get out of the pool and the pressure drops suddenly and sharply!
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bicyclridr4life
Bicycle Mechanics
17
12-29-18 09:28 PM
heysmellthis
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
12
07-01-15 10:20 AM
Pugwinkle
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
14
03-28-15 12:46 PM
davidbunnell
Road Cycling
37
11-19-14 08:34 PM
redryder74
Training & Nutrition
9
02-18-14 07:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.